Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography of knee synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: assessment of therapeutic response

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of power Doppler sonography (PDS) with ultrasound contrast agent to assess the synovial perfusion changes induced by intra-articular steroid injection therapy in the knee joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Eighteen RA patients (16 women, 2 men) with a history and signs of active knee synovitis were studied. Tenderness was evaluated using Thompson’s modified index of synovitis activity. All patients underwent joint aspiration followed by intra-articular injection of 40 mg of triamcinolone hexacetonide. Gray-scale ultrasonography and PDS with an intravenous ultrasound contrast agent (Levovist) examinations were carried out before and 3 weeks after the intra-articular steroid injection. The calculation of the time–intensity curves provided a quantitative estimation of the synovial perfusion. The median values of the index of synovitis activity decreased significantly from 7.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 6.0–8.0) to 3.0 (95% CI 2.0–4.0) (p<0.01) 3 weeks after the intra-articular steroid injection. All patients showed a reduction of PDS signal after intra-articular steroid therapy and the baseline and follow up median values of the area underlying time–intensity curves were 7.48 (95% CI 5.79–8.73) and 2.45 (95% CI 1.92–3.61), respectively. The comparison between baseline and follow-up median values of the area under the curves showed a statistically significant reduction of PDS findings (p<0.01). At follow-up examinations the changes in the index score of the synovitis activity were significantly correlated to the changes in the values of the area underlying time–intensity curves (r=0.785; p<0.01). A significant correlation was also observed between baseline values of the area underlying time–intensity curves and C-reactive protein (CRP) (r=0.548; p=0.023). In conclusion, PDS with an intravenous ultrasound contrast agent has been shown to be able to detect changes in synovial perfusion after intra-articular steroid injection and may be an additional useful method in the evaluation of synovial inflammation and in the assessment of the therapeutic response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DMARD:

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs

NSAID:

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

PDS:

Power Doppler sonography

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

RF:

Rheumatoid factor

US:

Ultrasonography

References

  1. Harris ED (1990) Rheumatoid arthritis. Pathophysiology and implications for therapy. N Engl J Med 322:1277–1289

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lindblad S, Hedfords E (1985) Intrarticular variation in synovitis. Local macroscopic and microscopic signs of inflammatory activity are significantly correlated. Arthritis Rheum 28:977–986

    Google Scholar 

  3. Backhaus M, Kamradt D, Sandrock D et al. (1999) Arthritis of the finger joints: A comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 42:1232–1245

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tamai K, Yamato M, Yamaguchi T, Ohno W (1994) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 37:1151–1157

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grassi W, Lamanna G, Farina A, Cervini C (1999) Synovitis of small joints: sonographic guided diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Ann Rheum Dis 58:595–597

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wakefield RJ, Brown AK, O’Connor PJ, Emery P (2003) Power doppler sonography: improving disease activity assessment in inflammatory musculoskeletal disease. Arthritis Rheum 48:285–288

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stone M, Bergin D, Whelan B, Maher M, Murray J, McCarthy C (2001) Power Doppler ultrasound assessment of rheumatoid hand synovitis. J Rheumatol 28:1979–1982

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Newman JS, Laing TJ, McCarthy CJ, Adler RS (1996) Power Doppler sonography of synovitis: assessment of therapeutic response—preliminary observations. Radiology 198:582–584

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cardinal E, Lafortune M, Burns P (1996) Power Doppler US in synovitis: reality or artifact? Radiology 200:868–869

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Blomley MJK, Cooke JC, Unger EC, Monaghan MJ, Cosgrove DO (2001) Microbubble contrast agents: a new era in ultrasound. Br Med J 322:1222–1225

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Magarelli N, Guglielmi G. Di Matteo L, Tartaro A, Mattei PA, Bonomo L (2001) Diagnostic utility of an echo-contrast agent in patients with synovitis using power Doppler ultrasound: a preliminary study with comparison to contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol 11:1039–1046

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Klauser A, Frauscher F, Schirmer M et al. (2002) The value of contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasound in the detection of vascularization of finger joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 46:647–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carotti M, Salaffi F, Manganelli P, Salera D, Simonetti B, Grassi W (2002) Power Doppler sonography in the assessment of synovial tissue of the knee joint in rheumatoid arthritis: a preliminary experience. Ann Rheum Dis 61.877–882

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA et al. (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thompson PW, Silman AJ, Kirwan JR, Currey LF (1987) Articular indices of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Correlation with acute-phase response. Arthritis Rheum 30:618–623

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ritchie DM, Boyle JA, McInnes JM et al. (1968) Clinical studies with an articular index for the assessment of joint tenderness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Q J Med 37:393–406

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ranza R, Marchesoni A, Calori G et al. (1993) The Italian version of the Functional Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire. A reliable instrument for multicenter studies on rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 11:123–128

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Steinbrocker O, Traeger CH, Batterman RC (1949) Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. JAMA 140:659–662

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fries JF, Spitz PW, Kraines RG, Holman HR (1980) Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 23:137–145

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Backhaus M, Burmester GR, Gerber T et al. (2001) Guidelines for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 60:641–649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rubin JM, Adler RS, Fowlkes JB et al. (1995) Fractional moving blood volume: estimation with power Doppler US. Radiology 197:183–190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rubaltelli L, Fiocco U, Cozzi L et al. (1994) Prospective sonographic and arthroscopic evaluation of proliferative knee joint synovitis. J Ultrasound Med 13:855–862

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Walsh DA, Wade M, Mapp PI, Blake DR (1998) Focally regulated endothelial proliferation and cell death in human synovium. Am J Pathol 152:691–702

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schmidt WA, Volker L, Zacher J, Schlafke M, Ruhnke M, Gromnica-Ihle E (2000) Colour Doppler ultrasonography to detect pannus in knee joint synovitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 18:439–444

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boumpas DT, Chrousos GP, Wilder RL, Cupps TR, Balow JE (1993) Glucocorticoid therapy for immune-mediated diseases: basic and clinical correlates. Ann Intern Med 119:1198–208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Youssef PP, Haynes DR, Triantafillou S et al. (1997) Effects of pulse methylprednisolone on inflammatory mediators in peripheral blood, synovial fluid, and synovial membrane in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 40:1400–1408

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schleimer RP (1993) An overview of glucocorticoid anti-inflammatory actions. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 45:S3–S7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nauch M, Karakiulakis G, Perruchoud AP, Papakonstantinou E, Roth M (1998) Corticosteroids inhibit the expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene in human vascular smooth muscle cells. Eur J Pharmacol 341:309–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Thomas KA (1996) Vascular endothelial growth factor, a potent and selective angiogenic agent. J Biol Chem 271:603–606

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McNatt LG, Weimer L, Yanni J, Clark AF (1999) Angiostatic activity of steroids in the chick embryo CAM and rabbit cornea models of neovascularization. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 15:413–423

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hashimoto I, Nakanishi H, Shono Y, Toda M, Tsuda H, Arase J (2002) Angiostatic effects of corticosteroid on wound healing of the rabbit ear. J Med Invest 49:61–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Salaffi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salaffi, F., Carotti, M., Manganelli, P. et al. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography of knee synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: assessment of therapeutic response. Clin Rheumatol 23, 285–290 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-004-0878-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-004-0878-7

Keywords

Navigation