Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Gastric Cancer 1/2014

01.01.2014 | Review Article

Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for gastric cancer: a systematic review of literature by the Task Force of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association

verfasst von: Hideaki Shimada, Tamaki Noie, Manabu Ohashi, Koji Oba, Yutaka Takahashi

Erschienen in: Gastric Cancer | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of this review was to evaluate the clinical significance of serum tumor markers, particularly CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4, in patients with gastric cancer. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE with the keywords “gastric cancer” and “tumor marker,” to select 4,925 relevant reports published before the end of November 2012. A total of 187 publications contained data for CEA and CA19-9, and 19 publications contained data related to all three tumor markers. The positive rates were 21.1 % for CEA, 27.8 % for CA19-9, and 30.0 % for CA72-4. These three markers were significantly associated with tumor stage and patient survival. Serum markers are not useful for early cancer, but they are useful for detecting recurrence and distant metastasis, predicting patient survival, and monitoring after surgery. Tumor marker monitoring may be useful for patients after surgery because the positive conversion of tumor markers usually occurs 2–3 months before imaging abnormalities. Among other tumor markers, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is useful for detecting and predicting liver metastases. Moreover, CA125 and sialyl Tn antigens (STN) are useful for detecting peritoneal metastases. Although no prospective trial has yet been completed to evaluate the clinical significance of these serum markers, this literature survey suggests that combinations of CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4 are the most effective ways for staging before surgery or chemotherapy. In particular, monitoring tumor markers that were elevated before surgery or chemotherapy could be useful for detection of recurrence or evaluation of the response.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim DH, Oh SJ, Oh CA, Choi MG, Noh JH, Sohn TS, et al. The relationships between perioperative CEA, CA 19–9, and CA 72–4 and recurrence in gastric cancer patients after curative radical gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104:585–91.PubMedCrossRef Kim DH, Oh SJ, Oh CA, Choi MG, Noh JH, Sohn TS, et al. The relationships between perioperative CEA, CA 19–9, and CA 72–4 and recurrence in gastric cancer patients after curative radical gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104:585–91.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishigami S, Natsugoe S, Nakashima H, Tokuda K, Nakajo A, Okumura H, et al. Biological aggressiveness of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-positive gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2006;53:338–41.PubMed Ishigami S, Natsugoe S, Nakashima H, Tokuda K, Nakajo A, Okumura H, et al. Biological aggressiveness of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-positive gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2006;53:338–41.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakata B, Hirakawa YS, Chung K, Kato Y, Yamashita Y, Maeda K, et al. Serum CA 125 level as a predictor of peritoneal dissemination in patients with gastric carcinoma. Cancer (Phila). 1998;83:2488–92.CrossRef Nakata B, Hirakawa YS, Chung K, Kato Y, Yamashita Y, Maeda K, et al. Serum CA 125 level as a predictor of peritoneal dissemination in patients with gastric carcinoma. Cancer (Phila). 1998;83:2488–92.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi I, Maehara Y, Kusumoto T, Yoshida M, Kakeji Y, Kusumoto H, et al. Predictive value of preoperative serum sialyl Tn antigen levels in prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. Cancer (Phila). 1993;72:1836–40.CrossRef Takahashi I, Maehara Y, Kusumoto T, Yoshida M, Kakeji Y, Kusumoto H, et al. Predictive value of preoperative serum sialyl Tn antigen levels in prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. Cancer (Phila). 1993;72:1836–40.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamada R, Hiramoto Y, Tsujitani S, Nozuka T, Okamura T, Masuda H, et al. Serum CEA levels facilitate detection of recurrences of cancer in patients after gastrectomy. Jpn J Surg. 1985;15:23–9.PubMedCrossRef Tamada R, Hiramoto Y, Tsujitani S, Nozuka T, Okamura T, Masuda H, et al. Serum CEA levels facilitate detection of recurrences of cancer in patients after gastrectomy. Jpn J Surg. 1985;15:23–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Koga T, Kano T, Souda K, Oka N, Inokuchi K. The clinical usefulness of preoperative CEA determination in gastric cancer. Jpn J Surg. 1987;17:342–7.PubMedCrossRef Koga T, Kano T, Souda K, Oka N, Inokuchi K. The clinical usefulness of preoperative CEA determination in gastric cancer. Jpn J Surg. 1987;17:342–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Maehara Y, Sugimachi K, Akagi M, Kakegawa T, Shimazu H, Tomita M. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen level increases correlate with tumor progression in patients with differentiated gastric carcinoma following noncurative resection. Cancer Res. 1990;50:3952–5.PubMed Maehara Y, Sugimachi K, Akagi M, Kakegawa T, Shimazu H, Tomita M. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen level increases correlate with tumor progression in patients with differentiated gastric carcinoma following noncurative resection. Cancer Res. 1990;50:3952–5.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wobbes T, Thomas CM, Segers MF, Nagengast FM. Evaluation of seven tumor markers (CA 50, CA 19–9, CA 19–9 TruQuant, CA 72–4, CA 195, carcinoembryonic antigen, and tissue polypeptide antigen) in the pretreatment sera of patients with gastric carcinoma. Cancer (Phila). 1992;69:2036–41.CrossRef Wobbes T, Thomas CM, Segers MF, Nagengast FM. Evaluation of seven tumor markers (CA 50, CA 19–9, CA 19–9 TruQuant, CA 72–4, CA 195, carcinoembryonic antigen, and tissue polypeptide antigen) in the pretreatment sera of patients with gastric carcinoma. Cancer (Phila). 1992;69:2036–41.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Guadagni F, Roselli M, Amato T, Cosimelli M, Perri P, Casale V, et al. CA72-4 measurement of tumor-associated glycoprotein 72 (TAG-72) as a serum marker in the management of gastric carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1992;52:1222–7.PubMed Guadagni F, Roselli M, Amato T, Cosimelli M, Perri P, Casale V, et al. CA72-4 measurement of tumor-associated glycoprotein 72 (TAG-72) as a serum marker in the management of gastric carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1992;52:1222–7.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamazoe R, Maeta M, Matsui T, Shibata S, Shiota S, Kaibara N. CA72-4 compared with carcinoembryonic antigen as a tumour marker for gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1992;28:1351–4.CrossRef Hamazoe R, Maeta M, Matsui T, Shibata S, Shiota S, Kaibara N. CA72-4 compared with carcinoembryonic antigen as a tumour marker for gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1992;28:1351–4.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikeda Y, Mori M, Adachi Y, Matsushima T, Sugimachi K, Saku M. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in stage IV gastric cancer as a risk factor for liver metastasis: a univariate and multivariate analysis. J Surg Oncol. 1993;53:235–8.PubMedCrossRef Ikeda Y, Mori M, Adachi Y, Matsushima T, Sugimachi K, Saku M. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in stage IV gastric cancer as a risk factor for liver metastasis: a univariate and multivariate analysis. J Surg Oncol. 1993;53:235–8.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Guadagni F, Roselli M, Cosimelli M, Ferroni P, Spila A, Casaldi V, et al. Correlation between positive CA72-4 serum levels and lymph node involvement in patients with gastric carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 1993;13:2409–13.PubMed Guadagni F, Roselli M, Cosimelli M, Ferroni P, Spila A, Casaldi V, et al. Correlation between positive CA72-4 serum levels and lymph node involvement in patients with gastric carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 1993;13:2409–13.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakane Y, Okamura S, Akehira K, Boku T, Okusa T, Tanaka K, et al. Correlation of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels and prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Cancer (Phila). 1994;73:2703–8.CrossRef Nakane Y, Okamura S, Akehira K, Boku T, Okusa T, Tanaka K, et al. Correlation of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels and prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Cancer (Phila). 1994;73:2703–8.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Maehara Y, Kusumoto T, Takahashi I, Kakeji Y, Baba H, Akazawa K, et al. Predictive value of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels for the prognosis of patients with well-differentiated gastric cancer. A multivariate analysis. Oncology. 1994;51:234–7.PubMedCrossRef Maehara Y, Kusumoto T, Takahashi I, Kakeji Y, Baba H, Akazawa K, et al. Predictive value of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels for the prognosis of patients with well-differentiated gastric cancer. A multivariate analysis. Oncology. 1994;51:234–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Filella X, Fuster J, Molina R, Grau JJ, García-Valdecasas JC, Grande L, et al. TAG-72, CA19-9 and CEA as tumor markers in gastric cancer. Acta Oncol. 1994;33:747–51.PubMedCrossRef Filella X, Fuster J, Molina R, Grau JJ, García-Valdecasas JC, Grande L, et al. TAG-72, CA19-9 and CEA as tumor markers in gastric cancer. Acta Oncol. 1994;33:747–51.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Victorzon M, Haglund C, Lundin J, Roberts PJ. A prognostic value of CA 19–9 but not of CEA in patients with gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1995;21:379–84.PubMedCrossRef Victorzon M, Haglund C, Lundin J, Roberts PJ. A prognostic value of CA 19–9 but not of CEA in patients with gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1995;21:379–84.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikeda Y, Oomori H, Koyanagi N, Mori M, Kamakura T, Minagawa S, Tateishi H, Sugimachi K. Prognostic value of combination assays for CEA and CA19-9 in gastric cancer. Oncology. 1995;52:483–6.PubMedCrossRef Ikeda Y, Oomori H, Koyanagi N, Mori M, Kamakura T, Minagawa S, Tateishi H, Sugimachi K. Prognostic value of combination assays for CEA and CA19-9 in gastric cancer. Oncology. 1995;52:483–6.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kodera Y, Yamamura Y, Torii A, Uesaka K, Hirai T, Yasui K, et al. The prognostic value of preoperative serum levels of CEA and CA19-9 in patients with gastric cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91:49–53.PubMed Kodera Y, Yamamura Y, Torii A, Uesaka K, Hirai T, Yasui K, et al. The prognostic value of preoperative serum levels of CEA and CA19-9 in patients with gastric cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91:49–53.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandez-Fernandez L, Tejero E, Tieso A, Rabadan L, Munoz M, Santos I. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the tumor markers CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in gastric cancer. Int Surg. 1996;81:400–2.PubMed Fernandez-Fernandez L, Tejero E, Tieso A, Rabadan L, Munoz M, Santos I. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the tumor markers CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in gastric cancer. Int Surg. 1996;81:400–2.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Spila A, Roselli M, Cosimelli M, Ferroni P, Cavaliere F, Arcuri R, et al. Clinical utility of CA 72–4 serum marker in the staging and immediate post-surgical management of gastric cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 1996;16:2241–7.PubMed Spila A, Roselli M, Cosimelli M, Ferroni P, Cavaliere F, Arcuri R, et al. Clinical utility of CA 72–4 serum marker in the staging and immediate post-surgical management of gastric cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 1996;16:2241–7.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikeda Y, Mori M, Kajiyama K, Kamakura T, Maehara Y, Haraguchi Y, Sugimachi K. Indicative value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for liver recurrence following curative resection of stage II and III gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 1996;43:1281–7.PubMed Ikeda Y, Mori M, Kajiyama K, Kamakura T, Maehara Y, Haraguchi Y, Sugimachi K. Indicative value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for liver recurrence following curative resection of stage II and III gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 1996;43:1281–7.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Pectasides D, Mylonakis A, Kostopoulou M, Papadopoulou M, Triantafillis D, Varthalitis J, Dimitriades M, Athanassiou A. CEA, CA19-9, and CA50 in monitoring gastric carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol. 1997;20:348–53.PubMedCrossRef Pectasides D, Mylonakis A, Kostopoulou M, Papadopoulou M, Triantafillis D, Varthalitis J, Dimitriades M, Athanassiou A. CEA, CA19-9, and CA50 in monitoring gastric carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol. 1997;20:348–53.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiter W, Stieber P, Reuter C, Nagel D, Cramer C, Pahl H, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative serum levels of CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 in gastric carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 1997;17:2903–6.PubMed Reiter W, Stieber P, Reuter C, Nagel D, Cramer C, Pahl H, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative serum levels of CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 in gastric carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 1997;17:2903–6.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikeguchi M, Katano K, Saitou H, Tsujitani S, Maeta M, Kaibara N. Pre-operative serum levels of CA72-4 in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;44:866–71.PubMed Ikeguchi M, Katano K, Saitou H, Tsujitani S, Maeta M, Kaibara N. Pre-operative serum levels of CA72-4 in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;44:866–71.PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Tachibana M, Takemoto Y, Nakashima Y, Kinugasa S, Kotoh T, Dhar DK, et al. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen as a prognostic factor in resectable gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:64–8.PubMedCrossRef Tachibana M, Takemoto Y, Nakashima Y, Kinugasa S, Kotoh T, Dhar DK, et al. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen as a prognostic factor in resectable gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:64–8.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Tocchi A, Costa G, Lepre L, Liotta G, Mazzoni G, Cianetti A, et al. The role of serum and gastric juice levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in patients with gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1998;124:450–5.PubMedCrossRef Tocchi A, Costa G, Lepre L, Liotta G, Mazzoni G, Cianetti A, et al. The role of serum and gastric juice levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in patients with gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1998;124:450–5.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakajima K, Ochiai T, Suzuki T, Shimada H, Hayashi H, Yasumoto A, et al. Impact of preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 19-9 and alpha-fetoprotein levels in gastric cancer patients. Tumour Biol. 1998;19:464–9.PubMedCrossRef Nakajima K, Ochiai T, Suzuki T, Shimada H, Hayashi H, Yasumoto A, et al. Impact of preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 19-9 and alpha-fetoprotein levels in gastric cancer patients. Tumour Biol. 1998;19:464–9.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Marrelli D, Roviello F, De Stefano A, Farnetani M, Garosi L, Messano A, et al. Prognostic significance of CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 preoperative serum levels in gastric carcinoma. Oncology. 1999;57:55–62.PubMedCrossRef Marrelli D, Roviello F, De Stefano A, Farnetani M, Garosi L, Messano A, et al. Prognostic significance of CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 preoperative serum levels in gastric carcinoma. Oncology. 1999;57:55–62.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim DY, Kim HR, Shim JH, Park CS, Kim SK, Kim YJ. Significance of serum and tissue carcinoembryonic antigen for the prognosis of gastric carcinoma patients. J Surg Oncol. 2000;74:185–92.PubMedCrossRef Kim DY, Kim HR, Shim JH, Park CS, Kim SK, Kim YJ. Significance of serum and tissue carcinoembryonic antigen for the prognosis of gastric carcinoma patients. J Surg Oncol. 2000;74:185–92.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Duraker N, Celik AN. The prognostic significance of preoperative serum CA 19-9 in patients with resectable gastric carcinoma: comparison with CEA. J Surg Oncol. 2001;76:266–71.PubMedCrossRef Duraker N, Celik AN. The prognostic significance of preoperative serum CA 19-9 in patients with resectable gastric carcinoma: comparison with CEA. J Surg Oncol. 2001;76:266–71.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Marrelli D, Pinto E, De Stefano A, Farnetani M, Garosi L, Roviello F. Clinical utility of CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 in the follow-up of patients with resectable gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2001;181:16–9.PubMedCrossRef Marrelli D, Pinto E, De Stefano A, Farnetani M, Garosi L, Roviello F. Clinical utility of CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 in the follow-up of patients with resectable gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2001;181:16–9.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Marrelli D, Pinto E, De Stefano A, de Manzoni G, Farnetani M, Garosi L, Roviello F. Preoperative positivity of serum tumor markers is a strong predictor of hematogenous recurrence of gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2001;78:253–8.PubMedCrossRef Marrelli D, Pinto E, De Stefano A, de Manzoni G, Farnetani M, Garosi L, Roviello F. Preoperative positivity of serum tumor markers is a strong predictor of hematogenous recurrence of gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2001;78:253–8.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishigami S, Natsugoe S, Hokita S, Che X, Tokuda K, Nakajo A, et al. Clinical importance of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 levels in gastric cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;32:41–4.PubMedCrossRef Ishigami S, Natsugoe S, Hokita S, Che X, Tokuda K, Nakajo A, et al. Clinical importance of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 levels in gastric cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;32:41–4.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaspar MJ, Arribas I, Coca MC, Díez-Alonso M. Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in gastric carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2001;22:318–22.PubMedCrossRef Gaspar MJ, Arribas I, Coca MC, Díez-Alonso M. Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in gastric carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2001;22:318–22.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Mattar R, Alves de Andrade CR, DiFavero GM, Gama-Rodrigues JJ, Laudanna AA. Preoperative serum levels of CA 72-4, CEA, CA 19-9, and alpha-fetoprotein in patients with gastric cancer. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2002;57:89–92.PubMed Mattar R, Alves de Andrade CR, DiFavero GM, Gama-Rodrigues JJ, Laudanna AA. Preoperative serum levels of CA 72-4, CEA, CA 19-9, and alpha-fetoprotein in patients with gastric cancer. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2002;57:89–92.PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai IR, Lee WJ, Huang MT, Lin HH. Comparison of serum CA72-4, CEA, TPA, CA19-9 and CA125 levels in gastric cancer patients and correlation with recurrence. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;49:1157–60.PubMed Lai IR, Lee WJ, Huang MT, Lin HH. Comparison of serum CA72-4, CEA, TPA, CA19-9 and CA125 levels in gastric cancer patients and correlation with recurrence. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;49:1157–60.PubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Aloe S, D’Alessandro R, Spila A, Ferroni P, Basili S, Palmirotta R, Carlini M, Graziano F, Mancini R, Mariotti S, Cosimelli M, Roselli M, Guadagni F. Prognostic value of serum and tumor tissue CA72-4 content in gastric cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 2003;18:21–7.PubMed Aloe S, D’Alessandro R, Spila A, Ferroni P, Basili S, Palmirotta R, Carlini M, Graziano F, Mancini R, Mariotti S, Cosimelli M, Roselli M, Guadagni F. Prognostic value of serum and tumor tissue CA72-4 content in gastric cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 2003;18:21–7.PubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi Y, Takeuchi T, Sakamoto J, Touge T, Mai M, Ohkura H, et al. Tumor Marker Committee. The usefulness of CEA and/or CA19-9 in monitoring for recurrence in gastric cancer patients: a prospective clinical study. Gastric Cancer. 2003;6:142–5.PubMedCrossRef Takahashi Y, Takeuchi T, Sakamoto J, Touge T, Mai M, Ohkura H, et al. Tumor Marker Committee. The usefulness of CEA and/or CA19-9 in monitoring for recurrence in gastric cancer patients: a prospective clinical study. Gastric Cancer. 2003;6:142–5.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Louhimo J, Kokkola A, Alfthan H, Stenman UH, Haglund C. Preoperative hCGbeta and CA 72–4 are prognostic factors in gastric cancer. Int J Cancer. 2004;111:929–33.PubMedCrossRef Louhimo J, Kokkola A, Alfthan H, Stenman UH, Haglund C. Preoperative hCGbeta and CA 72–4 are prognostic factors in gastric cancer. Int J Cancer. 2004;111:929–33.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Mihmanli M, Dilege E, Demir U, Coskun H, Eroglu T, Uysalol MD. The use of tumor markers as predictors of prognosis in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51:1544–7.PubMed Mihmanli M, Dilege E, Demir U, Coskun H, Eroglu T, Uysalol MD. The use of tumor markers as predictors of prognosis in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51:1544–7.PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Cetin B, Atalay C, Aslan S, Babacan B, Hatipoğlu C, Akinci M, et al. Peritoneal carcinoembryonic antigen level for predicting locoregional and distant spread of gastric cancer. Surg Today. 2005;35:919–24.PubMedCrossRef Cetin B, Atalay C, Aslan S, Babacan B, Hatipoğlu C, Akinci M, et al. Peritoneal carcinoembryonic antigen level for predicting locoregional and distant spread of gastric cancer. Surg Today. 2005;35:919–24.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Goral V, Yesilbagdan H, Kaplan A, Sit D. Evaluation of CA72-4 as a new tumor marker in patients with gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54:1272–5.PubMed Goral V, Yesilbagdan H, Kaplan A, Sit D. Evaluation of CA72-4 as a new tumor marker in patients with gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54:1272–5.PubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Ucar E, Semerci E, Ustun H, Yetim T, Huzmeli C, Gullu M. Prognostic value of preoperative CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4, and AFP levels in gastric cancer. Adv Ther. 2008;25:1075–84.PubMedCrossRef Ucar E, Semerci E, Ustun H, Yetim T, Huzmeli C, Gullu M. Prognostic value of preoperative CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4, and AFP levels in gastric cancer. Adv Ther. 2008;25:1075–84.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang YH, Li Y, Chen C, Peng CW. Carcinoembryonic antigen level is related to tumor invasion into the serosa of the stomach: study on 166 cases and suggestion for new therapy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009;56:1750–4.PubMed Zhang YH, Li Y, Chen C, Peng CW. Carcinoembryonic antigen level is related to tumor invasion into the serosa of the stomach: study on 166 cases and suggestion for new therapy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009;56:1750–4.PubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikeguchi M, Hatada T, Yamamoto M, Miyake T, Matsunaga T, Fukumoto Y, et al. Serum interleukin-6 and -10 levels in patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12:95–100.PubMedCrossRef Ikeguchi M, Hatada T, Yamamoto M, Miyake T, Matsunaga T, Fukumoto Y, et al. Serum interleukin-6 and -10 levels in patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12:95–100.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Jung M, Jeung HC, Lee SS, Park JY, Hong S, Lee SH, et al. The clinical significance of ascitic fluid CEA in advanced gastric cancer with ascites. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010;136:517–26.PubMedCrossRef Jung M, Jeung HC, Lee SS, Park JY, Hong S, Lee SH, et al. The clinical significance of ascitic fluid CEA in advanced gastric cancer with ascites. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010;136:517–26.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Dilege E, Mihmanli M, Demir U, Ozer K, Bostanci O, Kaya C, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative CEA and CA19-9 levels in resectable gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2010;57:674–7.PubMed Dilege E, Mihmanli M, Demir U, Ozer K, Bostanci O, Kaya C, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative CEA and CA19-9 levels in resectable gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2010;57:674–7.PubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Fan B, Xiong B. Investigation of serum tumor markers in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:239–45.PubMed Fan B, Xiong B. Investigation of serum tumor markers in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:239–45.PubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Lukaszewicz-Zając M, Mroczko B, Gryko M, Kędra B, Szmitkowski M. Comparison between clinical significance of serum proinflammatory proteins (IL-6 and CRP) and classic tumor markers (CEA and CA 19–9) in gastric cancer. Clin Exp Med. 2011;11(2):89–96.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lukaszewicz-Zając M, Mroczko B, Gryko M, Kędra B, Szmitkowski M. Comparison between clinical significance of serum proinflammatory proteins (IL-6 and CRP) and classic tumor markers (CEA and CA 19–9) in gastric cancer. Clin Exp Med. 2011;11(2):89–96.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Emoto S, Ishigami H, Yamashita H, Yamaguchi H, Kaisaki S, Kitayama J. Clinical significance of CA125 and CA72-4 in gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15:154–61.PubMedCrossRef Emoto S, Ishigami H, Yamashita H, Yamaguchi H, Kaisaki S, Kitayama J. Clinical significance of CA125 and CA72-4 in gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15:154–61.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu X, Cheng Y, Sheng W, Lu H, Xu Y, Long Z, Zhu H, Wang Y. Clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors in alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancers: analysis of 104 cases. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:249–55.PubMedCrossRef Liu X, Cheng Y, Sheng W, Lu H, Xu Y, Long Z, Zhu H, Wang Y. Clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors in alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancers: analysis of 104 cases. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:249–55.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Inoue M, Sano T, Kuchiba A, Taniguchi H, Fukagawa T, Katai H. Long-term results of gastrectomy for alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1056–61.PubMedCrossRef Inoue M, Sano T, Kuchiba A, Taniguchi H, Fukagawa T, Katai H. Long-term results of gastrectomy for alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1056–61.PubMedCrossRef
53.
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu X, Sheng W, Wang Y. An analysis of clinicopathological features and prognosis by comparing hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach with AFP-producing gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2012;106:299–303.PubMedCrossRef Liu X, Sheng W, Wang Y. An analysis of clinicopathological features and prognosis by comparing hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach with AFP-producing gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2012;106:299–303.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Bold RJ, Ota DM, Ajani JA, Mansfield PF. Peritoneal and serum tumor markers predict recurrence and survival of patients with resectable gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 1999;2:1–7.PubMedCrossRef Bold RJ, Ota DM, Ajani JA, Mansfield PF. Peritoneal and serum tumor markers predict recurrence and survival of patients with resectable gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 1999;2:1–7.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujimura T, Kinami S, Ninomiya I, Kitagawa H, Fushida S, Nishimura G, et al. Diagnostic laparoscopy, serum CA125, and peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. Endoscopy. 2002;34:569–74.PubMedCrossRef Fujimura T, Kinami S, Ninomiya I, Kitagawa H, Fushida S, Nishimura G, et al. Diagnostic laparoscopy, serum CA125, and peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. Endoscopy. 2002;34:569–74.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang GI, Yoo CH, Sohn BH, Shin JH, Park YL, Kim HD, et al. Predictive value of preoperative serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA125 levels for peritoneal metastasis in patients with gastric carcinoma. Cancer Res Treat. 2004;36:178–81.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hwang GI, Yoo CH, Sohn BH, Shin JH, Park YL, Kim HD, et al. Predictive value of preoperative serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA125 levels for peritoneal metastasis in patients with gastric carcinoma. Cancer Res Treat. 2004;36:178–81.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi I, Maehara Y, Kusumoto T, Kohnoe S, Kakeji Y, Baba H, et al. Combined evaluation of preoperative serum sialyl-Tn antigen and carcinoembryonic antigen levels is prognostic for gastric cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 1994;69:163–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Takahashi I, Maehara Y, Kusumoto T, Kohnoe S, Kakeji Y, Baba H, et al. Combined evaluation of preoperative serum sialyl-Tn antigen and carcinoembryonic antigen levels is prognostic for gastric cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 1994;69:163–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakagoe T, Sawai T, Tsuji T, Jibiki M, Nanashima A, Yamaguchi H, et al. Pre-operative serum levels of sialyl Tn antigen predict liver metastasis and poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:731–9.PubMedCrossRef Nakagoe T, Sawai T, Tsuji T, Jibiki M, Nanashima A, Yamaguchi H, et al. Pre-operative serum levels of sialyl Tn antigen predict liver metastasis and poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:731–9.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen XZ, Zhang WK, Yang K, Wang LL, Liu J, Wang L, et al. Correlation between serum CA724 and gastric cancer: multiple analyses based on Chinese population. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39:9031–9.PubMedCrossRef Chen XZ, Zhang WK, Yang K, Wang LL, Liu J, Wang L, et al. Correlation between serum CA724 and gastric cancer: multiple analyses based on Chinese population. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39:9031–9.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Santeusanio G, Peronace L, Castagna G, De Muro G, Santi D, D’Orazio A, et al. Immunohistochemical study of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in gastric tumors: correlation with preoperative serum levels, histologic type, and grade of anaplasia of the tumor. J Surg Oncol. 1988;37:13–9.PubMedCrossRef Santeusanio G, Peronace L, Castagna G, De Muro G, Santi D, D’Orazio A, et al. Immunohistochemical study of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in gastric tumors: correlation with preoperative serum levels, histologic type, and grade of anaplasia of the tumor. J Surg Oncol. 1988;37:13–9.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Staab HJ, Anderer FA, Brümmendorf T, Hornung A, Fischer R. Prognostic value of preoperative serum CEA level compared to clinical staging: II. Stomach cancer. Br J Cancer. 1982;45:718–27.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Staab HJ, Anderer FA, Brümmendorf T, Hornung A, Fischer R. Prognostic value of preoperative serum CEA level compared to clinical staging: II. Stomach cancer. Br J Cancer. 1982;45:718–27.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Ychou M, Duffour J, Kramar A, Gourgou S, Grenier J. Clinical significance and prognostic value of CA72-4 compared with CEA and CA19-9 in patients with gastric cancer. Dis Markers. 2000;16:105–10.PubMedCrossRef Ychou M, Duffour J, Kramar A, Gourgou S, Grenier J. Clinical significance and prognostic value of CA72-4 compared with CEA and CA19-9 in patients with gastric cancer. Dis Markers. 2000;16:105–10.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Li Y, Yang Y, Lu M, Shen L. Predictive value of serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA72.4 in early diagnosis of recurrence after radical resection of gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:2166–70.PubMed Li Y, Yang Y, Lu M, Shen L. Predictive value of serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA72.4 in early diagnosis of recurrence after radical resection of gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:2166–70.PubMed
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi SR, Jang JS, Lee JH, Roh MH, Kim MC, Lee WS, et al. Role of serum tumor markers in monitoring for recurrence of gastric cancer following radical gastrectomy. Dig Dis Sci. 2006;51:2081–6.PubMedCrossRef Choi SR, Jang JS, Lee JH, Roh MH, Kim MC, Lee WS, et al. Role of serum tumor markers in monitoring for recurrence of gastric cancer following radical gastrectomy. Dig Dis Sci. 2006;51:2081–6.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamao T, Kai S, Kazami A, Koizumi K, Handa T, Takemoto N, et al. Tumor markers CEA, CA19-9 and CA125 in monitoring of response to systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1999;29:550–5.PubMedCrossRef Yamao T, Kai S, Kazami A, Koizumi K, Handa T, Takemoto N, et al. Tumor markers CEA, CA19-9 and CA125 in monitoring of response to systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1999;29:550–5.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Catalano V, Graziano F, Santini D, D’Emidio S, Baldelli AM, Rossi D, et al. Second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer: who may benefit? Br J Cancer. 2008;99:1402–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Catalano V, Graziano F, Santini D, D’Emidio S, Baldelli AM, Rossi D, et al. Second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer: who may benefit? Br J Cancer. 2008;99:1402–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HJ, Lee KW, Kim YJ, Oh DY, Kim JH, Im SA, et al. Chemotherapy-induced transient CEA and CA19-9 surges in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer. Acta Oncol. 2009;48:385–90.PubMedCrossRef Kim HJ, Lee KW, Kim YJ, Oh DY, Kim JH, Im SA, et al. Chemotherapy-induced transient CEA and CA19-9 surges in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer. Acta Oncol. 2009;48:385–90.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for gastric cancer: a systematic review of literature by the Task Force of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association
verfasst von
Hideaki Shimada
Tamaki Noie
Manabu Ohashi
Koji Oba
Yutaka Takahashi
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2014
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Gastric Cancer / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1436-3291
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3305
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-013-0259-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Gastric Cancer 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.