Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 7/2015

01.07.2015 | Original Article

Comparison of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim to prevent neutropenia and maintain dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer

verfasst von: Georgia Kourlaba, Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Dimitrios Pectasides, Dimosthenis V. Skarlos, Helen Gogas, George Pentheroudakis, Angelos Koutras, George Fountzilas, Nikos Maniadakis

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 7/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of prophylactic single fixed dose of pegfilgrastim and daily administration of filgrastim on febrile neutropenia (FN), severe neutropenia, treatment delay, and dose reduction in patients with breast cancer receiving dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study with 1058 breast cancer patients matched by age and chemotherapy was conducted. The primary endpoints were FN, severe (grade 3, 4) neutropenia, dose reduction (>10 % reduction of the dose planned), and treatment delay (dose given more than 2 days later).

Results

Eighteen episodes of FN (3.4 %) in the filgrastim group and 23 (4.3 %) in the pegfilgrastim group (p = 0.500) were recorded. More than half of the total episodes (27/41) occurred during the first 4 cycles of treatment. Patients who received filgrastim were almost three times more likely to experience a severe neutropenia episode and were significantly more likely to experience a dose reduction (18.5 %) compared to those who received pegfilgrastim (10.8 %) (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients, who received their planned dose on time, was significantly lower in patients receiving filgrastim (58 %) compared to those receiving pegfilgrastim (72.4 %, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

No significant difference was detected on FN rate between daily administration of filgrastim and single administration of pegfilgrastim. However, patients receiving pegfilgrastim had a significantly lower rate of severe neutropenia, as well as dose reduction and treatment delay, thus, achieving a higher dose density.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyman GH, Lyman CH, Agboola O (2005) Risk models for predicting chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Oncologist 10:427–437PubMed Lyman GH, Lyman CH, Agboola O (2005) Risk models for predicting chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Oncologist 10:427–437PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Crawford J (2006) Risk assessment and guidelines for first-cycle colony-stimulating factor use in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Oncology 20:22–28PubMed Crawford J (2006) Risk assessment and guidelines for first-cycle colony-stimulating factor use in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Oncology 20:22–28PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuderer NM, Dale DC, Crawford J, Cosler LE, Lyman GH (2006) Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients. Cancer 106:2258–2266CrossRefPubMed Kuderer NM, Dale DC, Crawford J, Cosler LE, Lyman GH (2006) Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients. Cancer 106:2258–2266CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Padilla G, Ropka ME (2005) Quality of life and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Cancer Nurs 28:167–171PubMed Padilla G, Ropka ME (2005) Quality of life and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Cancer Nurs 28:167–171PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fortner BV, Schwartzberg L, Tauer K, Houts AC, Hackett J, Stolshek BS (2005) Impact of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia on quality of life: a prospective pilot investigation. Support Care Cancer 13:522–528PubMed Fortner BV, Schwartzberg L, Tauer K, Houts AC, Hackett J, Stolshek BS (2005) Impact of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia on quality of life: a prospective pilot investigation. Support Care Cancer 13:522–528PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chirivella I, Bermejo B, Insa A et al (2009) Optimal delivery of anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting improves outcome of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 114:479–484PubMed Chirivella I, Bermejo B, Insa A et al (2009) Optimal delivery of anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting improves outcome of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 114:479–484PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Liou SY, Stephens JM, Carpiuc KT, Feng W, Botteman MF, Hay JW (2007) Economic burden of haematological adverse effects in cancer patients: a systematic review. Clin Drug Investig 27:381–396PubMed Liou SY, Stephens JM, Carpiuc KT, Feng W, Botteman MF, Hay JW (2007) Economic burden of haematological adverse effects in cancer patients: a systematic review. Clin Drug Investig 27:381–396PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyman GH (2005) Guidelines of the national comprehensive cancer network on the use of myeloid growth factors with cancer chemotherapy: a review of the evidence. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 3:557–571PubMed Lyman GH (2005) Guidelines of the national comprehensive cancer network on the use of myeloid growth factors with cancer chemotherapy: a review of the evidence. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 3:557–571PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Timmer-Bonte JN, Tjan-Heijnen VC (2006) Febrile neutropenia: highlighting the role of prophylactic antibiotics and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during standard dose chemotherapy for solid tumors. Anticancer Drugs 17:881–889PubMed Timmer-Bonte JN, Tjan-Heijnen VC (2006) Febrile neutropenia: highlighting the role of prophylactic antibiotics and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during standard dose chemotherapy for solid tumors. Anticancer Drugs 17:881–889PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dale DC (2003) Optimizing the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 1:679–684PubMed Dale DC (2003) Optimizing the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 1:679–684PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Aapro MS, Cameron DA, Pettengell R et al (2006) EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphomas and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer 42:2433–2453PubMed Aapro MS, Cameron DA, Pettengell R et al (2006) EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphomas and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer 42:2433–2453PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH et al (2006) 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 24:3187–3205PubMed Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH et al (2006) 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 24:3187–3205PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuderer NM, Dale DC, Crawford J, Lyman GH (2007) Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol 25:3158–3167PubMed Kuderer NM, Dale DC, Crawford J, Lyman GH (2007) Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol 25:3158–3167PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat von Minckwitz G, Schwenkglenks M, Skacel T et al (2009) Febrile neutropenia and related complications in breast cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis versus current practice neutropaenia management: results from an integrated analysis. Eur J Cancer 45:608–617 von Minckwitz G, Schwenkglenks M, Skacel T et al (2009) Febrile neutropenia and related complications in breast cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis versus current practice neutropaenia management: results from an integrated analysis. Eur J Cancer 45:608–617
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinto L, Liu Z, Doan Q, Bernal M, Dubois R, Lyman G (2007) Comparison of pegfilgrastim with filgrastim on febrile neutropenia, grade IV neutropenia and bone pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Curr Med Res Opin 23:2283–2295PubMed Pinto L, Liu Z, Doan Q, Bernal M, Dubois R, Lyman G (2007) Comparison of pegfilgrastim with filgrastim on febrile neutropenia, grade IV neutropenia and bone pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Curr Med Res Opin 23:2283–2295PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Fountzilas G, Dafni U, Gogas H et al (2008) Postoperative dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel and CMF in patients with high-risk breast cancer: safety analysis of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group randomized phase III trial HE 10/00. Ann Oncol 19:853–860PubMed Fountzilas G, Dafni U, Gogas H et al (2008) Postoperative dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel and CMF in patients with high-risk breast cancer: safety analysis of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group randomized phase III trial HE 10/00. Ann Oncol 19:853–860PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fountzilas G, Pectasides D, Christodoulou C et al (2006) Adjuvant dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, CMF, and weekly docetaxel is feasible and safe in patients with operable breast cancer. Med Oncol 23:479–488PubMed Fountzilas G, Pectasides D, Christodoulou C et al (2006) Adjuvant dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, CMF, and weekly docetaxel is feasible and safe in patients with operable breast cancer. Med Oncol 23:479–488PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Skarlos DV, Timotheadou E, Galani E et al (2009) Pegfilgrastim administered on the same day with dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer is associated with a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia as compared to conventional growth factor support: matched case-control study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Oncology 77:107–112CrossRefPubMed Skarlos DV, Timotheadou E, Galani E et al (2009) Pegfilgrastim administered on the same day with dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer is associated with a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia as compared to conventional growth factor support: matched case-control study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Oncology 77:107–112CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper KL, Madan J, Whyte S, Stevenson MD, Akehurst RL (2011) Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 11:404CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Cooper KL, Madan J, Whyte S, Stevenson MD, Akehurst RL (2011) Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 11:404CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Holmes FA, Jones SE, O’Shaughnessy J et al (2002) Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol 13:903–909PubMed Holmes FA, Jones SE, O’Shaughnessy J et al (2002) Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol 13:903–909PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Green MD, Koelbl H, Baselga J et al (2003) A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 14:29–35PubMed Green MD, Koelbl H, Baselga J et al (2003) A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 14:29–35PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Danova M, Chiroli S, Rosti G, Doan QV (2009) Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6 days of filgrastim for preventing febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients. Tumori 95:219–226PubMed Danova M, Chiroli S, Rosti G, Doan QV (2009) Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6 days of filgrastim for preventing febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients. Tumori 95:219–226PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyman GH, Lalla A, Barron RL, Dubois RW (2009) Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim primary prophylaxis in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy in the United States. Clin Ther 31:1092–1104PubMed Lyman GH, Lalla A, Barron RL, Dubois RW (2009) Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim primary prophylaxis in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy in the United States. Clin Ther 31:1092–1104PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Z, Doan QV, Malin J, Leonard R (2009) The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 7:193–205PubMed Liu Z, Doan QV, Malin J, Leonard R (2009) The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 7:193–205PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim to prevent neutropenia and maintain dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer
verfasst von
Georgia Kourlaba
Meletios A. Dimopoulos
Dimitrios Pectasides
Dimosthenis V. Skarlos
Helen Gogas
George Pentheroudakis
Angelos Koutras
George Fountzilas
Nikos Maniadakis
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2555-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2015

Supportive Care in Cancer 7/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.