Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 5/2009

01.05.2009 | Original Article

Allogenic versus autologous cancellous bone in lumbar segmental spondylodesis: a randomized prospective study

verfasst von: Michael Putzier, Patrick Strube, Julia F. Funk, Christian Gross, Hans-Joachim Mönig, Carsten Perka, Axel Pruss

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 5/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The current gold standard in lumbar fusion consists of transpedicular fixation in combination with an interbody interponate of autologous bone from iliac crest. Because of the limited availability of autologous bone as well as the still relevant donor site morbidity after iliac crest grafting the need exists for alternative grafts with a comparable outcome. Forty patients with degenerative spinal disease were treated with a monosegmental spondylodesis (ventrally, 1 PEEK-cage; dorsally, a screw and rod system), and randomly placed in two groups. In group 1, autogenous iliac crest cancellous bone was used as a cage filling. In group 2 the cages were filled with an allogenic cancellous bone graft. Following 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, the clinical outcome was determined on the basis of: the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire; patient satisfaction; patient willingness to undergo the operation again; and a visual analog scale for pain. The radiological outcome was based on both fusion rate (radiographs, computed tomography), and on the bone mineral density of the grafts. After 6 months, the X-rays of the patients in group 2 had a significantly lower rate of fusion. Aside from this, there were no further significant differences. After 12 months, radiological results showed a similar fusion rate in both groups. Donor site complications consisted of five patients with hematoma, and three patients with persistent pain in group 1. No implant complications were observed. If a bone bank is available for support and accepting the low risk of possible transmission of infectious diseases, freeze–dried allogenic cancellous bone can be used for monosegmental spondylodeses. The results demonstrated an equivalent clinical outcome, as well as similar fusion rates following a 12-month period. This is in despite of a delayed consolidation process.
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Brantigan JW, McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Wang H, Orbegoso CM (1994) Interbody lumbar fusion using a carbon fiber cage implant versus allograft bone An investigational study in the Spanish goat. Spine 19:1437–1444 Brantigan JW, McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Wang H, Orbegoso CM (1994) Interbody lumbar fusion using a carbon fiber cage implant versus allograft bone An investigational study in the Spanish goat. Spine 19:1437–1444
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Brantigan JW, Steffee AD (1993) A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. Spine 18:2106–2107PubMedCrossRef Brantigan JW, Steffee AD (1993) A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. Spine 18:2106–2107PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Buck BE, Malinin TI, Brown MD (1989) Bone transplantation and human immunodeficiency virus. An estimate of risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Clin Orthop Relat Res 240:129–136PubMed Buck BE, Malinin TI, Brown MD (1989) Bone transplantation and human immunodeficiency virus. An estimate of risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Clin Orthop Relat Res 240:129–136PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dawson EG, Clader TJ, Bassett LW (1985) A comparison of different methods used to diagnose pseudarthrosis following posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1153–1159PubMed Dawson EG, Clader TJ, Bassett LW (1985) A comparison of different methods used to diagnose pseudarthrosis following posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1153–1159PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273PubMed Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernyhough JC, Schimandle JJ, Weigel MC, Edwards CC, Levine AM (1992) Chronic donor site pain complicating bone graft harvesting from the posterior iliac crest for spinal fusion. Spine 17:1474–1480PubMedCrossRef Fernyhough JC, Schimandle JJ, Weigel MC, Edwards CC, Levine AM (1992) Chronic donor site pain complicating bone graft harvesting from the posterior iliac crest for spinal fusion. Spine 17:1474–1480PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hahnel H, Muschik M, Zippel H, Gutsche H (1991) Lumbar segmental spondylodesis-isolated ventral or combined dorsoventral? A comparison of results. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 129:197–203PubMedCrossRef Hahnel H, Muschik M, Zippel H, Gutsche H (1991) Lumbar segmental spondylodesis-isolated ventral or combined dorsoventral? A comparison of results. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 129:197–203PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hutter CG (1983) Posterior intervertebral body fusion. A 25-year study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 179:86–96PubMedCrossRef Hutter CG (1983) Posterior intervertebral body fusion. A 25-year study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 179:86–96PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kozak JA, Heilman AE, O’Brien JP (1994) Anterior lumbar fusion options. Technique and graft materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 300:45–51PubMed Kozak JA, Heilman AE, O’Brien JP (1994) Anterior lumbar fusion options. Technique and graft materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 300:45–51PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lund T, Oxland TR, Jost B, Cripton P, Grassmann S, Etter C, Nolte LP (1998) Interbody cage stabilisation in the lumbar spine: biomechanical evaluation of cage design, posterior instrumentation and bone density. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:351–359. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.80B2.7693 PubMedCrossRef Lund T, Oxland TR, Jost B, Cripton P, Grassmann S, Etter C, Nolte LP (1998) Interbody cage stabilisation in the lumbar spine: biomechanical evaluation of cage design, posterior instrumentation and bone density. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:351–359. doi:10.​1302/​0301-620X.​80B2.​7693 PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Malanin TI (1992) Bone Grafts and Bone Substitutes. In: Habal MB, Reddi AH (eds) Acquisition and banking of bone allografts. WB Saunders, Philadelphia Malanin TI (1992) Bone Grafts and Bone Substitutes. In: Habal MB, Reddi AH (eds) Acquisition and banking of bone allografts. WB Saunders, Philadelphia
24.
Zurück zum Zitat McAfee PC, Boden SD, Brantigan JW, Fraser RD, Kuslich SD, Oxland TR, Panjabi MM, Ray CD, Zdeblick TA (2001) Symposium: a critical discrepancy-a criteria of successful arthrodesis following interbody spinal fusions. Spine 26:320–334. doi:10.1097/00007632-200102010-00020 PubMedCrossRef McAfee PC, Boden SD, Brantigan JW, Fraser RD, Kuslich SD, Oxland TR, Panjabi MM, Ray CD, Zdeblick TA (2001) Symposium: a critical discrepancy-a criteria of successful arthrodesis following interbody spinal fusions. Spine 26:320–334. doi:10.​1097/​00007632-200102010-00020 PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS, Carter JR (1988) Imaging of degenerative disk disease. Radiology 168:177–186PubMed Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS, Carter JR (1988) Imaging of degenerative disk disease. Radiology 168:177–186PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Muschler G, Lane J, Dawson E (1990) The biology of spinal fusion. In: Cotler J, Cotler H (eds) Spinal fusion, science and technique. Springer, Heidelberg Muschler G, Lane J, Dawson E (1990) The biology of spinal fusion. In: Cotler J, Cotler H (eds) Spinal fusion, science and technique. Springer, Heidelberg
28.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Pelker RR, Friedlaender GE (1987) Biomechanical aspects of bone autografts and allografts. Orthop Clin North Am 18:235–239PubMed Pelker RR, Friedlaender GE (1987) Biomechanical aspects of bone autografts and allografts. Orthop Clin North Am 18:235–239PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Pruss A, Baumann B, Seibold M, Kao M, Tintelnot K, von Versen R, Radtke H, Dörner T, Pauli G, Göbel UB (2001) Validation of the sterilization procedure of allogeneic avital bone transplants using peracetic acid-ethanol. Biologicals 29:59–66. doi:10.1006/biol.2001.0286 PubMedCrossRef Pruss A, Baumann B, Seibold M, Kao M, Tintelnot K, von Versen R, Radtke H, Dörner T, Pauli G, Göbel UB (2001) Validation of the sterilization procedure of allogeneic avital bone transplants using peracetic acid-ethanol. Biologicals 29:59–66. doi:10.​1006/​biol.​2001.​0286 PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Putzier M, Funk JF, Schneider SV, Gross C, Tohtz SW, Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, Perka C, Kandziora F (2006) Charite total disc replacement–clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J 15:183–195. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-1022-3 PubMedCrossRef Putzier M, Funk JF, Schneider SV, Gross C, Tohtz SW, Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, Perka C, Kandziora F (2006) Charite total disc replacement–clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J 15:183–195. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-005-1022-3 PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Simmons JW (1985) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior elements as chip grafts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 193:85–89PubMed Simmons JW (1985) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior elements as chip grafts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 193:85–89PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Videbaek TS, Christensen FB, Soegaard R, Hansen ES, Hoy K, Helmig P, Niedermann B, Eiskjoer SP, Bunger CE (2006) Circumferential fusion improves outcome in comparison with instrumented posterolateral fusion: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine 31:2875–2880. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000247793.99827.b7 PubMedCrossRef Videbaek TS, Christensen FB, Soegaard R, Hansen ES, Hoy K, Helmig P, Niedermann B, Eiskjoer SP, Bunger CE (2006) Circumferential fusion improves outcome in comparison with instrumented posterolateral fusion: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine 31:2875–2880. doi:10.​1097/​01.​brs.​0000247793.​99827.​b7 PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams AL, Gornet MF, Burkus JK (2005) CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: current concepts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:2057–2066PubMed Williams AL, Gornet MF, Burkus JK (2005) CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: current concepts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:2057–2066PubMed
37.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Xue Q, Li H, Zou X, Bunger M, Egund N, Lind M, Christensen FB, Bunger C (2005) Healing properties of allograft from alendronate-treated animal in lumbar spine interbody cage fusion. Eur Spine J 14:222–226. doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0771-8 PubMedCrossRef Xue Q, Li H, Zou X, Bunger M, Egund N, Lind M, Christensen FB, Bunger C (2005) Healing properties of allograft from alendronate-treated animal in lumbar spine interbody cage fusion. Eur Spine J 14:222–226. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-004-0771-8 PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Zelle B, Konig F, Enderle A, Bertagnoli R, Dorner J (2002) Circumferential fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine using a carbon fiber ALIF cage implant versus autogenous bone graft: a comparative study. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:376–379 Zelle B, Konig F, Enderle A, Bertagnoli R, Dorner J (2002) Circumferential fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine using a carbon fiber ALIF cage implant versus autogenous bone graft: a comparative study. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:376–379
Metadaten
Titel
Allogenic versus autologous cancellous bone in lumbar segmental spondylodesis: a randomized prospective study
verfasst von
Michael Putzier
Patrick Strube
Julia F. Funk
Christian Gross
Hans-Joachim Mönig
Carsten Perka
Axel Pruss
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 5/2009
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0875-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2009

European Spine Journal 5/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.