Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 12/2007

01.12.2007 | Original Article

The reliability of the Vernon and Mior neck disability index, and its validity compared with the short form-36 health survey questionnaire

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 12/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Prospective single cohort study. To evaluate the NDI by comparison with the SF36 health Survey Questionnaire. The NDI is a simple ten-item questionnaire used to assess patients with neck pain. The SF36 measures functional ability, well being and the overall health of patients. It is used as a gold standard in health economics to assess the health utility, gain and economic impact of medical interventions. One hundred and sixty patients with neck pain attending the spinal clinic completed self-assessment questionnaires. A second questionnaire was completed in 34 patients after a period of 1–2 weeks. The internal consistency of the NDI and SF36 was calculated using Cronbach’s alpha. The test–retest reliability was assessed using the Bland and Altman method. The concurrent validity of the NDI with respect to the SF-36 was assessed using Pearson correlations. Both questionnaires showed robust internal consistency: Cronbach’s alpha for the NDI scale was acceptable (0.864, 95% confidence limits 0.825–0.894) though slightly smaller than that of the SF36. The correlations between each item of the NDI scores and the total NDI score ranged from 0.447 to 0.659, (all with P < 0.001). The test–retest reliability of the NDI was high (intra-class correlation 0.93, 95% confidence limits 0.86–0.97) and comparable with the best values found for SF36. The correlations between NDI and SF36 domains ranged from −0.45 to −0.74 (all with P < 0.001). We have shown that the NDI has good reliability and validity and that it compares well with the SF36 in the spinal surgery out patient setting.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ackelman BH, Lindgren U (2002) Validity and reliability of a modified version of the neck disability index. J Rehabil Med 34:284–287PubMedCrossRef Ackelman BH, Lindgren U (2002) Validity and reliability of a modified version of the neck disability index. J Rehabil Med 34:284–287PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (1996) Measurement error. Br Med J 313:744–746 Bland JM, Altman DG (1996) Measurement error. Br Med J 313:744–746
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (1997) Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 314:572PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1997) Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 314:572PubMed
4.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Palmer JA (2006) The reliability and construct validity of the neck disability index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine 31:598–602PubMedCrossRef Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Palmer JA (2006) The reliability and construct validity of the neck disability index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine 31:598–602PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273PubMed Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Garratt AM, Ruter DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT (1993) The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS. Br Med J 306:1440–3 Garratt AM, Ruter DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT (1993) The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS. Br Med J 306:1440–3
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Grevitt M, Khazim R, Webb JK, Mulholland R, Shepperd (1997) The short form-36 health survey questionnaire in spine surgery. Br J Bone Joint Surg 79:48–52CrossRef Grevitt M, Khazim R, Webb JK, Mulholland R, Shepperd (1997) The short form-36 health survey questionnaire in spine surgery. Br J Bone Joint Surg 79:48–52CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gruez M, Hildingsson C, Nilsson M, Toolanen G (2002) The prevalence of neck pain—a population-based study from northern Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 73:455–759CrossRef Gruez M, Hildingsson C, Nilsson M, Toolanen G (2002) The prevalence of neck pain—a population-based study from northern Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 73:455–759CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hains F, Waalen J, Mior S (1998) Psychometric properties of the neck disability index. J Manip Physiol Thera 21:75–80 Hains F, Waalen J, Mior S (1998) Psychometric properties of the neck disability index. J Manip Physiol Thera 21:75–80
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hermann KM, Reese CS (2001) Relationships among selected measures of impairment, functional limitation, and disability in patients with cervical spine disorders. Phys Ther 81:903–914PubMed Hermann KM, Reese CS (2001) Relationships among selected measures of impairment, functional limitation, and disability in patients with cervical spine disorders. Phys Ther 81:903–914PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoving JL, O’Leary EF, Niere KR, Green S, Buchbinder R (2003) Validity of the neck disability index, Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire, and problem elicitation technique for measuring disability associated with whiplash-associated disorders. Pain 102:273–281PubMedCrossRef Hoving JL, O’Leary EF, Niere KR, Green S, Buchbinder R (2003) Validity of the neck disability index, Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire, and problem elicitation technique for measuring disability associated with whiplash-associated disorders. Pain 102:273–281PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L (1993) Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. Br Med J 306:1437–1440CrossRef Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L (1993) Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. Br Med J 306:1437–1440CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jenkinson C, Layte R, Wright L, Coulter A (2006) The UK SF-36: An analysis and interpretation manual. Health Services Research Unit, University of Oxford March 2006 Jenkinson C, Layte R, Wright L, Coulter A (2006) The UK SF-36: An analysis and interpretation manual. Health Services Research Unit, University of Oxford March 2006
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jette DU, Jette AM (1996) Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with spinal impairments. Phys Ther 76:930–941PubMed Jette DU, Jette AM (1996) Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with spinal impairments. Phys Ther 76:930–941PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Korthals-de Bos IB, Hoving JL, van Tulder MW, Rutten-van Molken MP, Ader HJ, de Vet HC, Koes BW, Vondeling H, Bouter LM (2003) Cost effectiveness of physiotherapy, manual therapy, and general practitioner care for neck pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 326:911PubMedCrossRef Korthals-de Bos IB, Hoving JL, van Tulder MW, Rutten-van Molken MP, Ader HJ, de Vet HC, Koes BW, Vondeling H, Bouter LM (2003) Cost effectiveness of physiotherapy, manual therapy, and general practitioner care for neck pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 326:911PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, Jones EC, Warren RF (2003) A comparison of two time intervals for test–retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol 56:730–735PubMedCrossRef Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, Jones EC, Warren RF (2003) A comparison of two time intervals for test–retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol 56:730–735PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Muller U, Duetz MS, Roeder C, Greenough CG (2003) Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Eur Spine J 13:301–324 Muller U, Duetz MS, Roeder C, Greenough CG (2003) Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Eur Spine J 13:301–324
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pietrobon R, Coeytaux RR, Carey TS, Richardson WJ, DeVellis RF (2002) Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction. Spine 27:515–522PubMedCrossRef Pietrobon R, Coeytaux RR, Carey TS, Richardson WJ, DeVellis RF (2002) Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction. Spine 27:515–522PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Riddle DL, Stratford PW (1998) Use of generic versus region specific functional status measures on patients with cervical disorders. Phys Ther 78:951–963PubMed Riddle DL, Stratford PW (1998) Use of generic versus region specific functional status measures on patients with cervical disorders. Phys Ther 78:951–963PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manip Physiol Ther 14:409–415 Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manip Physiol Ther 14:409–415
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Vos CJ, Verhagen AP, Koes BW (2006) Reliability and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Neck Disability Index in patients with acute neck pain in general practice. Eur Spine J 15:1729–1736PubMedCrossRef Vos CJ, Verhagen AP, Koes BW (2006) Reliability and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Neck Disability Index in patients with acute neck pain in general practice. Eur Spine J 15:1729–1736PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat White AR, Ernst E (1999) A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of acupuncture for neck pain. Rheumatology 38:143–147PubMedCrossRef White AR, Ernst E (1999) A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of acupuncture for neck pain. Rheumatology 38:143–147PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The reliability of the Vernon and Mior neck disability index, and its validity compared with the short form-36 health survey questionnaire
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2007
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 12/2007
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0503-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2007

European Spine Journal 12/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.