Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Anesthesia 4/2011

01.08.2011 | Original Article

Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40

verfasst von: Yuu Tanaka, Takafumi Wakita, Shunichi Fukuhara, Makoto Nishiwada, Satoki Inoue, Masahiko Kawaguchi, Hitoshi Furuya

Erschienen in: Journal of Anesthesia | Ausgabe 4/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The quality of recovery score QoR-40 is a recovery-specific and patient-rated questionnaire to assess the early postoperative health status of patients. However, the Japanese version of the QoR40 has not been established. The aim of this study was to validate the quality of recovery 40 Japanese version (the QoR-40J) according to the methods adopted by the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) project.

Methods

After obtaining ethics committee approval and consent, 192 general and otological surgical patients were studied. The QoR-40J was used to measure postoperative health status on day 3 and 1 month after surgery. The level of quality of life was also evaluated using a general, health-related quality of life questionnaire (Short-Form Health Survey-36 sub-scales; SF-36), at 1 month after the surgery. Psychometric analysis including the following properties: test–retest reliability, internal consistency, predictive validity, and measurement of responsiveness, was performed to validate the QoR-40J.

Results

Test–retest reliability (Spearman’s correlation coefficient) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) of the QoR-40J were 0.887 and 0.91, respectively. A significant relationship was observed between the total QoR-40J score and duration of hospitalization (r = −0.291) and between the global QoR-40J score and postoperative scores of the SF-36 sub-scales (physical function, ρ = 0.287; vital score, ρ = 0.349). The standardized mean of the QoR-40J, a measurement of responsiveness, was 0.70.

Conclusion

The results of the psychometric analysis indicated that the QoR-40J has characteristics of acceptable validity, reliability, and responsiveness in clinical practice in Japan. The QoR-40J may aid in evaluating the quality of recovery after surgery or the quality of methods of anesthesia.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84:11–5.PubMed Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84:11–5.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Troedel S, Leslie K, Irwin K, Pearce F, Ugoni A, Gillies R, Pemberton E, Dharmages S. Quality of recovery from anaesthesia in neurosurgical patients. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:1158–65.PubMedCrossRef Troedel S, Leslie K, Irwin K, Pearce F, Ugoni A, Gillies R, Pemberton E, Dharmages S. Quality of recovery from anaesthesia in neurosurgical patients. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:1158–65.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Myles PS, Hunt JO, Fletcher H, Solly R, Woodward D, Kelly S. Relation between quality of recovery in hospital and quality of life at 3 months after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:862–7.PubMedCrossRef Myles PS, Hunt JO, Fletcher H, Solly R, Woodward D, Kelly S. Relation between quality of recovery in hospital and quality of life at 3 months after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:862–7.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bost JE, Williams BA, Bottegal MT, Dang Q, Rubio DM. The 8-item short-form health survey and the physical comfort composite score of the quality of recovery 40-item scale provide the most responsive assessments of pain, physical function, and mental function during the first 4 days after ambulatory knee surgery with regional anaesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:1693–700.PubMedCrossRef Bost JE, Williams BA, Bottegal MT, Dang Q, Rubio DM. The 8-item short-form health survey and the physical comfort composite score of the quality of recovery 40-item scale provide the most responsive assessments of pain, physical function, and mental function during the first 4 days after ambulatory knee surgery with regional anaesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:1693–700.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, Leplège A, Sullivan M, Wood-Dauphinee S, Gandek B, Wagner A, Aaronson N, Bech P, Fukuhara S, Kaasa S, Ware JE Jr. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA project approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:913–23.PubMedCrossRef Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, Leplège A, Sullivan M, Wood-Dauphinee S, Gandek B, Wagner A, Aaronson N, Bech P, Fukuhara S, Kaasa S, Ware JE Jr. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA project approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:913–23.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hisao A, Kurokawa K. Translation, adaptation and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1037–44.PubMedCrossRef Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hisao A, Kurokawa K. Translation, adaptation and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1037–44.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Spector PE. Summated rating scale construction: an introduction. Sage University Paper series on quantitative application in social science, No. 82. London: SAGE Publication Inc.; 1992. Spector PE. Summated rating scale construction: an introduction. Sage University Paper series on quantitative application in social science, No. 82. London: SAGE Publication Inc.; 1992.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, Nagy A, Rubinstein A, Ponsford JL. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anaesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:83–90.PubMed Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, Nagy A, Rubinstein A, Ponsford JL. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anaesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:83–90.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz JN, Larson MG, Phillips CB, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care. 1992;30:917–25.PubMedCrossRef Katz JN, Larson MG, Phillips CB, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care. 1992;30:917–25.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
Metadaten
Titel
Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40
verfasst von
Yuu Tanaka
Takafumi Wakita
Shunichi Fukuhara
Makoto Nishiwada
Satoki Inoue
Masahiko Kawaguchi
Hitoshi Furuya
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2011
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Journal of Anesthesia / Ausgabe 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Elektronische ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-011-1151-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2011

Journal of Anesthesia 4/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.