Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Hernia 2/2008

01.04.2008 | Original Article

Laparoscopic trans-peritoneal hernioplasty (TAPP) for the acute management of strangulated inguino-crural hernias: a report of nine cases

verfasst von: G. L. Legnani, M. Rasini, S. Pastori, D. Sarli

Erschienen in: Hernia | Ausgabe 2/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Inguinal hernioplasty has always been one of the most commonly performed operations in clinical practice. In the last 15 years, thanks to the development of mini-invasive surgery, new video-endoscopic techniques for the treatment of inguinal hernia using trans-peritoneal (TAPP) and extraperitoneal (TEP) access have emerged. Both have a definite role in the treatment of bilateral and recurrent hernias, while the debate is still open about the treatment of primary mono-lateral hernias. In acute incarcerated hernia requiring an emergency operation, the endoscopic approach is uncommon and controversial, and even considered contraindicated. The aim of this publication is to verify the efficacy and the technical feasibility of TAPP operation by analyzing a consecutive series of patients operated on for incarcerated inguino-crural hernia associated with suspected visceral ischemic lesion in an emergency setting.

Materials and methods

From September 2004 to October 2005, 13 patients were operated on acutely for inguino-crural incarcerated hernia associated with suspected visceral ischemic damage. Four were excluded from the endoscopic treatment due to anesthesiologic contraindications or huge hernia dimensions. Nine patients were operated on using a trans-peritoneal approach (TAPP). Visceral mobilization and hernia reduction were obtained by incision and opening of the hernia ring. Visceral resection was performed in one case with intestinal ischemia following a prolonged observation time or “test time.”

Results

One case was associated with intestinal resection and incisional hernia repair, one with obturator hernia repair, and one with hepiployc appendix repair. None of the cases were converted to open technique, and no intra- or postoperative complications were recorded. Mean operative time was 72 min (35–180); mean hospital stay was 2.7 days (1–8). No recurrences were observed after a mean follow-up time of 18 months (8–24).

Conclusions

The TAPP procedure can be proposed for emergency treatment of inguino-crural incarcerated hernias, allowing not only hernia correction, but also visual control and the contestual treatment of the hernia content. TAPP is a more challenging procedure compared to the traditional open anterior approach and therefore requires an adequate laparoscopic training. Exclusion criteria are constituted by anesthesiologic contraindications or dimensional criteria of the hernia.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahon D, Decadt B, Rhodes M (2003) Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal) vs open (mesh) repair for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 17:1386–1390PubMedCrossRef Mahon D, Decadt B, Rhodes M (2003) Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal) vs open (mesh) repair for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 17:1386–1390PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bittner R, Sauerland S, Schmedt CG (2005) Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia rapir: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:605–615PubMedCrossRef Bittner R, Sauerland S, Schmedt CG (2005) Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia rapir: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:605–615PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:188–199PubMedCrossRef Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:188–199PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827PubMedCrossRef Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Douek M, Smith G, Oshowo A, Stoker DL, Wellwood JM (2003) Prospective randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia mesh repair: 5-year follow-up. BMJ 326:1012–1013PubMedCrossRef Douek M, Smith G, Oshowo A, Stoker DL, Wellwood JM (2003) Prospective randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia mesh repair: 5-year follow-up. BMJ 326:1012–1013PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Grant AM (2002) EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair: meta-analysis of randomized trials based on individual patient data. Hernia 6:2–10PubMedCrossRef Grant AM (2002) EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair: meta-analysis of randomized trials based on individual patient data. Hernia 6:2–10PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Kraft K, Kraft B, Bittner R (2001) Laparoscopic transperitoneal hernia repair of incarcerated hernias: is it feasible? Surg Endosc 15:1179–1183PubMed Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Kraft K, Kraft B, Bittner R (2001) Laparoscopic transperitoneal hernia repair of incarcerated hernias: is it feasible? Surg Endosc 15:1179–1183PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferzli G, Shapiro K, Chaudry G, Patel S (2004) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal approach to acutely incarcerated inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 18:228–231PubMedCrossRef Ferzli G, Shapiro K, Chaudry G, Patel S (2004) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal approach to acutely incarcerated inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 18:228–231PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Saggar VR, Sfrangi R (2005) Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of incarcerated inguinal hernia. Hernia 9:120–124PubMedCrossRef Saggar VR, Sfrangi R (2005) Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of incarcerated inguinal hernia. Hernia 9:120–124PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Watson SD, Saye W, Hollier PA (1993) Combined laparoscopic incarcerated herniorraphy and small bowel resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3:106–108PubMed Watson SD, Saye W, Hollier PA (1993) Combined laparoscopic incarcerated herniorraphy and small bowel resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3:106–108PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gallegos NC, Dawson J, Jarvis M, Hobsley M (1991) Risk of strangulation in groin hernias. Br J Surg 78:1171–1173PubMedCrossRef Gallegos NC, Dawson J, Jarvis M, Hobsley M (1991) Risk of strangulation in groin hernias. Br J Surg 78:1171–1173PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishihara T, Kubota K, Eda N, Ishibashi S, Haraguchi Y (1996) Laparoscopic approach to incarcerated inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 10:1111–1113PubMedCrossRef Ishihara T, Kubota K, Eda N, Ishibashi S, Haraguchi Y (1996) Laparoscopic approach to incarcerated inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 10:1111–1113PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Scierski A (2004) Laparoscopic operations of incarcerated inguinal and femoral hernias. Wiad Lek 57:245–248PubMed Scierski A (2004) Laparoscopic operations of incarcerated inguinal and femoral hernias. Wiad Lek 57:245–248PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaiwa Y, Namiki K, Matsumoto H (2003) Laparoscopic relief of reduction en masse of incarcerated inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 17:352PubMedCrossRef Kaiwa Y, Namiki K, Matsumoto H (2003) Laparoscopic relief of reduction en masse of incarcerated inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 17:352PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic trans-peritoneal hernioplasty (TAPP) for the acute management of strangulated inguino-crural hernias: a report of nine cases
verfasst von
G. L. Legnani
M. Rasini
S. Pastori
D. Sarli
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Hernia / Ausgabe 2/2008
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Elektronische ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0305-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2008

Hernia 2/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.