Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Hernia 1/2014

01.02.2014 | Review

Surgical treatment for giant incisional hernia: a qualitative systematic review

verfasst von: A. Eriksson, J. Rosenberg, T. Bisgaard

Erschienen in: Hernia | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Repair for giant incisional hernias is a challenge due to unacceptable high morbidity and recurrence rates. Several surgical techniques are available, but all are poorly documented. This systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the existing literature on repair for giant incisional hernia.

Methods

Literature was identified through a systematic search on PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL. We only included studies with clearly defined surgical techniques and defect size of at least 15 cm. The heterogeneity of the studies precluded a meta-analysis. The analysis was based on the premises of a systematic review of the literature.

Results

We identified 14 studies (1,198 patients) including one randomised trial. Studies were mainly small and retrospective and highly heterogenic regarding design, outcome, inclusion, and exclusion criteria. The overall morbidity rate was median 32 % with a wide range between studies of 4–100 %. The mortality ranged from 0 to 5 % (median 0 %) and recurrence rate ranged from 0 to 53 % (median 5 %). Study follow-up ranged from 15 to 97 months (median 36 months). Mesh repair should always be used for patients undergoing repair for a giant hernia, and the sublay position may have advantages over onlay positioning. To avoid tension, it may be advisable to use a mesh in combination with a component separation technique. Inlay positioning of the mesh and repair without a mesh should be avoided.

Conclusions

Evidence to optimise repair for giant hernias is weak due to the heterogeneity and the poor quality of studies. However, sublay positioning of the mesh perhaps in combination with a component separation technique may be advantageous compared with other surgical techniques for giant hernia repair. Giant hernia repair is a challenging surgical procedure and severely lack evidence-based research from high-quality, large-scaled randomised studies.
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Jørgensen LN, Bisgaard T (2012) Nationwide prospective study of outcome after elective incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 216:217–228. doi:10.1016/ PubMedCrossRef Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Jørgensen LN, Bisgaard T (2012) Nationwide prospective study of outcome after elective incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 216:217–228. doi:10.​1016/​ PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pmed.​1000100 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat de Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Charbon JA, Rosman C, Hesselink EJ, van derWilt GJ (2007) Repair of giant midline abdominal wall hernias: “components separation technique” versus prosthetic repair. World J Surg 31:756–763PubMedCrossRef de Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Charbon JA, Rosman C, Hesselink EJ, van derWilt GJ (2007) Repair of giant midline abdominal wall hernias: “components separation technique” versus prosthetic repair. World J Surg 31:756–763PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamy A, Pessaux P, Mucci-Hennekinne S, Radriamananjo S, Regenet N, Arnaud J-P (2003) Surgical treatment of large incisional hernias by an intraperitoneal dracon mesh and an aponeurotic graft. J Am Coll Surg 196:531–534PubMedCrossRef Hamy A, Pessaux P, Mucci-Hennekinne S, Radriamananjo S, Regenet N, Arnaud J-P (2003) Surgical treatment of large incisional hernias by an intraperitoneal dracon mesh and an aponeurotic graft. J Am Coll Surg 196:531–534PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Arnaud JP, Tuech JJ, Pessaux P, Hadchity Y (1999) Surgical treatment of postoperative incisional hernias by intraperitoneal insertion of dracon mesh and an aponeurotic graft: a report on 250 cases. Arch Surg 134:1260–1262PubMedCrossRef Arnaud JP, Tuech JJ, Pessaux P, Hadchity Y (1999) Surgical treatment of postoperative incisional hernias by intraperitoneal insertion of dracon mesh and an aponeurotic graft: a report on 250 cases. Arch Surg 134:1260–1262PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrari GC, Miranda A, Di Lernia S, Sansonna F, Magistro C, Maggioni D, Scandroglio I, Constanzi A, Franzetti M, Pugliese R (2008) Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia: outcomes of 100 consecutive cases comprising 25 wall defects larger than 15 cm. Surg Endosc 22:1173–1179. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9707-9 PubMedCrossRef Ferrari GC, Miranda A, Di Lernia S, Sansonna F, Magistro C, Maggioni D, Scandroglio I, Constanzi A, Franzetti M, Pugliese R (2008) Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia: outcomes of 100 consecutive cases comprising 25 wall defects larger than 15 cm. Surg Endosc 22:1173–1179. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-007-9707-9 PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Shestak KC, Edington HJ, Johnson RR (2000) The separation of anatomic components technique for the reconstruction of massive midline abdominal wall defects: anatomy, surgical technique, and limitations revised. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:731–738PubMedCrossRef Shestak KC, Edington HJ, Johnson RR (2000) The separation of anatomic components technique for the reconstruction of massive midline abdominal wall defects: anatomy, surgical technique, and limitations revised. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:731–738PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat de Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Rosman C, Bemelmans MH, de Jong D, van Nieuwenhoven EJ, van Engeland MI, Bleichrodt RP (2003) “Components separation technique” for the repair of large abdominal wall hernias. J Am Coll Surg 196:32–37. doi:10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01478-3 PubMedCrossRef de Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Rosman C, Bemelmans MH, de Jong D, van Nieuwenhoven EJ, van Engeland MI, Bleichrodt RP (2003) “Components separation technique” for the repair of large abdominal wall hernias. J Am Coll Surg 196:32–37. doi:10.​1016/​S1072-7515(02)01478-3 PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Geffen HJ, Simmermacher RK (2005) Incisional hernia repair: abdominoplasty, tissue expansion, and methods of augmentation. World J Surg 29:1080–1085PubMedCrossRef Van Geffen HJ, Simmermacher RK (2005) Incisional hernia repair: abdominoplasty, tissue expansion, and methods of augmentation. World J Surg 29:1080–1085PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat de Vries Reilingh TS, van Geldere D, Langenhorst B, de Jong D, van der Wilt GJ, van Goor H, Bleichrodt RP (2004) Repair of large midline incisional hernias with polypropylene mesh: comparison of three operative techniques. Hernia 8:56–59. doi:10.1007/s10029-003-0170-9 PubMedCrossRef de Vries Reilingh TS, van Geldere D, Langenhorst B, de Jong D, van der Wilt GJ, van Goor H, Bleichrodt RP (2004) Repair of large midline incisional hernias with polypropylene mesh: comparison of three operative techniques. Hernia 8:56–59. doi:10.​1007/​s10029-003-0170-9 PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL (1990) “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:519–526PubMedCrossRef Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL (1990) “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:519–526PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat DiCocco JM, Fabian TC, Emmet KP, Magnotti LJ, Goldberg SP, Croce MA (2012) Components separation for abdominal wall reconstruction: the Memphis modification. Surgery 151:118–125PubMedCrossRef DiCocco JM, Fabian TC, Emmet KP, Magnotti LJ, Goldberg SP, Croce MA (2012) Components separation for abdominal wall reconstruction: the Memphis modification. Surgery 151:118–125PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B, Seiler CM, Miserez M (2011) Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD007781. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007781.pub2 Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B, Seiler CM, Miserez M (2011) Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD007781. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD007781.​pub2
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Wassenaar E, Schoenmaeckers E, Raymakers J, van der Palen J, Rakic S (2010) Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques. Surg Endosc 24:1296–1302. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0763-1 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wassenaar E, Schoenmaeckers E, Raymakers J, van der Palen J, Rakic S (2010) Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques. Surg Endosc 24:1296–1302. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-009-0763-1 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Forbes SS, Eskicioglu C, McLeod RS, Okrainec A (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh. Br J Surg 96:851–858. doi:10.1002/bjs.6668 PubMedCrossRef Forbes SS, Eskicioglu C, McLeod RS, Okrainec A (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh. Br J Surg 96:851–858. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​6668 PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Müller-Riemenschneider F, Roll S, Friedrich M, Zieren J, Reinhold T, von der Schulenburg JM, Greiner W, Willich SN (2007) Medical effectiveness and safety of conventional compared to laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 21:2127–2136. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9513-4 PubMedCrossRef Müller-Riemenschneider F, Roll S, Friedrich M, Zieren J, Reinhold T, von der Schulenburg JM, Greiner W, Willich SN (2007) Medical effectiveness and safety of conventional compared to laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 21:2127–2136. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-007-9513-4 PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Surgical treatment for giant incisional hernia: a qualitative systematic review
verfasst von
A. Eriksson
J. Rosenberg
T. Bisgaard
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2014
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
Hernia / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Elektronische ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1066-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Hernia 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO REFEREES

Acknowledgement to referees 2013

Letter to the Editor

Who’s trusting in a truss?

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.