Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 1/2009

01.06.2009 | Original Article

Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art

verfasst von: P. Stradiotti, A. Curti, G. Castellazzi, A. Zerbi

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Sonderheft 1/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The projectional nature of radiogram limits its amount of information about the instrumented spine. MRI and CT imaging can be more helpful, using cross-sectional view. However, the presence of metal-related artifacts at both conventional CT and MRI imaging can obscure relevant anatomy and disease. We reviewed the literature about overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopaedic implants at high-field strength MRI imaging and multi-detector CT. The evolution of multichannel CT has made available new techniques that can help minimizing the severe beam-hardening artifacts. The presence of artifacts at CT from metal hardware is related to image reconstruction algorithm (filter), tube current (in mA), X-ray kilovolt peak, pitch, hardware composition, geometry (shape), and location. MRI imaging has been used safely in patients with orthopaedic metallic implants because most of these implants do not have ferromagnetic properties and have been fixed into position. However, on MRI imaging metallic implants may produce geometric distortion, the so-called susceptibility artifact. In conclusion, although 140 kV and high milliamperage second exposures are recommended for imaging patients with hardware, caution should always be exercised, particularly in children, young adults, and patients undergoing multiple examinations. MRI artifacts can be minimized by positioning optimally and correctly the examined anatomy part with metallic implants in the magnet and by choosing fast spin-echo sequences, and in some cases also STIR sequences, with an anterior to posterior frequency-encoding direction and the smallest voxel size.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat White LM, Buckwalter KA (2002) Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 6:5–17PubMedCrossRef White LM, Buckwalter KA (2002) Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 6:5–17PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrett JF, Keat N (2004) Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. RadioGraphics 24:1679–1691PubMedCrossRef Barrett JF, Keat N (2004) Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. RadioGraphics 24:1679–1691PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Yazdi M, Gingras L, Beaulieu L (2005) An adaptive approach to metal artifact reduction in helical computed tomography for radiation therapy treatment planning: experimental and clinical studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:1224–1231PubMed Yazdi M, Gingras L, Beaulieu L (2005) An adaptive approach to metal artifact reduction in helical computed tomography for radiation therapy treatment planning: experimental and clinical studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:1224–1231PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee MF, Kim S, Lee SA et al (2007) Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength mr imaging and multidetector CT. RadioGraphics 27:791–803PubMedCrossRef Lee MF, Kim S, Lee SA et al (2007) Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength mr imaging and multidetector CT. RadioGraphics 27:791–803PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Douglas-Akinwande AC, Buckwalter KA, Rydberg J et al (2006) Multichannel CT: evaluating the spine in postoperative patients with orthopaedic hardware. RadioGraphics 26:S97–S110PubMedCrossRef Douglas-Akinwande AC, Buckwalter KA, Rydberg J et al (2006) Multichannel CT: evaluating the spine in postoperative patients with orthopaedic hardware. RadioGraphics 26:S97–S110PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson DD, Weiss PJ, Fishman EK et al (1988) Evaluation of CT techniques for reducing artifacts in the presence of metallic orthopaedic implants. J Comput Assist Tomogr 12:236–241PubMedCrossRef Robertson DD, Weiss PJ, Fishman EK et al (1988) Evaluation of CT techniques for reducing artifacts in the presence of metallic orthopaedic implants. J Comput Assist Tomogr 12:236–241PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat White LM, Buckwalter KA (2002) Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 6:5–17PubMedCrossRef White LM, Buckwalter KA (2002) Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 6:5–17PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson DD, Magid D, Poss R, Fishman EK et al (1989) Enhanced computed tomographic techniques for the evaluation of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 4:271–276PubMedCrossRef Robertson DD, Magid D, Poss R, Fishman EK et al (1989) Enhanced computed tomographic techniques for the evaluation of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 4:271–276PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Haramati N, Staron RB, Mazel-Sperling K et al (1994) CT scans through metal scanning technique versus hardware composition. Comput Med Imaging Graph 18:429–434PubMedCrossRef Haramati N, Staron RB, Mazel-Sperling K et al (1994) CT scans through metal scanning technique versus hardware composition. Comput Med Imaging Graph 18:429–434PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang JC, Yu WD, Sandhu HS et al (1998) A comparison of magnetic resonance and computed tomographic image quality after the implantation of tantalum and titanium spinal instrumentation. Spine 23:1684–1688PubMedCrossRef Wang JC, Yu WD, Sandhu HS et al (1998) A comparison of magnetic resonance and computed tomographic image quality after the implantation of tantalum and titanium spinal instrumentation. Spine 23:1684–1688PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohashi K, El-Khoury GY, Bennett DL et al (2005) Orthopedic hardware complication diagnosed with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 237:570–577PubMedCrossRef Ohashi K, El-Khoury GY, Bennett DL et al (2005) Orthopedic hardware complication diagnosed with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 237:570–577PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lorenzen M, Wedegartner U, Weber C et al (2005) Clinical relevance of multislice CT of the spine after osteosynthesis. Rofo 177(11):1540–1544PubMed Lorenzen M, Wedegartner U, Weber C et al (2005) Clinical relevance of multislice CT of the spine after osteosynthesis. Rofo 177(11):1540–1544PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Schroder RJ, Noor J, Pflugmacher R et al (2004) Short-term CT findings after osteosynthesis of fractures of the vertebral spine. Rofo 176(5):694–703PubMed Schroder RJ, Noor J, Pflugmacher R et al (2004) Short-term CT findings after osteosynthesis of fractures of the vertebral spine. Rofo 176(5):694–703PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Viano AM, Gronemeyer SA, Haliloglu M et al (2000) Improved MR imaging for patients with metallic implants. Magn Reson Imaging 18:287–295PubMedCrossRef Viano AM, Gronemeyer SA, Haliloglu M et al (2000) Improved MR imaging for patients with metallic implants. Magn Reson Imaging 18:287–295PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ludeke KM, Roschmann P, Tischler R (1985) Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 3:329–343PubMedCrossRef Ludeke KM, Roschmann P, Tischler R (1985) Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 3:329–343PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris CA, White LM (2006) Metal artifact reduction in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging. Orthop Clin N Am 37:349–359CrossRef Harris CA, White LM (2006) Metal artifact reduction in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging. Orthop Clin N Am 37:349–359CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hassfeld S (2005) Artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental material. MAGMA 18:103–111PubMedCrossRef Hassfeld S (2005) Artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental material. MAGMA 18:103–111PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Suh JS, Jeong EK, Shin KH et al (1998) Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1207–1213PubMed Suh JS, Jeong EK, Shin KH et al (1998) Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1207–1213PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganapathi M, Joseph J, Savage R et al (2002) MRI susceptibility artefacts related to scaphoid screws: effect of screw type, screw orientation and imaging parameters. J Hand Surg Br 27:165–170PubMedCrossRef Ganapathi M, Joseph J, Savage R et al (2002) MRI susceptibility artefacts related to scaphoid screws: effect of screw type, screw orientation and imaging parameters. J Hand Surg Br 27:165–170PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Guermazi A, Miaux Y, Zaim S et al (2003) Metallic artefacts in MR imaging: effects of main field orientation and strength. Clin Radiol 58:322–328PubMedCrossRef Guermazi A, Miaux Y, Zaim S et al (2003) Metallic artefacts in MR imaging: effects of main field orientation and strength. Clin Radiol 58:322–328PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mueller PR, Stark DD, Simeone JF et al (1986) MR guided aspiration biopsy: needle design and clinical trials. Radiology 161:605–609PubMed Mueller PR, Stark DD, Simeone JF et al (1986) MR guided aspiration biopsy: needle design and clinical trials. Radiology 161:605–609PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Wendt RE, Wicott MR, Nitz W et al (1988) MR imaging of susceptibility-induced magnetic field inhomogeneities. Radiology 168:837–841PubMed Wendt RE, Wicott MR, Nitz W et al (1988) MR imaging of susceptibility-induced magnetic field inhomogeneities. Radiology 168:837–841PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat White LM, Kim JK, Mehta M et al (2000) Complication of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging initial experience. Radiology 215:254–262PubMed White LM, Kim JK, Mehta M et al (2000) Complication of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging initial experience. Radiology 215:254–262PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Port JD, Pomper MG (2000) Quantification and minimization of magnetic susceptibility artifacts on GRE images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:958–964CrossRef Port JD, Pomper MG (2000) Quantification and minimization of magnetic susceptibility artifacts on GRE images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:958–964CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterslige CA, Lewin JS, Duerk JL et al (1996) Optimizing imaging parameters for MR evaluation of the spine with titanium pedicle screws. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:1213–1218 Peterslige CA, Lewin JS, Duerk JL et al (1996) Optimizing imaging parameters for MR evaluation of the spine with titanium pedicle screws. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:1213–1218
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bakker CJG, Bhagwandien R, Moerland MA et al (1993) Susceptibility artifacts in 2DFT spin-echo imaging: the cylinder model revisited. Magn Reson Imaging 11:539–548PubMedCrossRef Bakker CJG, Bhagwandien R, Moerland MA et al (1993) Susceptibility artifacts in 2DFT spin-echo imaging: the cylinder model revisited. Magn Reson Imaging 11:539–548PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Schenck JF (1996) The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 23:815–850PubMedCrossRef Schenck JF (1996) The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 23:815–850PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Frazzini VI, Kagetsu Nk, Johnson CE et al (1997) Internally stabilized spine: optimal choice of frequency-encoding gradient direction during MR imaging minimizes susceptibility artifact from titanium vertebral body screws. Radiology 204:268–272PubMed Frazzini VI, Kagetsu Nk, Johnson CE et al (1997) Internally stabilized spine: optimal choice of frequency-encoding gradient direction during MR imaging minimizes susceptibility artifact from titanium vertebral body screws. Radiology 204:268–272PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Tartaglino LM, Flanders AE, Vitinski S et al (1994) Metallic artifacts on MR images of the postoperative spine: reduction with fast spin-echo techniques. Radiology 190:565–569PubMed Tartaglino LM, Flanders AE, Vitinski S et al (1994) Metallic artifacts on MR images of the postoperative spine: reduction with fast spin-echo techniques. Radiology 190:565–569PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilfiker P, Zanetti M, Debatin JF et al (1995) Fast spinecho inversion-recovery imaging versus fast spin echo imaging in bone marrow abnormalities. Invest Radiol 30:110–114PubMedCrossRef Hilfiker P, Zanetti M, Debatin JF et al (1995) Fast spinecho inversion-recovery imaging versus fast spin echo imaging in bone marrow abnormalities. Invest Radiol 30:110–114PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Czerny C, Krestan C, Imhof H et al (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative hip. Top Magn Reson Imag 10:214–220CrossRef Czerny C, Krestan C, Imhof H et al (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative hip. Top Magn Reson Imag 10:214–220CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell DG, Cohen MS (2000) Transverse magnetization and T2 contrast. In: Mitchell DG, Cohen MS (eds) MRI principles, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 35–47 Mitchell DG, Cohen MS (2000) Transverse magnetization and T2 contrast. In: Mitchell DG, Cohen MS (eds) MRI principles, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 35–47
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen RV, Munk PL, Lee MJ et al (2000) Metal artifact reduction sequence: early clinical applications. Radiographics 20:699–712PubMed Olsen RV, Munk PL, Lee MJ et al (2000) Metal artifact reduction sequence: early clinical applications. Radiographics 20:699–712PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang SD, Lee MJ, Munk PL et al (2001) MRI of spinal hardware: comparison of conventional T1-weighted sequence with a new metal artifact reduction sequence. Skeletal Radiol 20:213–218CrossRef Chang SD, Lee MJ, Munk PL et al (2001) MRI of spinal hardware: comparison of conventional T1-weighted sequence with a new metal artifact reduction sequence. Skeletal Radiol 20:213–218CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee MJ, Janzen DL, Munk PL et al (2001) Quantitative assessment of an MR technique for reducing metal artifact: application to spin-echo imaging in a phantom. Skeletal Radiol 30:398–401PubMedCrossRef Lee MJ, Janzen DL, Munk PL et al (2001) Quantitative assessment of an MR technique for reducing metal artifact: application to spin-echo imaging in a phantom. Skeletal Radiol 30:398–401PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Potter HG, Nestor BJ, Bryan J et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:1947–1954PubMed Potter HG, Nestor BJ, Bryan J et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:1947–1954PubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Suh JS, Jeong EK, Shin KH et al (1998) Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1207–1213PubMed Suh JS, Jeong EK, Shin KH et al (1998) Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1207–1213PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art
verfasst von
P. Stradiotti
A. Curti
G. Castellazzi
A. Zerbi
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe Sonderheft 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0998-5

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2009

European Spine Journal 1/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.