Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Hernia 1/2015

01.02.2015 | Original Article

Central failures of lightweight monofilament polyester mesh causing hernia recurrence: a cautionary note

verfasst von: C. C. Petro, E. H. Nahabet, C. N. Criss, S. B. Orenstein, H. A. von Recum, Y. W. Novitsky, M. J. Rosen

Erschienen in: Hernia | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Uncoated, lightweight, macroporous, monofilament mesh has been shown to demonstrate improved bacterial clearance, better tissue integration, reduced foreign body response, and less chronic pain with equivalent durability for hernia repair. These findings led us to use a new lightweight monofilament polyester mesh (Parietex TCM, Covidien). Here, we report our experience with this mesh in open incisional hernia repair.

Methods

Patients undergoing incisional hernia repair with Parietex TCM were retrospectively identified within our prospectively maintained database. Patient demographics, operative characteristics, and follow-up were reviewed. Outcome parameters included 90-day wound morbidity and hernia recurrence.

Results

In 2011, 36 patients (mean age 56.8; mean BMI 32.4 kg/m2) underwent open incisional hernia repair with retrorectus mesh placement by two surgeons (MJR, YWN) at Case Medical Center. Anterior and posterior fascial closure was achieved in all cases. Wound morbidity included seven surgical site occurrences: four superficial infections that resolved with antibiotics, one wound dehiscence requiring wet-to-dry packing, and two seromas that resolved without intervention. With a mean follow-up of 13 months, 8 (22 %) recurrences have occurred. On reoperation, 7 (19 %) of these patients had mechanical failure or fracturing of the mesh. No confounding variables were identified by univariate analysis of patient demographics, operative characteristics, or wound morbidity.

Conclusion

Lightweight monofilament polyester mesh (Parietex TCM) appears to have a high incidence of mechanical failure in the context of open incisional hernia repair. While this limitation may ultimately be revealed as a weakness of all lightweight mesh, surgeons should be aware that these failures have already been documented.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Luijendijk RW et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343(6):392–398PubMedCrossRef Luijendijk RW et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343(6):392–398PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Burger JW et al (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240(4):578–583 discussion 583–585PubMedCentralPubMed Burger JW et al (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240(4):578–583 discussion 583–585PubMedCentralPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen PT, Asarias JR, Pierce LM (2012) Influence of a new monofilament polyester mesh on inflammation and matrix remodeling. J Invest Surg 25(5):330–339PubMedCrossRef Nguyen PT, Asarias JR, Pierce LM (2012) Influence of a new monofilament polyester mesh on inflammation and matrix remodeling. J Invest Surg 25(5):330–339PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Asarias JR et al (2011) Influence of mesh materials on the expression of mediators involved in wound healing. J Invest Surg 24(2):87–98PubMedCrossRef Asarias JR et al (2011) Influence of mesh materials on the expression of mediators involved in wound healing. J Invest Surg 24(2):87–98PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanders D, Lambie J, Bond P, Moate R, Steer JA (2013) An in vitro study assessing the effect of mesh morphology and suture fixation on bacterial adherence. Hernia 17(6):779–789PubMedCrossRef Sanders D, Lambie J, Bond P, Moate R, Steer JA (2013) An in vitro study assessing the effect of mesh morphology and suture fixation on bacterial adherence. Hernia 17(6):779–789PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Blatnik JA et al (2012) In vivo analysis of the morphologic characteristics of synthetic mesh to resist MRSA adherence. J Gastrointest Surg 16(11):2139–2144PubMedCrossRef Blatnik JA et al (2012) In vivo analysis of the morphologic characteristics of synthetic mesh to resist MRSA adherence. J Gastrointest Surg 16(11):2139–2144PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bryan N et al (2012) In vitro activation of human leukocytes in response to contact with synthetic hernia meshes. Clin Biochem 45(9):672–676PubMedCrossRef Bryan N et al (2012) In vitro activation of human leukocytes in response to contact with synthetic hernia meshes. Clin Biochem 45(9):672–676PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Orenstein SB et al (2012) Comparative analysis of histopathologic effects of synthetic meshes based on material, weight, and pore size in mice. J Surg Res 176(2):423–429PubMedCrossRef Orenstein SB et al (2012) Comparative analysis of histopathologic effects of synthetic meshes based on material, weight, and pore size in mice. J Surg Res 176(2):423–429PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidbauer S et al (2005) Heavy-weight versus low-weight polypropylene meshes for open sublay mesh repair of incisional hernia. Eur J Med Res 10(6):247–253PubMed Schmidbauer S et al (2005) Heavy-weight versus low-weight polypropylene meshes for open sublay mesh repair of incisional hernia. Eur J Med Res 10(6):247–253PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cobb WS et al (2006) Textile analysis of heavy weight, mid-weight, and light weight polypropylene mesh in a porcine ventral hernia model. J Surg Res 136(1):1–7PubMedCrossRef Cobb WS et al (2006) Textile analysis of heavy weight, mid-weight, and light weight polypropylene mesh in a porcine ventral hernia model. J Surg Res 136(1):1–7PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2005) The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair. Surg Innov 12(1):63–69PubMedCrossRef Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2005) The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair. Surg Innov 12(1):63–69PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Novitsky YW et al (2012) Transversus abdominis muscle release: a novel approach to posterior component separation during complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg 204(5):709–716PubMedCrossRef Novitsky YW et al (2012) Transversus abdominis muscle release: a novel approach to posterior component separation during complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg 204(5):709–716PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Zuvela M, Galun D, Djuric-Stefanovic A, Palibrk I, Petrovic M, Milicevic M (2014) Central rupture and bulging of low-weight polypropylene mesh following recurrent incisional sublay hernioplasty. Hernia 18(1):135–140PubMedCrossRef Zuvela M, Galun D, Djuric-Stefanovic A, Palibrk I, Petrovic M, Milicevic M (2014) Central rupture and bulging of low-weight polypropylene mesh following recurrent incisional sublay hernioplasty. Hernia 18(1):135–140PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ray JA et al (1981) Polydioxanone (PDS), a novel monofilament synthetic absorbable suture. Surg Gynecol Obstet 153(4):497–507PubMed Ray JA et al (1981) Polydioxanone (PDS), a novel monofilament synthetic absorbable suture. Surg Gynecol Obstet 153(4):497–507PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Shumacker BH Jr, Mandelbaum I (1961) Clinical evaluation of dacron suture material. Arch Surg 83:647–649PubMedCrossRef Shumacker BH Jr, Mandelbaum I (1961) Clinical evaluation of dacron suture material. Arch Surg 83:647–649PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Central failures of lightweight monofilament polyester mesh causing hernia recurrence: a cautionary note
verfasst von
C. C. Petro
E. H. Nahabet
C. N. Criss
S. B. Orenstein
H. A. von Recum
Y. W. Novitsky
M. J. Rosen
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2015
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
Hernia / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Elektronische ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1237-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Hernia 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO REFEREES

Acknowledgement to referees

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.