Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Hernia
Erschienen in: Hernia 1/2009

01.02.2009 | Letter to the Editor

New “biological” meshes: the need for a register. The EHS Registry for Biological Prostheses

Call for participating European surgeons

verfasst von: L. Ansaloni, F. Catena, F. Coccolini, P. Negro, G. Campanelli, M. Miserez

Erschienen in: Hernia | Ausgabe 1/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Non-absorbable prosthetic materials in hernia surgery can cause relatively rare complications, which include chronic pain, a feeling of stiffness with reduced compliance of the abdominal wall, prosthetic erosion/fistulisation and an increased risk of persistent deep infection. Recently, to avoid these problems, new “biological” prosthetic materials have been developed and proposed for clinical use. These materials are all essentially composed of an extracellular matrix stripped of its cellular components, and differ substantially only in their source (porcine small intestine submucosa, porcine dermis or cadaveric human dermis). Because of the numerous variables involved, it is very difficult to conduct a randomised controlled trial. Therefore, the European Hernia Society (EHS) has decided to start the EHS Registry for Biological Prostheses (ERBP). This is a prospective registry in Europe on the use of collagen meshes in (potentially) contaminated circumstances or clean surgical fields. The registry intends to collect some preoperative data on the patient and indication, intraoperative data and outcome data.
Literatur
1.
Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM (1989) The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 157:188–193PubMedCrossRef
2.
Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, IJzermans JN, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343(6):392–398PubMedCrossRef
3.
Heise CP, Starling JR (1998) Mesh inguinodynia: a new clinical syndrome after inguinal herniorrhaphy? J Am Coll Surg 187:514–518PubMedCrossRef
4.
Taylor SG, O’Dwyer PJ (1999) Chronic groin sepsis following tension-free inguinal hernioplasty. Br J Surg 86:562–565PubMedCrossRef
5.
Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H, Strand L, Malmstrøm J, Andersen FH, Wara P, Juul P, Callesen T; Danish Hernia Database Collaboration (2001) Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study. Lancet 358:1124–1128PubMedCrossRef
6.
7.
Falagas ME, Kasiakou SK (2005) Mesh-related infections after hernia repair surgery. Clin Microbiol Infect 11:3–8PubMedCrossRef
8.
Dayton MT, Buchele BA, Shirazi SS, Hunt LB (1986) Use of an absorbable mesh to repair contaminated abdominal-wall defects. Arch Surg 121:954–960PubMed
9.
Record RD, Hillegonds D, Simmons C, Tullius R, Rickey FA, Elmore D, Badylak SF (2001) In vivo degradation of 14C-labeled small intestinal submucosa (SIS) when used for urinary bladder repair. Biomaterials 22:2653–2659PubMedCrossRef
10.
Hodde J (2002) Naturally occurring scaffolds for soft tissue repair and regeneration. Tissue Eng 8:295–308PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
Vacanti JP, Langer R (1999) Tissue engineering: the design and fabrication of living replacement devices for surgical reconstruction and transplantation. Lancet 354(Suppl 1):SI32–SI34PubMed
13.
14.
Hiles M, Hodde J (2006) Tissue engineering a clinically useful extracellular matrix biomaterial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct J 17:S39–S43PubMedCrossRef
15.
Hodde J (2006) Extracellular matrix as a bioactive material for soft tissue reconstruction. ANZ J Surg 76(12):1096–1100PubMedCrossRef
16.
Parker DM, Armstrong PJ, Frizzi JD, North JH Jr (2006) Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for abdominal wall reconstruction. Curr Surg 63:255–258PubMedCrossRef
17.
Ma SZ, Li XH, Hu J (2006) Acellular extracellular matrix for inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 10:229–231PubMedCrossRef
18.
Buinewicz B, Rosen B (2004) Acellular cadaveric dermis (AlloDerm): a new alternative for abdominal hernia repair. Ann Plast Surg 52:188–194PubMedCrossRef
19.
Espinosa-de-los-Monteros A, de la Torre JI, Marrero I, Andrades P, Davis MR, Vásconez LO (2007) Utilization of human cadaveric acellular dermis for abdominal hernia reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 58(3):264–267PubMedCrossRef
20.
Lipman J, Medalie D, Rosen MJ (2008) Staged repair of massive incisional hernias with loss of abdominal domain: a novel approach. Am J Surg 195(1):84–88PubMedCrossRef
21.
Ansaloni L, Catena F, D’Alessandro L (2003) Prospective randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing Lichtenstein’s repair of inguinal hernia with polypropylene mesh versus Surgisis gold soft tissue graft: preliminary results. Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense 74(Suppl 2):10–14
22.
Edelman DS (2002) Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy with porcine small intestinal submucosa: a preliminary study. JSLS 6:203–205PubMed
23.
Ansaloni L, Catena F, Gagliardi S, Gazzotti F, D’Alessandro L, Pinna AD (2007) Hernia repair with porcine small-intestinal submucosa. Hernia 11(4):321–326PubMedCrossRef
24.
Gagliardi S, Ansaloni L, Catena F, Gazzotti F, D’Alessandro L, Pinna AD (2007) Hernioplasty with Surgisis(R) inguinal hernia matrix (IHM)trade mark. Surg Technol Int 16:128–133PubMed
25.
Napolitano L, Di Bartolomeo N, Aceto L, Waku M, Innocenti P (2004) Use of prosthetic materials in incisional hernias: our clinical experience. G Chir 25(4):141–145PubMed
26.
Puccio F, Solazzo M, Marciano P (2005) Comparison of three different mesh materials in tension-free inguinal hernia repair: prolene versus Vypro versus surgisis. Int Surg 90(3 Suppl):S21–S23PubMed
27.
Edelman DS, Selesnick H (2006) “Sports” hernia: treatment with biologic mesh (Surgisis): a preliminary study. Surg Endosc 20(6):971–973PubMedCrossRef
28.
Edelman DS, Hodde JP (2006) Bioactive prosthetic material for treatment of hernias. Surg Technol Int 15:104–108PubMed
29.
Fine AP (2006) Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia using Surgisis mesh and fibrin sealant. JSLS 10(4):461–465PubMed
30.
Ansaloni L, Cambrini P, Catena F, Di Saverio S, Gagliardi S, Gazzotti F, Hodde JP, Metzger DW, D’Alessandro L, Pinna AD (2007) Immune response to small intestinal submucosa (surgisis) implant in humans: preliminary observations. J Invest Surg 20(4):237–241PubMedCrossRef
31.
Saettele TM, Bachman SL, Costello CR, Grant SA, Cleveland DS, Loy TS, Kolder DG, Ramshaw BJ (2007) Use of porcine dermal collagen as a prosthetic mesh in a contaminated field for ventral hernia repair: a case report. Hernia 11(3):279–285PubMedCrossRef
32.
Smart N, Immanuel A, Mercer-Jones M (2007) Laparoscopic repair of a Littre’s hernia with porcine dermal collagen implant (Permacol). Hernia 11(4):373–376PubMedCrossRef
33.
Shaikh FM, Giri SK, Durrani S, Waldron D, Grace PA (2007) Experience with porcine acellular dermal collagen implant in one-stage tension-free reconstruction of acute and chronic abdominal wall defects. World J Surg 31(10):1966–1975PubMedCrossRef
34.
Liyanage SH, Purohit GS, Frye JN, Giordano P (2006) Anterior abdominal wall reconstruction with a Permacol implant. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59(5):553–555PubMedCrossRef
35.
Gupta A, Zahriya K, Mullens PL, Salmassi S, Keshishian A (2006) Ventral herniorrhaphy: experience with two different biosynthetic mesh materials, Surgisis and Alloderm. Hernia 10(5):419–425PubMedCrossRef
36.
Albo D, Awad SS, Berger DH, Bellows CF (2006) Decellularized human cadaveric dermis provides a safe alternative for primary inguinal hernia repair in contaminated surgical fields. Am J Surg 192(5):e12–e17PubMedCrossRef
37.
Schuster R, Singh J, Safadi BY, Wren SM (2006) The use of acellular dermal matrix for contaminated abdominal wall defects: wound status predicts success. Am J Surg 192(5):594–597PubMedCrossRef
38.
Alaedeen DI, Lipman J, Medalie D, Rosen MJ (2007) The single-staged approach to the surgical management of abdominal wall hernias in contaminated fields. Hernia 11(1):41–45PubMedCrossRef
39.
Kim H, Bruen K, Vargo D (2006) Acellular dermal matrix in the management of high-risk abdominal wall defects. Am J Surg 192(6):705–709PubMedCrossRef
40.
Diaz JJ Jr, Guy J, Berkes MB, Guillamondegui O, Miller RS (2006) Acellular dermal allograft for ventral hernia repair in the compromised surgical field. Am Surg 72(12):1181–1188PubMed
41.
Patton JH Jr, Berry S, Kralovich KA (2007) Use of human acellular dermal matrix in complex and contaminated abdominal wall reconstructions. Am J Surg 193(3):360–363PubMedCrossRef
42.
Bellows CF, Albo D, Berger DH, Awad SS (2007) Abdominal wall repair using human acellular dermis. Am J Surg 194(2):192–198PubMedCrossRef
43.
Jin J, Rosen MJ, Blatnik J, McGee MF, Williams CP, Marks J, Ponsky J (2007) Use of acellular dermal matrix for complicated ventral hernia repair: does technique affect outcomes? J Am Coll Surg 205(5):654–660 (Epub 2007 September 14)PubMedCrossRef
44.
Franklin ME Jr, Gonzalez JJ Jr, Michaelson RP, Glass JL, Chock DA (2002) Preliminary experience with new bioactive prosthetic material for repair of hernias in infected fields. Hernia 6:171–174PubMedCrossRef
45.
Franklin ME Jr, Gonzalez JJ Jr, Glass JL (2004) Use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic device for laparoscopic repair of hernias in contaminated fields: 2-year follow-up. Hernia 8:186–189PubMed
46.
Helton WS, Fisichella PM, Berger R, Horgan S, Espat NJ, Abcarian H (2005) Short-term outcomes with small intestinal submucosa for ventral abdominal hernia. Arch Surg 140:549–560PubMedCrossRef
47.
Catena F, Ansaloni L, Leone A, De Cataldis A, Gagliardi S, Gazzotti F, Peruzzi S, Agrusti S, D’Alessandro L, Taffurelli M (2005) Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia with Surgisis inguinal hernia matrix soft-tissue graft in immunodepressed patients. Hernia 9:29–31PubMedCrossRef
48.
Catena F, Ansaloni L, Gazzotti F, Gagliardi S, Di Saverio S, D’Alessandro L, Pinna AD (2007) Use of porcine dermal collagen graft (Permacol) for hernia repair in contaminated fields. Hernia 11(1):57–60PubMedCrossRef
49.
Helton WS, Fisichella PM, Berger R, Horgan S, Espat NJ, Abcarian H (2005) Short-term outcomes with small intestinal submucosa for ventral abdominal hernia. Arch Surg 140(6):549–562PubMedCrossRef
50.
Treviño JM, Franklin ME Jr, Berghoff KR, Glass JL, Jaramillo EJ (2006) Preliminary results of a two-layered prosthetic repair for recurrent inguinal and ventral hernias combining open and laparoscopic techniques. Hernia 10(3):253–257PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
New “biological” meshes: the need for a register. The EHS Registry for Biological Prostheses
Call for participating European surgeons
verfasst von
L. Ansaloni
F. Catena
F. Coccolini
P. Negro
G. Campanelli
M. Miserez
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Hernia / Ausgabe 1/2009
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Elektronische ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0440-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2009

Hernia 1/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Erratum

Bilateral round ligament varicosities mimicking inguinal hernia during pregnancy

Original Article

A “self adhering” prosthesis for hernia repair: experimental study

Original Article

Pain, quality of life and recovery after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

Original Article

Comparison of ultrasonography with computed tomography in the diagnosis of incisional hernias

Original Article

Complex inguinal hernia repairs

Letter to the Editor

Lightweight mesh for extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a note of caution

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.