Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2019

19.11.2018 | Dynamic Manuscript

Laparoscopic duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection: a novel surgical approach for benign or low-grade malignant tumors

verfasst von: Jun Cao, Guo-lin Li, Jin-xing Wei, Wei-Bang Yang, Chang-zhen Shang, Ya-jin Chen, Wan Yee Lau, Jun Min

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection (DPPHRt) is an accepted alternative surgical procedure for benign or low-grade malignant tumors of the pancreatic head by preserving the duodenum with its intact blood supply from the pancreatic duodenal arterial arcade. This study describes our experience in laparoscopic DPPHRt (LDPPHRt). To our knowledge, this is the first description of this novel minimally invasive operation.

Methods

From August 2016 to May 2017, all consecutive patients who underwent LDPPHRt for pancreatic head lesions at the HPB Surgery Department, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital in Guangzhou, China were enrolled into this retrospective study.

Results

There were ten women and two men. The average age was 37.3 years (range 8–61 years). The average diameter of the pancreatic head lesions on pre-operative CT/MR was 3.7 cm (range 2–4.8 cm). All the LDPPHRt procedures were performed successfully. There was no peri-operative death. The average operative time was 272.5 min (range 210–320 min). The average blood loss was 215 ml (range 50–450 ml). Post-operative complications included pancreatic fistula grade B (two patients, or 16.7%) and biliary fistula (two patients, or 16.7%). All the complications responded well to conservative treatment. The mean post-operative hospital stay was 11.5 days (range 6–25 days).

Conclusions

LDPPHRt provided a minimally invasive approach with good organ-preservation for benign or low-grade malignant tumors of the pancreatic head. The long-term oncological outcomes, and the exocrine and endocrine pancreatic functions after this operation require further studies.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Beger HG, Büchler M, Bittner RR et al (1989) Duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas in severe chronic pancreatitis. Early and late results. Ann Surg 209(3):273–278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Beger HG, Büchler M, Bittner RR et al (1989) Duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas in severe chronic pancreatitis. Early and late results. Ann Surg 209(3):273–278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Diener MK, Rahbari NN, Fischer L et al (2008) Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 247(6):950–961CrossRef Diener MK, Rahbari NN, Fischer L et al (2008) Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 247(6):950–961CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Takada T, Yasuda H, Uchiyama K et al (1993) Duodenum-preserving pancreatoduodenostomy. A new technique for complete excision of the head of the pancreas with preservation of biliary and alimentary integrity. Hepatogastroenterology 40(4):356–359PubMed Takada T, Yasuda H, Uchiyama K et al (1993) Duodenum-preserving pancreatoduodenostomy. A new technique for complete excision of the head of the pancreas with preservation of biliary and alimentary integrity. Hepatogastroenterology 40(4):356–359PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Takada T, Yasuda H, Uchiyama K, Hasegawa H (1995) Completeduodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreaswith preservation of the biliary tract. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2:32–37CrossRef Takada T, Yasuda H, Uchiyama K, Hasegawa H (1995) Completeduodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreaswith preservation of the biliary tract. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2:32–37CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Beger HG, Schwarz M, Poch B (2012) Duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection for benign cystic neoplastic lesions. J Gastrointest Surg 16(11):2160–2166CrossRefPubMed Beger HG, Schwarz M, Poch B (2012) Duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection for benign cystic neoplastic lesions. J Gastrointest Surg 16(11):2160–2166CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Beger HG, Siech M, Poch B (2013) Duodenum-preserving total pancreatic headresection: an organ-sparing operation technique for cystic neoplasms andnon-invasive malignant tumors. Chirurg 84:412–420CrossRefPubMed Beger HG, Siech M, Poch B (2013) Duodenum-preserving total pancreatic headresection: an organ-sparing operation technique for cystic neoplasms andnon-invasive malignant tumors. Chirurg 84:412–420CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuan C-H, Tao M, Jia Y-M et al (2014) Duodenum-preserving resection and Roux-en-Y pancreatic jejunostomy in benign pancreatic head tumors. World J Gastroenterol 20(44):16786–16792CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yuan C-H, Tao M, Jia Y-M et al (2014) Duodenum-preserving resection and Roux-en-Y pancreatic jejunostomy in benign pancreatic head tumors. World J Gastroenterol 20(44):16786–16792CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Palanivelu C, Senthilnathan P, Sabnis SC et al (2017) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullarytumours. Br J Surg 104(11):1443–1450CrossRefPubMed Palanivelu C, Senthilnathan P, Sabnis SC et al (2017) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullarytumours. Br J Surg 104(11):1443–1450CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kutlu Onur C, Lee Jeffrey E, Katz Matthew H et al (2018) Open pancreaticoduodenectomy case volume predicts outcome of laparoscopic approach: a population-based analysis. Ann Surg 267(3):552–560CrossRefPubMed Kutlu Onur C, Lee Jeffrey E, Katz Matthew H et al (2018) Open pancreaticoduodenectomy case volume predicts outcome of laparoscopic approach: a population-based analysis. Ann Surg 267(3):552–560CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat DeRooij T, Lu MZ, Steen MW et al (2016) Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative cohort and registry studies. Ann Surg 264(2):257–267CrossRef DeRooij T, Lu MZ, Steen MW et al (2016) Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative cohort and registry studies. Ann Surg 264(2):257–267CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Peng C-H, Shen B-Y, Deng X-X et al (2012) Early experience for the robotic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection. World J Surg 36(5):1136–1141CrossRefPubMed Peng C-H, Shen B-Y, Deng X-X et al (2012) Early experience for the robotic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection. World J Surg 36(5):1136–1141CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou JY, Zhou YC, Mou YP et al (2016) Laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(32):e4442CrossRef Zhou JY, Zhou YC, Mou YP et al (2016) Laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(32):e4442CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Basar O, Brugge WR (2017) My treatment approach: pancreatic cysts. Mayo Clin Proc 92(10):1519–1531CrossRefPubMed Basar O, Brugge WR (2017) My treatment approach: pancreatic cysts. Mayo Clin Proc 92(10):1519–1531CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawrence SA, Attiyeh MA, Seier K et al (2017) Should patients with cystic lesions of the pancreas undergo long-term radiographic surveillance?: Results of 3024 patients evaluated at a single institution. Ann Surg 266(3):536–544CrossRefPubMed Lawrence SA, Attiyeh MA, Seier K et al (2017) Should patients with cystic lesions of the pancreas undergo long-term radiographic surveillance?: Results of 3024 patients evaluated at a single institution. Ann Surg 266(3):536–544CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hackert T, Michalski CW, Büchler MW (2017) Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: a surgical disease. JAMA Surg 152(1):26CrossRefPubMed Hackert T, Michalski CW, Büchler MW (2017) Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: a surgical disease. JAMA Surg 152(1):26CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Diener MK, Hüttner FJ, Kieser M et al (2017) Partial pancreatoduodenectomy versus duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in chronic pancreatitis: the multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-blind ChroPac trial. Lancet 390(10099):1027–1037CrossRefPubMed Diener MK, Hüttner FJ, Kieser M et al (2017) Partial pancreatoduodenectomy versus duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in chronic pancreatitis: the multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-blind ChroPac trial. Lancet 390(10099):1027–1037CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Beger HG, Nakao A, Mayer B et al (2015) Duodenum-preserving total and partial pancreatic head resection for benign tumors—systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatology 15(2):167–178CrossRefPubMed Beger HG, Nakao A, Mayer B et al (2015) Duodenum-preserving total and partial pancreatic head resection for benign tumors—systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatology 15(2):167–178CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Beger HG, Mayer B, Rau BM (2016) Parenchyma-sparing, limited pancreatic head resection for benign tumors and low-risk periampullary cancer—a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 20(1):206–217CrossRefPubMed Beger HG, Mayer B, Rau BM (2016) Parenchyma-sparing, limited pancreatic head resection for benign tumors and low-risk periampullary cancer—a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 20(1):206–217CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsuchikawa T, Hirano S, Tanaka E et al (2013) Modified duodenum-preserving pancreas head resection for low-grade malignant lesion in the pancreatic head. Pancreatology 13(2):170–174CrossRefPubMed Tsuchikawa T, Hirano S, Tanaka E et al (2013) Modified duodenum-preserving pancreas head resection for low-grade malignant lesion in the pancreatic head. Pancreatology 13(2):170–174CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection: a novel surgical approach for benign or low-grade malignant tumors
verfasst von
Jun Cao
Guo-lin Li
Jin-xing Wei
Wei-Bang Yang
Chang-zhen Shang
Ya-jin Chen
Wan Yee Lau
Jun Min
Publikationsdatum
19.11.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6488-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.