Introduction
Gastric cancer (GC) is a major cause of cancer mortality worldwide, and its early detection and endoscopic resection are essential for reducing the incidences of invasion and metastasis and improving survival. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc and histologically complete resection with no restriction on lesion size [
1‐
4]. Although this approach minimizes the recurrence rate and preserves the entire stomach and the patient’s quality of life, metachronous GC develops in the remnant stomach in about 10–20 % of patients after curative ESD [
5‐
7]. Consequently, assessing the risk of metachronous GC after ESD is extremely important for early detection of subsequent GC and reduction of mortality.
Helicobacter pylori (
H. pylori) infection plays an important role in gastric carcinogenesis [
8]. GCs are thought to arise from
H. pylori-related gastritis, and the severe mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia it causes are associated with the development of metachronous GC. Correspondingly, eradicating
H. pylori after ESD reduces the likelihood of metachronous GC [
9]. However, the individuals at high risk of developing metachronous GC cannot be predicted based on clinicopathological findings, including
H. pylori status. Thus, identification of a molecular marker useful for predicting the risk of metachronous GC would be highly desirable.
Epigenetic alterations such as DNA methylation play a key role during gastric carcinogenesis [
10,
11]. For example, DNA methylation is known to silence a variety of genes involved in cell-cycle control, apoptosis, cell signaling and DNA repair in GC [
10,
12]. Earlier reports have shown that
H. pylori infection induces methylation of tumor suppressor and other tumor-related genes in the noncancerous gastric mucosa, suggesting aberrant DNA methylation is an early event during gastric carcinogenesis [
13]. We and others previously demonstrated that the level of DNA methylation of tumor suppressor genes is increased in cases of gastritis that are at epidemiologically high risk for developing GC and in the background noncancerous gastric mucosa in GC [
14‐
16]. In addition, we previously reported that the level of
miR-
34b/c gene methylation is significantly higher in noncancerous gastric mucosa from patients with multiple GCs than in those with a single GC or in
H. pylori-positive healthy individuals [
17]. These results suggest DNA methylation in noncancerous gastric mucosa may be a useful biomarker for evaluating the risk of metachronous GC after ESD.
Our aim in the present study was to assess the clinical utility of DNA methylation in the noncancerous gastric mucosa as a marker of the risk of metachronous GC. Our approach was to perform a prospective study in a cohort of GC patients who underwent curative ESD.
Discussion
Surveillance of patients after ESD has important implications for early detection and treatment of metachronous GC. Although eradication of
H. pylori can reduce the risk of metachronous GC after endoscopic treatment of the initial GC, it does not ensure complete prevention in all patients [
7,
9]. Moreover, current diagnostic tools show patients with past
H. pylori infections to be
H. pylori-negative, and they do not receive eradication therapy. Thus, periodic endoscopy is recommended for GC patients after ESD [
7]. In an effort to establish a more effective surveillance strategy, we assessed DNA methylation in a set of candidate marker genes in noncancerous gastric mucosa, and then carried out scheduled endoscopic surveillance. This is the first prospective cohort study designed to assess the utility of DNA methylation as a predictive marker of metachronous GC risk.
The evidence collected in various studies to date shows a strong relationship between aberrant methylation of cancer-related genes in noncancerous gastric mucosa and GC risk [
16,
22‐
25]. In addition, genome-wide analyses of DNA methylation using microarray technology has shown that a larger number of genes are methylated in noncancerous gastric mucosa from GC patients than in gastric mucosa from
H. pylori-positive healthy individuals [
26,
27]. In the present study, we focused on
miR-
34b/c,
SFRP and
DKK family genes, because of the high frequency of their methylation in both GC tissue and adjacent gastric mucosa [
17,
20,
21]. That
SFRP and
DKK family genes are frequently methylated in both GC and adjacent gastric mucosa suggests the involvement of an epigenetic field defect [
20,
21].
miR-
34b/c is a putative tumor suppressor gene that acts as a downstream effector of p53 and is frequently silenced in association with CpG island hypermethylation in various malignancies [
28]. We previously showed that levels of
miR-
34b/c methylation in noncancerous gastric mucosa from patients with multiple GCs were significantly higher than in noncancerous gastric mucosa from patients with single GCs or from healthy individuals [
17].
We found that methylation of
miR-
34b/c,
SFRP2 and
DKK2 in the gastric body mucosa was strongly associated with a risk for metachronous GC, and
miR-
34b/c showed the greatest potential to serve as a predictive marker. Multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex,
H. pylori status and pathological findings revealed that
miR-
34b/c methylation and inflammation are independently associated with the development of metachronous GC. A number of studies have shown that chronic inflammation is strongly associated with aberrant DNA methylation, and one recent study also showed that the inflammatory response, not
H. pylori itself, is responsible for the altered DNA methylation in the infected stomach [
29,
30]. Consistent with those earlier findings, our study confirms the tight correlation between inflammation and aberrant DNA methylation, and shows that both inflammation and aberrant DNA methylation are independent risk factors of metachronous GC.
It also remains unclear why methylation in the gastric body strongly correlates with increased metachronous GC risk but methylation in the antrum does not. In gastritis patients, the antral mucosa generally exhibits more advanced histological features (e.g., metaplasia and atrophy) than the gastric body mucosa, though inflammation and activity are usually less severe in the antrum [
31,
32]. In this study, we observed that methylation of a number of genes was higher in the antrum than in the body (Fig.
2a, Supplementary Figures 1 and 2). In addition, pathological findings in the gastric body mucosa are more likely to reflect the degree and extent of the inflammation and activity of the gastritis than those in the antral mucosa with severe atrophy or metaplasia. An earlier study also showed that individuals with active inflammation in the gastric body (e.g., pangastritis or corpus-predominant gastritis) are at higher risk of developing GC [
8]. It is thus conceivable that aberrant methylation in the gastric body is associated an increased risk of metachronous GC.
Interestingly, we found that
miR-
34b/c methylation was also associated with metachronous GC risk in patients who underwent successful
H. pylori eradication after treatment of their GC. Similarly, while eradication of
H. pylori after endoscopic resection of early GC can reduce the risk of metachronous GC risk [
9], eradication in patients without a precancerous lesion more effectively reduces the risk of developing GC [
33,
34]. One possible reason for the development of metachronous GC, even after
H. pylori eradication, is the presence of malignant cells that cannot be detected through endoscopic examination. In addition, our results suggest that a certain amount of aberrant DNA methylation may not be reversed by eradication, and individuals with high levels of
miR-
34b/c methylation may remain at a high risk of metachronous GC.
There are several limitations to this study. First, patient samples were collected at a single institution, and the follow-up period was relatively short (average 18 months). The cumulative incidence rate for metachronous GCs increases linearly with time [
7], and we think the incidence of metachronous GCs in our study population would likely increase with a longer follow-up period. Second, the association between
miR-
34b/c methylation and GC risk in healthy individuals remains unclear because we focused on early GC patients who underwent endoscopic treatment. Thus, our findings should be validated in an independent long-term, multicenter study that includes a larger number of patients. Third, our study did not include patients who underwent
H. pylori eradication therapy prior to their diagnosis. Earlier studies suggest that levels of aberrant methylation in
H. pylori-infected noncancerous mucosa can be reduced by eradication therapy, but it is unclear how long the effect persists [
35‐
38]. Further studies will be needed to define the relation between
miR-
34b/c methylation and GC risk in patients with history of
H. pylori eradication therapy.
In summary, we observed that the level of miR-34b/c methylation in noncancerous gastric body mucosa is a useful biomarker that is predictive of the risk for metachronous GC risk after endoscopic resection. Thus, for early GC patients with elevated miR-34b/c methylation in the gastric body, more intensive and frequent follow-up endoscopy may be recommended after ESD. Our findings may greatly improve of the surveillance strategy used after ESD and contribute to the early detection of metachronous GC and a reduction in its mortality.