Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Hernia 2/2015

01.04.2015 | Original Article

An experimental comparison of the effects of bacterial colonization on biologic and synthetic meshes

verfasst von: William C. Cole, Eric M. Balent, Pamela C. Masella, Lauren N. Kajiura, Karen W. Matsumoto, Lisa M. Pierce

Erschienen in: Hernia | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Biologic meshes are being used with increasing frequency to repair contaminated abdominal wall defects despite high long-term recurrence and infection rates associated with their use. Recent clinical reports describing the success of lightweight, macroporous synthetic meshes in contaminated ventral hernia repairs have led some surgeons to challenge the belief that synthetics are contraindicated in contaminated fields. We aimed to determine whether a frequently used biologic mesh (StratticeTM) is more resistant to bacterial colonization than macroporous synthetic mesh (ParietexTM ProgripTM) after inoculation with two common pathogens.

Methods

Rats (n = 48) were implanted subcutaneously with StratticeTM or ProgripTM. Meshes were inoculated with sterile saline or a suspension containing 106 colony-forming units of Staphylococcus aureus or Escherichia coli prior to wound closure (n = 8 per subgroup). Meshes were explanted at 4 weeks and underwent microbiologic and histologic analyses.

Results

ProgripTM demonstrated superior bacterial clearance compared to StratticeTM (E. coli, 88 vs. 17 % clearance, p = 0.03; S. aureus, 75 vs. 50 %, p = 0.61; combined bacterial strains, 81 vs. 36 %, p = 0.02; respectively). In the StratticeTM group, severely degraded meshes were observed in 100 % of animals inoculated with E. coli (but 0 % inoculated with S. aureus). In contrast, all ProgripTM meshes remained intact regardless of inoculum. Scores for neovascularization were higher in the synthetic group irrespective of contamination (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Biologic meshes may not be more resistant to bacterial colonization than reduced-weight synthetics, and their resistance may differ in response to different pathogens. The routine use of biologics in contaminated ventral hernia repair should be questioned, particularly in the presence of E. coli.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Chavarriaga LF, Lin E, Losken A et al (2010) Management of complex abdominal wall defects using acellular porcine dermal collagen. Am Surg 76:96–100PubMed Chavarriaga LF, Lin E, Losken A et al (2010) Management of complex abdominal wall defects using acellular porcine dermal collagen. Am Surg 76:96–100PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Shankaran V, Weber DJ, Reed RL 2nd, Luchette FA (2011) A review of available prosthetics for ventral hernia repair. Ann Surg 253:16–26CrossRefPubMed Shankaran V, Weber DJ, Reed RL 2nd, Luchette FA (2011) A review of available prosthetics for ventral hernia repair. Ann Surg 253:16–26CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Satterwhite TS, Miri S, Chung C et al (2012) Outcomes of complex abdominal herniorrhaphy: experience with 106 cases. Ann Plast Surg 68:382–388CrossRefPubMed Satterwhite TS, Miri S, Chung C et al (2012) Outcomes of complex abdominal herniorrhaphy: experience with 106 cases. Ann Plast Surg 68:382–388CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kissane NA, Itani KM (2012) A decade of ventral incisional hernia repairs with biologic acellular dermal matrix: what have we learned? Plast Reconstr Surg 130:194S–202SCrossRefPubMed Kissane NA, Itani KM (2012) A decade of ventral incisional hernia repairs with biologic acellular dermal matrix: what have we learned? Plast Reconstr Surg 130:194S–202SCrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Slater NJ, van der Kolk M, Hendriks T, van Goor H, Bleichrodt RP (2013) Biologic grafts for ventral hernia repair: a systematic review. Am J Surg 205:220–230CrossRefPubMed Slater NJ, van der Kolk M, Hendriks T, van Goor H, Bleichrodt RP (2013) Biologic grafts for ventral hernia repair: a systematic review. Am J Surg 205:220–230CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Carbonell AM, Criss CN, Cobb WS, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ (2013) Outcomes of synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 217:991–998CrossRefPubMed Carbonell AM, Criss CN, Cobb WS, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ (2013) Outcomes of synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 217:991–998CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosen MJ, Krpata DM, Ermlich B, Blatnik JA (2013) A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh. Ann Surg 257:991–996CrossRefPubMed Rosen MJ, Krpata DM, Ermlich B, Blatnik JA (2013) A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh. Ann Surg 257:991–996CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Birolini C, Utiyama EM, Rodrigues AJ Jr, Birolini D (2000) Elective colonic operation and prosthetic repair of incisional hernia: does contamination contraindicate abdominal wall prosthesis use? J Am Coll Surg 191:366–372CrossRefPubMed Birolini C, Utiyama EM, Rodrigues AJ Jr, Birolini D (2000) Elective colonic operation and prosthetic repair of incisional hernia: does contamination contraindicate abdominal wall prosthesis use? J Am Coll Surg 191:366–372CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Darehzereshki A, Goldfarb M, Zehetner J et al (2014) Biologic versus nonbiologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 38:40–50CrossRefPubMed Darehzereshki A, Goldfarb M, Zehetner J et al (2014) Biologic versus nonbiologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 38:40–50CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Itani K, Rosen M, Vargo D, Awad SS, Denoto G, Butler CE, RICH Study Group (2012) Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a biologic porcine tissue matrix: the RICH study. Surgery 152:498–505CrossRefPubMed Itani K, Rosen M, Vargo D, Awad SS, Denoto G, Butler CE, RICH Study Group (2012) Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a biologic porcine tissue matrix: the RICH study. Surgery 152:498–505CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Cavallaro A, Lo Menzo E, Di Vita M et al (2010) Use of biological meshes for abdominal wall reconstruction in highly contaminated fields. World J Gastroenterol 16:1928–1933CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Cavallaro A, Lo Menzo E, Di Vita M et al (2010) Use of biological meshes for abdominal wall reconstruction in highly contaminated fields. World J Gastroenterol 16:1928–1933CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Janfaza M, Martin M, Skinner R (2012) A preliminary comparison study of two noncrosslinked biologic meshes used in complex ventral hernia repairs. World J Surg 36:1760–1764CrossRefPubMed Janfaza M, Martin M, Skinner R (2012) A preliminary comparison study of two noncrosslinked biologic meshes used in complex ventral hernia repairs. World J Surg 36:1760–1764CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel KM, Bhanot P (2012) Complications of acellular dermal matrices in abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:216S–224SCrossRefPubMed Patel KM, Bhanot P (2012) Complications of acellular dermal matrices in abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:216S–224SCrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Geisler DJ, Reilly JC, Vaughan SG, Glennon EJ, Kondylis PD (2003) Safety and outcome of use of nonabsorbable mesh for repair of fascial defects in the presence of open bowel. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1118–1123CrossRefPubMed Geisler DJ, Reilly JC, Vaughan SG, Glennon EJ, Kondylis PD (2003) Safety and outcome of use of nonabsorbable mesh for repair of fascial defects in the presence of open bowel. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1118–1123CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Souza JM, Dumanian GA (2013) Routine use of bioprosthetic mesh is not necessary: a retrospective review of 100 consecutive cases of intra-abdominal midweight polypropylene mesh for ventral hernia repair. Surgery 153:393–399CrossRefPubMed Souza JM, Dumanian GA (2013) Routine use of bioprosthetic mesh is not necessary: a retrospective review of 100 consecutive cases of intra-abdominal midweight polypropylene mesh for ventral hernia repair. Surgery 153:393–399CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Vertrees A, Kellicut D, Ottman S, Peoples G, Shriver C (2006) Early definitive abdominal closure using serial closure technique on injured soldiers returning from Afghanistan and Iraq. J Am Coll Surg 202:762–772CrossRefPubMed Vertrees A, Kellicut D, Ottman S, Peoples G, Shriver C (2006) Early definitive abdominal closure using serial closure technique on injured soldiers returning from Afghanistan and Iraq. J Am Coll Surg 202:762–772CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Harth KC, Blatnik JA, Anderson JM et al (2013) Effect of surgical wound classification on biologic graft performance in complex hernia repair: an experimental study. Surgery 153:481–492CrossRefPubMed Harth KC, Blatnik JA, Anderson JM et al (2013) Effect of surgical wound classification on biologic graft performance in complex hernia repair: an experimental study. Surgery 153:481–492CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ditzel M, Deerenberg EB, Grotenhuis N et al (2013) Biologic meshes are not superior to synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study with long-term follow-up evaluation. Surg Endosc 27:3654–3662CrossRefPubMed Ditzel M, Deerenberg EB, Grotenhuis N et al (2013) Biologic meshes are not superior to synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study with long-term follow-up evaluation. Surg Endosc 27:3654–3662CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Engelsman AF, van Dam GM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Ploeg RJ (2010) In vivo evaluation of bacterial infection involving morphologically different surgical meshes. Ann Surg 251:133–137CrossRefPubMed Engelsman AF, van Dam GM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Ploeg RJ (2010) In vivo evaluation of bacterial infection involving morphologically different surgical meshes. Ann Surg 251:133–137CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Díaz-Godoy A, García-Ureña MA, López-Monclús J et al (2011) Searching for the best polypropylene mesh to be used in bowel contamination. Hernia 15:173–179CrossRefPubMed Díaz-Godoy A, García-Ureña MA, López-Monclús J et al (2011) Searching for the best polypropylene mesh to be used in bowel contamination. Hernia 15:173–179CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Blatnik JA, Krpata DM, Jacobs MR et al (2012) In vivo analysis of the morphologic characteristics of synthetic mesh to resist MRSA adherence. J Gastrointest Surg 16:2139–2144CrossRefPubMed Blatnik JA, Krpata DM, Jacobs MR et al (2012) In vivo analysis of the morphologic characteristics of synthetic mesh to resist MRSA adherence. J Gastrointest Surg 16:2139–2144CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia-Pumarino R, Pascual G, Rodríguez M, Perez-Kohler B, Bellon JM (2014) Do collagen meshes offer benefits over preclude® ePTFE implants in contaminated surgical fields? A comparative in vitro and in vivo study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 102:366–375CrossRefPubMed Garcia-Pumarino R, Pascual G, Rodríguez M, Perez-Kohler B, Bellon JM (2014) Do collagen meshes offer benefits over preclude® ePTFE implants in contaminated surgical fields? A comparative in vitro and in vivo study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 102:366–375CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen PT, Asarias JR, Pierce LM (2012) Influence of a new monofilament polyester mesh on inflammation and matrix remodeling. J Invest Surg 25:330–339CrossRefPubMed Nguyen PT, Asarias JR, Pierce LM (2012) Influence of a new monofilament polyester mesh on inflammation and matrix remodeling. J Invest Surg 25:330–339CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
An experimental comparison of the effects of bacterial colonization on biologic and synthetic meshes
verfasst von
William C. Cole
Eric M. Balent
Pamela C. Masella
Lauren N. Kajiura
Karen W. Matsumoto
Lisa M. Pierce
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2015
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
Hernia / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Elektronische ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1290-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Hernia 2/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Invited Commentary

The heart of darkness

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.