nach oben

Supportive Care in Cancer

Erschienen in:

27.01.2016 | Original Article

Detrimental social interactions predict loss of dignity among patients with cancer

verfasst von: R. Philipp, A. Mehnert, C. Lehmann, K. Oechsle, C. Bokemeyer, A. Krüll, S. Vehling

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This prospective study aimed to determine the extent to which cancer patients experience loss of dignity during primary cancer care (baseline) and at 3-month follow-up and the contribution of positive social support and detrimental social interactions on loss of dignity at follow-up.

Methods

At baseline, we enrolled N = 270 cancer patients (advanced cancer 57 %) undergoing oncological treatment. At follow-up, n = 178 patients (72 %) participated. Patients completed the following questionnaires: sense of dignity item (SDI), physical problem list of the NCCN Distress Thermometer, Illness-Specific Social Support Scale (SSUK), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7). We conducted ordinal regression analyses controlling for age, gender, tumor stage, number of physical symptoms, depression, and anxiety.

Results

At baseline, 18 % of the patients experienced moderate to extreme loss of dignity (follow-up 23 %, p = 0.27). Detrimental interactions significantly predicted loss of dignity (OR = 1.42, 95 % CI 1.06–1.90) in a model including positive support (OR = 1.10, 95 % CI 0.82–1.49), depression (OR = 1.55, 95 % CI 0.96–2.51), and anxiety (OR = 1.20, 95 % CI 0.83–1.74). Items in relation to detrimental interactions with significant others such as “made you feel like you couldn’t take care of yourself” (r = 0.29, p < 0.001) and “felt uncomfortable in illness conversations” (r = 0.24, p = 0.002) showed the highest associations with perceived loss of dignity.

Conclusion

Loss of dignity was a frequent problem in our mixed cancer patient sample. Detrimental interactions that weaken the sense of dignity may result from discrepancies with patients’ needs for autonomy and security. Tailoring social support to attachment-related patient needs may help to conserve patients’ sense of dignity.

Jacobson N (2007) Dignity and health: a review. Soc Sci Med 64(2):292–302. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.039 CrossRefPubMed

Östlund U, Brown H, Johnston B (2012) Dignity conserving care at end-of-life: a narrative review. Eur J Oncol Nurs 16(4):353–367. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2011.07.010 CrossRefPubMed

Chochinov HM, Hack T, McClement S et al (2002) Dignity in the terminally ill: a developing empirical model. Soc Sci Med 54(3):433–443. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00084-3 CrossRefPubMed

Chochinov HM, Hack T, Hassard T et al (2002) Dignity in the terminally ill: a cross-sectional, cohort study. Lancet 360(9350):2026–2030. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)12022-8 CrossRefPubMed

Chochinov HM, Kristjanson LJ, Hack T et al (2006) Dignity in the terminally ill: revisited. J Palliat Med 9(3):666–672. doi:10.1089/jpm.2006.9.666 CrossRefPubMed

Chochinov HM, Hassard T, McClement S et al (2008) The patient dignity inventory: a novel way of measuring dignity-related distress in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage 36(6):559–571. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.12.018 CrossRefPubMed

Chochinov HM, Hassard T, McClement S et al (2009) The landscape of distress in the terminally ill. J Pain Symptom Manage 38(5):641–649. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.04.021 CrossRefPubMed

Vehling S, Mehnert A (2014) Symptom burden, loss of dignity, and demoralization in patients with cancer: a mediation model. Psychooncology 23(3):283–290. doi:10.1002/pon.3417 CrossRefPubMed

Chochinov HM, Kristjanson LJ, Hack TF et al (2007) Burden to others and the terminally ill. J Pain Symptom Manage 34(5):463–471. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.12.012 CrossRefPubMed

10.

McPherson CJ, Wilson KG, Murray MA (2007) Feeling like a burden to others: a systematic review focusing on the end of life. Palliat Med 21(2):115–128. doi:10.1177/0269216307076345 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Wilson KG, Curran D, McPherson CJ (2005) A burden to others: a common source of distress for the terminally ill. Cogn Behav Ther 34(2):115–123. doi:10.1080/16506070510008461 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Oechsle K, Wais MC, Vehling S et al (2014) Relationship between symptom burden, distress, and sense of dignity in terminally Ill cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 48(3):313–321. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.10.022 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Street AF, Kissane DW (2001) Constructions of dignity in end-of-life. J Palliat Care 17(2):93–101PubMed

14.

Pleschberger S (2007) Dignity and the challenge of dying in nursing homes: the residents’ view. Age Ageing 36(2):197–202. doi:10.1093/ageing/afl152 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Revenson TA, Schiaffino KM, Deborah Majerovitz S et al (1991) Social support as a double-edged sword: the relation of positive and problematic support to depression among rheumatoid arthritis patients. Soc Sci Med 33(7):807–813. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(91)90385-P CrossRefPubMed

16.

Chio C, Shih F, Chiou J et al (2008) The lived experiences of spiritual suffering and the healing process among Taiwanese patients with terminal cancer. J Clin Nurs 17(6):735–743. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01854.x CrossRefPubMed

17.

Rodin G, Walsh A, Zimmermann C et al (2007) The contribution of attachment security and social support to depressive symptoms in patients with metastatic cancer. Psychooncology 16(12):1080–1091. doi:10.1002/pon.1186 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Schroevers MJ, Ranchor AV, Sanderman R (2003) The role of social support and self-esteem in the presence and course of depressive symptoms: a comparison of cancer patients and individuals from the general population. Soc Sci Med 57(2):375–385. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00366-0 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Wilson KG, Scott JF, Graham ID et al (2000) Attitudes of terminally ill patients toward euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Arch Intern Med 160(16):2454–2460CrossRefPubMed

20.

Mehnert A, Müller D, Lehmann C et al (2006) The German version of the NCCN Distress Thermometer: validation of a screening instrument for assessment of psychosocial distress in cancer patients. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie 54(3):213–223. doi:10.1024/1661-4747.54.3.213 CrossRef

21.

Ramm GC, Hasenbring M (2003) Die deutsche Adaptation des Illness-specific Social Support Scale und ihre teststatistische Überprüfung beim Einsatz an Patienten vor und nach Knochenmarktransplantation [The German adaptation of the Illness-specific Social Support Scale and the test statistical evaluation on the basis of patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation]. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie 12(1):29–38

22.

Revenson TA, Schiaffino KM (1990) Development of a contextual social support measure for use with arthritis population., Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Arthritis Health Professions Association, Seattle

23.

Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW (1999) Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD. JAMA 282(18):1737–1744. doi:10.1001/jama.282.18.1737 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Löwe B, Spitzer RL, Zipfel S et al (2002) PHQ-D Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten. Manual Komplettversion und Kurzform. Autorisierte deutsche Version des Prime MD Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), 2nd edn. New York, NY, Pfizer

25.

Rief W, Nanke A, Klaiberg A et al (2004) Base rates for panic and depression according to the Brief Patient Health Questionnaire: a population-based study. J Affect Disord 82(2):271–276. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2003.11.006 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Löwe B, Decker O, Müller S et al (2008) Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Medical 46(3):266–274. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318160d093

27.

Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW et al (2006) A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder. Arch Intern Med 166(10):1092–1097. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 CrossRefPubMed

28.

McCullagh P (1980) Regression models for ordinal data. J Roy Stat Soc B (Methodological) 42(2):109–142

29.

Guo Q, Jacelon CS (2014) An integrative review of dignity in end-of-life care. Palliat Med 28(7):931–940. doi:10.1177/0269216314528399 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Randers I, Mattiasson A (2004) Autonomy and integrity: upholding older adult patients’ dignity. J Adv Nurs 45(1):63–71. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02861.x CrossRefPubMed

31.

Wilson F, Ingleton C, Gott M et al (2014) Autonomy and choice in palliative care: time for a new model? J Adv Nurs 70(5):1020–1029. doi:10.1111/jan.12267 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Enes SPD (2003) An exploration of dignity in palliative care. Palliat Med 17(3):263–269. doi:10.1191/0269216303pm699oa CrossRefPubMed

33.

van Gennip IE, Pasman HRW, Oosterveld-Vlug MG et al (2013) The development of a model of dignity in illness based on qualitative interviews with seriously ill patients. Int J Nurs Stud 50(8):1080–1089. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.12.014 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Rodin G (2013) Research on psychological and social factors in palliative care: an invited commentary. Palliat Med 27(10):925–931. doi:10.1177/0269216313499961 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Sautier LP, Vehling S, Mehnert A (2014) Assessment of patients’ dignity in cancer care: preliminary psychometrics of the German version of the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI-G). J Pain Symptom Manage 47(1):181–188. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.02.023 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Detrimental social interactions predict loss of dignity among patients with cancer
verfasst von: R. Philipp
A. Mehnert
C. Lehmann
K. Oechsle
C. Bokemeyer
A. Krüll
S. Vehling
Publikationsdatum: 27.01.2016
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3090-9

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Detrimental social interactions predict loss of dignity among patients with cancer

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Adjuvante Brustkrebstherapie: Doppelt hält besser

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

Einladung zum PSA-Screening senkt die Krebssterblichkeit

Update Onkologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Mixed method exploration of the medical, service-related, and emotional reasons for emergency room visits of older cancer patients

Permanent catheters for recurrent ascites—a critical and systematic review of study methodology

Results of 20- versus 45-min post-infusion scalp cooling time in the prevention of docetaxel-induced alopecia

Aromatase inhibitor associated arthralgia: the importance of oncology provider-patient communication about side effects and potential management through physical activity

Is it possible to detect an improvement in cancer pain management? A comparison of two Norwegian cross-sectional studies conducted 5 years apart

Acceptability and feasibility of an e-mental health intervention for parents of childhood cancer survivors: “Cascade”

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Adjuvante Brustkrebstherapie: Doppelt hält besser

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

Einladung zum PSA-Screening senkt die Krebssterblichkeit

Update Onkologie