Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2017

09.05.2017 | Original Article

What advanced cancer patients with limited treatment options know about clinical research: a qualitative study

verfasst von: Sarah B. Garrett, Christopher J. Koenig, Laura Trupin, Fay J. Hlubocky, Christopher K. Daugherty, Anne Reinert, Pamela Munster, Daniel Dohan

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 10/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Discussions between oncologists and advanced cancer patients (ACPs) may touch on the complex issue of clinical trial participation. Numerous initiatives have sought to improve the quality of these potentially difficult conversations. However, we have limited data about what ACPs know about clinical research as they enter such discussions as, to date, such research has focused on the period following informed consent. This study examines ACPs’ understanding of clinical research in the treatment period before consent.

Methods

We conducted in-depth interviews with adult ACPs with limited treatment options at four clinics in an academic medical center. So as not to influence patients’ perspectives, interviewers probed patients’ knowledge of clinical research only if the patient first brought up the topic. Interviews (40–60 min) were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically and via quantitative content analysis by an interdisciplinary team.

Results

Of 78 patients recruited, 56 (72%) spontaneously brought up the topic of clinical research during interview and are included in this analysis. Qualitative thematic analysis and quantitative content analysis revealed that patients’ knowledge varied in terms of (1) accuracy and (2) specificity (level of detail). ACPs who spoke with high specificity were not always accurate, and ACPs with accurate knowledge included both high- and low-specificity speakers.

Conclusions

ACPs’ knowledge of clinical research is variable. Patients who can discuss the technical details of their care may or may not understand the broader purpose and procedures of clinical trials. Understanding this variability is important for improving patient-provider communication about clinical research and supporting efforts to provide individualized care for ACPs.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (2016) ACGME common program requirements. Chicago, IL Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (2016) ACGME common program requirements. Chicago, IL
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Biedrzycki BA (2011) Research information knowledge, perceived adequacy, and understanding in cancer clinical trial participants. Oncol Nurs Forum. 38(4):E291–E296 Biedrzycki BA (2011) Research information knowledge, perceived adequacy, and understanding in cancer clinical trial participants. Oncol Nurs Forum. 38(4):E291–E296
15.
16.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruce JY, Hlubocky FJ, Daugherty CK (2007) “Was it worth it?” a pilot study of advanced cancer patients’ retrospective perceptions of benefit from phase 1 trial participation. J Investig Med 55:S347CrossRef Bruce JY, Hlubocky FJ, Daugherty CK (2007) “Was it worth it?” a pilot study of advanced cancer patients’ retrospective perceptions of benefit from phase 1 trial participation. J Investig Med 55:S347CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Olver IN, Buchanan L, Laidlaw C, Poulton G (1995) The adequacy of consent forms for informing patients entering oncological clinical trials. Ann Oncol 6:867–870CrossRefPubMed Olver IN, Buchanan L, Laidlaw C, Poulton G (1995) The adequacy of consent forms for informing patients entering oncological clinical trials. Ann Oncol 6:867–870CrossRefPubMed
21.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanchini V, Reni M, Calori G et al (2014) Informed consent as an ethical requirement in clinical trials: an old, but still unresolved issue. An observational study to evaluate patient’s informed consent comprehension. J Med Ethics 40:269–275. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-101115 CrossRefPubMed Sanchini V, Reni M, Calori G et al (2014) Informed consent as an ethical requirement in clinical trials: an old, but still unresolved issue. An observational study to evaluate patient’s informed consent comprehension. J Med Ethics 40:269–275. doi:10.​1136/​medethics-2012-101115 CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandez JW, Herzfeld M (2014) In search of meaningful methods. In: Bernard HR, Gravlee CC (eds) Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology, Second Ed. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, pp 55–96 Fernandez JW, Herzfeld M (2014) In search of meaningful methods. In: Bernard HR, Gravlee CC (eds) Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology, Second Ed. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, pp 55–96
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Atkinson P, Coffey A, Delamont S et al (2001) Handbook of ethnography. Sage, Thousand OaksCrossRef Atkinson P, Coffey A, Delamont S et al (2001) Handbook of ethnography. Sage, Thousand OaksCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL (2011) Writing ethnographic fieldnotes, Second edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (Google eBook)CrossRef Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL (2011) Writing ethnographic fieldnotes, Second edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (Google eBook)CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunn LB, Wiley J, Garrett S et al (2016) Interest in initiating an early phase clinical trial: results of a longitudinal study of advanced cancer patients. Psychooncology. doi:10.1002/pon.4179 Dunn LB, Wiley J, Garrett S et al (2016) Interest in initiating an early phase clinical trial: results of a longitudinal study of advanced cancer patients. Psychooncology. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​4179
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss AL, Corbin JM (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, New York Strauss AL, Corbin JM (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, New York
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Weitzman EA, Miles MB (1995) Choosing software for qualitative data analysis: an overview. Field Methods 7:1–5 Weitzman EA, Miles MB (1995) Choosing software for qualitative data analysis: an overview. Field Methods 7:1–5
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyatziz R (1998) Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Sage, Thousand Oaks Boyatziz R (1998) Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Sage, Thousand Oaks
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Guest G, MacQueen KM (2011) Applied thematic analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks Guest G, MacQueen KM (2011) Applied thematic analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Inc, New York Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Inc, New York
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Friis LS, Elverdam B, Schmidt KG (2003) The patient’s perspective a qualitative study of acute myeloid leukaemia patients’ need for information and their information-seeking behaviour. Support Care Cancer 11:162–170. doi:10.1007/s00520-002-0424-6 PubMed Friis LS, Elverdam B, Schmidt KG (2003) The patient’s perspective a qualitative study of acute myeloid leukaemia patients’ need for information and their information-seeking behaviour. Support Care Cancer 11:162–170. doi:10.​1007/​s00520-002-0424-6 PubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Koh HK, Brach C, Harris LM, Parchman ML (2013) A proposed “health literate care model” would constitute a systems approach to improving patients’ engagement in care. Health Aff (Millwood) 32:357–367. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1205 CrossRef Koh HK, Brach C, Harris LM, Parchman ML (2013) A proposed “health literate care model” would constitute a systems approach to improving patients’ engagement in care. Health Aff (Millwood) 32:357–367. doi:10.​1377/​hlthaff.​2012.​1205 CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Kao CY, Aranda S, Krishnasamy M, Hamilton B (2017) Interventions to improve patient understanding of cancer clinical trial participation: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 26:e12424. doi:10.1111/ecc.12424 CrossRef Kao CY, Aranda S, Krishnasamy M, Hamilton B (2017) Interventions to improve patient understanding of cancer clinical trial participation: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 26:e12424. doi:10.​1111/​ecc.​12424 CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
What advanced cancer patients with limited treatment options know about clinical research: a qualitative study
verfasst von
Sarah B. Garrett
Christopher J. Koenig
Laura Trupin
Fay J. Hlubocky
Christopher K. Daugherty
Anne Reinert
Pamela Munster
Daniel Dohan
Publikationsdatum
09.05.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3734-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2017

Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.