Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 1/2018

25.07.2017 | Original Article

A randomized phase II trial of geriatric assessment and management for older cancer patients

verfasst von: Martine T. E. Puts, Schroder Sattar, Michael Kulik, Mary Ellen MacDonald, Kara McWatters, Katherine Lee, Sarah Brennenstuhl, Raymond Jang, Eitan Amir, Monika K. Krzyzanowska, Anthony M. Joshua, Johanne Monette, Doreen Wan-Chow-Wah, Shabbir M. H. Alibhai

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Geriatric assessment and management (GAM) can identify current health issues and recommend interventions to optimize well-being of older adults, but no randomized trial has yet been completed in oncology. Therefore, a randomized phase 2 trial was conducted.

Methods

A two-group parallel single-blinded randomized phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.​gov Identifier: NCT02222259) enrolled patients aged ≥70 years, diagnosed with stage 2–4 gastrointestinal, genitourinary, or breast cancer within 6 weeks of commencing chemotherapy at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. The coprimary feasibility outcomes were the proportion of eligible patients enrolled and retained. The coprimary clinical outcomes were quality of life (QOL) (EORTC QLQ C30) and modification of cancer treatment. Descriptive and regression analyses using intent-to-treat analysis were conducted.

Results

Sixty-one persons (64%) agreed to participate (31 allocated to intervention arm and 30 to control group). In the control group, more participants died and refused follow-up. The benefit of intervention over control on QOL at 3 months was greater for those who survived 6 months (difference 9.28; 95% CI −10.35 to 28.91) versus those who survived only 3 months (difference 6.55; 95% CI −9.63 to 22.73).

Conclusions

This trial showed that it was feasible to recruit and retain older adults for a GAM study. Those who survived at least 6 months seemed to receive a greater QOL benefit than those who died or withdrew.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M et al (2012) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M et al (2012) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Santoni G, Angleman S, Welmer AK, Mangialasche F, Marengoni A, Fratiglioni L (2015) Age-related variation in health status after age 60. PLoS One 10(3):e0120077CrossRef Santoni G, Angleman S, Welmer AK, Mangialasche F, Marengoni A, Fratiglioni L (2015) Age-related variation in health status after age 60. PLoS One 10(3):e0120077CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wildiers H, Heeren P, Puts M et al (2014) International Society of Geriatric Oncology consensus on geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 32(24):2595–2603CrossRef Wildiers H, Heeren P, Puts M et al (2014) International Society of Geriatric Oncology consensus on geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 32(24):2595–2603CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurria A, Wildes T, Baumgartner J, et al. (2016) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Older Adult Oncology. Version 1.2016. NCCN Hurria A, Wildes T, Baumgartner J, et al. (2016) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Older Adult Oncology. Version 1.2016. NCCN
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pallis AG, Fortpied C, Wedding U et al (2010) EORTC elderly task force position paper: approach to the older cancer patient. Eur J Cancer 46(9):1502–1513CrossRef Pallis AG, Fortpied C, Wedding U et al (2010) EORTC elderly task force position paper: approach to the older cancer patient. Eur J Cancer 46(9):1502–1513CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fillenbaum GG, Smyer MA (1981) The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire. J Gerontol 36(4):428–434CrossRef Fillenbaum GG, Smyer MA (1981) The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire. J Gerontol 36(4):428–434CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergman H, Ferrucci L, Guralnik J et al (2007) Frailty: an emerging research and clinical paradigm—issues and controversies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 62(7):731–737CrossRef Bergman H, Ferrucci L, Guralnik J et al (2007) Frailty: an emerging research and clinical paradigm—issues and controversies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 62(7):731–737CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(3):M146–M156CrossRef Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(3):M146–M156CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Puts MT, Monette J, Girre V et al (2011) Are frailty markers useful for predicting treatment toxicity and mortality in older newly diagnosed cancer patients? Results from a prospective pilot study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 78(2):138–149CrossRef Puts MT, Monette J, Girre V et al (2011) Are frailty markers useful for predicting treatment toxicity and mortality in older newly diagnosed cancer patients? Results from a prospective pilot study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 78(2):138–149CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Puts MT, Monette J, Girre V et al (2010) Does frailty predict hospitalization, emergency department visits, and visits to the general practitioner in older newly-diagnosed cancer patients? Results of a prospective pilot study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 76(2):142–151CrossRef Puts MT, Monette J, Girre V et al (2010) Does frailty predict hospitalization, emergency department visits, and visits to the general practitioner in older newly-diagnosed cancer patients? Results of a prospective pilot study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 76(2):142–151CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M, Vitaliano P, Dokmak A (2000) The mini-cog: a cognitive ‘vital signs’ measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 15(11):1021–1027CrossRef Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M, Vitaliano P, Dokmak A (2000) The mini-cog: a cognitive ‘vital signs’ measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 15(11):1021–1027CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L et al (1994) A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 49(2):M85–M94CrossRef Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L et al (1994) A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 49(2):M85–M94CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7(2):6–9CrossRef Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7(2):6–9CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB (2001) The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 16(9):606–613CrossRef Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB (2001) The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 16(9):606–613CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurria A, Togawa K, Mohile SG et al (2011) Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 29(25):3457–3465CrossRef Hurria A, Togawa K, Mohile SG et al (2011) Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 29(25):3457–3465CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R et al (2010) A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol 10:1CrossRef Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R et al (2010) A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol 10:1CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(5):365–376CrossRef Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(5):365–376CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K et al (2001) The EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussel Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K et al (2001) The EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussel
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Osoba D, Bezjak A, Brundage M, Zee B, Tu D, Pater J (2005) Analysis and interpretation of health-related quality-of-life data from clinical trials: basic approach of The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Eur J Cancer 41(2):280–287CrossRef Osoba D, Bezjak A, Brundage M, Zee B, Tu D, Pater J (2005) Analysis and interpretation of health-related quality-of-life data from clinical trials: basic approach of The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Eur J Cancer 41(2):280–287CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Horgan AM, Leighl NB, Coate L et al (2012) Impact and feasibility of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in the oncology setting: a pilot study. Am J Clin Oncol 35(4):322–328CrossRef Horgan AM, Leighl NB, Coate L et al (2012) Impact and feasibility of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in the oncology setting: a pilot study. Am J Clin Oncol 35(4):322–328CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Saliba D, Elliott M, Rubenstein LZ et al (2001) The Vulnerable Elders Survey: a tool for identifying vulnerable older people in the community. J Am Geriatr Soc 49(12):1691–1699CrossRef Saliba D, Elliott M, Rubenstein LZ et al (2001) The Vulnerable Elders Survey: a tool for identifying vulnerable older people in the community. J Am Geriatr Soc 49(12):1691–1699CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sim J, Lewis M (2012) The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol 65(3):301–308CrossRef Sim J, Lewis M (2012) The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol 65(3):301–308CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Feeley N, Cossette S, Cote J et al (2009) The importance of piloting an RCT intervention. Can J Nurs Res 41(2):85–99PubMed Feeley N, Cossette S, Cote J et al (2009) The importance of piloting an RCT intervention. Can J Nurs Res 41(2):85–99PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hertzog MA (2008) Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Res Nurs Health 31(2):180–191CrossRef Hertzog MA (2008) Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Res Nurs Health 31(2):180–191CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Muthen B, Asparouhov T, Hunter AM, Leuchter AF (2011) Growth modeling with nonignorable dropout: alternative analyses of the STAR*D antidepressant trial. Psychol Methods 16(1):17–33CrossRef Muthen B, Asparouhov T, Hunter AM, Leuchter AF (2011) Growth modeling with nonignorable dropout: alternative analyses of the STAR*D antidepressant trial. Psychol Methods 16(1):17–33CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Muthen LK, Muthen BO (2009) Mplus user’s guide, Fifth edn. Muthen & Muthen, Los Angeles Muthen LK, Muthen BO (2009) Mplus user’s guide, Fifth edn. Muthen & Muthen, Los Angeles
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Puts MT, Monette J, Girre V et al (2009) Participation of older newly-diagnosed cancer patients in an observational prospective pilot study: an example of recruitment and retention. BMC Cancer 9:277CrossRef Puts MT, Monette J, Girre V et al (2009) Participation of older newly-diagnosed cancer patients in an observational prospective pilot study: an example of recruitment and retention. BMC Cancer 9:277CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Puts MT, Santos B, Hardt J et al (2014) An update on a systematic review of the use of geriatric assessment for older adults in oncology. Ann Oncol 25(2):307–315CrossRef Puts MT, Santos B, Hardt J et al (2014) An update on a systematic review of the use of geriatric assessment for older adults in oncology. Ann Oncol 25(2):307–315CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamaker ME, Schiphorst AH, ten Bokkel HD, Schaar C, van Munster BC (2014) The effect of a geriatric evaluation on treatment decisions for older cancer patients—a systematic review. Acta Oncol 53(3):289–296CrossRef Hamaker ME, Schiphorst AH, ten Bokkel HD, Schaar C, van Munster BC (2014) The effect of a geriatric evaluation on treatment decisions for older cancer patients—a systematic review. Acta Oncol 53(3):289–296CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Puts MT, Hardt J, Monette J, Girre V, Springall E, Alibhai SM (2012) Use of geriatric assessment for older adults in the oncology setting: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 104(15):1134–1164CrossRef Puts MT, Hardt J, Monette J, Girre V, Springall E, Alibhai SM (2012) Use of geriatric assessment for older adults in the oncology setting: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 104(15):1134–1164CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A randomized phase II trial of geriatric assessment and management for older cancer patients
verfasst von
Martine T. E. Puts
Schroder Sattar
Michael Kulik
Mary Ellen MacDonald
Kara McWatters
Katherine Lee
Sarah Brennenstuhl
Raymond Jang
Eitan Amir
Monika K. Krzyzanowska
Anthony M. Joshua
Johanne Monette
Doreen Wan-Chow-Wah
Shabbir M. H. Alibhai
Publikationsdatum
25.07.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3820-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Supportive Care in Cancer 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.