Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Neurological Sciences 1/2018

01.01.2018 | Original Article

The Italian version of cognitive function instrument (CFI): reliability and validity in a cohort of healthy elderly

verfasst von: Elena Chipi, Giulia Frattini, Paolo Eusebi, Anita Mollica, Katia D’Andrea, Mirella Russo, Alice Bernardelli, Chiara Montanucci, Elisa Luchetti, Paolo Calabresi, Lucilla Parnetti

Erschienen in: Neurological Sciences | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The Alzheimer’s disease Cooperative Study (ADCS)-Cognitive Function Instrument (CFI) is a 14-item questionnaire administered to the subject and the referent, aimed at detecting early changes in cognitive and functional abilities in individuals without clinical impairment. It is used for monitoring annual variations in cognitive functioning in prevention trials. The aim of the present study was to validate the Italian version of the CFI. A consecutive series of 257 functionally independent subjects was recruited among relatives of patients or as volunteers. They were administered CFI and global cognition measurements: Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) and Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). The reliability and criterion validity were comparable to the original in both self- and partner-report. Similarly to what reported in the original version, we found a corrected item-total correlation ranging between 0.38 and 0.54 in self-report and between 0.33 and 0.64 in partner-report. Cronbach’s α was 0.77 (95% CI 0.72–0.83) in self-report and 0.78 (95% CI 0.73–0.84) in partner-report. Total partner- and self-report scores were significantly correlated (rS = 0.31, p < 0.001). CFI self-report and CFI total-score (partner + self-report) were negatively correlated with MMSE (rS = − 0.15, p = 0.022; rS = − 0.17, p = 0.008) and RBANS (rS = − 0.22, p < 0.001; rS = − 0.25, p < 0.001). Analogous trends were found in the partner score, with a correlation with RBANS (rS = − 0.17, p = 0.014) and MMSE (rS = − 0.11, p = 0.071). Our results support the reliability and validity of the Italian version of CFI. In order to definitely propose the use of CFI for tracking longitudinal changes of cognitive and functional abilities in subjects without clinical impairment, data from the follow-up of this cohort are needed.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Walsh SP, Raman R, Jones KB, Aisen PS, Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Group (2006) ADCS prevention instrument project: the mail-in cognitive function screening instrument (MCFSI). Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 20(4 Suppl 3):S170–S178CrossRefPubMed Walsh SP, Raman R, Jones KB, Aisen PS, Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Group (2006) ADCS prevention instrument project: the mail-in cognitive function screening instrument (MCFSI). Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 20(4 Suppl 3):S170–S178CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12(3):189–198CrossRefPubMed Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12(3):189–198CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ponteri M, Pioli R, Padovani A, Tunesi S, De Girolamo G (2007) RBANS repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status. Edizione italiana. Giunti O.S Ponteri M, Pioli R, Padovani A, Tunesi S, De Girolamo G (2007) RBANS repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status. Edizione italiana. Giunti O.S
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Petersen RC, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, Kokmen E, Tangalos EG (1994) Memory function in very early Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 44(5):867–872CrossRefPubMed Petersen RC, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, Kokmen E, Tangalos EG (1994) Memory function in very early Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 44(5):867–872CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Feher EP, Mahurin RK, Doody RS, Cooke N, Sims J, Pirozzolo FJ (1992) Establishing the limits of the mini-mental state. Examination of ‘subtests. Arch Neurol 49(1):87–92CrossRefPubMed Feher EP, Mahurin RK, Doody RS, Cooke N, Sims J, Pirozzolo FJ (1992) Establishing the limits of the mini-mental state. Examination of ‘subtests. Arch Neurol 49(1):87–92CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Reise SP, Moore TM, Haviland MG (2013) Applying unidimensional item response theory models to psychological data. APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology: test theory and testing and assessment in. Ind Organ Psychol 1:101–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/14047-006 Reise SP, Moore TM, Haviland MG (2013) Applying unidimensional item response theory models to psychological data. APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology: test theory and testing and assessment in. Ind Organ Psychol 1:101–119. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​14047-006
13.
Zurück zum Zitat R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Found Stat Comput Vienna Austria ISBN: 3–900051–07-05 R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Found Stat Comput Vienna Austria ISBN: 3–900051–07-05
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Revelle W (2014) Psych: procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Northwest Univ Evanston, Illinois Revelle W (2014) Psych: procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Northwest Univ Evanston, Illinois
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Caselli RJ, Chen K, Locke DE et al (2014) Subjective cognitive decline: self and informant comparisons. Alzheimers Dement 10(1):93–98CrossRefPubMed Caselli RJ, Chen K, Locke DE et al (2014) Subjective cognitive decline: self and informant comparisons. Alzheimers Dement 10(1):93–98CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The Italian version of cognitive function instrument (CFI): reliability and validity in a cohort of healthy elderly
verfasst von
Elena Chipi
Giulia Frattini
Paolo Eusebi
Anita Mollica
Katia D’Andrea
Mirella Russo
Alice Bernardelli
Chiara Montanucci
Elisa Luchetti
Paolo Calabresi
Lucilla Parnetti
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2018
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
Neurological Sciences / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1590-1874
Elektronische ISSN: 1590-3478
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3150-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Neurological Sciences 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.