Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Hernia 3/2019

14.05.2019 | Review

Primary inguinal hernia: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair

verfasst von: A. Aiolfi, M. Cavalli, G. Micheletto, F. Lombardo, G. Bonitta, A. Morlacchi, P. G. Bruni, G. Campanelli, D. Bona

Erschienen in: Hernia | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The Open Lichtenstein technique, the Laparoscopic Trans-Abdominal PrePeritoneal (TAPP), the Totally Extra Peritoneal (TEP), and the robotic TAPP (rTAPP) are commonly performed. The aim of the present network meta-analysis was to globally compare short-term outcomes within these major surgical techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were consulted. A fully Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed.

Results

Sixteen studies (51.037 patients) were included. Overall, 35.5% underwent Open, 33.5% TAPP, 30.7% TEP, and 0.3% rTAPP. The postoperative seroma risk ratio (RR) was comparable considering TAPP vs. Open (RR 0.91; 95% CrI 0.50–1.62), TEP vs. Open (RR 0.64; 95% CrI 0.32–1.33), TEP vs. TAPP (RR 0.70; 95% CrI 0.39–1.31), and rTAPP vs. Open (RR 0.98; 95% CrI 0.37–2.51). The postoperative chronic pain RR was similar for TAPP vs. Open (RR 0.53; 95% CrI 0.27–1.20), TEP vs. Open (RR 0.86; 95% CrI 0.48–1.16), and TEP vs. TAPP (RR 1.70; 95% CrI 0.63–3.20). The recurrence RR was comparable when comparing TAPP vs. Open (RR 0.96; 95% CrI 0.57–1.51), TEP vs. Open (RR 1.0; 95% CrI 0.65–1.61), TEP vs. TAPP (RR 1.10; 95% CrI 0.63–2.10), and rTAPP vs. Open (RR 0.98; 95% CrI 0.45–2.10). No differences were found in term of postoperative hematoma, surgical site infection, urinary retention, and hospital length of stay.

Conclusions

This study suggests that Open, TAPP, TEP, and rTAPP seem comparable in the short term. The surgical management of inguinal hernia is evolving and the effect of the adoption of innovative minimally invasive techniques should be further investigated in the long term. Ultimately, the choice of the most suitable treatment should be based on individual surgeon expertise and tailored on each patient.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K (2003) Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet 362(9395):1561–1571CrossRefPubMed Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K (2003) Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet 362(9395):1561–1571CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, Carpenter JR, Chan AW, Churchill R, Deeks JJ, Hróbjartsson A, Kirkham J, Jüni P, Loke YK, Pigott TD, Ramsay CR, Regidor D, Rothstein HR, Sandhu L, Santaguida PL, Schünemann HJ, Shea B, Shrier I, Tugwell P, Turner L, Valentine JC, Waddington H, Waters E, Wells GA, Whiting PF, Higgins JP (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 4919:i355 Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, Carpenter JR, Chan AW, Churchill R, Deeks JJ, Hróbjartsson A, Kirkham J, Jüni P, Loke YK, Pigott TD, Ramsay CR, Regidor D, Rothstein HR, Sandhu L, Santaguida PL, Schünemann HJ, Shea B, Shrier I, Tugwell P, Turner L, Valentine JC, Waddington H, Waters E, Wells GA, Whiting PF, Higgins JP (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 4919:i355
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mills EJ, Thorlund K, Ioannidis JPA (2013) Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis. BMJ 346:f2914–f2914CrossRefPubMed Mills EJ, Thorlund K, Ioannidis JPA (2013) Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis. BMJ 346:f2914–f2914CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Warn DE, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ (2002) Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales. Stat Med 21(11):1601–1623CrossRefPubMed Warn DE, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ (2002) Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales. Stat Med 21(11):1601–1623CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Friede T, Röver C, Wandel S, Neuenschwander B (2017) Meta-analysis of few small studies in orphan diseases. Res Synth Methods 8(1):79–91CrossRefPubMed Friede T, Röver C, Wandel S, Neuenschwander B (2017) Meta-analysis of few small studies in orphan diseases. Res Synth Methods 8(1):79–91CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner RM, Davey J, Clarke MJ, Thompson SG, Higgins JP (2012) Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Int J Epidemiol 41(3):818–827CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Turner RM, Davey J, Clarke MJ, Thompson SG, Higgins JP (2012) Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Int J Epidemiol 41(3):818–827CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Ades AE (2010) Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med 29(7–8):932–944CrossRefPubMed Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Ades AE (2010) Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med 29(7–8):932–944CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Salanti G, Del Giovane C, Chaimani A, Caldwell DM, Higgins JPT (2014) Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis. PLoS One 9(7):e99682CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Salanti G, Del Giovane C, Chaimani A, Caldwell DM, Higgins JPT (2014) Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis. PLoS One 9(7):e99682CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Plummer M (2003) JAGS: a program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on distributed statistical computing, Vienna, Austria, 20–22 March 2003 Plummer M (2003) JAGS: a program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on distributed statistical computing, Vienna, Austria, 20–22 March 2003
20.
Zurück zum Zitat R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Anadol ZA, Ersoy E, Taneri F, Tekin E (2004) Outcome and cost comparison of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair versus Open Lichtenstein technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14(3):159–163CrossRefPubMed Anadol ZA, Ersoy E, Taneri F, Tekin E (2004) Outcome and cost comparison of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair versus Open Lichtenstein technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14(3):159–163CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen W (2006) Day-case endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty versus open Lichtenstein hernioplasty for unilateral primary inguinal hernia in males: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 1:76–81CrossRef Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen W (2006) Day-case endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty versus open Lichtenstein hernioplasty for unilateral primary inguinal hernia in males: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 1:76–81CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Butters M, Redecke J, Köninger J (2007) Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of Shouldice, Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs. Br J Surg 94:562–565CrossRefPubMed Butters M, Redecke J, Köninger J (2007) Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of Shouldice, Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs. Br J Surg 94:562–565CrossRefPubMed
25.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Gong K, Zhang N, Lu Y, Zhu B, Zhang Z, Du D, Zhao X, Jiang H (2011) Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 1:234–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1165-0 CrossRef Gong K, Zhang N, Lu Y, Zhu B, Zhang Z, Du D, Zhao X, Jiang H (2011) Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 1:234–239. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-010-1165-0 CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Köckerling F, Bittner R, Kofler M, Mayer F, Adolf D, Kuthe A, Weyhe D (2019) Lichtenstein versus total extraperitoneal patch plasty versus transabdominal patch plasty technique for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a registry-based, propensity score-matched comparison of 57,906 patients. Ann Surg 269:351–357. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002541 CrossRefPubMed Köckerling F, Bittner R, Kofler M, Mayer F, Adolf D, Kuthe A, Weyhe D (2019) Lichtenstein versus total extraperitoneal patch plasty versus transabdominal patch plasty technique for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a registry-based, propensity score-matched comparison of 57,906 patients. Ann Surg 269:351–357. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000002541​ CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner JP, Schroeder AD, Espinoza JC, Hiatt JR, Mellinger JD, Cusick RA, Fitzgibbons RJ, Campanelli G, Cavalli M, Roll S, Silva RA, Reinpold W, Télémaque LF, Matthews BD, Filipi CJ, Chen DC (2017) Global outreach using a systematic, competency-based training paradigm for inguinal hernioplasty. JAMA Surg 152:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.3323 CrossRefPubMed Wagner JP, Schroeder AD, Espinoza JC, Hiatt JR, Mellinger JD, Cusick RA, Fitzgibbons RJ, Campanelli G, Cavalli M, Roll S, Silva RA, Reinpold W, Télémaque LF, Matthews BD, Filipi CJ, Chen DC (2017) Global outreach using a systematic, competency-based training paradigm for inguinal hernioplasty. JAMA Surg 152:66–73. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jamasurg.​2016.​3323 CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Mui WL, Ng CS, Fung TM, Cheung FK, Wong CM, Ma TH, Bn MY, Ng EK (2006) Prophylactic ilioinguinal neurectomy in open inguinal hernia repair: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 244(1):27–33CrossRefPubMed Mui WL, Ng CS, Fung TM, Cheung FK, Wong CM, Ma TH, Bn MY, Ng EK (2006) Prophylactic ilioinguinal neurectomy in open inguinal hernia repair: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 244(1):27–33CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Junge K, Rosch R, Klinge U, Schwab R, Peiper Ch, Binnebösel M, Schenten F, Schumpelick V (2006) Risk factors related to recurrence in inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective analysis. Hernia 10(4):309–315CrossRefPubMed Junge K, Rosch R, Klinge U, Schwab R, Peiper Ch, Binnebösel M, Schenten F, Schumpelick V (2006) Risk factors related to recurrence in inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective analysis. Hernia 10(4):309–315CrossRefPubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Shrier I, Boivin JF, Steele RJ (2007) Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles. Am J Epidemiol 166:1203–1209CrossRefPubMed Shrier I, Boivin JF, Steele RJ (2007) Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles. Am J Epidemiol 166:1203–1209CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Primary inguinal hernia: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair
verfasst von
A. Aiolfi
M. Cavalli
G. Micheletto
F. Lombardo
G. Bonitta
A. Morlacchi
P. G. Bruni
G. Campanelli
D. Bona
Publikationsdatum
14.05.2019
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
Hernia / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Elektronische ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01964-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Hernia 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.