nach oben

Clinical Oral Investigations

Erschienen in:

01.03.2007 | Original Article

Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: Marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning

verfasst von: T. Bortolotto, I. Onisor, I. Krejci

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 1/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the marginal adaptation of CEREC ceramic inlays, CEREC composite inlays and direct composite restorations in unbeveled proximal slot cavities under artificial aging conditions. Two groups of each restoration type were prepared (n = 6), one group with a self-etch adhesive, the other group with H₃PO₄ enamel etching before the self-etch adhesive application. Replicas were generated before and after long-term thermo-mechanical loading under dentinal fluid simulation and margins were evaluated at ×200 magnification in the scanning electron miscroscope (SEM). Statistically, significant differences were found before and after loading with respect to the percentages of “continuous margins”, the direct composite filling with H₃PO₄ enamel etching giving the lowest percentages of “continuous margins” after loading (p < 0.05). The highest percentage of “continuous margin” was attained by composite inlays without H₃PO₄ enamel etching. However, these results were not significantly different from ceramic inlays after stressing. Polymerization shrinkage is still one critical property of composite restorative materials. The marginal adaptation of indirect adhesive proximal slot restorations without enamel bevels both fabricated out of composite and ceramic is better than that of directly placed composite restorations.

Ausiello P, Rengo S, Davidson C, Watts D (2004) Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study. Dent Mater 20:862–872PubMedCrossRef

Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M (2003) Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 89:268–274PubMedCrossRef

Buonocore M (1955) A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 34:849–853PubMed

Burgess JO, Walker RS, Porche CJ, Rappold AJ (2002) Light curing—an update. Compend Contin Educ Dent 23:889–892PubMed

Burke FJ, Watts DC, Wilson NH, Wilson MA (1991) Current status and rationale for composite inlays and onlays. Br Dent J 7:269–273

Fett H, Mörmann W, Krejci I, Lutz F (1991) Marginal adaptation of Cerec-MOD inlays in vitro. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on computer restorations. Zurich, Switzerland, pp 393–404

Frencken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P (1996) A traumatic restorative treatment (ART): rationale, technique and development. J Public Health Dent 56:135–140PubMed

Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD, Hackenitz E (1998) 3 year survival of ART restorations and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health program in Zimbabwe. Caries Res 32:119–126PubMedCrossRef

Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Bey B (1997) Clinical and quantitative marginal analysis of feldspathic ceramic inlays at 4 years. Clin Oral Investig 1:163–168PubMedCrossRef

10.

Göhring TN, Peters OA, Lutz F (2001) Marginal adaptation of inlay-retained adhesive fixed partial dentures after mechanical and thermal stress: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 1:81–92

11.

Hasselrot L (1993) Tunnel restorations. Swed Dent J 17:173–182PubMed

12.

Hickel R, Manhart J (2001) Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 3:45–64PubMed

13.

Hilton T, Schwartz R, Ferracane J (1997) Microleakage of four Class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quintessence Int 28:135–144PubMed

14.

Houpt M, Fuks A, Eidelman F (1994) The preventive resin (composite resin/sealant) restoration. Nine-year results. Quintessence Int 25:155–159PubMed

15.

Hugo B, Lussi A, Hotz P (1992) The preparation of enamel margin beveling in proximal cavities. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 102:1181–188 (in German)PubMed

16.

Hugo B, Stassinakis A, Hofmann N, Schmitz B, Klaiber B (2001) Marginal adaptation of small Class II resin restorations. An in vitro evaluation. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 111:19–27 (in German)PubMed

17.

Hunt PR (1984) A modified class II cavity preparation for glass ionomer restorative materials. Quintessence Int 10:1011–1018

18.

Hunt PR (1994) Rational cavity design principles. J Esthet Dent 6:245–256PubMed

19.

Jinks GM (1963) Fluoride-impregnated cements and their effect on the activity of interproximal caries. J Dent Child 30:87–92

20.

Kaaden C, Powers JM, Friedl KH, Schmalz G (2002) Bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dental hard tissues. Clin Oral Investig 6:155–160PubMedCrossRef

21.

Knight GM (1984) The use of adhesive materials in the conservative restoration of selected posterior teeth. Aust Dent J 29:324–331PubMedCrossRef

22.

Krejci I, Lutz F (1990) In-vitro test results of the evaluation of dental restoration systems. Correlation with in-vivo results. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:1445–1449 (in German)PubMed

23.

Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M (1990) In-vitro test procedure for evaluation of dental restorative systems: 1. Computer-controlled chewing simulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:953–960 (in German)PubMed

24.

Krejci I, Albertoni M, Lutz F (1990) In-vitro test procedure for evaluation of dental restorative systems: 1. Computer-controlled chewing simulator. 2. Toothbrush-/toothpaste abrasion and chemical degradation. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:1164–1168 (in German)PubMed

25.

Krejci I, Kuster M, Lutz F (1993) Influence of dentinal fluid and stress on marginal adaptation of resin composites. J Dent Res 72:490–495PubMed

26.

Krejci I, Lutz F, Krejci D (1995) Sonic/ultrasonic diamond coating instruments for cavity preparation, for contouring and finishing. ZWR 104:781–786 (in German)

27.

Lu H, Stansbury JW, Dickens SH, Eichmiller FC, Bowman CN (2004) Probing the origins and control of shrinkage stress in dental resin-composites: I. Shrinkage stress characterization technique. J Mater Sci Mater Med 15:1097–1103PubMedCrossRef

28.

Lussi A (1995) Damage to neighboring teeth during the preparation of proximal cavities. An in-vivo study. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 10:1259–1264 (in German)

29.

Lussi A, Kronenberg O, Megert B (2003) The effect of magnification on the iatrogenic damage to adjacent tooth surfaces during Class II preparation. J Dent 31:291–296PubMedCrossRef

30.

Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR (1986) Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 17:777–784PubMed

31.

Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F (1991) Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 7:107–113PubMedCrossRef

32.

Lutz F, Krejci I (1999) Resin composites in the post-amalgam age. Compend Contin Educ Dent 12:1138–1144

33.

Manhart J, Schmidt M, Chen HY, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R (2001) Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging. Oper Dent 4:357–366

34.

Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R (2004) Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 29:481–508PubMed

35.

Mehl A, Hickel R (1999) Current state of development and perspectives of machined-based production methods for dental restorations. Int J Comput Dent 2:9–35PubMed

36.

Mertz-fairhust EJ, Curtis JW, Ergle JW, Rueggeberg FA, Adair SM (1998) Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10. J Am Dent Assoc 129:55–66

37.

Mormann W, Bindl A (2000) The Cerec 3-A quantum leap for computer-aided restorations: initial clinical results. Quintessence Int 10:699–712

38.

Mount GJ (1986) Longevity of glass ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent 55:682–685PubMedCrossRef

39.

Munechika T, Suzuki K, Nishiyama M, Ohashi M, Horie K (1984) A comparison of the tensile bond strengths of composite resins to longitudinal and transverse sections of enamel prisms in human teeth. J Dent Res 8:1079–1082

40.

Nordbo H, Leirskar J, Von Der Fehr F (1993) Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for composite resin restorations in class II carious lesions: three year results. J Prosthet Dent 69:155–159PubMedCrossRef

41.

Opdam NJM, Roeters JJM, Van Berghem E, Eijsvogels E, Bronkhorst E (2002) Microleakage and damage to adjacent teeth when finishing Class II adhesive preparations using either a sonic device or bur. Am J Dent 15:317–320PubMed

42.

Peutzfeld A, Asmussen E (2004) Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composites. J Dent 32:109–115CrossRef

43.

Pyk N, Mejare I (1999) Tunnel restorations in general practice. Influence of some clinical variables on the success rate. Acta Odontol Scand 57:195–200PubMedCrossRef

44.

Reiss B, Walther W (2000) Clinical long-term results and 10 year Kaplan Meier Analysis of Cerec restorations. Int J Comp Dent 3:9–23

45.

Roulet JF, Salchow B, Wald M (1991) Margin analysis of posterior composites in vivo. Dent Mater 7:44–49PubMedCrossRef

46.

Rusin R (2001) Properties and applications of a new composite block for CAD/CAM. Compendium 22:35–41PubMed

47.

Sarrett DC (2005) Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater 21:9–20PubMedCrossRef

48.

Schmalz G, Federlin M, Reich E (1995) Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a class II ceramic inlay. J Prosthet Dent 73:392–399PubMedCrossRef

49.

Shimada Y, Tagami J (2003) Effects of regional enamel and prism orientation on resin bonding. Oper Dent 28:20–27PubMed

50.

Sidhu SK, Watson TF (1995) Resin-modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 8:59–67PubMed

51.

Simonsen RJ (1989) Cost effectiveness of pit and fissure sealant at 10 years. Quintessence Int 20:75–84PubMed

52.

Staehle HJ (1999) Minimally invasive restorative treatment. J Adhes Dent 3:267–284

53.

Stavridakis MM, Lutz F, Johnston WM, Krejci I (2003) Linear displacement and force induced by polymerization shrinkage of resin-based restorative materials. Am J Dent 16:431–438PubMed

54.

Strand GV, Nordbo H, Tveit AB, Espelid I, Wikstrand K, Eide GE (1996) A three-year clinical study of tunnel restorations. Eur J Oral Sci 104:384–389PubMed

55.

Tyas M, Anusavice K, Frencken J, Mount GJ (2000) Minimal intervention dentistry-a review. Int Dent J 50:1–12PubMed

56.

Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, de Munck J, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2006) Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching. J Dent 34:77–85PubMedCrossRef

57.

Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Pintado M, Delong R, Douglas W (2004) Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration. Dent Mater 20:554–564PubMedCrossRef

58.

Weinmann W, Thalacker CH, Guggenberger R (2005) Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater 21:68–74PubMedCrossRef

59.

Welbury RR, Walls AW, Murray JJ, Mccabe JF (1990) The management of occlusal caries in permanent molars. A 5-year clinical trial comparing a minimal composite with an amalgam restoration. Br Dent J 169:361–366PubMed

60.

Wilder A, May K, Bayne S, Taylor D, Leinfelder K (1999) Seventeen-year clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite class I and II restorations. J Esthet Dent 3:135–142

61.

Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G (1993) Composite resins in the 21st century. Quintessence Int 24:641–658PubMed

62.

Yip HK, Samaranayake LP (1998) Caries removal techniques and instrumentation: a review. Clin Oral Invest 2:148–154CrossRef

Titel: Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: Marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning
verfasst von: T. Bortolotto
I. Onisor
I. Krejci
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2007
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 1/2007
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-006-0076-x

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

19.04.2024 | Vorhofflimmern | Nachrichten

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: Marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2007

Daniel van Steenberghe hands over the Associate Editor position to Reinhilde Jacobs

Comparison of the proliferative activity in gingival epithelium after surgical treatments of intrabony defects with bioactive glass and bioabsorbable membrane

Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical and mechanical caries removal: status of the restorations at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

Outcome and complications of 540 microvascular free flaps: the Hamburg experience

How to bridge the gap between available information and clinical concepts and practice?

Resin composites: strength of the bond to dentin versus mechanical properties

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter