Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Gastric Cancer 2/2021

11.09.2020 | Original Article

Multi-institutional development and validation of a nomogram to predict recurrence after curative resection of gastric neuroendocrine/mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma

verfasst von: Hualong Zheng, YaJun Zhao, Qingliang He, Hankun Hao, Yantao Tian, Bingbing Zou, Lixin Jiang, Xiantu Qiu, Yanbing Zhou, Zhi Li, Yanchang Xu, Gang Zhao, Fangqin Xue, Shuliang Li, Weihua Fu, Yongxiang Li, Xiaojun Zhou, Yong Li, Zhenggang Zhu, Jinping Chen, Zekuan Xu, Lisheng Cai, En Li, Honglang Li, Jianwei Xie, Chaohui Zheng, Jun Lu, Ping Li, Changming Huang

Erschienen in: Gastric Cancer | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To establish a novel nomogram to predict individual 1, 3, and 5 years disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma/mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma [(MA)NEC].

Background

Among patients undergoing radical resection of gastric (MA)NEC, there is still a high tendency for relapse.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 777 patients with gastric (MA)NEC at 23 centers in China from 2004 to 2015 was performed. Based on the established nomogram, which included age, ASA, pT, pN and Ki67, the overall patients were divided into low-risk group (LRG) and high-risk group (HRG).

Results

The median follow-up time was 40 months (1–169 months). The C-index, AUC and time-ROC of the nomogram were significantly higher than that of the 8th edition AJCC and ENETS TNM staging systems. The 3-year DFS of patients in HRG generated by the nomogram was significantly lower than that in LRG (all patients: 35% vs 66.9%, p < 0.001), and there were still significant differences in stratified analysis of the TNM staging systems. The local recurrence rate (10.5% vs 2.6%) and distant recurrence rate (45.1% vs 22.6%) in HRG were significantly higher than those in LRG, especially in anastomotic recurrence (6.3% vs 2%), liver recurrence (20.7% vs 13.4%) and peritoneal metastasis (12.7% vs 2.6%).

Conclusions

Compared with AJCC and ENETS TNM staging systems, the established novel validated nomogram had a significantly better prediction ability for DFS and recurrence patterns in patients with gastric (MA)NEC. It can also compensate for the shortcomings of existing AJCC and ENETS TNM staging in predicting individual recurrence risk.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Maggard MA, O’Connell JB, Ko CY. Updated population-based review of carcinoid tumors. Ann Surg. 2004;240:117–22.CrossRef Maggard MA, O’Connell JB, Ko CY. Updated population-based review of carcinoid tumors. Ann Surg. 2004;240:117–22.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rindi G, Arnold R, Bosman FT, et al. Nomenclature and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system. In: Bosman FT, editor. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th ed. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2010. p. 64. Rindi G, Arnold R, Bosman FT, et al. Nomenclature and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system. In: Bosman FT, editor. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th ed. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2010. p. 64.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, et al. Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:1335.CrossRef Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, et al. Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:1335.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Klimstra DS, Kloppell G, La Rosa S, Rindi G. Classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system. In: WHO Classification of Tumours: Digestive System Tumours, 5th ed, WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (Ed), International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon 2019. p.16. Klimstra DS, Kloppell G, La Rosa S, Rindi G. Classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system. In: WHO Classification of Tumours: Digestive System Tumours, 5th ed, WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (Ed), International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon 2019. p.16.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Couvelard A, Scoazec J. Proposal for a TNM classification of digestive (neuro)endocrine tumors: recommendations of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. Annales de Pathol. 2006;26(6):413–7.CrossRef Couvelard A, Scoazec J. Proposal for a TNM classification of digestive (neuro)endocrine tumors: recommendations of the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. Annales de Pathol. 2006;26(6):413–7.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Veen A, Seesing MFJ, Wijnhoven BPL, et al. Management of resectable esophageal and gastric (mixed adeno)neuroendocrine carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:1955–62.CrossRef van der Veen A, Seesing MFJ, Wijnhoven BPL, et al. Management of resectable esophageal and gastric (mixed adeno)neuroendocrine carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:1955–62.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Alhman H, Caplin M, Couvelard A, et al. TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch. 2006;449:395–401.CrossRef Alhman H, Caplin M, Couvelard A, et al. TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch. 2006;449:395–401.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Vélayoudom-Céphise F-L, Duvillard P, Foucan L, et al. Are G3 ENETS neuroendocrine neoplasms heterogeneous? Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013;20:649–57.CrossRef Vélayoudom-Céphise F-L, Duvillard P, Foucan L, et al. Are G3 ENETS neuroendocrine neoplasms heterogeneous? Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013;20:649–57.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Heetfeld M, Chougnet CN, Olsen IH, et al. Characteristics and treatment of patients with G3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015;22:657–64.CrossRef Heetfeld M, Chougnet CN, Olsen IH, et al. Characteristics and treatment of patients with G3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015;22:657–64.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sorbye H, Welin S, Langer SW, et al. Predictive and prognostic factors for treatment and survival in 305 patients with advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (WHO G3): The NORDIC NEC study. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:152–60.CrossRef Sorbye H, Welin S, Langer SW, et al. Predictive and prognostic factors for treatment and survival in 305 patients with advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (WHO G3): The NORDIC NEC study. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:152–60.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Basturk O, Yang Z, Tang LH, et al. The high-grade (WHO G3) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor category is morphologically and biologically heterogenous and includes both well differentiated and poorly differentiated neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39:683–90.CrossRef Basturk O, Yang Z, Tang LH, et al. The high-grade (WHO G3) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor category is morphologically and biologically heterogenous and includes both well differentiated and poorly differentiated neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39:683–90.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie JW, Sun YQ, Feng CY, et al. Evaluation of clinicopathological factors related to the prognosis of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(10):1464–70.CrossRef Xie JW, Sun YQ, Feng CY, et al. Evaluation of clinicopathological factors related to the prognosis of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(10):1464–70.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, et al. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(18):3063–72.CrossRef Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, et al. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(18):3063–72.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Klöppel G, Rindi G, Perren A, et al. The ENETS and AJCC/UICC TNM classifications of the neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and the pancreas: a statement. Virchows Arch. 2010;456:595–7.CrossRef Klöppel G, Rindi G, Perren A, et al. The ENETS and AJCC/UICC TNM classifications of the neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and the pancreas: a statement. Virchows Arch. 2010;456:595–7.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajasekaran Rathnakumar G, Gupta A, John F, et al. A case of gastric small cell carcinoma with metastases to bone and liver. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019;10:1027–31.CrossRef Rajasekaran Rathnakumar G, Gupta A, John F, et al. A case of gastric small cell carcinoma with metastases to bone and liver. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019;10:1027–31.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rindi G, Bordi C, La Rosa S, et al. Gastroenteropancreatic (neuro)endocrine neoplasms: The histology report. Digest Liver Dis. 2011;43S:S356–S360360.CrossRef Rindi G, Bordi C, La Rosa S, et al. Gastroenteropancreatic (neuro)endocrine neoplasms: The histology report. Digest Liver Dis. 2011;43S:S356–S360360.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu J, Zhao YJ, Zhou Y, et al. Modified staging system for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma based on American Joint Committee on Cancer and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society systems. Br J Surg. 2020;107:248–57.CrossRef Lu J, Zhao YJ, Zhou Y, et al. Modified staging system for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma based on American Joint Committee on Cancer and European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society systems. Br J Surg. 2020;107:248–57.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolcetta-Capuzzo A, Villa V, Albarello L, et al. Gastroenteric neuroendocrine neoplasms classification: Comparison of prognostic models: GE-NENs: Prognostic Model Comparison. Cancer. 2013;119:36–44.CrossRef Dolcetta-Capuzzo A, Villa V, Albarello L, et al. Gastroenteric neuroendocrine neoplasms classification: Comparison of prognostic models: GE-NENs: Prognostic Model Comparison. Cancer. 2013;119:36–44.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Amin M, Edge S, Greene F, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed: Springer International Publishing 2017. Amin M, Edge S, Greene F, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed: Springer International Publishing 2017.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rudloff U, Jacks LM, Goldberg JI, et al. Nomogram for predicting the risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3762–9.CrossRef Rudloff U, Jacks LM, Goldberg JI, et al. Nomogram for predicting the risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3762–9.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Suardi N, et al. Comparison of nomograms with other methods for predicting outcomes in prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:4400–7.CrossRef Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Suardi N, et al. Comparison of nomograms with other methods for predicting outcomes in prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:4400–7.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang SJ, Lemieux A, Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al. Nomogram for predicting the benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resected gallbladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4627–32.CrossRef Wang SJ, Lemieux A, Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al. Nomogram for predicting the benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resected gallbladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4627–32.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiser MR, Landmann RG, Kattan MW, et al. Individualized prediction of colon cancer recurrence using a nomogram. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:380–5.CrossRef Weiser MR, Landmann RG, Kattan MW, et al. Individualized prediction of colon cancer recurrence using a nomogram. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:380–5.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Wierda WG, O’Brien S, Wang X, et al. Prognostic nomogram and index for overall survival in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2007;109:4679–85.CrossRef Wierda WG, O’Brien S, Wang X, et al. Prognostic nomogram and index for overall survival in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2007;109:4679–85.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Fang C, Wang W, Feng X, et al. Nomogram individually predicts the overall survival of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Br J Cancer. 2017;117:1544–50.CrossRef Fang C, Wang W, Feng X, et al. Nomogram individually predicts the overall survival of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Br J Cancer. 2017;117:1544–50.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Cao L-L, Lu J, Lin J-X, et al. Incidence and survival trends for gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: An analysis of 3523 patients in the SEER database. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:1628–33.CrossRef Cao L-L, Lu J, Lin J-X, et al. Incidence and survival trends for gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: An analysis of 3523 patients in the SEER database. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:1628–33.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lepage C, Ciccolallo L, De Angelis R, et al. European disparities in malignant digestive endocrine tumours survival. Int J Cancer. 2010. Lepage C, Ciccolallo L, De Angelis R, et al. European disparities in malignant digestive endocrine tumours survival. Int J Cancer. 2010.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Gastrointestinal Pathology Study Group of Korean Society of Pathologists, Cho M-Y, Kim JM, et al. Current Trends of the Incidence and Pathological Diagnosis of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs) in Korea 2000–2009: Multicenter Study. Cancer Res Treat. 2012;44:157–165. Gastrointestinal Pathology Study Group of Korean Society of Pathologists, Cho M-Y, Kim JM, et al. Current Trends of the Incidence and Pathological Diagnosis of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs) in Korea 2000–2009: Multicenter Study. Cancer Res Treat. 2012;44:157–165.
Metadaten
Titel
Multi-institutional development and validation of a nomogram to predict recurrence after curative resection of gastric neuroendocrine/mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma
verfasst von
Hualong Zheng
YaJun Zhao
Qingliang He
Hankun Hao
Yantao Tian
Bingbing Zou
Lixin Jiang
Xiantu Qiu
Yanbing Zhou
Zhi Li
Yanchang Xu
Gang Zhao
Fangqin Xue
Shuliang Li
Weihua Fu
Yongxiang Li
Xiaojun Zhou
Yong Li
Zhenggang Zhu
Jinping Chen
Zekuan Xu
Lisheng Cai
En Li
Honglang Li
Jianwei Xie
Chaohui Zheng
Jun Lu
Ping Li
Changming Huang
Publikationsdatum
11.09.2020
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Gastric Cancer / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1436-3291
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3305
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01119-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Gastric Cancer 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.