Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
European Spine Journal
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 8/2018

28.05.2018 | Review

Relationship between sagittal balance and adjacent segment disease in surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease: meta-analysis and implications for choice of fusion technique

verfasst von: Kevin Phan, Alexander Nazareth, Awais K. Hussain, Adam A. Dmytriw, Mithun Nambiar, Damian Nguyen, Jack Kerferd, Steven Phan, Chet Sutterlin III, Samuel K. Cho, Ralph J. Mobbs

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 8/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Study design

Meta-analysis.

Objective

To conduct a meta-analysis investigating the relationship between spinopelvic alignment parameters and development of adjacent level disease (ALD) following lumbar fusion for degenerative disease.

Summary of background data

ALD is a degenerative pathology that develops at mobile segments above or below fused spinal segments. Patient outcomes are worse, and the likelihood of requiring revision surgery is higher in ALD compared to patients without ALD. Spinopelvic sagittal alignment has been found to have a significant effect on outcomes post-fusion; however, studies investigating the relationship between spinopelvic sagittal alignment parameters and ALD in degenerative lumbar disease are limited.

Methods

Six e-databases were searched. Predefined endpoints were extracted and meta-analyzed from the identified studies.

Results

There was a significantly larger pre-operative PT in the ALD cohort versus control (WMD 3.99, CI 1.97–6.00, p = 0.0001), a smaller pre-operative SS (WMD − 2.74; CI − 5.14 to 0.34, p = 0.03), and a smaller pre-operative LL (WMD − 4.76; CI − 7.66 to 1.86, p = 0.001). There was a significantly larger pre-operative PI-LL in the ALD cohort (WMD 8.74; CI 3.12–14.37, p = 0.002). There was a significantly larger postoperative PI in the ALD cohort (WMD 2.08; CI 0.26–3.90, p = 0.03) and a larger postoperative PT (WMD 5.23; CI 3.18–7.27, p < 0.00001).

Conclusion

The sagittal parameters: PT, SS, PI-LL, and LL may predict development of ALD in patients’ post-lumbar fusion for degenerative disease. Decision-making aimed at correcting these parameters may decrease risk of developing ALD in this cohort.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Lotz JC, Haughton V, Boden SD et al (2012) New treatments and imaging strategies in degenerative disease of the intervertebral disks. Radiology 264:6–19CrossRefPubMed
2.
Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G et al (2015) Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg (Hong Kong) 1:2–18
3.
Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Daly D et al (2016) Approach-related complications of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: results of a combined spine and vascular surgical team. Glob Spine J 6:147–154CrossRef
4.
Phan K, Lee NJ, Kothari P et al (2016) Risk factors for readmissions following anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 43:364–369CrossRef
5.
Rao PJ, Ghent F, Phan K et al (2015) Stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Clin Neurosci 22:1619–1624CrossRefPubMed
6.
Phan K, Thayaparan GK, Mobbs RJ (2015) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion–systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Neurosurg 29:705–711CrossRefPubMed
7.
Di Capua J, Somani S, Kim JS et al (2017) Analysis of risk factors for major complications following elective posterior lumbar fusion. Spine 42:1347–1354CrossRefPubMed
8.
Lee NJ, Kothari P, Phan K et al (2016) The incidence and risk factors for 30-day unplanned readmissions after elective posterior lumbar fusion. Spine 43:41–48CrossRef
9.
Phan K, Rao PJ, Scherman DB et al (2015) Lateral lumbar interbody fusion for sagittal balance correction and spinal deformity. J Clin Neurosci 22:1714–1721CrossRefPubMed
10.
Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LE et al (2012) Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine 37:67–76CrossRefPubMed
11.
Yelin E, Weinstein S, King T (2016) The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States. Semin Arthritis Rheum 46:259–260CrossRefPubMed
12.
Davies M (2013) Where the United States Spends its Spine Dollars: expenditures on different ambulatory services for the management of back and neck conditions. Spine 37(19):1693–1701CrossRef
13.
Hilibrand AS, Robbins M (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 4:190S–194SCrossRefPubMed
14.
Yang SW, Langrana NA, Lee CK (1986) Biomechanics of lumbosacral spinal fusion in combined compression-torsion loads. Spine 11:937–941CrossRefPubMed
15.
Lee CK (1988) Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 13:375–377CrossRefPubMed
16.
Bresnahan L, Ogden AT, Natarajan RN et al (2009) A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques. Spine 34:17–23CrossRefPubMed
17.
Regev GJ, Lee YP, Taylor WR et al (2009) Nerve injury to the posterior rami medial branch during the insertion of pedicle screws: comparison of mini-open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion techniques. Spine 34:1239–1242CrossRefPubMed
18.
Battie MC, Videman T, Kaprio J et al (2009) The Twin Spine Study: contributions to a changing view of disc degeneration. Spine J 9:47–59CrossRefPubMed
19.
Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK et al (2005) Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine 30:123–129CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
Harrop JS, Youssef JA, Maltenfort M et al (2008) Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty. Spine 33:1701–1707CrossRefPubMed
22.
Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S et al (2013) Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine 38:E803–E812CrossRefPubMed
23.
Djurasovic MO, Carreon LY, Glassman SD et al (2008) Sagittal alignment as a risk factor for adjacent level degeneration: a case-control study. Orthopedics 31:546CrossRefPubMed
24.
Radcliff KE, Kepler CK, Jakoi A et al (2013) Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions. Spine J 13:1339–1349CrossRefPubMed
25.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Phan K, Tian DH, Cao C et al (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis: techniques and a guide for the academic surgeon. Anna Cardiothorac Surg 4:112–122
27.
Phan K, Mobbs RJ (2015) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in spine surgery, neurosurgery and orthopedics: guidelines for the surgeon scientist. J Spine Surg 1:19–27PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Cole T-C, Ghosh P, Hannan NJ et al (1987) The response of the canine intervertebral disc to immobilization produced by spinal arthrodesis is dependent on constitutional factors. J Orthop Res 5:337–347CrossRefPubMed
29.
Lee CK, Langrana NA (1984) Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study. Spine 9:574–581CrossRefPubMed
30.
Cole T-C, Burkhardt D, Ghosh P et al (1985) Effects of spinal fusion on the proteoglycans of the canine intervertebral disc. J Orthop Res 3:277–291CrossRefPubMed
31.
Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2007) Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine 32:2253–2257CrossRefPubMed
32.
Mok JM, Cloyd JM, Bradford DS et al (2009) Reoperation after primary fusion for adult spinal deformity: rate, reason, and timing. Spine 34:832–839CrossRefPubMed
33.
Sears WR, Sergides IG, Kazemi N et al (2011) Incidence and prevalence of surgery at segments adjacent to a previous posterior lumbar arthrodesis. Spine J 11:11–20CrossRefPubMed
34.
Di Martino A, Quattrocchi CC, Scarciolla L et al (2014) Estimating the risk for symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: analysis from a cohort of patients undergoing revision surgery. Eur Spine J 23(Suppl 6):693–698CrossRefPubMed
35.
Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D (2001) Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J 10:314–319CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Umehara S, Zindrick MR, Patwardhan AG et al (2000) The biomechanical effect of postoperative hypolordosis in instrumented lumbar fusion on instrumented and adjacent spinal segments. Spine 25:1617–1624CrossRefPubMed
37.
Oda I, Cunningham BW, Buckley RA et al (1999) Does spinal kyphotic deformity influence the biomechanical characteristics of the adjacent motion segments? An in vivo animal model. Spine 24:2139–2146CrossRefPubMed
38.
Barrey C, Roussouly P, Perrin G et al (2011) Sagittal balance disorders in severe degenerative spine. Can we identify the compensatory mechanisms? Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):626–633CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL (2011) Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):609–618CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Senteler M, Weisse B, Snedeker JG et al (2014) Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch results in increased segmental joint loads in the unfused and fused lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 23:1384–1393CrossRefPubMed
41.
Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Tim Yoon S et al (2003) Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 28:1560–1566PubMed
42.
Kim KH, Lee SH, Shim CS et al (2010) Adjacent segment disease after interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixations for isolated L4-L5 spondylolisthesis: a minimum five-year follow-up. Spine 35:625–634CrossRefPubMed
43.
Hsieh PC, Koski TR, O’Shaughnessy BA et al (2007) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance. J Neurosurg Spine 7:379–386CrossRefPubMed
44.
Pavlov PW, Meijers H, van Limbeek J et al (2004) Good outcome and restoration of lordosis after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with additional posterior fixation. Spine 29:1893–1899 (discussion 900) CrossRefPubMed
45.
Rao PJ, Maharaj MM, Phan K et al (2015) Indirect foraminal decompression after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective radiographic study using a new pedicle-to-pedicle technique. Spine J 15:817–824CrossRefPubMed
46.
Lee N, Kim KN, Yi S et al (2017) Comparison of outcomes of anterior-, posterior- and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery at a single lumbar level with degenerative spinal disease. World Neurosurg 101:216–226CrossRefPubMed
47.
Sembrano JN, Yson SC, Horazdovsky RD et al (2015) Radiographic comparison of lateral lumbar interbody fusion versus traditional fusion approaches: analysis of sagittal contour change. Int J Spine Surg 9:16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Malham GM, Parker RM, Blecher CM et al (2016) Choice of approach does not affect clinical and radiologic outcomes: a comparative cohort of patients having anterior lumbar interbody fusion and patients having lateral lumbar interbody fusion at 24 months. Glob Spine J 6:472–481CrossRef
49.
Challier V, Boissiere L, Obeid I et al (2016) One-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and posterior approach. is transforaminal lateral interbody fusion mandatory? A randomized controlled trial with two year follow-up. Spine 42(8):531–539CrossRef
50.
51.
52.
53.
Lee JH, Na KH, Kim JH et al (2016) Is pelvic incidence a constant, as everyone knows? Changes of pelvic incidence in surgically corrected adult sagittal deformity. Eur Spine J 25(11):3707–3714CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Relationship between sagittal balance and adjacent segment disease in surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease: meta-analysis and implications for choice of fusion technique
verfasst von
Kevin Phan
Alexander Nazareth
Awais K. Hussain
Adam A. Dmytriw
Mithun Nambiar
Damian Nguyen
Jack Kerferd
Steven Phan
Chet Sutterlin III
Samuel K. Cho
Ralph J. Mobbs
Publikationsdatum
28.05.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5629-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2018

European Spine Journal 8/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Pedicle screw anchorage of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK screws under cyclic loading

Original Article

Psychometric validation of the cross-culturally adapted traditional Chinese version of the Back Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ) and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)

Original Article

Axonal damage is remarkable in patients with acutely worsening symptoms of compression myelopathy: biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid samples

Original Article

Pressure-induced end-plate fracture in the porcine spine: Is the annulus fibrosus susceptible to damage?

Grand Rounds

Slow correction of severe spastic hyperlordosis in an adult by means of magnetically expandable rods

Original Article

Radiological and functional outcomes of high-grade spondylolisthesis treated by intrasacral fixation, dome resection and circumferential fusion: a retrospective series of 20 consecutive cases with a minimum of 2 years follow-up

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

23.04.2024 | Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen | Nachrichten

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

16.04.2024 | Spondylitis ankylosans | Nachrichten

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

15.04.2024 | Knie-TEP | Nachrichten

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger
weitere anzeigen

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise