Skip to main content
Log in

What every radiologist should know about adnexal torsion

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adnexal torsion is the fifth most common gynecologic surgical emergency, requiring clinician and radiologist awareness. It involves the rotation of the ovarian tissue on its vascular pedicle leading to stromal edema, hemorrhagic infarction, and necrosis of the adnexal structures with the subsequent sequelae. Expedient diagnosis poses a difficult challenge because the clinical presentation is variable and often misleading. Adnexal torsion can mimic malignancy as it can take a subacute, intermittent, or chronic course, and thereby can be complicated to diagnose. The torsion may occur in the normal ovary but is usually secondary to a preexisting adnexal mass. Early surgery is necessary to avoid irreversible adnexal damage and to preserve ovarian function especially in children and young women. Pelvic ultrasound forms the foundation of diagnostic evaluation due to its ability to directly and rapidly evaluate both ovarian anatomy and perfusion. Moreover, it is a noninvasive and accessible technique. However, the color Doppler appearance of the ovary should not be relied upon to rule out torsion because a torsed ovary or adnexa may still have preserved arterial flow due to the dual blood supply. MR and CT may be used as problem-solving tools needed after the ultrasound examination but should not be the first-line imaging modalities in this setting due to ionizing radiation and potential time delay in diagnosis. The goal of this article is to review the adnexal anatomy, to familiarize radiologists with the main imaging features, and to discuss the main mimickers and the most common pitfalls of adnexal torsion.

Main points

  • Adnexal torsion is an uncommon gynecological disorder caused by partial or complete rotation of the ovary and/or the Fallopian tube about the infundibulopelvic ligament.

  • The ovaries receive a dual blood supply from the ovarian artery and uterine artery.

  • The lack of pathognomonic symptoms and specific findings on physical examination makes this entity difficult to diagnose. Since the right adnexa are most commonly involved, symptoms may mimic acute appendicitis.

  • Persistence of adnexal vascularization does not exclude torsion.

  • In the pediatric age group, gray-scale ultrasound is the best modality of choice. Obtaining CT and/or MR images should not delay treatment in order to preserve ovarian viability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE et al (2002) CT and MR imaging features of adnexal torsion. Radiographics 22(2):283–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rey-Bellet Gasser C, Gehri M, Joseph JM, Pauchard JY (2016) Is it ovarian torsion? A systematic literature review and evaluation of prediction signs. Pediatr Emerg Care 32(4):256–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Huchon C, Fauconnier A (2010) Adnexal torsion: a literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 150(1):8–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pavlik EJ, DePriest PD, Gallion HH et al (2000) Ovarian volume related to age. Gynecol Oncol 77(3):410–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buy JN, Ghossain MA. Embryology, anatomy, and histology. In: Gynecological imaging. France, Springer, 2013; 57–66.

  6. Hiller N, Appelbaum L, Simanovsky N, Lev-Sagi A, Aharoni D, Sella T (2007) CT features of adnexal torsion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(1):124–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Warnock NG, Brown BP, Barloon TJ, Hemann LS (1994) Spontaneous detorsion of the ovary demonstrated by ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 13(1):57–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Graziano A, Lo Monte G, Engl B, Marci R (2014) Recurrent ovarian torsion in a pregnancy complicated by ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21(5):723–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shalev J, Mashiach R, Bar-Hava I et al (2001) Subtorsion of the ovary: sonographic features and clinical management. J Ultrasound Med 20(8):849–854

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyd CA, Riall TS (2012) Unexpected gynecologic findings during abdominal surgery. Curr Probl Surg 49(4):195–251

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chang HC, Bhatt S, Dogra VS (2008) Pearls and pitfalls in diagnosis of ovarian torsion. Radiographics 28(5):1355–1368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Deffieux X, Thubert T, Huchon C et al (2013) Complications of presumed benign ovarian tumors. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 42(8):816–832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Asfour V, Varma R, Menon P (2015) Clinical risk factors for ovarian torsion. J Obstet Gynaecol 35(7):721–725

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eftekhar Z, Rahimi-Moghaddam P, Yarandi F, Tahmasbi M (2005) An ovarian torsion in severe spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome associated with a singleton pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol 25(4):393–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ginath S, Shalev A, Keidar R et al (2012) Differences between adnexal torsion in pregnant and nonpregnant women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19(6):708–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mashiach S, Bider D, Moran O, Goldenberg M, Ben-Rafael Z (1990) Adnexal torsion of hyperstimulated ovaries in pregnancies after gonadotropin therapy. Fertil Steril 53(1):76–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wan YL, Chen WJ, Chien CC, Lee TY, Tsai CC (1993) Ovarian dermoid cyst associated with tuberculosis, cystadenoma and torsion. J Formos Med Assoc 92(9):851–853

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim YH, Cho KS, Ha HK et al (1999) CT features of torsion of benign cystic teratoma of the ovary. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23(6):923–928

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pinkert M, Klein Z, Tepper R, Beyth Y (2006) Hydrosalpinx with adnexal torsion in an adolescent virgin patient—a diagnostic dilemma: case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 19(4):297–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sommerville M, Grimes DA, Koonings PP, Campbell K (1991) Ovarian neoplasms and the risk of adnexal torsion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 164(2):577–578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lourenco AP, Swenson D, Tubbs RJ, Lazarus E (2014) Ovarian and tubal torsion: imaging findings on US, CT, and MRI. Emerg Radiol 21(2):179–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schuh AM, Klein EJ, Allred RJ, Christensen A, Brown JC (2016) Pediatric adnexal torsion: not just a postmenarchal problem. J Emerg Med 52(2):169–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Der Zanden M, Nap A, van Kints M (2011) Isolated torsion of the fallopian tube: a case report and review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr 170(10):1329–1332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Spinelli C, Piscioneri J, Strambi S (2015) Adnexal torsion in adolescents: update and review of the literature. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 27(5):320–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Aziz D, Davis V, Allen L, Langer JC (2004) Ovarian torsion in children: is oophorectomy necessary? J Pediatr Surg 39(5):750–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ozcan C, Celik A, Ozok G, Erdener A, Balik E (2002) Adnexal torsion in children may have a catastrophic sequel: asynchronous bilateral torsion. J Pediatr Surg 37(11):1617–1620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chiou SY, Lev-Toaff AS, Masuda E, Feld RI, Bergin D (2007) Adnexal torsion: new clinical and imaging observations by sonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med 26(10):1289–1301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kupesic S, Plavsic BM (2010) Adnexal torsion: color Doppler and three-dimensional ultrasound. Abdom Imaging 35(5):602–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Haque TL, Togashi K, Kobayashi H, Fujii S, Konishi J (2000) Adnexal torsion: MR imaging findings of viable ovary. Eur Radiol 10(12):1954–1957

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Servaes S, Zurakowski D, Laufer MR, Feins N, Chow JS (2007) Sonographic findings of ovarian torsion in children. Pediatr Radiol 37(5):446–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sibal M (2012) Follicular ring sign: a simple sonographic sign for early diagnosis of ovarian torsion. J Ultrasound Med 31(11):1803–1809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Navve D, Hershkovitz R, Zetounie E, Klein Z, Tepper R (2013) Medial or lateral location of the whirlpool sign in adnexal torsion: clinical importance. J Ultrasound Med 32(9):1631–1634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Valsky DV, Cohen SM, Hamani Y, Lipschuetz M, Yagel S, Esh-Broder E (2009) Whirlpool sign in the diagnosis of adnexal torsion with atypical clinical presentation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34(2):239–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Valsky DV, Esh-Broder E, Cohen SM, Lipschuetz M, Yagel S (2010) Added value of the gray-scale whirlpool sign in the diagnosis of adnexal torsion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36(5):630–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fleischer AC, Stein SM, Cullinan JA, Warner MA (1995) Color Doppler sonography of adnexal torsion. J Ultrasound Med 14(7):523–528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ghossain MA, Buy JN, Bazot M et al (1994) CT in adnexal torsion with emphasis on tubal findings: correlation with US. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18(4):619–625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Beranger-Gibert S, Sakly H, Ballester M et al (2016) Diagnostic value of MR imaging in the diagnosis of adnexal torsion. Radiology 279(2):461–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ghossain MA, Hachem K, Buy JN et al (2004) Adnexal torsion: magnetic resonance findings in the viable adnexa with emphasis on stromal ovarian appearance. J Magn Reson Imaging 20(3):451–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jain KA (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging findings in ovarian torsion. Magn Reson Imaging 13(1):111–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kalstone CE, Jaffe RB, Abell MR (1969) Massive edema of the ovary simulating fibroma. Obstet Gynecol 34:564–571

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tavassoli FA, Devilee P. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and genetics. Tumours of the breast and female genital organs. Lyon: IARC Press; 2003 .p190.

  42. Hall BP, Printz DA, Roth J (1993 May–Jun) Massive ovarian edema: ultrasound and MR characteristics. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17(3):477–479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Harmon JC, Binkovitz LA, Binkovitz LE (2008) Isolated fallopian tube torsion: sonographic and CT features. Pediatr Radiol 38(2):175–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kisku S, Thomas RJ (2013) An uncommon twist: isolated fallopian tube torsion in an adolescent. Case Rep Surg 2013:509424

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kousari YM, Pollock AN (2016) Isolated fallopian tube torsion with paraovarian cyst. Pediatr Emerg Care 32(11):817–819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sun LT, Ning CP, Guo XJ, Li XY, Liu W, Tian JW (2014) Role of ultrasound in diagnosing isolated torsion of fallopian tube. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 40(1):208–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Athanasias P, Doumouchtsis SK, Malick R, Croucher C (2013) Isolated fallopian tube torsion: a rare variant of a common entity with successful laparoscopic detorsion. J Obstet Gynaecol 33(3):318–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Smith AL, Bieber EJ (2008) The diagnostic challenge of identifying isolated fallopian tube torsion: a case report of laparoscopic management. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(4):514–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kawahara Y, Fukuda T, Futagawa S et al (1996) Intravascular gas within an ovarian tumor: a CT sign of ovarian torsion. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20(1):154–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Fujii S, Mukuda N, Nosaka K, Fukunaga T, Inoue C, Ogawa T (2016. Dec 22) The mechanism causing high-signal intensity on diffusion-weighted imaging in adnexal torsion: two case reports. Magn Reson Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.cr.2016-0105.

  51. Kilickesmez O, Tasdelen N, Yetimoglu B, Kayhan A, Cihangiroglu M, Gurmen N (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging of adnexal torsion. Emerg Radiol 16(5):399–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Fujii S, Kaneda S, Kakite S et al (2011) Diffusion-weighted imaging findings of adnexal torsion: initial results. Eur J Radiol 77(2):330–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kato H, Kanematsu M, Uchiyama M, Yano R, Furui T, Morishige K (2014) Diffusion-weighted imaging of ovarian torsion: usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for the detection of hemorrhagic infarction. Magn Reson Med Sci 13(1):39–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Petkovska I, Duke E, Martin DR et al (2016) MRI of ovarian torsion: correlation of imaging features with the presence of perifollicular hemorrhage and ovarian viability. Eur J Radiol 85(11):2064–2071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Koonings PP, Grimes DA (1989) Adnexal torsion in postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol 73(1):11–12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kim HS, Yoo SY, Cha MJ, Kim JH, Jeon TY, Kim WK (2016) Diagnosis of neonatal ovarian torsion: emphasis on prenatal and postnatal sonographic findings. J Clin Ultrasound 44(5):290–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hasiakos D, Papakonstantinou K, Kontoravdis A, Gogas L, Aravantinos L, Vitoratos N (2008) Adnexal torsion during pregnancy: report of four cases and review of the literature. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 34(4 Pt 2):683–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Yilmaz E, Usal C, Kovanlikaya A, Karabay N (2001) Sonographic and MRI findings in prepubertal adnexal hemorrhagic cyst with torsion. J Clin Ultrasound 29(3):200–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Swenson DW, Lourenco AP, Beaudoin FL, Grand DJ, Killelea AG, McGregor AJ (2014) Ovarian torsion: case-control study comparing the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography and computed tomography for diagnosis in the emergency department. Eur J Radiol 83(4):733–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Mancuso A, Broccio G, Angio LG, Pirri V (1997) Adnexal torsion in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76(1):83–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Takeda A, Hayashi S, Teranishi Y, Imoto S, Nakamura H (2016) Chronic adnexal torsion: an under-recognized disease entity. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 210:45–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Neinstein LS, Braud BJ (1984) Coincident acute appendicitis and hemorrhagic corpus luteal cyst. J Adolesc Health Care 5(2):137–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Dewhurst C, Beddy P, Pedrosa IMRI (2013) Evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. J Magn Reson Imaging 37(3):566–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Jain KA (2002) Sonographic spectrum of hemorrhagic ovarian cysts. J Ultrasound Med 21(8):879–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Levine D, Brown DL, Andreotti RF et al (2010) Management of asymptomatic ovarian and other adnexal cysts imaged at US Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement. Ultrasound Q 26(3):121–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Baltarowich OH, Kurtz AB, Pasto ME, Rifkin MD, Needleman L, Goldberg BB (1987) The spectrum of sonographic findings in hemorrhagic ovarian cysts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 148(5):901–905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Lamazou F, Legouez A, Letouzey V et al (2011) Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: pathophysiology, risk factors, prevention, diagnosis and treatment. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 40(7):593–611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Li W, Zhang Y, Cui Y, Zhang P, Pelvic WX (2013) Inflammatory disease: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy with conventional MR with added diffusion-weighted imaging. Abdom Imaging 38(1):193–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Pierre Le Pouesard for his valuable editing of the manuscript. They also would like to thank Benjamin Giroux for providing the drawings shown in Figs. 1 and 2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillaume Ssi-Yan-Kai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

The authors declare that they comply with the mentioned ethical guidelines.

Financial disclosure statements

The authors report no financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ssi-Yan-Kai, G., Rivain, AL., Trichot, C. et al. What every radiologist should know about adnexal torsion. Emerg Radiol 25, 51–59 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-017-1549-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-017-1549-8

Keywords

Navigation