Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Emergency Radiology 1/2012

01.01.2012 | Original Article

Negative predictive value of intravenous contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen for patients presenting to the emergency department with undifferentiated upper abdominal pain

verfasst von: Hyungjoo Ham, Matthew D. F. McInnes, Michael Woo, Sylvie Lemonde

Erschienen in: Emergency Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to calculate the negative predictive value (NPV) CT of the abdomen in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with undifferentiated upper abdominal pain. Approved by the hospital research ethics board, this retrospective study examined consecutive patients presenting to the ED with undifferentiated upper abdominal pain whose intravenous contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen was reported as “normal” from June 2006–August 2010. Exclusion criteria included active malignancy, trauma, and known inflammatory bowel disease. True-negative (TN) vs. false-negative (FN) cases were categorized by consensus opinion of radiologist and emergency physician using a composite reference standard including clinical, laboratory, imaging, surgery, pathology, and patient self-reporting via phone questionnaire. The NPV was calculated with confidence intervals of 95%. The TN and FN groups were compared based on gender, age, site of pain, oral contrast use, and laboratory values. One hundred twenty-seven patients were included for analysis. The NPV was 64% (95% CI 55–72). The FN group had a higher proportion of patients with epigastric pain (p = 0.02) and a lower proportion of patients with left upper quadrant pain (p = 0.02). The WBC, lipase, and ALT were all higher in the FN group compared with the TN group. The most commonly missed pathologies were inflammatory conditions of the biliary tract and upper gastrointestinal systems. The NPV of CT for evaluation of undifferentiated upper abdominal pain in the ED was low at 64%. Physicians should consider this limitation and the commonly missed pathology when discharging patients with a “normal” CT report.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhuiya FA, Pitts SR, McCaig LF (2010) Emergency department visits for chest pain and abdominal pain: United States, 1999–2008. NCHS Data Brief 43:1–8PubMed Bhuiya FA, Pitts SR, McCaig LF (2010) Emergency department visits for chest pain and abdominal pain: United States, 1999–2008. NCHS Data Brief 43:1–8PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Abujudeh HH, Kaewlai R, McMahon PM et al (2011) Abdominopelvic CT increases diagnostic certainty and guide management decisions: a prospective investigation of 584 patients in a large academic medical center. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(2):238–243PubMedCrossRef Abujudeh HH, Kaewlai R, McMahon PM et al (2011) Abdominopelvic CT increases diagnostic certainty and guide management decisions: a prospective investigation of 584 patients in a large academic medical center. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(2):238–243PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM, Salisbury SR, Forman HP (2011) National trends in CT use in the emergency department: 1995–2007. Radiology 258(1):164–173PubMedCrossRef Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM, Salisbury SR, Forman HP (2011) National trends in CT use in the emergency department: 1995–2007. Radiology 258(1):164–173PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Broder J, Warshauer DM (2006) Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000–2005. Emerg Radiol 13:25–30PubMedCrossRef Broder J, Warshauer DM (2006) Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000–2005. Emerg Radiol 13:25–30PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat MacKersie AB, Lane MJ, Gerhardt RT et al (2005) Nontraumatic acute abdominal pain: unenhanced helical CT compared with three-view acute abdominal series. Radiology 237(1):114–122PubMedCrossRef MacKersie AB, Lane MJ, Gerhardt RT et al (2005) Nontraumatic acute abdominal pain: unenhanced helical CT compared with three-view acute abdominal series. Radiology 237(1):114–122PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE 3rd, Reynolds KF, Wagner M, Raptopoulos V (2000) Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1391–1396PubMed Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE 3rd, Reynolds KF, Wagner M, Raptopoulos V (2000) Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1391–1396PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mun S, Ernst RD, Chen K, Oto A, Shah S, Mileski WJ (2006) Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material. Emerg Radiol 12(3):19–102CrossRef Mun S, Ernst RD, Chen K, Oto A, Shah S, Mileski WJ (2006) Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material. Emerg Radiol 12(3):19–102CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tack D, Sourtzis S, Delpierre I, de Maertelaer V, Gevenois PA (2003) Low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT of patients with suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(2):305–311PubMed Tack D, Sourtzis S, Delpierre I, de Maertelaer V, Gevenois PA (2003) Low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT of patients with suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(2):305–311PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Arvanitakis M, Delhave M, Maertelaere DV et al (2004) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 126(3):715–723PubMedCrossRef Arvanitakis M, Delhave M, Maertelaere DV et al (2004) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 126(3):715–723PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Randen V, Lameris W, van Es W et al (2011) A comparison of the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain. Eur Radiol 21:1535–1545PubMedCrossRef Van Randen V, Lameris W, van Es W et al (2011) A comparison of the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain. Eur Radiol 21:1535–1545PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson SW, Rhoe E, Soto JA (2008) Detection of biliary duct narrowing and choledocholithiasis: accuracy of portal venous phase multidetector CT. Radiology 247(2):418–427PubMedCrossRef Anderson SW, Rhoe E, Soto JA (2008) Detection of biliary duct narrowing and choledocholithiasis: accuracy of portal venous phase multidetector CT. Radiology 247(2):418–427PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson SW, Lucey BC, Varghese JC, Soto JA (2006) Accuracy of MDCT in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Am J Roentgenol 187(1):174–180CrossRef Anderson SW, Lucey BC, Varghese JC, Soto JA (2006) Accuracy of MDCT in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Am J Roentgenol 187(1):174–180CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2003) Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD Initiative. Radiology 226(1):24–28PubMedCrossRef Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2003) Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD Initiative. Radiology 226(1):24–28PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Barakos JA, Ralls PW, Lapin SA et al (1987) Cholelithiasis: evaluation with CT. Radiology 162:415–418PubMed Barakos JA, Ralls PW, Lapin SA et al (1987) Cholelithiasis: evaluation with CT. Radiology 162:415–418PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sugiyama M, Atomi Y (1997) Endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosing choledocholithiasis: a prospective comparative study with ultrasonography and computed tomography. Gastrointest Endosc 45(2):143–146PubMedCrossRef Sugiyama M, Atomi Y (1997) Endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosing choledocholithiasis: a prospective comparative study with ultrasonography and computed tomography. Gastrointest Endosc 45(2):143–146PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Harvey RT, Miller WT Jr (1999) Acute biliary disease: Initial CT and follow-up US versus initial US and follow-up CT. Radiology 213(3):831–836PubMed Harvey RT, Miller WT Jr (1999) Acute biliary disease: Initial CT and follow-up US versus initial US and follow-up CT. Radiology 213(3):831–836PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Balthazar EJ, Freeny PC, van Sonnenberg E (1994) Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology 193:297–306PubMed Balthazar EJ, Freeny PC, van Sonnenberg E (1994) Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology 193:297–306PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill MC, Barkin J, Isikoff MB, Silverstein W, Kalser M (1982) Acute pancreatitis: clinical vs. CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 139(2):263–269PubMed Hill MC, Barkin J, Isikoff MB, Silverstein W, Kalser M (1982) Acute pancreatitis: clinical vs. CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 139(2):263–269PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat King LR, Siegel MJ, Balfe DM (1995) Acute pancreatitis in children: CT findings of intra- and extrapancreatic fluid collections. Radiology 195(1):196–200PubMed King LR, Siegel MJ, Balfe DM (1995) Acute pancreatitis in children: CT findings of intra- and extrapancreatic fluid collections. Radiology 195(1):196–200PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher MM, Lucey BC, Gervais DA, Mueller PR (2004) Acute pancreatitis: the role of imaging and interventional radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 27:208–225PubMedCrossRef Maher MM, Lucey BC, Gervais DA, Mueller PR (2004) Acute pancreatitis: the role of imaging and interventional radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 27:208–225PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Siewert B, Raptopoulos V, Mueller MF, Rosen MP, Steer M (1997) Impact of CT on diagnosis and management of the acute abdomen in patients initially treated without surgery. Am J Roentgenol 168(1):173–178 Siewert B, Raptopoulos V, Mueller MF, Rosen MP, Steer M (1997) Impact of CT on diagnosis and management of the acute abdomen in patients initially treated without surgery. Am J Roentgenol 168(1):173–178
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Balthazar EJ (1991) CT of the gastrointestinal tract: principles and interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156(1):23–32PubMed Balthazar EJ (1991) CT of the gastrointestinal tract: principles and interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156(1):23–32PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Macari M, Balthazar EJ (2001) CT of bowel wall thickening: significance and pitfalls of interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(5):1105–1116PubMed Macari M, Balthazar EJ (2001) CT of bowel wall thickening: significance and pitfalls of interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(5):1105–1116PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowell M (2006) Esophagus, stomach, and duodenum. In: Marx J, Hockberger R, Walls R et al (eds) Rosen's emergency medicine: concepts and clinical practice, vol 2, 6th edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 1390–1394 Lowell M (2006) Esophagus, stomach, and duodenum. In: Marx J, Hockberger R, Walls R et al (eds) Rosen's emergency medicine: concepts and clinical practice, vol 2, 6th edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 1390–1394
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim S, Haruma K, Ito M, Tanaka S, Yoshihara M, Chayama K (2003) Magnifying gastroendoscopy for diagnosis of histologic gastritis in the gastric antrum. Dig Liver Dis 36:286–291CrossRef Kim S, Haruma K, Ito M, Tanaka S, Yoshihara M, Chayama K (2003) Magnifying gastroendoscopy for diagnosis of histologic gastritis in the gastric antrum. Dig Liver Dis 36:286–291CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Roth C, Tello R, Sutherland K, Ptak T (2002) Prediction rule for etiology of vague abdominal pain in the emergency room: utility for imaging triage. Invest Radiol 37(10):552–556PubMedCrossRef Roth C, Tello R, Sutherland K, Ptak T (2002) Prediction rule for etiology of vague abdominal pain in the emergency room: utility for imaging triage. Invest Radiol 37(10):552–556PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Treacy J, Williams A, Bais R et al (2001) Evaluation of amylase and lipase in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. ANZ J Surg 71(10):577–582PubMedCrossRef Treacy J, Williams A, Bais R et al (2001) Evaluation of amylase and lipase in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. ANZ J Surg 71(10):577–582PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis LM, Klippel AP, Bavolek RA, Ross LM, Scherer TM, Banet GA (2007) Quantifying the usefulness of CT in evaluating seniors with abdominal pain. Eur J Radiol 61:290–296PubMedCrossRef Lewis LM, Klippel AP, Bavolek RA, Ross LM, Scherer TM, Banet GA (2007) Quantifying the usefulness of CT in evaluating seniors with abdominal pain. Eur J Radiol 61:290–296PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Esses D, Birnbaum A, Bijur P et al (2004) Ability of CT to alter decision making in elderly patients with acute abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med 22:270–272PubMedCrossRef Esses D, Birnbaum A, Bijur P et al (2004) Ability of CT to alter decision making in elderly patients with acute abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med 22:270–272PubMedCrossRef
30.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman DG, Bland JM (1994) Statistics notes: diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ 309:102PubMedCrossRef Altman DG, Bland JM (1994) Statistics notes: diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ 309:102PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Negative predictive value of intravenous contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen for patients presenting to the emergency department with undifferentiated upper abdominal pain
verfasst von
Hyungjoo Ham
Matthew D. F. McInnes
Michael Woo
Sylvie Lemonde
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Emergency Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Elektronische ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-011-0996-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Emergency Radiology 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.