Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2016

01.02.2016 | Original Article

Patient and family experiences with accessing telephone cancer treatment symptom support: a descriptive study

verfasst von: Dawn Stacey, Esther Green, Barbara Ballantyne, Myriam Skrutkowski, Angela Whynot, Lucie Tardif, Joy Tarasuk, Meg Carley, For the Pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (COSTaRS) Team

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Assess patient and family member experiences with telephone cancer treatment symptom support.

Methods

Descriptive study guided by the Knowledge-to-Action Framework. Patients and family members who received telephone support for a cancer treatment symptom within the last month at one of three ambulatory cancer programs (Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec) were eligible. An adapted Short Questionnaire for Out-of-hours Care instrument was analyzed with univariate statistics.

Results

Of 105 participants, 83 % telephoned about themselves and 17 % for a family member. Participants received advice over the telephone (90 %) and were advised to go to emergency (13 %) and/or the clinic (9 %). Two left a message and were not called back. Participants were “very satisfied” with the manner of nurse or doctor (58 %), explanation about problem (56 %), treatment/advice given (54 %), way call was handled (48 %), getting through (40 %), and wait time to speak to a nurse or doctor (38 %). The proportion “dissatisfied” or “very dissatisfied” for the above items was 4, 5, 9, 11, 10, and 14 %, respectively. Suggestions were shorter call back time, weekend access to telephone support, more knowledgeable advice on self-care strategies, more education at discharge, and shared documentation on calls to avoid repetition and improve continuity.

Conclusions

Most patients and family members who responded to the survey were satisfied with telephone-based cancer treatment symptom support. Programs could improve telephone support services by providing an estimated time for callback, ensuring that nurses have access to and use previous call documentation, and enhancing patient education on self-care strategies for managing and triaging treatment-related symptoms.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Stacey D, Bakker D, Green E, Zanchetta M, Conlon M (2007) Ambulatory oncology nursing telephone services: a provincial survey. Can Oncol Nurs J 17:1–5 Stacey D, Bakker D, Green E, Zanchetta M, Conlon M (2007) Ambulatory oncology nursing telephone services: a provincial survey. Can Oncol Nurs J 17:1–5
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Macartney G, Stacey D, Carley M, Harrison MB (2012) Priorities, barriers and facilitators for remote support of cancer symptoms: a survey of Canadian oncology nurses. Can Oncol Nurs J 22:235–47PubMedCrossRef Macartney G, Stacey D, Carley M, Harrison MB (2012) Priorities, barriers and facilitators for remote support of cancer symptoms: a survey of Canadian oncology nurses. Can Oncol Nurs J 22:235–47PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Coleman A (1997) Where do I stand? Legal implications of telephone triage. J Clin Nurs 6:227–31PubMedCrossRef Coleman A (1997) Where do I stand? Legal implications of telephone triage. J Clin Nurs 6:227–31PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat College of Nurses of Ontario. Telepractice: a practice guideline. College of Nurses of Ontario. Telepractice: a practice guideline.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat National Clinical Guideline Centre (NCGC) (2012) Patient experience in adult NHS services: improving the experience of care for people using adult NHS services: patient experience in generic terms (NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 138.). Royal College of Physicians (UK), London, Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK115230/ National Clinical Guideline Centre (NCGC) (2012) Patient experience in adult NHS services: improving the experience of care for people using adult NHS services: patient experience in generic terms (NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 138.). Royal College of Physicians (UK), London, Available from: http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​books/​NBK115230/​
7.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kimman ML, Bloebaum MM, Dirksen CD, Houben RM, Lambin P, Boersma LJ (2010) Patient satisfaction with nurse-led telephone follow-up after curative treatment for breast cancer. BMC Cancer 10.1186/1471-2407-10-174 [doi]. Kimman ML, Bloebaum MM, Dirksen CD, Houben RM, Lambin P, Boersma LJ (2010) Patient satisfaction with nurse-led telephone follow-up after curative treatment for breast cancer. BMC Cancer 10.​1186/​1471-2407-10-174 [doi].
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Overend A, Khoo K, Delorme M, Krause V, Avanessian A, Saltman D (2008) Evaluation of a nurse-led telephone follow-up clinic for patients with indolent and chronic hematological malignancies: a pilot study. Can Oncol Nurs J 18:64–73PubMedCrossRef Overend A, Khoo K, Delorme M, Krause V, Avanessian A, Saltman D (2008) Evaluation of a nurse-led telephone follow-up clinic for patients with indolent and chronic hematological malignancies: a pilot study. Can Oncol Nurs J 18:64–73PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Booker J, Eardley A, Cowan R, Logue J, Wylie J, Caress AL (2004) Telephone first post-intervention follow-up for men who have had radical radiotherapy to the prostate: evaluation of a novel service delivery approach. Eur J Oncol Nurs 8:325–33. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2004.01.003 PubMedCrossRef Booker J, Eardley A, Cowan R, Logue J, Wylie J, Caress AL (2004) Telephone first post-intervention follow-up for men who have had radical radiotherapy to the prostate: evaluation of a novel service delivery approach. Eur J Oncol Nurs 8:325–33. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejon.​2004.​01.​003 PubMedCrossRef
19.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mair F, Whitten P, May C, Doolittle GC (2000) Patients’ perceptions of a telemedicine specialty clinic. J Telemed Telecare 6:36–40PubMedCrossRef Mair F, Whitten P, May C, Doolittle GC (2000) Patients’ perceptions of a telemedicine specialty clinic. J Telemed Telecare 6:36–40PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB et al (2006) Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 26:13–24PubMedCrossRef Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB et al (2006) Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 26:13–24PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Stacey D, Carley M, Ballantyne B, Skrutkowski M, Whynot A, For the Pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (COSTaRS) Team (2015) Perceived factors influencing nurses’ use of evidence-informed protocols for remote cancer treatment-related symptom management: a mixed methods study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 19:268–77. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2014.11.002 PubMedCrossRef Stacey D, Carley M, Ballantyne B, Skrutkowski M, Whynot A, For the Pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (COSTaRS) Team (2015) Perceived factors influencing nurses’ use of evidence-informed protocols for remote cancer treatment-related symptom management: a mixed methods study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 19:268–77. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejon.​2014.​11.​002 PubMedCrossRef
25.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Garratt AM, Danielsen K, Hunskaar S (2007) Patient satisfaction questionnaires for primary care out-of-hours services: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 57:741–7PubMedPubMedCentral Garratt AM, Danielsen K, Hunskaar S (2007) Patient satisfaction questionnaires for primary care out-of-hours services: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 57:741–7PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (1976) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3186–91CrossRef Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (1976) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3186–91CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson R, Hubert J (2002) Resurfacing the care in nursing by telephone: lessons from ambulatory oncology. Nurs Outlook 50:160–4PubMedCrossRef Wilson R, Hubert J (2002) Resurfacing the care in nursing by telephone: lessons from ambulatory oncology. Nurs Outlook 50:160–4PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Henry DH, Viswanathan HN, Elkin EP, Traina S, Wade S, Cella D (2008) Symptoms and treatment burden associated with cancer treatment: results from a cross-sectional national survey in the U.S. Support Care Cancer 16:791–801PubMedCrossRef Henry DH, Viswanathan HN, Elkin EP, Traina S, Wade S, Cella D (2008) Symptoms and treatment burden associated with cancer treatment: results from a cross-sectional national survey in the U.S. Support Care Cancer 16:791–801PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbera L, Seow H, Howell D et al (2010) Symptom burden and performance status in a population-based cohort of ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer 116:5767–76PubMedCrossRef Barbera L, Seow H, Howell D et al (2010) Symptom burden and performance status in a population-based cohort of ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer 116:5767–76PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Behl D, Hendrickson AW, Moynihan TJ (2010) Oncologic Emergencies. Crit Care Clin 26:181–205PubMedCrossRef Behl D, Hendrickson AW, Moynihan TJ (2010) Oncologic Emergencies. Crit Care Clin 26:181–205PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Patient and family experiences with accessing telephone cancer treatment symptom support: a descriptive study
verfasst von
Dawn Stacey
Esther Green
Barbara Ballantyne
Myriam Skrutkowski
Angela Whynot
Lucie Tardif
Joy Tarasuk
Meg Carley
For the Pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (COSTaRS) Team
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2859-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.