Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations 2/2018

24.06.2017 | Original Article

Bonding of composite resins to PEEK: the influence of adhesive systems and air-abrasion parameters

verfasst von: Bogna Stawarczyk, Simon Taufall, Malgorzata Roos, Patrick R. Schmidlin, Nina Lümkemann

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The objective of the study was to investigate the tensile bond strength (TBS) to polyaryletheretherketone (PEEK) after different pretreatment and conditioning methods.

Methods

Four hundred PEEK specimens were fabricated and allocated to the following air-abrasion methods (n 1 = 80/pretreatment): (i) 50 μm Al2O3 (0.05 MPa); (ii) 50 μm Al2O3 (0.35 MPa); (iii) 110 μm Al2O3 (0.05 MPa); (iv) 110 μm Al2O3 (0.35 MPa); and (v) Rocatec 110 μm (0.28 MPa). These pretreatments were combined with the following conditioning methods (n 2 = 20/pretreatment/conditioning): (a) visio.link (VL); (b) Monobond Plus/Heliobond (MH); (c) Scotchbond Universal (SU); and (d) dialog bonding fluid (DB). After veneering of all specimens with dialog occlusal and aging (28 days H2O, 37 °C + 20,000 thermal cycles, 5/55 °C), TBS was measured. Data was analysed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis with Breslow–Gehan test and Cox-regressions.

Results

The major impact on TBS showed the conditioning, followed by the air-abrasion-pressure, while the grain size of the air-abrasion powder did not show any effect. Specimens air-abraded at 0.35 MPa showed the highest survival rates. However, within VL groups, this observation was not statistically significant. Within MH groups, pretreatment using 110 μm Al2O3 and 0.05 MPa resulted in higher survival rates compared to groups treated with 50 and 110 μm Al2O3 using a pressure of 0.35 MPa. The use of VL showed the highest survival rates between the adhesive systems and the TBS values higher than 25 MPa independent of the pretreatment method. As an exception, only VL showed significantly higher survival rates when compared to MH.

Conclusions

The adequate choice of the adhesive system and higher pressures improved the TBS between PEEK and veneering resin composite. The particle size had no major impact.

Clinical relevance

According to this study, best veneering of PEEK with dialog occlusal can be achieved by conditioning with visio.link in combination with the pretreatment of airborne particle abrasion at a pressure of 0.35 MPa.
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Toth JM, Wang M, Estes BT, Scifert JL, Seim HB 3rd, Turner AS (2006) Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomaterials 27:324–334CrossRefPubMed Toth JM, Wang M, Estes BT, Scifert JL, Seim HB 3rd, Turner AS (2006) Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomaterials 27:324–334CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M et al (2013) Polyetheretherketone—a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 101:1209–1216CrossRefPubMed Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M et al (2013) Polyetheretherketone—a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 101:1209–1216CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B, Wieland M, Attin T, Hammerle CH, Fischer J (2010) Effect of different surface pre-treatments and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK. Dent Mater 26:553–559CrossRefPubMed Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B, Wieland M, Attin T, Hammerle CH, Fischer J (2010) Effect of different surface pre-treatments and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK. Dent Mater 26:553–559CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Klingler JH, Krüger MT, Sircar R, Kogias E, Scholz C, Volz F, Scheiwe C, Hubbe U, et al. (2014) PEEK cages versus PMMA spacers in anterior cervical discectomy: comparison of fusion, subsidence, sagittal alignment, and clinical outcome with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Sci World J. doi:10.1155/2014/398396 Klingler JH, Krüger MT, Sircar R, Kogias E, Scholz C, Volz F, Scheiwe C, Hubbe U, et al. (2014) PEEK cages versus PMMA spacers in anterior cervical discectomy: comparison of fusion, subsidence, sagittal alignment, and clinical outcome with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Sci World J. doi:10.​1155/​2014/​398396
8.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Reilly EB, Barnett S, Madden C, Welch B, Mickey B, Rozen S et al (2015) Computed-tomography modeled polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants in revision cranioplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68(3):329–338CrossRefPubMed O’Reilly EB, Barnett S, Madden C, Welch B, Mickey B, Rozen S et al (2015) Computed-tomography modeled polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants in revision cranioplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68(3):329–338CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwitalla A, Muller WD (2013) PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol 39:743–749CrossRefPubMed Schwitalla A, Muller WD (2013) PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol 39:743–749CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Stawarczyk B, Eichberger M, Uhrenbacher J, Wimmer T, Edelhoff D, Schmidlin PR (2015) Three-unit reinforced polyetheretherketone composite FDPs: influence of fabrication method on load-bearing capacity and failure types. Dent Mater J 34:7–12CrossRefPubMed Stawarczyk B, Eichberger M, Uhrenbacher J, Wimmer T, Edelhoff D, Schmidlin PR (2015) Three-unit reinforced polyetheretherketone composite FDPs: influence of fabrication method on load-bearing capacity and failure types. Dent Mater J 34:7–12CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Beuer F, Roos M, Schmidlin PR (2013) Tensile bond strength of veneering resins to PEEK: impact of different adhesives. Dent Mater J 32:441–448CrossRefPubMed Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Beuer F, Roos M, Schmidlin PR (2013) Tensile bond strength of veneering resins to PEEK: impact of different adhesives. Dent Mater J 32:441–448CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sproesser O, Schmidlin PR, Uhrenbacher J, Eichberger M, Roos M, Stawarczyk B (2014) Work of adhesion between resin composite cement and PEEK as a function of etching duration with sulfuric acid and its correlation with bond strength values. Int J Adhes Adhes 54:184–190CrossRef Sproesser O, Schmidlin PR, Uhrenbacher J, Eichberger M, Roos M, Stawarczyk B (2014) Work of adhesion between resin composite cement and PEEK as a function of etching duration with sulfuric acid and its correlation with bond strength values. Int J Adhes Adhes 54:184–190CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hallmann L, Mehl A, Senero N, Hämmerle CHF (2012) The improvement of adhesive properties of PEEK through pretreatments. Appl Surface Sci 258:7213–7218CrossRef Hallmann L, Mehl A, Senero N, Hämmerle CHF (2012) The improvement of adhesive properties of PEEK through pretreatments. Appl Surface Sci 258:7213–7218CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Keul C, Liebermann A, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Sener B, Stawarczyk B (2014) Influence of PEEK surface modification on surface properties and bond strength to veneering resin composites. J Adhes Dent 16:383–392PubMed Keul C, Liebermann A, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Sener B, Stawarczyk B (2014) Influence of PEEK surface modification on surface properties and bond strength to veneering resin composites. J Adhes Dent 16:383–392PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Stawarczyk B, Jordan P, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Eichberger M, Gernet W et al (2014) PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins. J Prosthet Dent 112:1278–1288CrossRefPubMed Stawarczyk B, Jordan P, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Eichberger M, Gernet W et al (2014) PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins. J Prosthet Dent 112:1278–1288CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Uhrenbacher J, Schmidlin PR, Keul C, Eichberger M, Roos M, Gernet W et al (2015) The effect of surface modification on the retention strength of polyetheretherketone crowns adhesively bonded to dentin abutments. J Prosthet Dent 112:1489–1497CrossRef Uhrenbacher J, Schmidlin PR, Keul C, Eichberger M, Roos M, Gernet W et al (2015) The effect of surface modification on the retention strength of polyetheretherketone crowns adhesively bonded to dentin abutments. J Prosthet Dent 112:1489–1497CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sproesser O, Schmidlin PR, Uhrenbacher J, Roos M, Gernet W, Stawarczyk B (2014) Effect of sulfuric acid etching of polyetheretherketone on the shear bond strength to resin cements. J Adhes Dent 16:465–472PubMed Sproesser O, Schmidlin PR, Uhrenbacher J, Roos M, Gernet W, Stawarczyk B (2014) Effect of sulfuric acid etching of polyetheretherketone on the shear bond strength to resin cements. J Adhes Dent 16:465–472PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Stawarczyk B, Bahr N, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Eichberger M, Gernet W et al (2014) Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone. Clin Oral Investig 18:163–170CrossRefPubMed Stawarczyk B, Bahr N, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Eichberger M, Gernet W et al (2014) Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone. Clin Oral Investig 18:163–170CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bähr N, Keul C, Edelhoff D, Eichberger M, Roos M, Gernet W, Stawarczyk B (2013) Effect of different adhesives combined with two resin composite cements on shear bond strength to polymeric CAD/CAM materials. Dent Mater J 32:492–501CrossRefPubMed Bähr N, Keul C, Edelhoff D, Eichberger M, Roos M, Gernet W, Stawarczyk B (2013) Effect of different adhesives combined with two resin composite cements on shear bond strength to polymeric CAD/CAM materials. Dent Mater J 32:492–501CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ourahmoune R, Salvia M, Mathia TG, Mesrati N (2014) Surface morphology and wettability of sandblasted PEEK and its composites. Scanning 36:64–75CrossRefPubMed Ourahmoune R, Salvia M, Mathia TG, Mesrati N (2014) Surface morphology and wettability of sandblasted PEEK and its composites. Scanning 36:64–75CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kern M, Lehmann F (2012) Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to polyetheretherketon (PEEK). Dent Mater 28:1280–1283CrossRefPubMed Kern M, Lehmann F (2012) Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to polyetheretherketon (PEEK). Dent Mater 28:1280–1283CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosentritt M, Preis V, Behr M, Sereno N, Kolbeck C (2015) Shear bond strength between veneering composite and PEEK after different surface modifications. Clin Oral Investig 19(3):739–744CrossRefPubMed Rosentritt M, Preis V, Behr M, Sereno N, Kolbeck C (2015) Shear bond strength between veneering composite and PEEK after different surface modifications. Clin Oral Investig 19(3):739–744CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Andrade AM, Moura SK, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Garcia EJ, Grande RHM (2010) Evaluating resin-enamel bonds by microshear and microtensile bond strength tests: effect of composite resin. J Appl Oral Sci 18:591–598CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Andrade AM, Moura SK, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Garcia EJ, Grande RHM (2010) Evaluating resin-enamel bonds by microshear and microtensile bond strength tests: effect of composite resin. J Appl Oral Sci 18:591–598CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Heintze SD, Zimmerli B (2011) Relevance of in vitro tests of adhesive and composite dental materials. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 121:1024–1040PubMed Heintze SD, Zimmerli B (2011) Relevance of in vitro tests of adhesive and composite dental materials. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 121:1024–1040PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Eren D, Bektas ÖÖ, Siso SH (2013) Three different adhesive systems; three different bond strength test methods. Acta Odontol Scan 71:978–983CrossRef Eren D, Bektas ÖÖ, Siso SH (2013) Three different adhesive systems; three different bond strength test methods. Acta Odontol Scan 71:978–983CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Gale MS, Darvell BW (1999) Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 27:89–99CrossRefPubMed Gale MS, Darvell BW (1999) Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 27:89–99CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Torstenson B, Brannström M (1988) Contraction gap under composite resin restorations: effect of hygroscopic expansion and thermal stress. Oper Dent 13:24–31PubMed Torstenson B, Brannström M (1988) Contraction gap under composite resin restorations: effect of hygroscopic expansion and thermal stress. Oper Dent 13:24–31PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Bonding of composite resins to PEEK: the influence of adhesive systems and air-abrasion parameters
verfasst von
Bogna Stawarczyk
Simon Taufall
Malgorzata Roos
Patrick R. Schmidlin
Nina Lümkemann
Publikationsdatum
24.06.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2151-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Clinical Oral Investigations 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.