Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 4/2016

18.02.2016 | Original Article

Worldwide research productivity in the field of spine surgery: a 10-year bibliometric analysis

verfasst von: Meiyang Wei, Wanming Wang, Yanfeng Zhuang

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Bibliometrics is increasingly used to assess the quantity and quality of scientific research output in many research fields worldwide. However, the bibliometric studies in the field of spine surgery are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the worldwide research productivity in the field of spine surgery using bibliometric methods and to provide an insight into the spine research for surgeons and researchers.

Methods

Articles published between 2004 and 2013 were retrieved using the Scopus database in 5 spine journals, including Spine, European Spine Journal, The Spine Journal, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques. The number of articles, trend of publications, countries’ contribution and h-index, authorship, subspecialty, funding source, journal pattern, institutions, and top cited articles were analyzed.

Results

A total of 13,115 publications were identified in the database of Scopus from 2004 to 2013. The time trend of the number of articles showed a significant increase of 1.9-fold between 2004 and 2013 (p = 0.000). The largest number of articles in the field of spine surgery was from United States (39.17 %), followed by Japan (10.74 %) and China (8.62 %). United States also have the highest h-index (106), followed by Canada (60) and United Kingdom (54). China (p = 0.000) and South Korea (p = 0.000) have a significantly increasing trend of contribution proportion to the world spine production over time in years, but h-index was still low (39 and 38, respectively). Spine published the highest number of articles (45.44 %), followed by European Spine Journal (21.43 %) and Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine (13.32 %). The most productive institutions were University of California, San Francisco (1.98 %), followed by Thomas Jefferson University (1.61 %) and University of Toronto (1.41 %).

Conclusions

There has a rapid increase of scientific research productivity in the field of spine surgery during the past 10 years. United States has special contributions to the body of spine publications. China and South Korea have increasing contributions to the field of spine surgery.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Morandi G, Guido D, Tagliabue A (2015) A bibliometric study of scientific literature on the dietary therapies for epilepsy in Scopus. Nutr Neurosci 18(5):201–209CrossRefPubMed Morandi G, Guido D, Tagliabue A (2015) A bibliometric study of scientific literature on the dietary therapies for epilepsy in Scopus. Nutr Neurosci 18(5):201–209CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM (2014) Worldwide research productivity in the field of electronic cigarette: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Public Health 14:667CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM (2014) Worldwide research productivity in the field of electronic cigarette: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Public Health 14:667CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hui Z, Yi Z, Peng J (2013) Bibliometric analysis of the orthopedic literature. Orthopedics 36(10):e1225–e1232CrossRefPubMed Hui Z, Yi Z, Peng J (2013) Bibliometric analysis of the orthopedic literature. Orthopedics 36(10):e1225–e1232CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Michalopoulos A, Falagas ME (2005) A bibliometric analysis of global research production in respiratory medicine. Chest 128(6):3993–3998CrossRefPubMed Michalopoulos A, Falagas ME (2005) A bibliometric analysis of global research production in respiratory medicine. Chest 128(6):3993–3998CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hauptman JS, Chow DS, Martin NA, Itagaki MW (2011) Research productivity in neurosurgery: trends in globalization, scientific focus, and funding. J Neurosurg 115(6):1262–1272CrossRefPubMed Hauptman JS, Chow DS, Martin NA, Itagaki MW (2011) Research productivity in neurosurgery: trends in globalization, scientific focus, and funding. J Neurosurg 115(6):1262–1272CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Vergidis PI, Karavasiou AI, Paraschakis K, Bliziotis IA, Falagas ME (2005) Bibliometric analysis of global trends for research productivity in microbiology. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 24(5):342–346CrossRefPubMed Vergidis PI, Karavasiou AI, Paraschakis K, Bliziotis IA, Falagas ME (2005) Bibliometric analysis of global trends for research productivity in microbiology. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 24(5):342–346CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang WJ, Ding W, Jiang H, Zhang YF, Zhang JL (2013) National representation in the plastic and reconstructive surgery literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals. Ann Plast Surg 70(2):231–234CrossRefPubMed Zhang WJ, Ding W, Jiang H, Zhang YF, Zhang JL (2013) National representation in the plastic and reconstructive surgery literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals. Ann Plast Surg 70(2):231–234CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Li Q, Jiang Y, Zhang M (2012) National representation in the emergency medicine literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals. Am J Emerg Med 30(8):1530–1534CrossRefPubMed Li Q, Jiang Y, Zhang M (2012) National representation in the emergency medicine literature: a bibliometric analysis of highly cited journals. Am J Emerg Med 30(8):1530–1534CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng T, Zhang G (2013) Worldwide research productivity in the field of rheumatology from 1996 to 2010: a bibliometric analysis. Rheumatol (Oxford) 52(9):1630–1634CrossRef Cheng T, Zhang G (2013) Worldwide research productivity in the field of rheumatology from 1996 to 2010: a bibliometric analysis. Rheumatol (Oxford) 52(9):1630–1634CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM (2014) Worldwide research productivity of paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning: a bibliometric analysis (2003–2012). Hum Exp Toxicol 34(1):12–23CrossRefPubMed Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM (2014) Worldwide research productivity of paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning: a bibliometric analysis (2003–2012). Hum Exp Toxicol 34(1):12–23CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Thornton K, Lee DJ, Yuan JC, Knoernschild KL, Campbell SD, Sukotjo C (2012) An analysis of prosthodontic research productivity: geographic, economic, and collaborative perspective. J Prosthodont 21(1):73–78CrossRefPubMed Thornton K, Lee DJ, Yuan JC, Knoernschild KL, Campbell SD, Sukotjo C (2012) An analysis of prosthodontic research productivity: geographic, economic, and collaborative perspective. J Prosthodont 21(1):73–78CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen HL, Cai DY, Shen WQ, Liu P (2010) Bibliometric analysis of pressure ulcer research: 1990–2009. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 37(6):627–632CrossRefPubMed Chen HL, Cai DY, Shen WQ, Liu P (2010) Bibliometric analysis of pressure ulcer research: 1990–2009. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 37(6):627–632CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jamshidi AR, Gharibdoost F, Nadji A, Nikou M, Habibi G, Mardani A, Ghaemi M (2013) Presentation of psoriatic arthritis in the literature: a twenty-year bibliometric evaluation. Rheumatol Int 33(2):361–367CrossRefPubMed Jamshidi AR, Gharibdoost F, Nadji A, Nikou M, Habibi G, Mardani A, Ghaemi M (2013) Presentation of psoriatic arthritis in the literature: a twenty-year bibliometric evaluation. Rheumatol Int 33(2):361–367CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandes CH, Meirelles LM, Raduan Neto J, dos Santos JB, Faloppa F, Albertoni WM (2012) Characteristics of global publications about wrist arthroscopy: a bibliometric analysis. Hand Surg 17(3):311–315CrossRefPubMed Fernandes CH, Meirelles LM, Raduan Neto J, dos Santos JB, Faloppa F, Albertoni WM (2012) Characteristics of global publications about wrist arthroscopy: a bibliometric analysis. Hand Surg 17(3):311–315CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mao Z, Wang G, Mei X, Chen S, Liu X, Zeng X, Long A, Zhang L, Tang P (2014) Systematic reviews on reports of hip fractures in Web of Science: a bibliometric analysis of publication activity. Chin Med J (Engl) 127(13):2518–2522 Mao Z, Wang G, Mei X, Chen S, Liu X, Zeng X, Long A, Zhang L, Tang P (2014) Systematic reviews on reports of hip fractures in Web of Science: a bibliometric analysis of publication activity. Chin Med J (Engl) 127(13):2518–2522
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM (2014) Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on waterpipe (narghile, shisha, hookah) tobacco smoking during the period 2003–2012. Tob Induc Dis 12(1):7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM (2014) Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on waterpipe (narghile, shisha, hookah) tobacco smoking during the period 2003–2012. Tob Induc Dis 12(1):7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G (2008) Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 22(2):338–342CrossRefPubMed Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G (2008) Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 22(2):338–342CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Camp M, Escott BG (2013) Authorship proliferation in the orthopaedic literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(7):e44CrossRefPubMed Camp M, Escott BG (2013) Authorship proliferation in the orthopaedic literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(7):e44CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lynch JR, Cunningham MR, Warme WJ, Schaad DC, Wolf FM, Leopold SS (2007) Commercially funded and United States-based research is more likely to be published; good-quality studies with negative outcomes are not. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(5):1010–1018CrossRefPubMed Lynch JR, Cunningham MR, Warme WJ, Schaad DC, Wolf FM, Leopold SS (2007) Commercially funded and United States-based research is more likely to be published; good-quality studies with negative outcomes are not. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(5):1010–1018CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pagel PS, Hudetz JA (2012) Recent trends in publication of basic science and clinical research by United States investigators in anesthesia journals. BMC Anesthesiol 12:5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pagel PS, Hudetz JA (2012) Recent trends in publication of basic science and clinical research by United States investigators in anesthesia journals. BMC Anesthesiol 12:5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Nie YX, Guo J, Knight DJ, Porter DE (2011) Orthopaedics in China. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(9):1145–1148CrossRefPubMed Nie YX, Guo J, Knight DJ, Porter DE (2011) Orthopaedics in China. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(9):1145–1148CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang C, Liu Q (2013) A turning point for clinical research in China? Lancet 382(9895):835–836CrossRefPubMed Wang C, Liu Q (2013) A turning point for clinical research in China? Lancet 382(9895):835–836CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat King JT Jr (2000) How many neurosurgeons does it take to write a research articles? Authorship proliferation in neurosurgical research. Neurosurgery 47(2):435–440CrossRefPubMed King JT Jr (2000) How many neurosurgeons does it take to write a research articles? Authorship proliferation in neurosurgical research. Neurosurgery 47(2):435–440CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Modi P, Hassan A, Teng CJ, Chitwood WR Jr (2008) “How many cardiac surgeons does it take to write a research article?” Seventy years of authorship proliferation and internationalization in the cardiothoracic surgical literature. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136(1):4–6CrossRefPubMed Modi P, Hassan A, Teng CJ, Chitwood WR Jr (2008) “How many cardiac surgeons does it take to write a research article?” Seventy years of authorship proliferation and internationalization in the cardiothoracic surgical literature. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136(1):4–6CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Jia Z, Wu Y, Tang Y, Ji W, Li W, Zhao X, Li H, He Q, Ruan D (2015) Equal contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship in major spine journals during a 10-year period. Eur Spine J 4 Nov 2015 [Epub ahead of print] Jia Z, Wu Y, Tang Y, Ji W, Li W, Zhao X, Li H, He Q, Ruan D (2015) Equal contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship in major spine journals during a 10-year period. Eur Spine J 4 Nov 2015 [Epub ahead of print]
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Amiri AR, Kanesalingam K, Cro S, Casey AT (2014) Does source of funding and conflict of interest influence the outcome and quality of spinal research? Spine J 14(2):308–314CrossRefPubMed Amiri AR, Kanesalingam K, Cro S, Casey AT (2014) Does source of funding and conflict of interest influence the outcome and quality of spinal research? Spine J 14(2):308–314CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Errico T (2010) The promethean role of industry in spine surgery research. J Spinal Disord Tech 23(8):491–492CrossRefPubMed Errico T (2010) The promethean role of industry in spine surgery research. J Spinal Disord Tech 23(8):491–492CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Worldwide research productivity in the field of spine surgery: a 10-year bibliometric analysis
verfasst von
Meiyang Wei
Wanming Wang
Yanfeng Zhuang
Publikationsdatum
18.02.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4442-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

European Spine Journal 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.