Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ct method for visualization of the appendix using a fixed oral dosage of diatrizoate—clinical experience in 525 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine if focused CT examinations of the pelvis, utilizing fixed oral dosage of diatrizoate contrast media, improve overall reader confidence in visualization of the appendix. Materials and methods: Five hundred and twenty-five patients referred for, rule out appendicitis, evaluations underwent focused CT examinations of the pelvis following fixed oral dosage of diatrizoate contrast media. A five-point scale was used to assess the effect of contrast enhancement of the distal small bowel, cecum, and appendix on overall reader confidence, and subsequent visualization of the appendix. Results: Bowel preparation was ideal in 504 of 525 (96%) patients. Enhanced supine CT images following oral administration of fixed dosage of diatrizoate had consistently good scores for reader confidence for bowel opacification (4.8±0.1, P<0.005) and visualization of the appendix (3.7±0.1, P<0.005), at 50 min following oral contrast administration. This method improved visualization of the normal appendix in 446 of 504 (88%) patients, with a specificity of 99%. In a patients meeting CT criteria for appendicitis, 21 of 21 (100%) patients were proven at surgery. Conclusion: The use of fixed oral dosage of diatrizoate contrast media resulted in good overall reader confidence to visualize the appendix and peri-appendiceal area, in addition to high specificity and rapid transit time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rypins EB, Kipper SL (2000) Scintigraphic determination of equivocal appendicitis. Am Surg 66:891–895

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rypins EB, Kipper SL, Weiland F (2002) 99 m Tc anti-CD 15 monoclonal antibody (LeuTech) imaging improves diagnostic accuracy and clinical management in patients with equivocal presentation of appendicitis. Ann Surg 235:232–239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA (1998) Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 338:141–146

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mullins ME, Kircher MF, Ryan DP (2001) Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children using limited helical CT and colonic contrast material. Am J Roentgenol 176:37–41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Raptopoulos V, Katsou G, Rosen MP (2003) Acute appendicitis: effect of increased use of CT on selecting patients earlier. Radiology 226:521–526

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Callahan MJ, Rodriguez DP, Taylor GA (2002) CT of appendicitis in children. Radiology 224:325–332

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kapote S, Nazareth HM, Bapat RD (1988) Barium peritonitis: a case report. J Postgrad Med 34:103–104

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Karanikas ID, Kaloulidis DD, Gouvas ZT (1997) Barium peritonitis: a rare complication of upper gastrointestinal contrast investigation. Postgrad Med J 73:297–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giuliano V, Giuliano C, Pinto F (2004) Rapid CT visualization of the appendix and early acute non-perforated appendicitis using an improved oral contrast method. Emerg Radiol 10:235–237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morrin M, Farrel R, Kruskal J (2000) Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 217:765–771

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sivit CJ (2004) Controversies in emergency radiology: acute appendicitis in children—the case for CT. Emerg Radiol 10:238–240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Angelescu N (2001) The useless appendectomy. Chirurgia Bucur 96:265–268

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Andren-Sandberg A, Ryska M (2004) Exploratory laparotomy at suspicion of acute appendicitis. Rozhl Chir 83:131–137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kosloske A, Love C, Rohrer J (2004) The diagnosis of appendicitis in children: outcomes of a strategy based on pediatric surgical evaluation. Pediatrics 113:29–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Panjanen H, Julkunen K, Waris H (2005) Laparoscopy in chronic abdominal pain: a prospective nonrandomized long-term follow-up. J Clin Gastroenterol 39:110–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Courtney E, Melville D, Leicester R (2003) Chronic appendicitis diagnosed incidentally by colonoscopy. Hosp Med 64:434–435

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Line B, Breyer R, McElvany K (2004) Evaluation of human anti-mouse antibody response in normal volunteers following repeated injections of fanolesomab (NeuroSpec), a murine anti-CD15 IgM monoclonal antibody for injection. Nucl Med Commun 25:807–811

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. DeArmond G, Dent D, Myers J (2003) Appendicitis: selective use of abdominal CT reduces negative appendectomy rate. Surg Infect 4:213–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stroman DL, Bayouth CV (1999) The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 178:485–489

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Balthazar E, Rofsky N, Zucker R (1998) Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Gastroenterology 93:768–771

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rao R, Rhea J (1999) Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann Surg 229:344–349

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nikolaidis P, Hwang C, Miller FH (2004) The nonvisualized appendix: incidence of acute appendicitis when secondary inflammatory changes are absent. Am J Roentgenol 183:889–892

    Google Scholar 

  23. Amin Z, Boulos P, Lees W (1996) Technical report: spiral CT pneumocolon for suspected colonic neoplasm. Clin Radiol 51:56–61

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Harvey C, Amin Z, Hare C (1998) Helical CT pneumocolon to assess colonic tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 170:1439–1443

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kurabayashi T, Ida M, Fukayama H (1998) Adverse reactions to nonionic iodine in contrast-enhanced computed tomography: usefulness of monitoring vital signs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27:199–202

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yasuda R, Munechika H (1998) Delayed adverse reactions to nonionic monomeric contrast-enhanced media. Invest Radiol 33:1–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincenzo Giuliano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giuliano, V., Giuliano, C., Pinto, F. et al. Ct method for visualization of the appendix using a fixed oral dosage of diatrizoate—clinical experience in 525 cases. Emerg Radiol 11, 281–285 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-005-0414-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-005-0414-3

Keywords

Navigation