Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Hernia 1/2016

01.02.2016 | Original Article

Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional multiple-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: a systemic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Chi-Wen Lo, Stephen Shei-Dei Yang, Yao-Chou Tsai, Cheng-Hsing Hsieh, Shang-Jen Chang

Erschienen in: Hernia | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

We systemically reviewed published literatures and performed meta-analysis to compare the surgical outcomes between laparoendoscopic single-site over the multiple-port total extraperitoneal approach in hernia repair.

Methods

We did a systemic search of PubMed® and Cochrane review for all randomized controlled trials and comparative trials that compared the efficacy and safety between LESS-TEP and MP-TEP. The evaluated outcomes included perioperative parameters (operative time, conversion rate), hospital stay and complications (seroma, delayed return of bladder function, postoperative pain and recurrence). The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager software (RevMan®, version 5.2.6) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

There were 10 trials met the inclusion criteria and included for meta-analysis. Totally, there were 595 and 514 patients underwent LESS-TEP and MP-TEP, respectively. The LESS-TEP took significantly longer-operative time than the MP-TEP in unilateral hernia repair (weighted mean difference (WMD) 4.11 min, 95 % CI 0.76–7.46, p = 0.02) while not in bilateral hernia repair (WMD 3.87 min, 95 % of CI −2.59–10.33, z = 1.17, p = 0.24). There were no significant differences in surgical outcomes with regard to postoperative pain scale, conversion rate, hospital stay, recurrence rate and complication rate between two groups. The length of the sub-umbilical wound was the same in both groups. The result of cosmesis was not compared because of the limited data.

Conclusion

In experienced hands, LESS-TEP is a feasible alternative to MP-TEP with comparable surgical efficacy and morbidity, but with longer operation time in unilateral hernia repair. Potential advantages of LESS-TEP including better cosmesis, less postoperative pain and less trocar-associated complications were not clearly shown.
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Schumpelick V, Treutner KH, Arlt G (1994) Inguinal hernia repair in adults. Lancet 344(8919):375–379CrossRefPubMed Schumpelick V, Treutner KH, Arlt G (1994) Inguinal hernia repair in adults. Lancet 344(8919):375–379CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures versus Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19(2):188–199. doi:10.1007/s00464-004-9126-0 CrossRefPubMed Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures versus Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19(2):188–199. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-004-9126-0 CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, Dudai M, Ferzli GS, Fitzgibbons RJ, Fortelny RH, Klinge U, Kockerling F, Kuhry E, Kukleta J, Lomanto D, Misra MC, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Reinpold W, Rosenberg J, Sauerland S, Schug-Pass C, Singh K, Timoney M, Weyhe D, Chowbey P (2011) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc 25(9):2773–2843. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1799-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, Dudai M, Ferzli GS, Fitzgibbons RJ, Fortelny RH, Klinge U, Kockerling F, Kuhry E, Kukleta J, Lomanto D, Misra MC, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Reinpold W, Rosenberg J, Sauerland S, Schug-Pass C, Singh K, Timoney M, Weyhe D, Chowbey P (2011) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc 25(9):2773–2843. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-011-1799-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Filipovic-Cugura J, Kirac I, Kulis T, Jankovic J, Bekavac-Beslin M (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: first case. Surg Endosc 23(4):920–921. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0318-x CrossRefPubMed Filipovic-Cugura J, Kirac I, Kulis T, Jankovic J, Bekavac-Beslin M (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: first case. Surg Endosc 23(4):920–921. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-008-0318-x CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tai HC, Lin CD, Chung SD, Chueh SC, Tsai YC, Yang SS (2011) A comparative study of standard versus laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 25(9):2879–2883. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1636-y CrossRefPubMed Tai HC, Lin CD, Chung SD, Chueh SC, Tsai YC, Yang SS (2011) A comparative study of standard versus laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 25(9):2879–2883. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-011-1636-y CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cugura JF, Kirac I, Kulis T, Sremac M, Ledinsky M, Beslin MB (2012) Comparison of single incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: initial experience. J Endourol 26(1):63–66. doi:10.1089/end.2011.0352 CrossRefPubMed Cugura JF, Kirac I, Kulis T, Sremac M, Ledinsky M, Beslin MB (2012) Comparison of single incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: initial experience. J Endourol 26(1):63–66. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2011.​0352 CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JH, Lee YS, Kim JJ, Park SM (2013) Single port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty: a comparative study of short-term outcome with conventional laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty. World J Surg 37(4):746–751. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-1925-9 CrossRefPubMed Kim JH, Lee YS, Kim JJ, Park SM (2013) Single port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty: a comparative study of short-term outcome with conventional laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty. World J Surg 37(4):746–751. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-013-1925-9 CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai YC, Ho CH, Tai HC, Chung SD, Chueh SC (2013) Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 27(12):4684–4692. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3116-z CrossRefPubMed Tsai YC, Ho CH, Tai HC, Chung SD, Chueh SC (2013) Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 27(12):4684–4692. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-013-3116-z CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Buckley FP 3rd, Vassaur H, Monsivais S, Sharp NE, Jupiter D, Watson R, Eckford J (2014) Comparison of outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy and traditional three-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy at a single institution. Surg Endosc 28(1):30–35. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3145-7 CrossRefPubMed Buckley FP 3rd, Vassaur H, Monsivais S, Sharp NE, Jupiter D, Watson R, Eckford J (2014) Comparison of outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy and traditional three-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy at a single institution. Surg Endosc 28(1):30–35. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-013-3145-7 CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wakasugi M, Masuzawa T, Tei M, Omori T, Ueshima S, Tori M, Akamatsu H (2014) Single-incision totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: our initial 100 cases and comparison with conventional three-port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Surg Today. doi:10.1007/s00595-014-0967-4 PubMed Wakasugi M, Masuzawa T, Tei M, Omori T, Ueshima S, Tori M, Akamatsu H (2014) Single-incision totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: our initial 100 cases and comparison with conventional three-port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Surg Today. doi:10.​1007/​s00595-014-0967-4 PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tran H, Turingan I, Tran K, Zajkowska M, Lam V, Hawthorne W (2014) Potential benefits of single-port compared to multiport laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Hernia 18(5):731–744. doi:10.1007/s10029-014-1261-5 CrossRefPubMed Tran H, Turingan I, Tran K, Zajkowska M, Lam V, Hawthorne W (2014) Potential benefits of single-port compared to multiport laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Hernia 18(5):731–744. doi:10.​1007/​s10029-014-1261-5 CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bialecki JT, Wieloch MM, Kolomecki K (2014) Single incision approach to totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Wideochirurgia i inne techniki malo inwazyjne=Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques/kwartalnik pod patronatem Sekcji Wideochirurgii TChP oraz Sekcji Chirurgii Bariatrycznej TChP 9 (2):201–206. doi:10.5114/wiitm.2014.41631 Bialecki JT, Wieloch MM, Kolomecki K (2014) Single incision approach to totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Wideochirurgia i inne techniki malo inwazyjne=Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques/kwartalnik pod patronatem Sekcji Wideochirurgii TChP oraz Sekcji Chirurgii Bariatrycznej TChP 9 (2):201–206. doi:10.​5114/​wiitm.​2014.​41631
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wijerathne S, Agarwal N, Ramzy A, Lomanto D (2014) A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare single-port endo-laparoscopic surgery versus conventional TEP inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 28(11):3053–3058. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3578-7 CrossRefPubMed Wijerathne S, Agarwal N, Ramzy A, Lomanto D (2014) A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare single-port endo-laparoscopic surgery versus conventional TEP inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 28(11):3053–3058. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-014-3578-7 CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaouk JH, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Han DH, Lee SW, Yinghao S, Cadeddu JA, Derweesh IH, Richstone L, Cindolo L, Branco A, Greco F, Allaf M, Sotelo R, Liatsikos E, Stolzenburg JU, Rane A, White WM, Han WK, Haber GP, White MA, Molina WR, Jeong BC, Lee JY, Linhui W, Best S, Stroup SP, Rais-Bahrami S, Schips L, Fornara P, Pierorazio P, Giedelman C, Lee JW, Stein RJ, Rha KH (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: worldwide multi-institutional analysis of 1076 cases. Eur Urol 60(5):998–1005. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.002 CrossRefPubMed Kaouk JH, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Han DH, Lee SW, Yinghao S, Cadeddu JA, Derweesh IH, Richstone L, Cindolo L, Branco A, Greco F, Allaf M, Sotelo R, Liatsikos E, Stolzenburg JU, Rane A, White WM, Han WK, Haber GP, White MA, Molina WR, Jeong BC, Lee JY, Linhui W, Best S, Stroup SP, Rais-Bahrami S, Schips L, Fornara P, Pierorazio P, Giedelman C, Lee JW, Stein RJ, Rha KH (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: worldwide multi-institutional analysis of 1076 cases. Eur Urol 60(5):998–1005. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2011.​06.​002 CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Yussra Y, Sutton PA, Kosai NR, Razman J, Mishra RK, Harunarashid H, Das S (2013) Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) inguinal hernia repair—recent clinical experiences of this novel technique. La Clinica terapeutica 164(5):425–428. doi:10.7417/ct.2013.1608 PubMed Yussra Y, Sutton PA, Kosai NR, Razman J, Mishra RK, Harunarashid H, Das S (2013) Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) inguinal hernia repair—recent clinical experiences of this novel technique. La Clinica terapeutica 164(5):425–428. doi:10.​7417/​ct.​2013.​1608 PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Siddiqui MR, Kovzel M, Brennan SJ, Priest OH, Preston SR, Soon Y (2014) The role of the laparoendoscopic single site totally extraperitoneal approach to inguinal hernia repairs: a review and meta-analysis of the literature. Can J Surg 57(2):116–126CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Siddiqui MR, Kovzel M, Brennan SJ, Priest OH, Preston SR, Soon Y (2014) The role of the laparoendoscopic single site totally extraperitoneal approach to inguinal hernia repairs: a review and meta-analysis of the literature. Can J Surg 57(2):116–126CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SK, Olweny EO, Best SL, Tracy CR, Mir SA, Cadeddu JA (2011) Patient-reported body image and cosmesis outcomes following kidney surgery: comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site, laparoscopic, and open surgery. Eur Urol 60(5):1097–1104. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.08.007 CrossRefPubMed Park SK, Olweny EO, Best SL, Tracy CR, Mir SA, Cadeddu JA (2011) Patient-reported body image and cosmesis outcomes following kidney surgery: comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site, laparoscopic, and open surgery. Eur Urol 60(5):1097–1104. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2011.​08.​007 CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gill IS, Advincula AP, Aron M, Caddedu J, Canes D, Curcillo PG 2nd, Desai MM, Evanko JC, Falcone T, Fazio V, Gettman M, Gumbs AA, Haber GP, Kaouk JH, Kim F, King SA, Ponsky J, Remzi F, Rivas H, Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Schauer P, Sotelo R, Speranza J, Sweeney J, Teixeira J (2010) Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Surg Endosc 24(4):762–768. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0688-8 CrossRefPubMed Gill IS, Advincula AP, Aron M, Caddedu J, Canes D, Curcillo PG 2nd, Desai MM, Evanko JC, Falcone T, Fazio V, Gettman M, Gumbs AA, Haber GP, Kaouk JH, Kim F, King SA, Ponsky J, Remzi F, Rivas H, Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Schauer P, Sotelo R, Speranza J, Sweeney J, Teixeira J (2010) Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Surg Endosc 24(4):762–768. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-009-0688-8 CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Pucher PH, Sodergren MH, Singh P, Darzi A, Parakseva P (2013) Have we learned from lessons of the past? A systematic review of training for single incision laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 27(5):1478–1484. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2632-6 CrossRefPubMed Pucher PH, Sodergren MH, Singh P, Darzi A, Parakseva P (2013) Have we learned from lessons of the past? A systematic review of training for single incision laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 27(5):1478–1484. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-012-2632-6 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional multiple-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: a systemic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von
Chi-Wen Lo
Stephen Shei-Dei Yang
Yao-Chou Tsai
Cheng-Hsing Hsieh
Shang-Jen Chang
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2016
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
Hernia / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Elektronische ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1443-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Hernia 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.