Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Gastric Cancer 1/2018

01.01.2018 | Original Article

Anthracycline-based triplets do not improve the efficacy of platinum-fluoropyrimidine doublets in first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer: real-world data from the AGAMEMON National Cancer Registry

verfasst von: A. Carmona-Bayonas, P. Jiménez-Fonseca, A. Custodio, M. Sánchez Cánovas, R. Hernández, C. Pericay, I. Echavarria, A. Lacalle, L. Visa, A. Rodríguez Palomo, M. Mangas, J. M. Cano, E. Buxo, F. Álvarez-Manceñido, T. García, J. E. Lorenzo, M. Ferrer-Cardona, A. Viudez, A. Azkarate, A. Ramchandani, D. Arias, F. Longo, C. López, R. Sánchez Bayona, M. L. Limón, A. Díaz-Serrano, A. Fernández Montes, P. Sala, P. Cerdá, F. Rivera, J. Gallego, AGAMENON study group

Erschienen in: Gastric Cancer | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Although anthracycline-based triplets are one of the most widely used schedules to treat advanced gastric cancer (AGC), the benefit of including epirubicin in these therapeutic combinations remains unknown. This study aims to evaluate both the efficacy and tolerance of triplets with epirubicin vs. doublets with platinum-fluoropyrimidine in a national AGC registry.

Methods

Patients with AGC treated with polychemotherapy without trastuzumab at 28 hospitals in Spain between 2008 and 2016 were included. The effect of anthracycline-based triplets against doublets was evaluated by propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox proportional hazards (PH) regression.

Result

A total of 1002 patients were included (doublets, n = 653; anthracycline-based triplets, n = 349). The multivariable Cox PH regression failed to detect significantly increased OS in favor of triplets with anthracyclines: HR 0.90 (95% CI, 0.78–1.05), p = 0.20035. After PSM, the sample contained 325 pairs with similar baseline characteristics. This method was also unable to reveal an increase in OS: 10.5 (95% CI, 9.7–12.3) vs. 9.9 (95% CI, 9.2–11.4) months, HR 0.91 (CI 95%, 0.76–1.083), and (log-rank test, p = 0.226). Response rates (42.1 vs. 33.1%, p = 0.12) and PFS (HR 0.95, CI 95%, 0.80–1.13, log-rank test, p = 0.873) were not significantly higher with epirubicin-based regimens. The triplets were associated with greater grade 3–4 hematological toxicity, and increased hospitalization due to toxicity by 68%. The addition of epirubicin is viable, but 23.7% discontinued treatment because of adverse effects or patient decision.

Conclusion

Anthracyclines added to platinum-fluoropyrimidine doublets did not improve the response rate or survival outcomes in patients with AGC but entailed greater toxicity.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:687–97.CrossRefPubMed Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:687–97.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tokunaga A, Onda M, Okuda T, Teramoto T, Fujita I, Mizutani T, et al. Clinical significance of epidermal growth factor (EGF), EGF receptor, and c-erbb-2 in human gastric cancer. Cancer. 1995;75:1418–25.CrossRefPubMed Tokunaga A, Onda M, Okuda T, Teramoto T, Fujita I, Mizutani T, et al. Clinical significance of epidermal growth factor (EGF), EGF receptor, and c-erbb-2 in human gastric cancer. Cancer. 1995;75:1418–25.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiménez-Fonseca P, Carmona-Bayonas A, Lorenzo MLS, Plazas JG, Custodio A, Hernández R, et al. Prognostic significance of performing universal HER2 testing in cases of advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2016. doi:10.1007/s10120-016-0639-8. Jiménez-Fonseca P, Carmona-Bayonas A, Lorenzo MLS, Plazas JG, Custodio A, Hernández R, et al. Prognostic significance of performing universal HER2 testing in cases of advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2016. doi:10.​1007/​s10120-016-0639-8.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Carmona-Bayonas A, Jiménez-Fonseca P, Lorenzo MLS, Ramchandani A, Martínez EA, Custodio A, et al. On the effect of triplet or doublet chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: results from a National Cancer Registry. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2016;14:1379–88. http://www.jnccn.org/content/14/11/1379.abstract. Accessed 7 Apr 2017. Carmona-Bayonas A, Jiménez-Fonseca P, Lorenzo MLS, Ramchandani A, Martínez EA, Custodio A, et al. On the effect of triplet or doublet chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: results from a National Cancer Registry. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2016;14:1379–88. http://​www.​jnccn.​org/​content/​14/​11/​1379.​abstract. Accessed 7 Apr 2017.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ter Veer E, Haj Mohammad N, van Valkenhoef G, Ngai LL, Mali RMA, Anderegg MC, et al. The efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapy in advanced esophagogastric cancer: a network meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst (internet). 2016;108. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27576566. Accessed 7 Apr 2017. Ter Veer E, Haj Mohammad N, van Valkenhoef G, Ngai LL, Mali RMA, Anderegg MC, et al. The efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapy in advanced esophagogastric cancer: a network meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst (internet). 2016;108. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​27576566. Accessed 7 Apr 2017.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Webb A, Cunningham D, Scarffe JH, Harper P, Norman A, Joffe JK, et al. Randomized trial comparing epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:261–7.CrossRefPubMed Webb A, Cunningham D, Scarffe JH, Harper P, Norman A, Joffe JK, et al. Randomized trial comparing epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:261–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Coombes RC, Chilvers CE, Amadori D, Medi F, Fountzilas G, Rauschecker H, et al. Randomised trial of epirubicin versus fluorouracil in advanced gastric cancer. An International Collaborative Cancer Group (ICCG) study. Ann Oncol (internet). 2016;5:33–6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8172789. Accessed 7 Apr 2017. Coombes RC, Chilvers CE, Amadori D, Medi F, Fountzilas G, Rauschecker H, et al. Randomised trial of epirubicin versus fluorouracil in advanced gastric cancer. An International Collaborative Cancer Group (ICCG) study. Ann Oncol (internet). 2016;5:33–6. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​8172789. Accessed 7 Apr 2017.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim NK, Park YS, Heo DS, Suh C, Kim SY, Park KC, et al. A phase III randomized study of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin C versus 5-fluorouracil alone in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Cancer (internet). 1993;71:3813–8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8508349. Accessed 7 Apr 2017. Kim NK, Park YS, Heo DS, Suh C, Kim SY, Park KC, et al. A phase III randomized study of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin C versus 5-fluorouracil alone in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Cancer (internet). 1993;71:3813–8. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​8508349. Accessed 7 Apr 2017.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cullinan SA, Moertel CG, Fleming TR, Rubin JR, Krook JE, Everson LK, et al. A comparison of three chemotherapeutic regimens in the treatment of advanced pancreatic and gastric carcinoma. Fluorouracil vs fluorouracil and doxorubicin vs fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin. JAMA (internet). 1985;253:2061–7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2579257. Accessed 7 Apr 2017. Cullinan SA, Moertel CG, Fleming TR, Rubin JR, Krook JE, Everson LK, et al. A comparison of three chemotherapeutic regimens in the treatment of advanced pancreatic and gastric carcinoma. Fluorouracil vs fluorouracil and doxorubicin vs fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin. JAMA (internet). 1985;253:2061–7. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​2579257. Accessed 7 Apr 2017.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner A, Grothe W, Haerting J, Kleber G, Grothey A, Fleig WE. Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data. J Clin Oncol. American Society of. Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2903–9.CrossRef Wagner A, Grothe W, Haerting J, Kleber G, Grothey A, Fleig WE. Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data. J Clin Oncol. American Society of. Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2903–9.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ross P, Nicolson M, Cunningham D, Valle J, Seymour M, Harper P, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing mitomycin, cisplatin, and protracted venous-infusion fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) with epirubicin, cisplatin, and PVI 5-FU in advanced esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1996–2004.CrossRefPubMed Ross P, Nicolson M, Cunningham D, Valle J, Seymour M, Harper P, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing mitomycin, cisplatin, and protracted venous-infusion fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) with epirubicin, cisplatin, and PVI 5-FU in advanced esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1996–2004.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat A randomized, comparative study of combination chemotherapies in advanced gastric cancer: 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP) versus 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and 4′-epirubicin (FPEPIR). Kyoto Research Group for Chemotherapy of Gastric Cancer (KRGCGC). Anticancer Res (internet). 1992;12:1983–8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1295444. Accessed 7 Apr 2017. A randomized, comparative study of combination chemotherapies in advanced gastric cancer: 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP) versus 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and 4′-epirubicin (FPEPIR). Kyoto Research Group for Chemotherapy of Gastric Cancer (KRGCGC). Anticancer Res (internet). 1992;12:1983–8. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​1295444. Accessed 7 Apr 2017.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim TW, Choi SJ, Ahn JH, Bang HS, Chang HM, Kang YK, et al. A prospective randomized phase III trial of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP) versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fu (ECF) in the treatment of patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:S314.CrossRef Kim TW, Choi SJ, Ahn JH, Bang HS, Chang HM, Kang YK, et al. A prospective randomized phase III trial of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP) versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fu (ECF) in the treatment of patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:S314.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Yun J, Lee J, Park SH, Park JO, Park YS, Lim HY, et al. A randomised phase II study of combination chemotherapy with epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) or cisplatin and capecitabine (CX) in advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:885–91.CrossRefPubMed Yun J, Lee J, Park SH, Park JO, Park YS, Lim HY, et al. A randomised phase II study of combination chemotherapy with epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) or cisplatin and capecitabine (CX) in advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:885–91.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Austin PC. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Stat Med. 2008;27:2037–49.CrossRefPubMed Austin PC. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Stat Med. 2008;27:2037–49.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Austin PC. A tutorial and case study in propensity score analysis: an application to estimating the effect of in-hospital smoking cessation counseling on mortality. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46:119–51.CrossRef Austin PC. A tutorial and case study in propensity score analysis: an application to estimating the effect of in-hospital smoking cessation counseling on mortality. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46:119–51.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2009;28:3083–107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2009;28:3083–107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Schoenfeld DA. Sample-size formula for the proportional-hazards regression model. Biometrics. 1983;39(2):499–503.CrossRefPubMed Schoenfeld DA. Sample-size formula for the proportional-hazards regression model. Biometrics. 1983;39(2):499–503.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Koppert LB, Janssen-Heijnen MLG, Louwman MWJ, Lemmens VEPP, Wijnhoven BPL, Tilanus HW, et al. Comparison of comorbidity prevalence in oesophageal and gastric carcinoma patients: a population-based study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;16:681–8.CrossRefPubMed Koppert LB, Janssen-Heijnen MLG, Louwman MWJ, Lemmens VEPP, Wijnhoven BPL, Tilanus HW, et al. Comparison of comorbidity prevalence in oesophageal and gastric carcinoma patients: a population-based study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;16:681–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, Iveson T, Nicolson M, Coxon F, et al. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. The New England journal of medicine. 2008;358(1):36–46.CrossRefPubMed Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, Iveson T, Nicolson M, Coxon F, et al. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. The New England journal of medicine. 2008;358(1):36–46.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, Majlis A, Constenla M, Boni C, et al. Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(31):4991–7.CrossRefPubMed Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, Majlis A, Constenla M, Boni C, et al. Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(31):4991–7.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen X-L, Chen X-Z, Yang C, Liao Y-B, Li H, Wang L, et al. Docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) regimen compared with non-taxane-containing palliative chemotherapy for gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One (internet). 2013;8:e60320. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23593191. Chen X-L, Chen X-Z, Yang C, Liao Y-B, Li H, Wang L, et al. Docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) regimen compared with non-taxane-containing palliative chemotherapy for gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One (internet). 2013;8:e60320. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​23593191.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ochenduszko S, Puskulluoglu M, Konopka K, Fijorek K, Urbanczyk K, Budzynski A, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of first-line palliative chemotherapy with EOX and mDCF regimens in patients with locally advanced inoperable or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase 3 trial. Med Oncol. 2015;32:1–8.CrossRef Ochenduszko S, Puskulluoglu M, Konopka K, Fijorek K, Urbanczyk K, Budzynski A, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of first-line palliative chemotherapy with EOX and mDCF regimens in patients with locally advanced inoperable or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase 3 trial. Med Oncol. 2015;32:1–8.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Carmona-Bayonas A, Jiménez-Fonseca P, Lorenzo MLS, Ramchandani A, Martínez EA, Custodio A, et al. On the effect of triplet or doublet chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: results from a National Cancer Registry. J Natl Compre Cancer Netw internet). 2016;14:1379–88. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799509. Carmona-Bayonas A, Jiménez-Fonseca P, Lorenzo MLS, Ramchandani A, Martínez EA, Custodio A, et al. On the effect of triplet or doublet chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: results from a National Cancer Registry. J Natl Compre Cancer Netw internet). 2016;14:1379–88. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​27799509.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Waddell T, Chau I, Cunningham D, Gonzalez D, Okines AFC, Wotherspoon A, et al. Epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine with or without panitumumab for patients with previously untreated advanced oesophagogastric cancer (REAL3): a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:481–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Waddell T, Chau I, Cunningham D, Gonzalez D, Okines AFC, Wotherspoon A, et al. Epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine with or without panitumumab for patients with previously untreated advanced oesophagogastric cancer (REAL3): a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:481–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham D, Tebbutt NC, Davidenko I, Murad AM, Al-Batran S-E, Ilson DH, et al. Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo (P)-controlled trial of rilotumumab (R) plus epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced MET-positive (pos) gastric or gastroesophageal juncti. In: ASCO annual meeting proceedings. 2015. p. 4000. Cunningham D, Tebbutt NC, Davidenko I, Murad AM, Al-Batran S-E, Ilson DH, et al. Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo (P)-controlled trial of rilotumumab (R) plus epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced MET-positive (pos) gastric or gastroesophageal juncti. In: ASCO annual meeting proceedings. 2015. p. 4000.
Metadaten
Titel
Anthracycline-based triplets do not improve the efficacy of platinum-fluoropyrimidine doublets in first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer: real-world data from the AGAMEMON National Cancer Registry
verfasst von
A. Carmona-Bayonas
P. Jiménez-Fonseca
A. Custodio
M. Sánchez Cánovas
R. Hernández
C. Pericay
I. Echavarria
A. Lacalle
L. Visa
A. Rodríguez Palomo
M. Mangas
J. M. Cano
E. Buxo
F. Álvarez-Manceñido
T. García
J. E. Lorenzo
M. Ferrer-Cardona
A. Viudez
A. Azkarate
A. Ramchandani
D. Arias
F. Longo
C. López
R. Sánchez Bayona
M. L. Limón
A. Díaz-Serrano
A. Fernández Montes
P. Sala
P. Cerdá
F. Rivera
J. Gallego
AGAMENON study group
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2018
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Gastric Cancer / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1436-3291
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3305
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-017-0718-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Gastric Cancer 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.