Abstract
A 64-year-old male was admitted to a local hospital with epigastric pain. Diagnostic imaging revealed hepatolithiasis in the atrophic left lobe. However, endoscopic intervention was impossible because of the presence of many large stones. He was referred to our hospital for surgical treatment. Enhanced multidetector-row computed tomography revealed that the right posterior portal vein (PV) was branched from the portal trunk as a first-order branch, and the bile duct of segment 3 ran caudally to the umbilical portion of the left PV. Furthermore, the umbilical portion of the left PV, which was located between the dilated bile ducts of segment 2 and segment 3, and also the right anterior PV, was occluded with thrombus. Based on these findings, he underwent left hepatic trisectionectomy. Although the indications for left hepatic trisectionectomy for hepatolithiasis are limited, it is therefore extremely important to determine the most appropriate surgical procedure based on the anatomy and findings of hepatic hilus in individual cases.
References
Deniz K, Torun E, Celikbilek M, Sözüer E. Combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma associated with hepatolithiasis: report of a case. Surg Today. 2011;41:591–5.
Tajima T, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, Aibe H, Shinozaki K, Nishie A, et al. Portal vein occlusion or stenosis in patients with hepatolithiasis: observation by multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT. Clin Radiol. 2005;60:469–78.
Senda Y, Nishio H, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Igami T, Sugawara G, et al. Hepatolithiasis in the hepatic hilum mimicking hilar cholangiocarcinoma: report of a case. Surg Today. 2011;41:1243–6.
Kitagawa Y, Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J, Nagino M, Uesaka K, et al. Intrahepatic segmental bile duct patterns in hepatolithiasis: a comparative cholangiographic study between Taiwan and Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2003;10:377–81.
Lee SE, Jang JY, Lee JM, Kim SW. Selection of appropriate liver resection in left hepatolithiasis based on anatomic and clinical study. World J Surg. 2008;32:413–8.
Cheon YK, Cho YD, Moon JH, Lee JS, Shim CS. Evaluation of long-term results and recurrent factor after operative and nonoperative treatment for hepatolithiasis. Surgery. 2009;146:843–53.
Yoon YS, Han HS, Shin SH, Cho JY, Min SK, Lee HK. Laparoscopic treatment for intrahepatic duct stones in the era of laparoscopy laparoscopic intrahepatic duct exploration and laparoscopic hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2009;249:286–91.
Uenishi T, Hamba H, Takemura S, Oba K, Ogawa M, Yamamoto T, et al. Outcome of hepatic resection for hepatolithiasis. Am J Surg. 2009;198:199–202.
Yang T, Lau WY, Lai ECH, Yang LQ, Zhang J, Yang GS, et al. Hepatectomy for bilateral primary hepatolithiasis a cohort study. Ann Surg. 2010;251:84–90.
Li SQ, Liang LJ, Peng BG, Hua YP, Lv MD, Fu SJ, et al. Outcomes of liver resection for intrahepatic stones a comparative study of unilateral versus bilateral disease. Ann Surg. 2012;255:946–53.
Ozden I, Kamiya J, Nagino M, Uesaka K, Sano T, Nimura Y. Clinicoanatomical study on the infraportal bile ducts of segment 3. World J Surg. 2002;26:1441–5.
Kitami M, Takase K, Murakami G, Ko S, Tsuboi M, Saito H, et al. Types and frequencies of biliary tract variations associated with a major portal venous anomaly: analysis with multi–detector row CT cholangiography. Radiology; 238:156–66.
Sakpal SV, Babel N, Chamberlain RS. Surgical management of hepatolithiasis. HPB. 2009;11:194–202.
Jarufe N, Figueroa E, Munos C, Moisan F, Varas J, Valbuena JR, et al. Anatomic hepatectomy as a definitive treatment for hepatolithiasis: a cohort study. HPB. 2012;14:604–10.
Shah OJ, Robbani I, Shah P, Zargar SA, Javaid G, Yattoo GN, et al. Left-sided hepatic resection for hepatolithiasis: a longitudinal study of 110 patients. HPB. 2012;14:764–71.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hosokawa, I., Shimizu, H., Yoshidome, H. et al. Left hepatic trisectionectomy for hepatolithiasis with occluded left and right anterior branches of the portal vein: report of a case. Surg Today 44, 1556–1560 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0598-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0598-1