Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Clinical Oral Investigations
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations 5/2014

01.06.2014 | Review

Retention of tooth-colored restorations in non-carious cervical lesions—a systematic review

verfasst von: Maria Jacinta Moraes Coelho Santos, Nilgun Ari, Shawn Steele, John Costella, David Banting

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 5/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this review was to assess the effect of different adhesive systems and tooth preparation on the retention of tooth-colored restorative materials placed in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs).

Methods

Randomized clinical trials with a minimum of 3 years of follow-up that evaluated the effectiveness of tooth-colored materials, adhesive systems, and preparation techniques for the restoration of NCCLs were selected. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE (OVID), the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database (LILACS), and Medline (OVID) electronic databases were searched from 1990 to 2013.

Results

Twenty-seven randomized clinical trials were included and reviewed. Meta-analysis was used to determine the relative risk of loss of tooth-colored NCCL restorations between different categories of adhesive systems. The effect of tooth preparation could not be similarly analyzed.

Conclusion

The current best evidence indicates that a glass ionomer cement has a significantly lower risk of loss of a NCCL restoration compared to either a three-step etch-and-rinse or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system; a three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system has a significantly lower risk of loss of a NCCL restoration compared to a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system. No significant difference could be observed in the risk of loss of a tooth-colored NCCL restoration between a three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system and either a two-step self-etch or a one-step self-etch adhesive system.
Literatur
1.
Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO (1994) Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 22:195–207PubMedCrossRef
2.
Spranger H (1995) Investigation into the genesis of angular lesions at the cervical region of teeth. Quintessence Int 26:149–154PubMed
3.
Tay FR, Pashley DH (2004) Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: a review. J Dent 32:173–196PubMedCrossRef
4.
Karan K, Yao X, Xu C, Wang Y (2012) Chemical characterization of etched dentin in non-carious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 14:315–322PubMed
5.
Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2005) Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 21:864–881PubMedCrossRef
6.
Heintze SD, Ruffieux C, Rousson V (2010) Clinical performance of cervical restorations—a meta-analysis. Dent Mater 26:993–1000PubMedCrossRef
7.
8.
Kwong SM, Cheung GS, Kei LH, Itthagarun A, Smales RJ, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2002) Micro-tensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a self-etching and a total-etching technique. Dent Mater 18:359–369PubMedCrossRef
9.
Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebisu S, Tagami J, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM, Johnson MH, Pashley DH (1996) Regional strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res 75:1404–1413PubMedCrossRef
10.
Franco EB, Benetti AR, Ishikiriama SK, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Jorge MF, Navarro MF (2006) 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 31:403–408PubMedCrossRef
11.
van Dijken JWV, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, Lindberg A (2007) Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions: a 13 years evaluation. Dent Mater 23:1101–1107PubMedCrossRef
12.
van Dijken JWV (2010) A prospective 8-year evaluation of a mild two-step self-etching adhesive and a heavily filled two-step etch-and-rinse system in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 26:940–946PubMedCrossRef
13.
Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Ermis B, Van Meerbeek B (2011) Three-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free one-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 119:511–516PubMedCrossRef
14.
Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift EJ Jr, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr (2008) Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis. Oper Dent 33:370–378PubMedCrossRef
15.
Ritter AV, Swift EJ Jr, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr (2009) An eight-year clinical evaluation of filled and unfilled one-bottle dental adhesives. J Am Dent Assoc 140:28–37PubMedCrossRef
16.
van Dijken JWV (2005) Retention of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions: a 6-year follow-up. J Dent 33:541–547PubMedCrossRef
17.
van Dijken JWV (2000) Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater 16:285–291PubMedCrossRef
18.
Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y (2006) Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 34:97–105PubMedCrossRef
19.
Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y (2010) Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 38:191–200PubMedCrossRef
20.
Wilder AD Jr, Swift EJ Jr, Heymann HO, Ritter AV, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC (2009) A 12-year clinical evaluation of a three-step dentin adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 140:526–535PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zimmerli B, De Munck J, Lussi A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2012) Long-term bonding to eroded dentin requires superficial bur preparation. Clin Oral Investig 16:1451–1461PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
Kim SY, Lee KW, Seong SR, Lee MA, Lee IB, Son HH, Kim HY, Oh MH, Cho BH (2009) Two-year clinical effectiveness of adhesives and retention form on resin composite restorations of non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 34:507–515PubMedCrossRef
23.
Baratieri LN, Canabarro S, Lopes GC, Ritter AV (2003) Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of class V composite restorations: three-year results. Oper Dent 28:482–487PubMed
24.
Reis A, Loguercio AD (2009) A 36-month clinical evaluation of ethanol/water and acetone-based etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 34:384–391PubMedCrossRef
25.
Carvalho RM, Manso AP, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2012) Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater 28:72–86PubMedCrossRef
26.
van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U (2012) A 7-year randomized prospective study of a one-step self-etching adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. The effect of curing modes and restorative material. J Dent 40:1060–1067PubMedCrossRef
27.
van Dijken JWV (2013) A randomized controlled 5-year prospective study of two HEMA free adhesives, a 1-step self etching and a 3-step etch-and-rinse, in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 29:e271–80PubMedCrossRef
28.
Burrow MF, Tyas MJ (2007) Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 32:11–15PubMedCrossRef
29.
Matis BA, Cochran M, Carlson T (1996) Longevity of glass-ionomer restorative materials: results of a 10-year evaluation. Quintessence Int 27:373–382PubMed
30.
Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitvein A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2012) A 13-year clinical evaluation of two three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious class-V lesions. Clin Oral Investig 16:129–137PubMedCrossRef
31.
Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2010) Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 26:1176–1184PubMedCrossRef
32.
Pollington S, van Noort R (2008) A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious class V lesions: a 3-year follow-up. Am J Dent 21:49–52PubMed
33.
van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U (2008) Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 24:915–922PubMedCrossRef
34.
Loguercio AD, Bittencourt DD, Baratieri LN (2007) Reis A. A 36-month evaluation of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives in noncarious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 138:507–514PubMedCrossRef
35.
Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl LA (2005) A three-year clinical evaluation of two-bottle versus one-bottle dentin adhesives. J Am Dent Assoc 136:311–322PubMedCrossRef
36.
Matis BA, Cochran MJ, Carlson TJ, Guba C, Eckert GJ (2004) A three-year clinical evaluation of two dentin bonding agents. J Am Dent Assoc 135:451–457PubMedCrossRef
37.
Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN, Roulet JF (2003) Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 5:323–332PubMed
38.
Ozgunaltay G, Onen A (2002) Three-year clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin in non-carious class V lesions. J Oral Rehabil 29:1037–1041PubMedCrossRef
39.
McCoy RB, Anderson MH, Lepe X, Johnson GH (1998) Clinical success of class V composite resin restorations without mechanical retention. J Am Dent Assoc 129:593–599PubMedCrossRef
40.
van Dijken JWV (1996) Four-year evaluation of the effect of 10 % polyacrylic acid or water rinsing pretreatment on retention of glass polyalkenoate cement. Eur J Oral Sci 104:64–66PubMedCrossRef
41.
Hörsted-Bindslev P, Knudsen J, Baelum V (1996) 3-year clinical evaluation of modified Gluma adhesive systems in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions. Am J Dent 9:22–26PubMed
42.
Burrow MF, Tyas MJ (2007) Five-year clinical evaluation of One-Up Bond F in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent 20:361–364PubMed
43.
Akimoto N, Takamizu M, Momoi Y (2007) 10-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching adhesive system. Oper Dent 32:3–10PubMedCrossRef
44.
Belluz M, Pedrocca M, Gagliani M (2005) Restorative treatment of cervical lesions with resin composites: 4-year results. Am J Dent 18:307–310PubMed
45.
Gallo JR, Burgess JO, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ, Mercante DE, Davidson JM (2005) Three-year clinical evaluation of a compomer and a resin composite as class V filling materials. Oper Dent 30:275–281PubMed
46.
van Dijken JWV, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K (2004) A calcium aluminate cement as restorative material in class V cavities. Swed Dent J 28:111–118PubMed
47.
Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ (2004) Clinical evaluation of four class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall. Am J Dent 17:147–50PubMed
48.
Tyas MJ, Burrow MF (2002) Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive system: results at five years. Oper Dent 27:438–441PubMed
49.
Tyas MJ, Burrow MF (2002) Three-year clinical evaluation of One-Step in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent 15:309–311PubMed
50.
Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R (2001) Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results. Am J Dent 14:153–156PubMed
51.
Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R (2001) Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials—3-year results. Clin Oral Investig 5:31–9PubMedCrossRef
52.
Swift EJ Jr, Perdigão J, Wilder AD Jr, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC (2001) Clinical evaluation of two one-bottle dentin adhesives at three years. J Am Dent Assoc 132:1117–23PubMedCrossRef
53.
Tyas MJ (2000) Three-year clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract). Oper Dent 25:152–54PubMed
54.
Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R (2000) Determination of changes on tooth-colored cervical restorations in vivo using a three-dimensional laser scanning device. Eur J Oral Sci 108:233–238PubMedCrossRef
55.
Brunton PA, Cowan AJ, Wilson MA, Wilson NH (1999) A three-year evaluation of restorations placed with a smear-layer-mediated dentin bonding agent in non-carious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 1:333–341PubMed
56.
Duke ES, Trevino DF (1998) A resin-modified glass ionomer restorative: three-year clinical results. J Indiana Dent Assoc 77:13–6,25PubMed
57.
Prati C, Chersoni S, Cretti L, Montanari G (1998) Retention and marginal adaptation of a compomer placed in non-stress-bearing areas used with the total-etch technique: a 3-year retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig 2:168–173PubMedCrossRef
58.
Neo J, Chew CL (1996) Direct tooth-colored materials for noncarious lesions: a 3-year clinical report. Quintessence Int 27:183–188PubMed
59.
Tyas MJ (1996) Clinical evaluation of five adhesive systems: three-year results. Int Dent J 46:10–14PubMed
60.
Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (1996) Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 27:775–84PubMed
61.
van Dijken JWV (1994) Clinical evaluation of four dentin bonding agents in class V abrasion lesions: a four-year follow-up. Dent Mater 10:319–324PubMedCrossRef
62.
Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (1994) Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 73:1690–1702PubMed
63.
Tyas MJ (1994) The effect of dentine conditioning with polyacrylic acid on the clinical performance of glass ionomer cement-3-year results. Aust Dent J 39:220–1PubMedCrossRef
64.
van Dijken JWV (1992) Three-year evaluation of effect of surface conditioning on bonding of glass ionomer cement in cervical abrasion lesions. Scand J Dent Res 100:133–135PubMed
65.
Duke ES, Robbins JW, Snyder DS (1991) Clinical evaluation of a dentinal adhesive system: three-year results. Quintessence Int 22:889–895PubMed
66.
Tyas MJ (1991) Three-year clinical evaluation of dentine bonding agents. Aust Dent J 36:298–301PubMedCrossRef
67.
Hansen EK (1989) Three-year study of cervical erosions restored with resin and dentin-bonding agent. Acta Odontol Scand 47:301–306PubMedCrossRef
68.
Chee B, Rickman LJ, Satterthwaite JD (2012) Adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: a systematic review. J Dent 40:443–452PubMedCrossRef
69.
Marshman Z, Farid F (2010) The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in dental public health. Community Dent Health 27:253–256PubMed
70.
Sjögren P, Halling A (2002) Quality of reporting randomised clinical trials in dental and medical research. Br Dent J 192:100–103PubMedCrossRef
71.
Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G (2007) Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig 11:5–33PubMedCrossRef
72.
De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B (2005) A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 84:118–132PubMedCrossRef
73.
Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J (2010) Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 26:e100–21PubMedCrossRef
74.
Francisconi LF, Scaffa PM, de Barros VR, Coutinho M, Francisconi PA (2009) Glass ionomer cements and their role in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. J Appl Oral Sci 17:364–369PubMed
75.
Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (1999) Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in class V cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 30:607–614PubMed
76.
Sidhu SK (2011) Glass-ionomer cement restorative materials: a sticky subject? Aust Dent J 56(Suppl 1):23–30PubMedCrossRef
77.
Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjäderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A (2011) State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 27:1–16PubMedCrossRef
78.
Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL (2011) State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 27:17–28PubMedCrossRef
79.
Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ (2012) Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater 28:87–101PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Retention of tooth-colored restorations in non-carious cervical lesions—a systematic review
verfasst von
Maria Jacinta Moraes Coelho Santos
Nilgun Ari
Shawn Steele
John Costella
David Banting
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1220-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2014

Clinical Oral Investigations 5/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Randomized clinical evaluation of a light-cured base material for complete dentures

Original Article

Oral health behaviors and metabolic syndrome: the 2008–2010 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Original Article

Fracture behavior of zirconia implant abutments is influenced by superstructure-geometry

Original Article

Effect of a sugar-free pediatric antibiotic on primary tooth enamel hardness when exposed to different sucrose exposure conditions in situ

Original Article

Comparison of the Easyshade Compact and Advance in vitro and in vivo

Original Article

Prevalence of feeding disorders in children with cleft palate only: a retrospective study

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

19.04.2024 | Vorhofflimmern | Nachrichten

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

11.04.2024 | Endokarditis | Nachrichten

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

08.04.2024 | Zahnmedizin | Nachrichten

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

11.03.2024 | Kinderzahnmedizin | Nachrichten

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt
weitere anzeigen

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise