Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Lasers in Medical Science 8/2016

11.08.2016 | Original Article

Treatment of in-stent restenosis with excimer laser coronary angioplasty: benefits over scoring balloon angioplasty alone

verfasst von: Shunsuke Hirose, Takashi Ashikaga, Yu Hatano, Shunji Yoshikawa, Taro Sasaoka, Yasuhiro Maejima, Mitsuaki Isobe

Erschienen in: Lasers in Medical Science | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) is associated with a high incidence of recurrence. This study evaluated the clinical safety and 6-month efficacy of excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) before scoring balloon dilatation for the treatment of ISR. Twenty-three patients with ISR were included and treatment strategy of ISR was dependent on each operator. Twelve patients among those were treated with ELCA before scoring balloon dilatation (ELCA group) and 11 patients were treated with scoring balloon alone (non-ELCA group). Acute procedural results were evaluated by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT). Follow-up angiography was performed in all patients and the incidence of recurrent ISR and target lesion revascularization (TLR) was determined at 6 months after initial ISR treatment. Procedural success was achieved in all patients. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between groups. Maximum dilatation pressure of scoring balloon was significantly lower in the ELCA group than in the non-ELCA group (9.0 ± 3.1 vs. 14.9 ± 4.3 atm, p = 0.001). In follow-up angiography, the occurrence of TLR was similar between groups (16.7 vs. 45.5 %, p = 0.09), but the late luminal loss was significantly lower in the ELCA group (0.7 ± 0.6 vs. 1.3 ± 0.7 mm, p = 0.03). ELCA is a safe and feasible technique for the treatment of ISR and associated with a relatively low recurrent restenosis in comparison with scoring balloon dilatation alone.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Moulias A, Alexopoulos D (2011) Long-term outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention: the significance of native coronary artery disease progression. Clin Cardiol 34(10):588–592. doi:10.1002/clc.20929 CrossRefPubMed Moulias A, Alexopoulos D (2011) Long-term outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention: the significance of native coronary artery disease progression. Clin Cardiol 34(10):588–592. doi:10.​1002/​clc.​20929 CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernandez R, Bethencourt A, Marti V, Lopez-Minguez JR, Angel J, Iniguez A, Moris C, Cequier A, Sabate M, Escaned J, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Banuelos C, Suarez A, Macaya C (2008) Long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis results of the RIBS-II (Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs. elective sirolimus-eluting Stenting) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(20):1621–1627. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.025 CrossRefPubMed Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernandez R, Bethencourt A, Marti V, Lopez-Minguez JR, Angel J, Iniguez A, Moris C, Cequier A, Sabate M, Escaned J, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Banuelos C, Suarez A, Macaya C (2008) Long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis results of the RIBS-II (Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs. elective sirolimus-eluting Stenting) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(20):1621–1627. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2008.​08.​025 CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Liistro F, Fineschi M, Grotti S, Angioli P, Carrera A, Ducci K, Gori T, Falsini G, Pierli C, Bolognese L (2010) Long-term effectiveness and safety of sirolimus stent implantation for coronary in-stent restenosis results of the TRUE (Tuscany Registry of sirolimus for unselected in-stent restenosis) registry at 4 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(7):613–616. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.075 CrossRefPubMed Liistro F, Fineschi M, Grotti S, Angioli P, Carrera A, Ducci K, Gori T, Falsini G, Pierli C, Bolognese L (2010) Long-term effectiveness and safety of sirolimus stent implantation for coronary in-stent restenosis results of the TRUE (Tuscany Registry of sirolimus for unselected in-stent restenosis) registry at 4 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(7):613–616. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2009.​08.​075 CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Steinberg DH, Gaglia MA Jr, Pinto Slottow TL, Roy P, Bonello L, De Labriolle A, Lemesle G, Torguson R, Kineshige K, Xue Z, Suddath WO, Kent KM, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Lindsay J, Waksman R (2009) Outcome differences with the use of drug-eluting stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis of bare-metal stents versus drug-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol 103(4):491–495. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.09.107 CrossRefPubMed Steinberg DH, Gaglia MA Jr, Pinto Slottow TL, Roy P, Bonello L, De Labriolle A, Lemesle G, Torguson R, Kineshige K, Xue Z, Suddath WO, Kent KM, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Lindsay J, Waksman R (2009) Outcome differences with the use of drug-eluting stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis of bare-metal stents versus drug-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol 103(4):491–495. doi:10.​1016/​j.​amjcard.​2008.​09.​107 CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernandez R, Bethencourt A, Marti V, Lopez-Minguez JR, Angel J, Mantilla R, Moris C, Cequier A, Sabate M, Escaned J, Moreno R, Banuelos C, Suarez A, Macaya C, Investigators R-I (2006) A randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis: results of the Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Sirolimus-Eluting Stenting (RIBS-II) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(11):2152–2160. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.078 CrossRefPubMed Alfonso F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Hernandez R, Bethencourt A, Marti V, Lopez-Minguez JR, Angel J, Mantilla R, Moris C, Cequier A, Sabate M, Escaned J, Moreno R, Banuelos C, Suarez A, Macaya C, Investigators R-I (2006) A randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis: results of the Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Sirolimus-Eluting Stenting (RIBS-II) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(11):2152–2160. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2005.​10.​078 CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Holmes DR Jr, Teirstein P, Satler L, Sketch M, O’Malley J, Popma JJ, Kuntz RE, Fitzgerald PJ, Wang H, Caramanica E, Cohen SA (2006) Sirolimus-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the SISR randomized trial. JAMA 295(11):1264–1273. doi:10.1001/jama.295.11.1264 CrossRefPubMed Holmes DR Jr, Teirstein P, Satler L, Sketch M, O’Malley J, Popma JJ, Kuntz RE, Fitzgerald PJ, Wang H, Caramanica E, Cohen SA (2006) Sirolimus-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the SISR randomized trial. JAMA 295(11):1264–1273. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​295.​11.​1264 CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Miyamoto T, Araki T, Hiroe M, Marumo F, Niwa A, Yokoyama K (2001) Standalone cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of stent-related restenosis: acute results and 3- to 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rates. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 54(3):301–308CrossRefPubMed Miyamoto T, Araki T, Hiroe M, Marumo F, Niwa A, Yokoyama K (2001) Standalone cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of stent-related restenosis: acute results and 3- to 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rates. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 54(3):301–308CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Albiero R, Silber S, Di Mario C, Cernigliaro C, Battaglia S, Reimers B, Frasheri A, Klauss V, Auge JM, Rubartelli P, Morice MC, Cremonesi A, Schofer J, Bortone A, Colombo A, Investigators R (2004) Cutting balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: results of the restenosis cutting balloon evaluation trial (RESCUT). J Am Coll Cardiol 43(6):943–949. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.054 CrossRefPubMed Albiero R, Silber S, Di Mario C, Cernigliaro C, Battaglia S, Reimers B, Frasheri A, Klauss V, Auge JM, Rubartelli P, Morice MC, Cremonesi A, Schofer J, Bortone A, Colombo A, Investigators R (2004) Cutting balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: results of the restenosis cutting balloon evaluation trial (RESCUT). J Am Coll Cardiol 43(6):943–949. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2003.​09.​054 CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Stone GW, Leon MB (1999) Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation 100(18):1872–1878CrossRefPubMed Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Stone GW, Leon MB (1999) Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation 100(18):1872–1878CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Takeda Y, Tsuchikane E, Kobayashi T, Terai K, Kobayashi Y, Nakagawa T, Sakurai M, Awata N, Kobayashi T (2003) Effect of plaque debulking before stent implantation on in-stent neointimal proliferation: a serial 3-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study. Am Heart J 146(1):175–182. doi:10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00114-5 CrossRefPubMed Takeda Y, Tsuchikane E, Kobayashi T, Terai K, Kobayashi Y, Nakagawa T, Sakurai M, Awata N, Kobayashi T (2003) Effect of plaque debulking before stent implantation on in-stent neointimal proliferation: a serial 3-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study. Am Heart J 146(1):175–182. doi:10.​1016/​S0002-8703(03)00114-5 CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, Steg PG, Morel MA, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky A, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW, Academic Research C (2007) Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 115(17):2344–2351. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313 CrossRefPubMed Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, Steg PG, Morel MA, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky A, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW, Academic Research C (2007) Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 115(17):2344–2351. doi:10.​1161/​CIRCULATIONAHA.​106.​685313 CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishino M, Lee Y, Nakamura D, Yoshimura T, Taniike M, Makino N, Kato H, Egami Y, Shutta R, Tanouchi J, Yamada Y (2012) Differences in optical coherence tomographic findings and clinical outcomes between excimer laser and cutting balloon angioplasty for focal in-stent restenosis lesions. J Invasive Cardiol 24(10):478–483PubMed Nishino M, Lee Y, Nakamura D, Yoshimura T, Taniike M, Makino N, Kato H, Egami Y, Shutta R, Tanouchi J, Yamada Y (2012) Differences in optical coherence tomographic findings and clinical outcomes between excimer laser and cutting balloon angioplasty for focal in-stent restenosis lesions. J Invasive Cardiol 24(10):478–483PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ashida K, Hayase T, Shinmura T (2013) Efficacy of lacrosse NSE using the “leopard-crawl” technique on severely calcified lesions. J Invasive Cardiol 25(10):555–564PubMed Ashida K, Hayase T, Shinmura T (2013) Efficacy of lacrosse NSE using the “leopard-crawl” technique on severely calcified lesions. J Invasive Cardiol 25(10):555–564PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Treatment of in-stent restenosis with excimer laser coronary angioplasty: benefits over scoring balloon angioplasty alone
verfasst von
Shunsuke Hirose
Takashi Ashikaga
Yu Hatano
Shunji Yoshikawa
Taro Sasaoka
Yasuhiro Maejima
Mitsuaki Isobe
Publikationsdatum
11.08.2016
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Lasers in Medical Science / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0268-8921
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-604X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-2039-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

Lasers in Medical Science 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe