Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Hernia 4/2016

28.10.2015 | Original Article

Prophylactic mesh placement to prevent parastomal hernia, early results of a prospective multicentre randomized trial

verfasst von: H. T. Brandsma, B. M. E. Hansson, T. J Aufenacker, D. van Geldere, F. M. van Lammeren, C. Mahabier, P. Steenvoorde, T. S. de Vries Reilingh, R. J. Wiezer, J. H. W. de Wilt, R. P. Bleichrodt, C. Rosman

Erschienen in: Hernia | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Parastomal hernia (PSH) is a common complication after colostomy formation. Recent studies indicate that mesh implantation during formation of a colostomy might prevent a PSH. To determine if placement of a retromuscular mesh at the colostomy site is a feasible, safe and effective procedure in preventing a parastomal hernia, we performed a multicentre randomized controlled trial in 11 large teaching hospitals and three university centres in The Netherlands.

Methods

Augmentation of the abdominal wall with a retromuscular light-weight polypropylene mesh (Parietene Light™, Covidien) around the trephine was compared with traditional colostomy formation. Patients undergoing elective open formation of a permanent end-colostomy were eligible. 150 patients were randomized between 2010 and 2012. Primary endpoint of the PREVENT trial is the incidence of parastomal hernia. Secondary endpoints are morbidity, pain, quality of life, mortality and cost-effectiveness. This article focussed on the early results of the PREVENT trial and, therefore, operation time, postoperative morbidity, pain, and quality of life were measured.

Results

Outcomes represent results after 3 months of follow-up. A total of 150 patients were randomized. Mean operation time of the mesh group (N = 72) was significantly longer than in the control group (N = 78) (182.6 vs. 156.8 min; P = 0.018). Four (2.7 %) peristomal infections occurred of which one (1.4 %) in the mesh group. No infection of the mesh occurred. Most of the other infections were infections of the perineal wound, equally distributed over both groups. No statistical differences were discovered in stoma or mesh-related complications, fistula or stricture formation, pain, or quality of life.

Conclusions

During open and elective formation of an end-colostomy, primary placement of a retromuscular light-weight polypropylene mesh for prevention of a parastomal hernia is a safe and feasible procedure.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung MT, Chia NH, Chiu WY (2001) Surgical treatment of parastomal hernia complicating sigmoid colostomies. Dis Colon Rectum 44(2):266–270CrossRefPubMed Cheung MT, Chia NH, Chiu WY (2001) Surgical treatment of parastomal hernia complicating sigmoid colostomies. Dis Colon Rectum 44(2):266–270CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Arumugam PJ, Bevan L, Macdonald L, Watkins AJ, Morgan AR, Beynon J, Carr ND (2003) A prospective audit of stomas–analysis of risk factors and complications and their management. Colorectal Dis 5(1):49–52CrossRefPubMed Arumugam PJ, Bevan L, Macdonald L, Watkins AJ, Morgan AR, Beynon J, Carr ND (2003) A prospective audit of stomas–analysis of risk factors and complications and their management. Colorectal Dis 5(1):49–52CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shellito PC (1998) Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 41(12):1562–1572CrossRefPubMed Shellito PC (1998) Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 41(12):1562–1572CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Serra-Aracil X, Bombardo-Junca J, Moreno-Matias J, Darnell A, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, Ayguavives-Garnica I, Navarro-Soto S (2009) Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Ann Surg 249(4):583–587. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ec809 CrossRefPubMed Serra-Aracil X, Bombardo-Junca J, Moreno-Matias J, Darnell A, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, Ayguavives-Garnica I, Navarro-Soto S (2009) Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Ann Surg 249(4):583–587. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e31819ec809​ CrossRefPubMed
11.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Brandsma HT, Hansson BM, Haan HV, Aufenacker TJ, Rosman C, Bleichrodt RP (2012) PREVENTion of a parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh in patients undergoing permanent end-colostomy; the PREVENT-trial: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials 13:226. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-13-226 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brandsma HT, Hansson BM, Haan HV, Aufenacker TJ, Rosman C, Bleichrodt RP (2012) PREVENTion of a parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh in patients undergoing permanent end-colostomy; the PREVENT-trial: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials 13:226. doi:10.​1186/​1745-6215-13-226 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) hospital infection control practices advisory committee. Am J Infect Control 27(2):97–132. doi:10.1016/S0196-6553(99)70088-X (quiz 133–134, discussion 196) CrossRefPubMed Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) hospital infection control practices advisory committee. Am J Infect Control 27(2):97–132. doi:10.​1016/​S0196-6553(99)70088-X (quiz 133–134, discussion 196) CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD (1994) The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 32(1):40–66CrossRefPubMed McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD (1994) The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 32(1):40–66CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483CrossRefPubMed Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Von Korff M, Dworkin SF, Le Resche L (1990) Graded chronic pain status: an epidemiologic evaluation. Pain 40(3):279–291CrossRef Von Korff M, Dworkin SF, Le Resche L (1990) Graded chronic pain status: an epidemiologic evaluation. Pain 40(3):279–291CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Oostenbrink JB, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF (2002) Standardisation of costs: the Dutch manual for costing in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics 20(7):443–454CrossRefPubMed Oostenbrink JB, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF (2002) Standardisation of costs: the Dutch manual for costing in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics 20(7):443–454CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chui LB, Ng WT, Sze YS, Yuen KS, Wong YT, Kong CK (2010) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in chronic pain incidence after TEP repair of bilateral inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 24(11):2735–2738. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1036-8 CrossRefPubMed Chui LB, Ng WT, Sze YS, Yuen KS, Wong YT, Kong CK (2010) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in chronic pain incidence after TEP repair of bilateral inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 24(11):2735–2738. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-010-1036-8 CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Post S, Weiss B, Willer M, Neufang T, Lorenz D (2004) Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 91(1):44–48. doi:10.1002/bjs.4387 CrossRefPubMed Post S, Weiss B, Willer M, Neufang T, Lorenz D (2004) Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 91(1):44–48. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​4387 CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris-Stiff G, Hughes LE (1998) The continuing challenge of parastomal hernia: failure of a novel polypropylene mesh repair. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80(3):184–187PubMedPubMedCentral Morris-Stiff G, Hughes LE (1998) The continuing challenge of parastomal hernia: failure of a novel polypropylene mesh repair. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80(3):184–187PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing D (2012) Dutch surgical colorectal audit Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing D (2012) Dutch surgical colorectal audit
Metadaten
Titel
Prophylactic mesh placement to prevent parastomal hernia, early results of a prospective multicentre randomized trial
verfasst von
H. T. Brandsma
B. M. E. Hansson
T. J Aufenacker
D. van Geldere
F. M. van Lammeren
C. Mahabier
P. Steenvoorde
T. S. de Vries Reilingh
R. J. Wiezer
J. H. W. de Wilt
R. P. Bleichrodt
C. Rosman
Publikationsdatum
28.10.2015
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
Hernia / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Elektronische ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1427-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Hernia 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.