Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Gastric Cancer 3/2011

01.08.2011 | Original Article

Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with intraperitoneal and intravenous cisplatin followed by oral fluorouracil (UFT) in serosa-positive gastric cancer versus curative resection alone: final results of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial JCOG9206-2

verfasst von: Isao Miyashiro, Hiroshi Furukawa, Mitsuru Sasako, Seiichiro Yamamoto, Atsushi Nashimoto, Toshifusa Nakajima, Taira Kinoshita, Osamu Kobayashi, Kuniyoshi Arai, The Gastric Cancer Surgical Study Group in the Japan Clinical Oncology Group

Erschienen in: Gastric Cancer | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection in serosa-positive gastric cancer, a multicenter phase III clinical trial was conducted in Japan.

Patients and methods

From January 1993 to March 1998, 268 patients were randomized to adjuvant chemotherapy (135 patients) or surgery alone (133 patients). All patients underwent gastrectomy with D2 or greater lymph node dissection. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of intraperitoneal cisplatin soon after abdominal closure, postoperative intravenous cisplatin (day 14) and 5-fluorouracil (day 14–16), and daily oral FU (UFT) starting 4 weeks after surgery for 12 months. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Relapse-free survival and site of recurrence were secondary endpoints.

Results

Fifty-two patients (38.5%) in the adjuvant chemotherapy arm completed the chemotherapy regimen. There were 4 (1.49%) treatment-related deaths, 1 in the surgery-alone and 3 in the adjuvant chemotherapy arm (2 did not receive chemotherapy). Grade 4 toxicity was observed in 3 patients in the surgery-alone and 2 patients in the adjuvant chemotherapy arm. There was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (62.0% adjuvant chemotherapy vs. 60.9% surgery-alone, P = 0.482) and 5-year relapse-free survival rates (57.5% adjuvant chemotherapy vs. 55.6% surgery-alone; P = 0.512).

Conclusion

There was no benefit in overall and relapse-free survival with this adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with macroscopically serosa-positive gastric cancer after curative resection.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisani P, Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide mortality from 25 cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer. 1999;83(1):18–29.CrossRefPubMed Pisani P, Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide mortality from 25 cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer. 1999;83(1):18–29.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wanebo HJ, Kennedy BJ, Chmiel J, Steele G Jr, Winchester D, Osteen R. Cancer of the stomach. A patient care study by the American College of Surgeons. Ann Surg. 1993;218(5):583–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wanebo HJ, Kennedy BJ, Chmiel J, Steele G Jr, Winchester D, Osteen R. Cancer of the stomach. A patient care study by the American College of Surgeons. Ann Surg. 1993;218(5):583–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Miyashiro I, Takachi K, Doki Y, Ishikawa O, Ohigashi H, Murata K, et al. When is curative gastrectomy justified for gastric cancer with positive peritoneal lavage cytology but negative macroscopic peritoneal implant? World J Surg. 2005;29(9):1131–4.CrossRefPubMed Miyashiro I, Takachi K, Doki Y, Ishikawa O, Ohigashi H, Murata K, et al. When is curative gastrectomy justified for gastric cancer with positive peritoneal lavage cytology but negative macroscopic peritoneal implant? World J Surg. 2005;29(9):1131–4.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Burke EC, Jr. Karpeh MS, Conlon KC, Brennan MF. Peritoneal lavage cytology in gastric cancer: an independent predictor of outcome. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5(5):411–5.CrossRefPubMed Burke EC, Jr. Karpeh MS, Conlon KC, Brennan MF. Peritoneal lavage cytology in gastric cancer: an independent predictor of outcome. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5(5):411–5.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gunderson LL, Sosin H. Adenocarcinoma of the stomach: areas of failure in a re-operation series (second or symptomatic look) clinicopathologic correlation and implications for adjuvant therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1982;8(1):1–11.CrossRefPubMed Gunderson LL, Sosin H. Adenocarcinoma of the stomach: areas of failure in a re-operation series (second or symptomatic look) clinicopathologic correlation and implications for adjuvant therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1982;8(1):1–11.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hiratsuka M, Iwanaga T, Furukawa H, Yasuda T, Nakano H, Nakamori S, et al. Important prognostic factors in surgically treated gastric cancer patients. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1995;22(5):703–8.PubMed Hiratsuka M, Iwanaga T, Furukawa H, Yasuda T, Nakano H, Nakamori S, et al. Important prognostic factors in surgically treated gastric cancer patients. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1995;22(5):703–8.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Landry J, Tepper JE, Wood WC, Moulton EO, Koerner F, Sullinger J. Patterns of failure following curative resection of gastric carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990;19(6):1357–62.CrossRefPubMed Landry J, Tepper JE, Wood WC, Moulton EO, Koerner F, Sullinger J. Patterns of failure following curative resection of gastric carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990;19(6):1357–62.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. 1st English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara; 1995. Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. 1st English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara; 1995.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma—2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1(1):10–24.CrossRefPubMed Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma—2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1(1):10–24.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, Kinoshita T, Fujii M, Nashimoto A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1810–20.CrossRefPubMed Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, Kinoshita T, Fujii M, Nashimoto A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1810–20.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakajima T, Nashimoto A, Kitamura M, Kito T, Iwanaga T, Okabayashi K, et al. Adjuvant mitomycin and fluorouracil followed by oral uracil plus tegafur in serosa-negative gastric cancer: a randomised trial. Gastric Cancer Surgical Study Group. Lancet. 1999;354(9175):273–7.CrossRefPubMed Nakajima T, Nashimoto A, Kitamura M, Kito T, Iwanaga T, Okabayashi K, et al. Adjuvant mitomycin and fluorouracil followed by oral uracil plus tegafur in serosa-negative gastric cancer: a randomised trial. Gastric Cancer Surgical Study Group. Lancet. 1999;354(9175):273–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nashimoto A, Nakajima T, Furukawa H, Kitamura M, Kinoshita T, Yamamura Y, et al. Randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with mitomycin, fluorouracil, and cytosine arabinoside followed by oral fluorouracil in serosa-negative gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group 9206-1. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(12):2282–7.CrossRefPubMed Nashimoto A, Nakajima T, Furukawa H, Kitamura M, Kinoshita T, Yamamura Y, et al. Randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with mitomycin, fluorouracil, and cytosine arabinoside followed by oral fluorouracil in serosa-negative gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group 9206-1. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(12):2282–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimoyama M, Fukuda H, Saijo N, Yamaguchi N. Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1998;28(3):158–62.CrossRefPubMed Shimoyama M, Fukuda H, Saijo N, Yamaguchi N. Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1998;28(3):158–62.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tobinai K, Kohno A, Shimada Y, Watanabe T, Tamura T, Takeyama K, et al. Toxicity grading criteria of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. The Clinical Trial Review Committee of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1993;23(4):250–7.PubMed Tobinai K, Kohno A, Shimada Y, Watanabe T, Tamura T, Takeyama K, et al. Toxicity grading criteria of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. The Clinical Trial Review Committee of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1993;23(4):250–7.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sano T, Katai H, Sasako M, Maruyama K. One thousand consecutive gastrectomies without operative mortality. Br J Surg. 2002;89(1):123.PubMed Sano T, Katai H, Sasako M, Maruyama K. One thousand consecutive gastrectomies without operative mortality. Br J Surg. 2002;89(1):123.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang Y, Chang H, Zang D, Lee J, Kim T, Yang D, et al. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for grossly serosa-positive advanced gastric cancer: a randomized phase III trial of intraperitoneal cisplatin and early mitomycin-C plus long-term doxifluridine plus cisplatin (iceMFP) versus mitomycin-C plus short-term doxifluridine (Mf) (AMC0101) (NCT00296322). J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(15s; ASCO annual meeting abstract LBA4511). Kang Y, Chang H, Zang D, Lee J, Kim T, Yang D, et al. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for grossly serosa-positive advanced gastric cancer: a randomized phase III trial of intraperitoneal cisplatin and early mitomycin-C plus long-term doxifluridine plus cisplatin (iceMFP) versus mitomycin-C plus short-term doxifluridine (Mf) (AMC0101) (NCT00296322). J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(15s; ASCO annual meeting abstract LBA4511).
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang H, Kang Y, Min Y, Zang D, Kim G, Yang D, et al. A randomized phase III trial comparing mitomycin-C plus short-term doxifluridine (Mf) versus mitomycin-C plus long-term doxifluridine plus cisplatin (MFP) after curative resection of advanced gastric cancer (AMC 0201) (NCT00296335). J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(15s; ASCO annual meeting abstract 4531). Chang H, Kang Y, Min Y, Zang D, Kim G, Yang D, et al. A randomized phase III trial comparing mitomycin-C plus short-term doxifluridine (Mf) versus mitomycin-C plus long-term doxifluridine plus cisplatin (MFP) after curative resection of advanced gastric cancer (AMC 0201) (NCT00296335). J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(15s; ASCO annual meeting abstract 4531).
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(1):11–20.CrossRefPubMed Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(1):11–20.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Msika S, Benhamiche AM, Tazi MA, Rat P, Faivre J. Improvement of operative mortality after curative resection for gastric cancer: population-based study. World J Surg. 2000;24(9):1137–42.CrossRefPubMed Msika S, Benhamiche AM, Tazi MA, Rat P, Faivre J. Improvement of operative mortality after curative resection for gastric cancer: population-based study. World J Surg. 2000;24(9):1137–42.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S, Sairenji M, Arai K, Kinoshita T, et al. Left thoracoabdominal approach versus abdominal-transhiatal approach for gastric cancer of the cardia or subcardia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(8):644–51.CrossRefPubMed Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S, Sairenji M, Arai K, Kinoshita T, et al. Left thoracoabdominal approach versus abdominal-transhiatal approach for gastric cancer of the cardia or subcardia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(8):644–51.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with intraperitoneal and intravenous cisplatin followed by oral fluorouracil (UFT) in serosa-positive gastric cancer versus curative resection alone: final results of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial JCOG9206-2
verfasst von
Isao Miyashiro
Hiroshi Furukawa
Mitsuru Sasako
Seiichiro Yamamoto
Atsushi Nashimoto
Toshifusa Nakajima
Taira Kinoshita
Osamu Kobayashi
Kuniyoshi Arai
The Gastric Cancer Surgical Study Group in the Japan Clinical Oncology Group
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2011
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Gastric Cancer / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1436-3291
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3305
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0027-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

Gastric Cancer 3/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.