Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2016

30.04.2016 | Original Article

Attitudes and experiences of family involvement in cancer consultations: a qualitative exploration of patient and family member perspectives

verfasst von: Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell, Phyllis Butow, Stella Bu, Alana Fisher, Ilona Juraskova

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 10/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Family members (FMs) often provide support to patients, regularly attend cancer consultations and are often involved in medical decision-making. Limited research has been conducted to date to understand patients’ and FMs’ perceptions about family involvement in cancer consultations. Therefore, this study aimed to qualitatively explore the attitudes and experiences of Australian cancer patients and FMs regarding (1) family attendance at consultations, (2) family roles in consultations and (3) the challenges of family involvement.

Methods

Thirty patients and 33 FMs, recruited through either a tertiary metropolitan oncology clinic or national cancer patient advocacy group, participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed and qualitatively analysed using Framework analysis methods.

Results

Four relevant themes were identified: (1) negotiating family involvement, (2) attitudes towards the roles FMs assume, (3) challenges of family involvement and (4) family-clinician interactions. Overall, patients appreciated family involvement and valued FMs’ provision of emotional and informational support, and FMs also found benefit from participating in consultations. Some patients appreciated their FM assuming the role of ‘messenger’ between the consultation and extended family. However, a number of challenges were also reported by patients (e.g. maintaining privacy, mismatched patient-family information needs) and FMs (e.g. emotional toll of supportive roles, negative behaviours of clinicians towards FMs).

Conclusions

FMs appear to make valuable contributions to cancer consultations, and their presence can benefit both the patient and the FM themselves in many ways. However, for some FMs, attending consultations can be challenging. Study findings point to the need for psychosocial support addressing FMs’ needs and the development of communication strategies for oncology clinicians to positively engage with FMs. Further research is needed in these areas.
Fußnoten
1
An accurate response rate could not be determined for participants recruited through the advocacy group as numbers receiving the invitation email were not recorded. All participants who returned a questionnaire completed the interview.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Repetto L, Piselli P, Raffaele M, Locatelli C (2009) Communicating cancer diagnosis and prognosis: when the target is the elderly patient—a GIOGer study. Eur J Cancer 45(3):374–383CrossRefPubMed Repetto L, Piselli P, Raffaele M, Locatelli C (2009) Communicating cancer diagnosis and prognosis: when the target is the elderly patient—a GIOGer study. Eur J Cancer 45(3):374–383CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Eggly S, Penner LA, Greene M, Harper FW, Ruckdeschel JC, Albrecht TL (2006) Information seeking during “bad news” oncology interactions: question asking by patients and their companions. Soc Sci Med 63(11):2974–2985CrossRefPubMed Eggly S, Penner LA, Greene M, Harper FW, Ruckdeschel JC, Albrecht TL (2006) Information seeking during “bad news” oncology interactions: question asking by patients and their companions. Soc Sci Med 63(11):2974–2985CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Street RL, Gordon HS (2008) Companion participation in cancer consultations. Psycho-Oncology 17(3):244–251CrossRefPubMed Street RL, Gordon HS (2008) Companion participation in cancer consultations. Psycho-Oncology 17(3):244–251CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schäfer C, Putnik K, Dietl B, Leiberich P, Loew TH, Kölbl O (2006) Medical decision-making of the patient in the context of the family: results of a survey. Support Care Cancer 14(9):952–959CrossRefPubMed Schäfer C, Putnik K, Dietl B, Leiberich P, Loew TH, Kölbl O (2006) Medical decision-making of the patient in the context of the family: results of a survey. Support Care Cancer 14(9):952–959CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Laidsaar-Powell R, Butow P, Bu S, Charles C, Gafni A, Lam W, Jansen J, McCaffery K, Shepherd H, Tattersall M (2013) Physician–patient–companion communication and decision-making: a systematic review of triadic medical consultations. Patient Educ Couns 91(1):3–13CrossRefPubMed Laidsaar-Powell R, Butow P, Bu S, Charles C, Gafni A, Lam W, Jansen J, McCaffery K, Shepherd H, Tattersall M (2013) Physician–patient–companion communication and decision-making: a systematic review of triadic medical consultations. Patient Educ Couns 91(1):3–13CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kimberlin C, Brushwood D, Allen W, Radson E, Wilson D (2004) Cancer patient and caregiver experiences: communication and pain management issues. J Pain Symptom Manag 28(6):566–578CrossRef Kimberlin C, Brushwood D, Allen W, Radson E, Wilson D (2004) Cancer patient and caregiver experiences: communication and pain management issues. J Pain Symptom Manag 28(6):566–578CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Speice J, Harkness J, Laneri H, Frankel R, Roter D, Kornblith A, Ahles T, Winer E, Fleishman S, Luber P (2000) Involving family members in cancer care: focus group considerations of patients and oncological providers. Psycho-Oncology 9(2):101–112CrossRefPubMed Speice J, Harkness J, Laneri H, Frankel R, Roter D, Kornblith A, Ahles T, Winer E, Fleishman S, Luber P (2000) Involving family members in cancer care: focus group considerations of patients and oncological providers. Psycho-Oncology 9(2):101–112CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sinfield P, Baker R, Agarwal S, Tarrant C (2008) Patient-centred care: what are the experiences of prostate cancer patients and their partners? Patient Educ Couns 73(1):91–96CrossRefPubMed Sinfield P, Baker R, Agarwal S, Tarrant C (2008) Patient-centred care: what are the experiences of prostate cancer patients and their partners? Patient Educ Couns 73(1):91–96CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris SM, Thomas C (2001) The carer’s place in the cancer situation: where does the carer stand in the medical setting? Eur J Cancer Care 10(2):87–95CrossRef Morris SM, Thomas C (2001) The carer’s place in the cancer situation: where does the carer stand in the medical setting? Eur J Cancer Care 10(2):87–95CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowen GA (2008) Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qual Res 8(1):137–152CrossRef Bowen GA (2008) Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qual Res 8(1):137–152CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean?(or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 44(5):681–692CrossRefPubMed Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean?(or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 44(5):681–692CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R (2000) Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract 50(460):892–899PubMedPubMedCentral Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R (2000) Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract 50(460):892–899PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID (2008) Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns 73(3):526–535CrossRefPubMed Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID (2008) Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns 73(3):526–535CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Makoul G, Clayman ML (2006) An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns 60(3):301–312CrossRefPubMed Makoul G, Clayman ML (2006) An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns 60(3):301–312CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Laidsaar-Powell R, Butow P, Bu S, Charles C, Gafni A, Fisher A, Juraskova I (2016) Family involvement in cancer treatment decision-making: a qualitative study of patient, family, and health professional attitudes and experiences. Patient Educ Couns. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.014 Laidsaar-Powell R, Butow P, Bu S, Charles C, Gafni A, Fisher A, Juraskova I (2016) Family involvement in cancer treatment decision-making: a qualitative study of patient, family, and health professional attitudes and experiences. Patient Educ Couns. doi:10.​1016/​j.​pec.​2016.​01.​014
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer DZ, Avery LM (2009) Excel as a qualitative data analysis tool. Field Methods 21(1):91–112CrossRef Meyer DZ, Avery LM (2009) Excel as a qualitative data analysis tool. Field Methods 21(1):91–112CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat de Rosenroll A, Higuchi K, Dutton K, Murray M, Stacey D (2012) Perspectives of significant others in dialysis modality decision-making: a qualitative study. CANNT Journal 23(4):17–24 de Rosenroll A, Higuchi K, Dutton K, Murray M, Stacey D (2012) Perspectives of significant others in dialysis modality decision-making: a qualitative study. CANNT Journal 23(4):17–24
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellingson LL (2002) The roles of companions in geriatric patient–interdisciplinary oncology team interactions. J Aging Stud 16(4):361–382CrossRef Ellingson LL (2002) The roles of companions in geriatric patient–interdisciplinary oncology team interactions. J Aging Stud 16(4):361–382CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitnick S, Leffler C, Hood VL, American College of Physicians Ethics P, Committee HR (2010) Family caregivers, patients and physicians: ethical guidance to optimize relationships. J Gen Intern Med 25(3):255–260CrossRef Mitnick S, Leffler C, Hood VL, American College of Physicians Ethics P, Committee HR (2010) Family caregivers, patients and physicians: ethical guidance to optimize relationships. J Gen Intern Med 25(3):255–260CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobsen PB, Wagner LI (2012) A new quality standard: the integration of psychosocial care into routine cancer care. J Clin Oncol 30(11):1154–1159CrossRefPubMed Jacobsen PB, Wagner LI (2012) A new quality standard: the integration of psychosocial care into routine cancer care. J Clin Oncol 30(11):1154–1159CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodges L, Humphris G, Macfarlane G (2005) A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between the psychological distress of cancer patients and their carers. Soc Sci Med 60(1):1–12CrossRefPubMed Hodges L, Humphris G, Macfarlane G (2005) A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between the psychological distress of cancer patients and their carers. Soc Sci Med 60(1):1–12CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Sklenarova H, Krümpelmann A, Haun MW, Friederich HC, Huber J, Thomas M, Winkler EC, Herzog W, Hartmann M (2015) When do we need to care about the caregiver? Supportive care needs, anxiety, and depression among informal caregivers of patients with cancer and cancer survivors. Cancer 121(9):1513–1519 Sklenarova H, Krümpelmann A, Haun MW, Friederich HC, Huber J, Thomas M, Winkler EC, Herzog W, Hartmann M (2015) When do we need to care about the caregiver? Supportive care needs, anxiety, and depression among informal caregivers of patients with cancer and cancer survivors. Cancer 121(9):1513–1519
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bee PE, Barnes P, Luker KA (2009) A systematic review of informal caregivers’ needs in providing home-based end-of-life care to people with cancer. J Clin Nurs 18(10):1379–1393CrossRefPubMed Bee PE, Barnes P, Luker KA (2009) A systematic review of informal caregivers’ needs in providing home-based end-of-life care to people with cancer. J Clin Nurs 18(10):1379–1393CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen SC (2014) Information needs and information sources of family caregivers of cancer patients. Aslib J Inf Manage 66(6):623–639CrossRef Chen SC (2014) Information needs and information sources of family caregivers of cancer patients. Aslib J Inf Manage 66(6):623–639CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Fried TR, Bradley EH, O’Leary JR, Byers AL (2005) Unmet desire for caregiver-patient communication and increased caregiver burden. J Am Geriatr Soc 53(1):59–65CrossRefPubMed Fried TR, Bradley EH, O’Leary JR, Byers AL (2005) Unmet desire for caregiver-patient communication and increased caregiver burden. J Am Geriatr Soc 53(1):59–65CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang X, Butow P, Meiser B, Goldstein D (1999) Attitudes and information needs of Chinese migrant cancer patients and their relatives. Aust NZ J Med 29(2):207–213CrossRef Huang X, Butow P, Meiser B, Goldstein D (1999) Attitudes and information needs of Chinese migrant cancer patients and their relatives. Aust NZ J Med 29(2):207–213CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Attitudes and experiences of family involvement in cancer consultations: a qualitative exploration of patient and family member perspectives
verfasst von
Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell
Phyllis Butow
Stella Bu
Alana Fisher
Ilona Juraskova
Publikationsdatum
30.04.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3237-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2016

Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.