Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2019

13.07.2018

Bile duct injuries (BDI) in the advanced laparoscopic cholecystectomy era

verfasst von: Christopher W. Mangieri, Bryan P. Hendren, Matthew A. Strode, Bradley C. Bandera, Byron J. Faler

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most commonly performed laparoscopic procedure. It is superior in nearly every regard compared to open cholecystectomies. The one significant aspect where the laparoscopic approach is inferior regards the association with bile duct injuries (BDI). The BDI rate with laparoscopic cholecystectomy is approximately 0.5%; nearly triple the rate compared to the open approach. We propose that 0.5% BDI rate with the laparoscopic approach is no longer accurate.

Methods

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) registry was retrospectively reviewed. All laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed between 2012 and 2016 were extracted. A total of 217,774 cases meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed. The primary data points were the overall BDI incidence rate and time of diagnosis. BDI were identified by ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Secondary data points were variables associated with BDI.

Results

The BDI rate was 0.19%. 77% of cases were diagnosed after the index surgical admission. Intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) use was associated with a higher BDI rate and higher identification rate of a BDI intraoperatively (P value < 0.0001). Resident teaching cases were protective with a RR score of 0.56 (P value < 0.0001). The presence of cholecystitis increased the risk of a BDI with a RR score of 1.20 (P value < 0.0001). There was a low conversion rate of 0.04% however converted cases had a nearly hundredfold increase in BDI at 15% (P value < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomies in North America is no longer associated with higher BDI rates compared to open. IOC use still is not protective against BDI, and cholecystitis continues to be a risk factor for BDI. When a cholecystectomy requires conversion from a laparoscopic to an open approach the BDI increases a hundredfold; which may raise the concern if this approach is still a safe bailout method for a difficult laparoscopic dissection.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Flum DR et al (2003) Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. JAMA 289(13):1639–1644CrossRef Flum DR et al (2003) Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. JAMA 289(13):1639–1644CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Perugini RA, Callery MP (2001) Complications of laparoscopic surgery. In: Holzheimer RG, Mannick JA (eds) Surgical treatment: evidence-based and problem-oriented. Zuckschwerdt, Munich Perugini RA, Callery MP (2001) Complications of laparoscopic surgery. In: Holzheimer RG, Mannick JA (eds) Surgical treatment: evidence-based and problem-oriented. Zuckschwerdt, Munich
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Karvonen J et al (2007) Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: primary and long-term results from a single institution. Surg Endosc 21(7):1069–1073CrossRefPubMed Karvonen J et al (2007) Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: primary and long-term results from a single institution. Surg Endosc 21(7):1069–1073CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Flum DR et al (2003) Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 290(16):2168–2173CrossRefPubMed Flum DR et al (2003) Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 290(16):2168–2173CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nuzzo G et al (2005) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies. Arch Surg 140(10):986–992CrossRef Nuzzo G et al (2005) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies. Arch Surg 140(10):986–992CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Waage A, Nilsson M (2006) Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry. Arch Surg 141(12):1207–1213CrossRef Waage A, Nilsson M (2006) Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry. Arch Surg 141(12):1207–1213CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamad MA et al (2011) Major biliary complications in 2,714 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiography: a multicenter retrospective study. Surg Endosc 25(12):3747–3751CrossRef Hamad MA et al (2011) Major biliary complications in 2,714 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiography: a multicenter retrospective study. Surg Endosc 25(12):3747–3751CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Halbert C et al (2016) Beyond the learning curve: incidence of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy normalize to open in the modern era. Surg Endosc 30(6):2239–2243CrossRefPubMed Halbert C et al (2016) Beyond the learning curve: incidence of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy normalize to open in the modern era. Surg Endosc 30(6):2239–2243CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (n.d.) American College of Surgeons. Web. 14 Nov 2017 ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (n.d.) American College of Surgeons. Web. 14 Nov 2017
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Shiloach M et al (2010) Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 210(1):6–16CrossRefPubMed Shiloach M et al (2010) Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 210(1):6–16CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Schol FPG, Go PMNYH, Gouma DJ (1994) Risk factors for bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 49 cases. Br J Surg 81(12):1786–1788CrossRefPubMed Schol FPG, Go PMNYH, Gouma DJ (1994) Risk factors for bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 49 cases. Br J Surg 81(12):1786–1788CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Russell JC et al (1996) Bile duct injuries, 1989–1993: a statewide experience. Arch Surg 131(4):382–388CrossRefPubMed Russell JC et al (1996) Bile duct injuries, 1989–1993: a statewide experience. Arch Surg 131(4):382–388CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat McMahon AJ et al (1995) Bile duct injury and bile leakage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 82(3):307–313CrossRefPubMed McMahon AJ et al (1995) Bile duct injury and bile leakage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 82(3):307–313CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat MacFadyen BV et al (1998) Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12(4):315–321CrossRefPubMed MacFadyen BV et al (1998) Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12(4):315–321CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cameron JL, Cameron AM (2017) Chapter 84: Management of benign biliary strictures. In: Current surgical therapy, 12th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 445–451 Cameron JL, Cameron AM (2017) Chapter 84: Management of benign biliary strictures. In: Current surgical therapy, 12th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 445–451
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Townsend CM et al (2016) Chapter 54: Biliary system. In: Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice, 20th edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1482–1519 Townsend CM et al (2016) Chapter 54: Biliary system. In: Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice, 20th edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1482–1519
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lau WY, Lai ECH, Lau SHY (2010) Management of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review. ANZ J Surg 80(1–2):75–81CrossRef Lau WY, Lai ECH, Lau SHY (2010) Management of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review. ANZ J Surg 80(1–2):75–81CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Duca S et al (2003) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidents and complications. A retrospective analysis of 9542 consecutive laparoscopic operations. HPB 5(3):152–158CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Duca S et al (2003) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidents and complications. A retrospective analysis of 9542 consecutive laparoscopic operations. HPB 5(3):152–158CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore MJ, Bennett CL (1995) The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 170(1):55–59CrossRefPubMed Moore MJ, Bennett CL (1995) The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 170(1):55–59CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Cagir B et al (1994) The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 4(6):419–427CrossRefPubMed Cagir B et al (1994) The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 4(6):419–427CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Richardson MC, Bell G, Fullarton GM (1996) Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases. Br J Surg 83(10):1356–1360CrossRefPubMed Richardson MC, Bell G, Fullarton GM (1996) Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases. Br J Surg 83(10):1356–1360CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sekimoto M et al (1998) New retraction technique to allow better visualization of Calot’s triangle during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12(12):1439–1441CrossRefPubMed Sekimoto M et al (1998) New retraction technique to allow better visualization of Calot’s triangle during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12(12):1439–1441CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosser JC et al (2007) The impact of video games on training surgeons in the 21st century. Arch Surg 142(2):181–186CrossRefPubMed Rosser JC et al (2007) The impact of video games on training surgeons in the 21st century. Arch Surg 142(2):181–186CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kneebone R (2003) Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications. Med Educ 37(3):267–277CrossRefPubMed Kneebone R (2003) Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications. Med Educ 37(3):267–277CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Pucher PH et al (2015) SAGES expert Delphi consensus: critical factors for safe surgical practice in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 29(11):3074–3085CrossRef Pucher PH et al (2015) SAGES expert Delphi consensus: critical factors for safe surgical practice in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 29(11):3074–3085CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Francoeur JR et al (2003) Surgeons’ anonymous response after bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 185(5):468–475CrossRefPubMed Francoeur JR et al (2003) Surgeons’ anonymous response after bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 185(5):468–475CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Söderlund C, Frozanpor F, Linder S (2005) Bile duct injuries at laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-institution prospective study. Acute cholecystitis indicates an increased risk. World J Surg 29(8):987–993CrossRefPubMed Söderlund C, Frozanpor F, Linder S (2005) Bile duct injuries at laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-institution prospective study. Acute cholecystitis indicates an increased risk. World J Surg 29(8):987–993CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Borzellino G et al (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis. A meta-analysis of results. Surg Endosc 22(1):8–15CrossRefPubMed Borzellino G et al (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis. A meta-analysis of results. Surg Endosc 22(1):8–15CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Connor S, Garden OJ (2006) Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 93(2):158–168CrossRefPubMed Connor S, Garden OJ (2006) Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 93(2):158–168CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Genc V et al (2011) What necessitates the conversion to open cholecystectomy? A retrospective analysis of 5164 consecutive laparoscopic operations. Clinics 66(3):417–420CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Genc V et al (2011) What necessitates the conversion to open cholecystectomy? A retrospective analysis of 5164 consecutive laparoscopic operations. Clinics 66(3):417–420CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolf AS et al (2009) Surgical outcomes of open cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg 197(6):781–784CrossRefPubMed Wolf AS et al (2009) Surgical outcomes of open cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg 197(6):781–784CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulman CI et al (2007) Are we training our residents to perform open gall bladder and common bile duct operations? J Surg Res 142(2):246–249CrossRefPubMed Schulman CI et al (2007) Are we training our residents to perform open gall bladder and common bile duct operations? J Surg Res 142(2):246–249CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung RS et al (2003) The decline of training in open biliary surgery. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 17(2):338–340CrossRef Chung RS et al (2003) The decline of training in open biliary surgery. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 17(2):338–340CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung RS, Ahmed N (2010) The impact of minimally invasive surgery on residents’ open operative experience: analysis of two decades of national data. Ann Surg 251(2):205–212CrossRefPubMed Chung RS, Ahmed N (2010) The impact of minimally invasive surgery on residents’ open operative experience: analysis of two decades of national data. Ann Surg 251(2):205–212CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Sellers MM et al (2013) Validation of new readmission data in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 216(3):420–427CrossRefPubMed Sellers MM et al (2013) Validation of new readmission data in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 216(3):420–427CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Bile duct injuries (BDI) in the advanced laparoscopic cholecystectomy era
verfasst von
Christopher W. Mangieri
Bryan P. Hendren
Matthew A. Strode
Bradley C. Bandera
Byron J. Faler
Publikationsdatum
13.07.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6333-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.