Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2018

29.06.2017

Safety and efficacy of the endoscopic duodenal–jejunal bypass liner prototype in severe or morbidly obese subjects implanted for up to 3 years

verfasst von: Nicolás Quezada, Rodrigo Muñoz, Carla Morelli, Dannae Turiel, Julián Hernández, Fernando Pimentel, Alex Escalona

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The duodenal–jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) is an endoscopic device that mimics the duodenal–jejunal exclusion component of the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Previous studies assessing the efficacy of the DJBL have shown 10-40% excess weight loss (%EWL) and improvements in obesity-associated comorbidities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new DJBL prototype over a 3-year period.

Methods

Morbidly obese subjects were enrolled in a single-arm, open-label, prospective trial. The subjects were offered the opportunity to continue with the trial annually and signed a new consent form. The primary endpoint was safety. The secondary endpoints were changes in weight and biochemical parameters from baseline.

Results

The DJBL was implanted endoscopically in 80 subjects (age: 35±10 years; 69% female; weight: 109±17 kg; BMI: 42±5.4 kg/m2). Seventy-two severe adverse events (AEs) were observed in 55 patients (68%), of which nine subjects required a prolonged hospital stay and three subjects required major interventions. Overall, 23 subjects (29%) underwent early device removal due to AEs. Additionally, 95% of the patients experienced mild AEs that mainly consisted of abdominal pain. The severe AEs included a liver abscess (3), upper GI bleeding (4), cholangitis (1), and acute pancreatitis (1) and mostly occurred after 12 months of follow-up. Two patients presented a short esophageal perforation during explantation. These perforations were successfully managed with endoscopic closure in one subject and medical treatment in the other subject. In the completer population at 52 weeks (71 patients), 104 weeks (40 patients), and 156 weeks (11 patients), the mean %EWL were 44 ± 16, 40 ± 22, and 39 ± 20, respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study shows significant and sustained weight loss after 3 years of treatment with the new DJBL. However, the high frequency and severity of AEs preclude the use of this prototype for periods longer than 1 year.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams KF, Schatzkin A, Harris TB, Kipnis V, Mouw T, Ballard-Barbash R, Hollenbeck A, Leitzmann MF (2006) Overweight, obesity, and mortality in a large prospective cohort of persons 50 to 71 years old. N Engl J Med 355(8):763–778. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa055643 CrossRefPubMed Adams KF, Schatzkin A, Harris TB, Kipnis V, Mouw T, Ballard-Barbash R, Hollenbeck A, Leitzmann MF (2006) Overweight, obesity, and mortality in a large prospective cohort of persons 50 to 71 years old. N Engl J Med 355(8):763–778. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa055643 CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pitzul KB, Jackson T, Crawford S, Kwong JC, Sockalingam S, Hawa R, Urbach D, Okrainec A (2014) Understanding disposition after referral for bariatric surgery: when and why patients referred do not undergo surgery. Obes Surg 24(1):134–140. doi:10.1007/s11695-013-1083-z CrossRefPubMed Pitzul KB, Jackson T, Crawford S, Kwong JC, Sockalingam S, Hawa R, Urbach D, Okrainec A (2014) Understanding disposition after referral for bariatric surgery: when and why patients referred do not undergo surgery. Obes Surg 24(1):134–140. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-013-1083-z CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rohde U, Hedback N, Gluud LL, Vilsboll T, Knop FK (2016) Effect of the EndoBarrier Gastrointestinal Liner on obesity and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 18(3):300–305. doi:10.1111/dom.12603 CrossRefPubMed Rohde U, Hedback N, Gluud LL, Vilsboll T, Knop FK (2016) Effect of the EndoBarrier Gastrointestinal Liner on obesity and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 18(3):300–305. doi:10.​1111/​dom.​12603 CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fishman E, Melanson D, Lamport R, Levine A (2008) A novel endoscopic delivery system for placement of a duodenal-jejunal implant for the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008:2501–2503. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649708 PubMed Fishman E, Melanson D, Lamport R, Levine A (2008) A novel endoscopic delivery system for placement of a duodenal-jejunal implant for the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008:2501–2503. doi:10.​1109/​IEMBS.​2008.​4649708 PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Escalona A, Pimentel F, Sharp A, Becerra P, Slako M, Turiel D, Munoz R, Bambs C, Guzman S, Ibanez L, Gersin K (2012) Weight loss and metabolic improvement in morbidly obese subjects implanted for 1 year with an endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner. Ann Surg 255(6):1080–1085. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825498c4 CrossRefPubMed Escalona A, Pimentel F, Sharp A, Becerra P, Slako M, Turiel D, Munoz R, Bambs C, Guzman S, Ibanez L, Gersin K (2012) Weight loss and metabolic improvement in morbidly obese subjects implanted for 1 year with an endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner. Ann Surg 255(6):1080–1085. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e31825498c4​ CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schouten R, Rijs CS, Bouvy ND, Hameeteman W, Koek GH, Janssen IM, Greve JW (2010) A multicenter, randomized efficacy study of the Endobarrier gastrointestinal liner for presurgical weight loss prior to bariatric surgery. Ann Surg 251(2):236–243. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bdfbff CrossRefPubMed Schouten R, Rijs CS, Bouvy ND, Hameeteman W, Koek GH, Janssen IM, Greve JW (2010) A multicenter, randomized efficacy study of the Endobarrier gastrointestinal liner for presurgical weight loss prior to bariatric surgery. Ann Surg 251(2):236–243. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e3181bdfbff​ CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, Torgerson J, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, Dahlgren S, Larsson B, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, Sullivan M, Wedel H, Swedish Obese Subjects Study Scientific Group (2004) Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Eng J Med 351(26):2683–2693. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa035622 CrossRef Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, Torgerson J, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, Dahlgren S, Larsson B, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, Sullivan M, Wedel H, Swedish Obese Subjects Study Scientific Group (2004) Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Eng J Med 351(26):2683–2693. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa035622 CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gersin KS, Rothstein RI, Rosenthal RJ, Stefanidis D, Deal SE, Kuwada TS, Laycock W, Adrales G, Vassiliou M, Szomstein S, Heller S, Joyce AM, Heiss F, Nepomnayshy D (2010) Open-label, sham-controlled trial of an endoscopic duodenojejunal bypass liner for preoperative weight loss in bariatric surgery candidates. Gastrointest Endosc 71(6):976–982. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.051 CrossRefPubMed Gersin KS, Rothstein RI, Rosenthal RJ, Stefanidis D, Deal SE, Kuwada TS, Laycock W, Adrales G, Vassiliou M, Szomstein S, Heller S, Joyce AM, Heiss F, Nepomnayshy D (2010) Open-label, sham-controlled trial of an endoscopic duodenojejunal bypass liner for preoperative weight loss in bariatric surgery candidates. Gastrointest Endosc 71(6):976–982. doi:10.​1016/​j.​gie.​2009.​11.​051 CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Boza C, Gamboa C, Perez G, Crovari F, Escalona A, Pimentel F, Raddatz A, Guzman S, Ibanez L (2011) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB): surgical results and 5-year follow-up. Surg Endosc 25(1):292–297. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1176-x CrossRefPubMed Boza C, Gamboa C, Perez G, Crovari F, Escalona A, Pimentel F, Raddatz A, Guzman S, Ibanez L (2011) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB): surgical results and 5-year follow-up. Surg Endosc 25(1):292–297. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-010-1176-x CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pekkarinen T, Mustonen H, Sane T, Jaser N, Juuti A, Leivonen M (2016) Long-term effect of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on severe obesity: do preoperative weight loss and binge eating behavior predict the outcome of bariatric surgery? Obes Surg. doi:10.1007/s11695-016-2090-7 PubMed Pekkarinen T, Mustonen H, Sane T, Jaser N, Juuti A, Leivonen M (2016) Long-term effect of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on severe obesity: do preoperative weight loss and binge eating behavior predict the outcome of bariatric surgery? Obes Surg. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-016-2090-7 PubMed
15.
Metadaten
Titel
Safety and efficacy of the endoscopic duodenal–jejunal bypass liner prototype in severe or morbidly obese subjects implanted for up to 3 years
verfasst von
Nicolás Quezada
Rodrigo Muñoz
Carla Morelli
Dannae Turiel
Julián Hernández
Fernando Pimentel
Alex Escalona
Publikationsdatum
29.06.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5672-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.