Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Gastric Cancer 1/2018

01.01.2018 | Original Article

Higher incidence of pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Real-world evidence from a nationwide prospective cohort study

verfasst von: Naoki Hiki, Michitaka Honda, Tsuyoshi Etoh, Kazuhiro Yoshida, Yasuhiro Kodera, Yoshihiro Kakeji, Hikaru Kumamaru, Hiroaki Miyata, Yuichi Yamashita, Masafumi Inomata, Hiroyuki Konno, Yasuyuki Seto, Seigo Kitano

Erschienen in: Gastric Cancer | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) is becoming the standard procedure for gastric cancer. However, supporting evidence thus far has been derived primarily from randomized control trials conducted by centers of excellence. In the present study we used the National Clinical Database (NCD) in Japan to prospectively accumulate data from diverse types of hospitals and examine whether LDG is a safe and valid standard procedure.

Methods

From the NCD, 169 institutions were selected to form a cohort that was considered to be representative of Japan. From August 2014 to July 2015, 5288 patients who underwent LDG were registered prospectively, and clinical data were acquired through the NCD. To compare surgical outcomes between open distal gastrectomy (ODG) and LDG, we adjusted for confounding factors using propensity score matching, ultimately retrieving data from 1067 patients in each group.

Results

There were no significant differences in the number of in-hospital deaths in the ODG and LDG groups (3/1067 vs. 6/1067; P = 0.51) or in the number of reoperations (20/1067 vs. 29/1067; P = 0.19). However, the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LDG. Although wound infection and dehiscence were more common in the ODG group, LDG was more often associated with grade B or higher pancreatic fistulas.

Conclusion

The safety and minimal invasiveness of LDG were confirmed in the present Japanese nationwide survey. However, care must be taken to prevent the formation of pancreatic fistulas with LDG, and further improvements in surgical quality are warranted in this regard.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;4:146–8.PubMed Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;4:146–8.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Katai H, Sasako M, Fukuda H, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG 0703). Gastric Cancer. 2010;13:238–44.CrossRefPubMed Katai H, Sasako M, Fukuda H, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG 0703). Gastric Cancer. 2010;13:238–44.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report—a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010;251:417–20.CrossRefPubMed Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report—a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010;251:417–20.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Takiguchi S, Fujiwara Y, Yamasaki M, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy. A prospective randomized single-blind study. World J Surg. 2013;37:2379–86.CrossRefPubMed Takiguchi S, Fujiwara Y, Yamasaki M, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy. A prospective randomized single-blind study. World J Surg. 2013;37:2379–86.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Fujii K, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report. Surgery. 2002;131:S306–11.CrossRefPubMed Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Fujii K, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report. Surgery. 2002;131:S306–11.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S, et al. Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by expert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese patients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1695–705.CrossRefPubMed Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S, et al. Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by expert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese patients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1695–705.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer, 2016. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer, 2016.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Japan_Society_for_Endoscopic_Surgery. 12th Nationwide survey of endoscopic surgery in Japan. J Jpn Soc Endosc Surg. 2014;19:495–558. Japan_Society_for_Endoscopic_Surgery. 12th Nationwide survey of endoscopic surgery in Japan. J Jpn Soc Endosc Surg. 2014;19:495–558.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Davenport DL, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, et al. Preoperative risk factors and surgical complexity are more predictive of costs than postoperative complications: a case study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Ann Surg. 2005;242:463–8 (discussion 468–71).PubMedPubMedCentral Davenport DL, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, et al. Preoperative risk factors and surgical complexity are more predictive of costs than postoperative complications: a case study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Ann Surg. 2005;242:463–8 (discussion 468–71).PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fink AS, Campbell DA Jr, Mentzer RM Jr, et al. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility. Ann Surg. 2002;236:344–53 (discussion 353–4).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fink AS, Campbell DA Jr, Mentzer RM Jr, et al. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility. Ann Surg. 2002;236:344–53 (discussion 353–4).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Murakami A, Hirata Y, Motomura N, et al. The national clinical database as an initiative for quality improvement in Japan. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;47:437–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Murakami A, Hirata Y, Motomura N, et al. The national clinical database as an initiative for quality improvement in Japan. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;47:437–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gotoh M, Miyata H, Hashimoto H, et al. National Clinical Database feedback implementation for quality improvement of cancer treatment in Japan: from good to great through transparency. Surg Today. 2016;46:38–47.CrossRefPubMed Gotoh M, Miyata H, Hashimoto H, et al. National Clinical Database feedback implementation for quality improvement of cancer treatment in Japan: from good to great through transparency. Surg Today. 2016;46:38–47.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41–55.CrossRef Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41–55.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurita N, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. Risk model for distal gastrectomy when treating gastric cancer on the basis of data from 33,917 Japanese Patients Collected Using a Nationwide Web-based Data Entry System. Ann Surg. 2015;262:295–303.CrossRefPubMed Kurita N, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. Risk model for distal gastrectomy when treating gastric cancer on the basis of data from 33,917 Japanese Patients Collected Using a Nationwide Web-based Data Entry System. Ann Surg. 2015;262:295–303.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Coca-Perraillon M. Local and global optimal propensity score matching. SAS Global Forum 2007 Paper. 2007;185. Coca-Perraillon M. Local and global optimal propensity score matching. SAS Global Forum 2007 Paper. 2007;185.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang DDJ. A unified approach to measuring the effect size between two groups using SAS. @ SAS Global Forum 2012; paper 335–2012. Yang DDJ. A unified approach to measuring the effect size between two groups using SAS. @ SAS Global Forum 2012; paper 335–2012.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Honda M, Hiki N, Kinoshita T, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for clinical stage I gastric cancer: the LOC-1 study. Ann Surg. 2016;264:214–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Honda M, Hiki N, Kinoshita T, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for clinical stage I gastric cancer: the LOC-1 study. Ann Surg. 2016;264:214–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial (phase III) to comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with open distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma (KLASS 01). J Korean Surg Soc. 2013;84:123–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial (phase III) to comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with open distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma (KLASS 01). J Korean Surg Soc. 2013;84:123–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Irino T, Hiki N, Ohashi M, et al. The Hit and Away technique: optimal usage of the ultrasonic scalpel in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Endosc, 2015. Irino T, Hiki N, Ohashi M, et al. The Hit and Away technique: optimal usage of the ultrasonic scalpel in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Endosc, 2015.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang X, Hiki N, Nunobe S, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula and the risk factors of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;19:115–21.CrossRefPubMed Jiang X, Hiki N, Nunobe S, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula and the risk factors of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;19:115–21.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kubota T, Hiki N, Sano T, et al. Prognostic significance of complications after curative surgery for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:891–8.CrossRefPubMed Kubota T, Hiki N, Sano T, et al. Prognostic significance of complications after curative surgery for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:891–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukunaga T, Hiki N, Kubota T, et al. Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2676–82.CrossRefPubMed Fukunaga T, Hiki N, Kubota T, et al. Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2676–82.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsujiura M, Hiki N, Ohashi M, et al. ‘‘Pancreas-compressionless gastrectomy’’: A novel laparoscopic approach for suprapancreatic lymph node dissection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;PM:28699131. Tsujiura M, Hiki N, Ohashi M, et al. ‘‘Pancreas-compressionless gastrectomy’’: A novel laparoscopic approach for suprapancreatic lymph node dissection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;PM:28699131.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Strong VE, Song KY, Park CH, et al. Comparison of gastric cancer survival following R0 resection in the United States and Korea using an internationally validated nomogram. Ann Surg. 2010;251:640–6.CrossRefPubMed Strong VE, Song KY, Park CH, et al. Comparison of gastric cancer survival following R0 resection in the United States and Korea using an internationally validated nomogram. Ann Surg. 2010;251:640–6.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin JX, Huang CM, Zheng CH, et al. Is all advanced Gastric cancer suitable for laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy? A case-control study using a Propensity score method. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1252–60.CrossRefPubMed Lin JX, Huang CM, Zheng CH, et al. Is all advanced Gastric cancer suitable for laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy? A case-control study using a Propensity score method. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1252–60.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamada T, Yoshikawa T, Taguri M, et al. The survival difference between gastric cancer patients from the UK and Japan remains after weighted propensity score analysis considering all background factors. Gastric Cancer. 2015. Yamada T, Yoshikawa T, Taguri M, et al. The survival difference between gastric cancer patients from the UK and Japan remains after weighted propensity score analysis considering all background factors. Gastric Cancer. 2015.
Metadaten
Titel
Higher incidence of pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Real-world evidence from a nationwide prospective cohort study
verfasst von
Naoki Hiki
Michitaka Honda
Tsuyoshi Etoh
Kazuhiro Yoshida
Yasuhiro Kodera
Yoshihiro Kakeji
Hikaru Kumamaru
Hiroaki Miyata
Yuichi Yamashita
Masafumi Inomata
Hiroyuki Konno
Yasuyuki Seto
Seigo Kitano
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2018
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Gastric Cancer / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1436-3291
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3305
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-017-0764-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Gastric Cancer 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.