Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 7/2016

11.02.2016 | Original Article

Which pain intensity scale from the Brief Pain Inventory correlates most highly with functional interference scores in patients experiencing taxane-induced arthralgia and myalgia?

verfasst von: Nicholas Chiu, Liying Zhang, Daniela Gallo-Hershberg, Rebecca Dent, Leonard Chiu, Mark Pasetka, Jenna van Draanen, Ronald Chow, Henry Lam, Sunil Verma, Jordan Stinson, Erica Stacey, Edward Chow, Carlo DeAngelis

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 7/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess which pain intensity dimension scale (worst, least, average, or current pain) from the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) correlates most highly with functional interference scores in patients experiencing taxane-induced arthralgia and myalgia.

Methods

Breast cancer patients scheduled to receive docetaxel, paclitaxel, or albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) were enrolled in the study. Patients completed an initial baseline questionnaire and subsequently filled out a diary based on the BPI on days 1–7, 14, and 21 for three consecutive treatment cycles. Pain scores for worst, least, average, and current pain intensity dimensions as well as pain interference scores were recorded in the diaries and questionnaires using the BPI. Worst, least, average, and current pain scores were correlated with functional pain interference scores using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. A general linear mixed model of each functional interference measure was performed over time for cycles 1–3 with each pain intensity dimension scale.

Results

Among worst, average, least, and current joint pain dimensions, average joint pain scores correlated best with all BPI interference responses while average muscle pain scores correlated best with all BPI interference responses except for sleeping probability and normal work.

Conclusion

We recommend the BPI scale measuring average pain for future studies evaluating pain scores in patients experiencing taxane-induced arthralgia and myalgia.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Loprinzi CL, Reeves BN, Dakhil SR, Sloan JA, Wolf SL, Burger KN et al (2011) Natural history of paclitaxel-associated acute pain syndrome: prospective cohort study NCCTG N08C1. J Clin Oncol 29(11):1472–1478CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Loprinzi CL, Reeves BN, Dakhil SR, Sloan JA, Wolf SL, Burger KN et al (2011) Natural history of paclitaxel-associated acute pain syndrome: prospective cohort study NCCTG N08C1. J Clin Oncol 29(11):1472–1478CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Saibil S, Fitzgerald B, Freedman OC, Amir E, Napolskikh J, Salvo N et al (2010) Incidence of taxane-induced pain and distress in patients receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: a retrospective, outcomes-based survey. Curr Oncol 17(4):42CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saibil S, Fitzgerald B, Freedman OC, Amir E, Napolskikh J, Salvo N et al (2010) Incidence of taxane-induced pain and distress in patients receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: a retrospective, outcomes-based survey. Curr Oncol 17(4):42CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris K, Li K, Flynn C, Chow E (2007) Worst, average or current pain in the brief pain inventory: which should be used to calculate the response to palliative radiotherapy in patients with bone metastases? Clin Oncol 19(7):523–527CrossRef Harris K, Li K, Flynn C, Chow E (2007) Worst, average or current pain in the brief pain inventory: which should be used to calculate the response to palliative radiotherapy in patients with bone metastases? Clin Oncol 19(7):523–527CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen MP (2003) The validity and reliability of pain measures in adults with cancer. J Pain 4(1):2–21CrossRefPubMed Jensen MP (2003) The validity and reliability of pain measures in adults with cancer. J Pain 4(1):2–21CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Markman M, Kennedy A, Webster K, Kulp B, Peterson G, Belinson J (1999) Use of low-dose oral prednisone to prevent paclitaxel-induced arthralgia and myalgia. Gynecol Oncol 72(1):100–101CrossRefPubMed Markman M, Kennedy A, Webster K, Kulp B, Peterson G, Belinson J (1999) Use of low-dose oral prednisone to prevent paclitaxel-induced arthralgia and myalgia. Gynecol Oncol 72(1):100–101CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zelman DC, Hoffman DL, Seifeldin R, Dukes EM (2003) Development of a metric for a day of manageable pain control: derivation of pain severity cut-points for low back pain and osteoarthritis. Pain 106(1):35–42CrossRefPubMed Zelman DC, Hoffman DL, Seifeldin R, Dukes EM (2003) Development of a metric for a day of manageable pain control: derivation of pain severity cut-points for low back pain and osteoarthritis. Pain 106(1):35–42CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen MP (2003) Questionnaire validation: a brief guide for readers of the research literature. Clin J Pain 19(6):345–352CrossRefPubMed Jensen MP (2003) Questionnaire validation: a brief guide for readers of the research literature. Clin J Pain 19(6):345–352CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen MP, Smith DG, Ehde DM, Robinsin LR (2001) Pain site and the effects of amputation pain: further clarification of the meaning of mild, moderate, and severe pain. Pain 91(3):317–322CrossRefPubMed Jensen MP, Smith DG, Ehde DM, Robinsin LR (2001) Pain site and the effects of amputation pain: further clarification of the meaning of mild, moderate, and severe pain. Pain 91(3):317–322CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Which pain intensity scale from the Brief Pain Inventory correlates most highly with functional interference scores in patients experiencing taxane-induced arthralgia and myalgia?
verfasst von
Nicholas Chiu
Liying Zhang
Daniela Gallo-Hershberg
Rebecca Dent
Leonard Chiu
Mark Pasetka
Jenna van Draanen
Ronald Chow
Henry Lam
Sunil Verma
Jordan Stinson
Erica Stacey
Edward Chow
Carlo DeAngelis
Publikationsdatum
11.02.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3106-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2016

Supportive Care in Cancer 7/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.