Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2019

26.11.2018

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for small submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer in the gastric fundus

verfasst von: Bing Li, Tao Chen, Zhi-Peng Qi, Li-Qing Yao, Mei-Dong Xu, Qiang Shi, Shi-Lun Cai, Di Sun, Ping-Hong Zhou, Yun-Shi Zhong

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 8/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Gastric small submucosal tumors (SMTs) are becoming increasingly common. However, the fundus of stomach is regarded as a difficult area for endoscopic resection (ER). In this study, we investigated the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of ER for small SMTs of the gastric fundus in a large series of patients, research that was previously lacking.

Methods

537 consecutive patients with SMTs no more than 20 mm in diameter, occurring in the gastric fundus and originating from the muscularis propria layer, which were treated with endoscopic submucosal excavation or endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) were included in this retrospective study at Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from January 2013 to September 2016. Clinicopathological, endoscopic, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed.

Results

En bloc resection was achieved in 100% of patients, and complete resection was achieved for 530 (98.7%) lesions. Although the total rate of complications was 9.3%, few serious adverse events occurred in only three (0.6%) patients, including major pneumoperitoneum, major hydrothorax, and bleeding. Unlike lager tumor sizes and longer procedure times, endoscopist experience had a positive impact on decreasing the likelihood of complications. Based on statistical analysis, tumors with greater size near the cardia, which were treated by EFTR, were the significant contributors to longer operative times. A median follow-up of 32 months was available, and all patients were free from local recurrence or distant metastasis during the study period.

Conclusions

Although the gastric fundus presents technical difficulties, ER is effective for the resection of small gastric SMTs with a high complete resection rate and rare serious adverse events.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu QX et al (2014) Clinical presentations of gastric small gastrointestinal stromal tumors mimics functional dyspepsia symptoms. World J Gastroenterol 20:11800–11807CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yu QX et al (2014) Clinical presentations of gastric small gastrointestinal stromal tumors mimics functional dyspepsia symptoms. World J Gastroenterol 20:11800–11807CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat von Mehren et al (2016) Soft tissue sarcoma, version 2.2016, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 14:758–786CrossRef von Mehren et al (2016) Soft tissue sarcoma, version 2.2016, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 14:758–786CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou PH et al (2011) Endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance for gastric submucosal tumors originated from the muscularis propria. Surg Endosc 25:2926–2931CrossRefPubMed Zhou PH et al (2011) Endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance for gastric submucosal tumors originated from the muscularis propria. Surg Endosc 25:2926–2931CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai MY et al (2016) Endoscopic resection for gastric schwannoma with long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 30:3994–4000CrossRefPubMed Cai MY et al (2016) Endoscopic resection for gastric schwannoma with long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 30:3994–4000CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Shi Q et al (2013) Complete closure of large gastric defects after endoscopic full-thickness resection, using endoloop and metallic clip interrupted suture. Endoscopy 45:329–334CrossRefPubMed Shi Q et al (2013) Complete closure of large gastric defects after endoscopic full-thickness resection, using endoloop and metallic clip interrupted suture. Endoscopy 45:329–334CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen T et al (2017) Long-term outcomes of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Ann Surg 265:363–369CrossRefPubMed Chen T et al (2017) Long-term outcomes of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Ann Surg 265:363–369CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Joensuu H et al (2008) Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum Pathol 39:1411–1419CrossRefPubMed Joensuu H et al (2008) Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum Pathol 39:1411–1419CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SP et al (2017) A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics in the prevention of electrocoagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 86:349–357.e2CrossRefPubMed Lee SP et al (2017) A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics in the prevention of electrocoagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 86:349–357.e2CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Faulx AL et al (2017) The role of endoscopy in subepithelial lesions of the GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 85:1117–1132CrossRefPubMed Faulx AL et al (2017) The role of endoscopy in subepithelial lesions of the GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 85:1117–1132CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chandrasekhara V et al (2011) Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 13:532–539CrossRefPubMed Chandrasekhara V et al (2011) Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 13:532–539CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lok KH et al (2009) Endosonographic surveillance of small gastrointestinal tumors originating from muscularis propria. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 18:177–180 Lok KH et al (2009) Endosonographic surveillance of small gastrointestinal tumors originating from muscularis propria. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 18:177–180
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou XX et al (2011) EUS for choosing best endoscopic treatment of mesenchymal tumors of upper gastrointestinal tract. World J Gastroenterol 17:1766–1771CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhou XX et al (2011) EUS for choosing best endoscopic treatment of mesenchymal tumors of upper gastrointestinal tract. World J Gastroenterol 17:1766–1771CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang JH et al (2006) American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of gastric subepithelial masses. Gastroenterology 130:2217–2228CrossRefPubMed Hwang JH et al (2006) American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of gastric subepithelial masses. Gastroenterology 130:2217–2228CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiech T et al (2005) Histopathological classification of nonneoplastic and neoplastic gastrointestinal submucosal lesions. Endoscopy 37:630–634CrossRefPubMed Wiech T et al (2005) Histopathological classification of nonneoplastic and neoplastic gastrointestinal submucosal lesions. Endoscopy 37:630–634CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Akahoshi K et al (2007) Preoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. World J Gastroenterol 13:2077–2082CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Akahoshi K et al (2007) Preoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. World J Gastroenterol 13:2077–2082CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Eckardt AJ et al (2012) Endosonographic large-bore biopsy of gastric subepithelial tumors: a prospective multicenter study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24:1135–1144CrossRefPubMed Eckardt AJ et al (2012) Endosonographic large-bore biopsy of gastric subepithelial tumors: a prospective multicenter study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24:1135–1144CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Qiao WG et al (2015) Cap-aspiration lumpectomy for small submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria of the gastric fundus: a preliminary study (with videos). J Dig Dis 16:642–648CrossRefPubMed Qiao WG et al (2015) Cap-aspiration lumpectomy for small submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria of the gastric fundus: a preliminary study (with videos). J Dig Dis 16:642–648CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Li L et al (2013) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric fundus subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria. Exp Ther Med 6:391–395CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li L et al (2013) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric fundus subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria. Exp Ther Med 6:391–395CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Li QL et al (2012) Submucosal tumors of the esophagogastric junction originating from the muscularis propria layer: a large study of endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 75:1153–1158CrossRefPubMed Li QL et al (2012) Submucosal tumors of the esophagogastric junction originating from the muscularis propria layer: a large study of endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 75:1153–1158CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Joo MK et al (2016) Endoscopic versus surgical resection of GI stromal tumors in the upper GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 83:318–326CrossRefPubMed Joo MK et al (2016) Endoscopic versus surgical resection of GI stromal tumors in the upper GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 83:318–326CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Chun SY et al (2013) Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric subepithelial tumors that originate from the muscularis propria layer: a preliminary analysis of appropriate indications. Surg Endosc 27:3271–3279CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chun SY et al (2013) Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric subepithelial tumors that originate from the muscularis propria layer: a preliminary analysis of appropriate indications. Surg Endosc 27:3271–3279CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat An W et al (2017) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 31:4522–4531CrossRefPubMed An W et al (2017) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 31:4522–4531CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee H et al (2012) Clinical features and predictive factors of coagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasm. Gastric Cancer 15:83–90CrossRefPubMed Lee H et al (2012) Clinical features and predictive factors of coagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasm. Gastric Cancer 15:83–90CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Karaca C et al (2017) Endoscopic submucosal resection of gastric subepithelial lesions smaller than 20 mm: a comparison of saline solution-assisted snare and cap band mucosectomy techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 85:956–962CrossRefPubMed Karaca C et al (2017) Endoscopic submucosal resection of gastric subepithelial lesions smaller than 20 mm: a comparison of saline solution-assisted snare and cap band mucosectomy techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 85:956–962CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Godat S et al (2016) Efficiency and safety of endoscopic resection in the management of subepithelial lesions of the stomach. United Eur Gastroenterol J 4:250–256CrossRef Godat S et al (2016) Efficiency and safety of endoscopic resection in the management of subepithelial lesions of the stomach. United Eur Gastroenterol J 4:250–256CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Meng Y et al (2017) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopic resection for gastric stromal tumors less than 2 cm. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 32:1693–1697CrossRefPubMed Meng Y et al (2017) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopic resection for gastric stromal tumors less than 2 cm. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 32:1693–1697CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Meng FS et al (2016) Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer: a single-center study (with video). Surg Endosc 30:5099–5107CrossRefPubMed Meng FS et al (2016) Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer: a single-center study (with video). Surg Endosc 30:5099–5107CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for small submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer in the gastric fundus
verfasst von
Bing Li
Tao Chen
Zhi-Peng Qi
Li-Qing Yao
Mei-Dong Xu
Qiang Shi
Shi-Lun Cai
Di Sun
Ping-Hong Zhou
Yun-Shi Zhong
Publikationsdatum
26.11.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6549-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.