Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Resident education in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Resident education in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was studied in a retrospective analysis of consecutive cases performed at two academic institutions with different educational approaches.

Methods

Each procedure was performed by a resident as operating surgeon under the direct guidance of one of a small, constant group of LC-certified attendings acting as first assistant. In group I (n = 48), residents acquired LC skills by graded exposure and surgical responsibility similar to their training in other general surgical procedures. In group II (n = 48) residents were additionally certified via an intensive course (including didactic and animal model experience) prior to assuming responsibility as surgeon.

Results

Results were similar in each group. No technical errors were identified. Blood transfusion was not required related to surgery. Conversion to an open procedure occurred in 10% and 8% in groups I and II, respectively. The rate of complications was 4% for group I and 8% for group II. A longer operating time was noted in group I and may be attributed to nonoperative reasons.

Conclusions

Education in LC via graded experience throughout residency achieves results similar to that found with the addition of an intensive course. This additional training may not be necessary for surgical residents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bailey R, Imbembo A, Zucker K (1991) Establishment of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy training program. Am Surg 57: 231–236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cuschieri A (1993) Endosurgical training methods: is it surgical training that is out of control? Surg Endosc 7: 71–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dent T (1991) Training, credentialing, and granting of clinical privileges for laparoscopic general surgery. Am J Surg 161: 399–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dent T (1992) Training, credentialing and evaluation in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 72: 1003–1011

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Forde KA (1993) Reflections on surgical training. Surg Endosc 7: 73–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Laws H (1991) Credentialing residents for laparoscopic surgery: a matter of opinion. Curr Surg 48: 684–686

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schirmer B, Edge S, Dix J, Miller A (1992) Incorporation of laparoscopy into a surgical endoscopy training program. Am J Surg 163: 46–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sharp W, Guyton D, Crans C, Abdu R, Young J, Dash S, Kremer R, Can A (1992) Initial experience with laparoscopic surgery: establishing a new surgical procedure. J Laparoendosc Surg 2: 151–155

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (1990) Granting of privileges for laparoscopic (peritoneoscopic) general surgery. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tompkins R (1990) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: threat or opportunity? Arch Surg 125: 1245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, R.L., Pace, B.W. Resident education in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 10, 26–28 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649910005

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649910005

Key words

Navigation