Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Neurosurgical Review
Erschienen in: Neurosurgical Review 3/2016

06.04.2016 | Original Article

The value of lateral spread response monitoring in predicting the clinical outcome after microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm: a prospective study on 100 patients

verfasst von: Ahmed El Damaty, Christian Rosenstengel, Marc Matthes, Joerg Baldauf, Henry W. S. Schroeder

Erschienen in: Neurosurgical Review | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Microvascular decompression represents an effective treatment for hemifacial spasm. The use of lateral spread response (LSR) monitoring remains a useful intraoperative tool to ensure adequate decompression of the facial nerve. The aim of this study was to assess the value of LSRs intraoperative monitoring as a prognostic indicator for the outcome of microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm. Our study included 100 patients prospectively. The patients were classified into four groups whether LSRs were totally, partially, not relieved, or not detected from the start. According to clinical outcome, the patients were classified into four groups depending on the clinical course after surgery and the residual symptoms if any. Then, correlations were made between LSR events and treatment outcome to detect its reliability as a prognostic indicator. LSRs were relieved totally in 56 % of the patients, partially relieved in 14 %, not relieved in 10 %, and were not detected in 20 % of the patients from the start. HFS was relieved directly after operation in 62 % with clinical improvement of 90–100 %. Thirty-one percent described 50–90 % improvement over the next 3 months after surgery. Almost all of these 31 % (28 out of 31 patients) reported further clinical improvement of 90–100 % within 1 year after surgery. Three percent suffered from a relapse after a HFS-free period, and 4 % reported minimal or no improvement describing 0–50 % of the preoperative state. The percentage of the satisfied patients with the clinical outcome who reported after 1 year a clinical improvement of 90–100 % was 90 %. Statistical analysis did not find a significant correlation between the relief of LSRs and clinical outcome. LSRs may only represent an intraoperative tool to guide for an adequate decompression but failed to represent a reliable prognostic indicator for treatment outcome.
Literatur
1.
Aoki N, Nagao T (1986) Resolution of hemifacial spasm after posterior fossa exploration without vascular decompression. Neurosurgery 18(4):478–479CrossRefPubMed
2.
Auger RG, Whisnant JP (1990) Hemifacial spasm in Rochester and Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1960 to 1984. Arch Neurol 47(11):1233–1234CrossRefPubMed
3.
Barker FG 2nd, Jannetta PJ, Bissonette DJ, Shields PT, Larkins MV, Jho HD (1995) Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. J Neurosurg 82(2):201–210CrossRefPubMed
4.
Campbell E, Keedy C (1947) Hemifacial spasm: a note on the etiology in two cases. J Neurosurg 4(4):342–347CrossRefPubMed
5.
Chung SS, Chang JH, Choi JY, Chang JW, Park YG (2001) Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: a long-term follow-up of 1,169 consecutive cases. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 77(1-4):190–193CrossRefPubMed
6.
Eekhof JL, Aramideh M, Speelman JD, Devriese PP, Ongerboer De Visser BW (2000) Blink reflexes and lateral spreading in patients with synkinesia after Bell’s palsy and in hemifacial spasm. Eur Neurol 43(3):141–146CrossRefPubMed
7.
El Refaee E, Langner S, Baldauf J, Matthes M, Kirsch M, Schroeder HWS (2013) Value of 3-dimensional high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in detecting the offending vessel in hemifacial spasm: comparison with intraoperative high definition endoscopic visualization. Neurosurgery 73(1):58–67CrossRefPubMed
8.
Gowers R (1893) Manual of disease of the nervous system, 2nd edn. Churchill, London
9.
Haines SJ, Torres F (1991) Intraoperative monitoring of the facial nerve during decompressive surgery for hemifacial spasm. J Neurosurg 74(2):254–257CrossRefPubMed
10.
Hatem J, Sindou M, Vial C (2001) Intraoperative monitoring of facial EMG responses during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Prognostic value for long-term outcome: a study in a 33-patient series. Br J Neurosurg 15(6):496–499CrossRefPubMed
11.
Ishikawa M, Ohira T, Namiki J, Ajimi Y, Takase M, Toya S (1996) Abnormal muscle response (lateral spread) and F-wave in patients with hemifacial spasm. J Neurol Sci 137(2):109–116CrossRefPubMed
12.
Ishikawa M, Ohira T, Namiki J, Gotoh K, Takase M, Toya S (1996) Electrophysiological investigation of hemifacial spasm: F-waves of the facial muscles. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 138(1):24–32CrossRef
13.
Ishikawa M, Ohira T, Namiki J, Kobayashi M, Takase M, Kawase T, Toya S (1997) Electrophysiological investigation of hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression: F waves of the facial muscles, blink reflexes, and abnormal muscle responses. J Neurosurg 86(4):654–661CrossRefPubMed
14.
Isu T, Kamada K, Mabuchi S, Kitaoka A, Ito T, Koiwa M, Abe H (1996) Intra-operative monitoring by facial electromyographic responses during microvascular decompressive surgery for hemifacial spasm. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 138(1):19–23, discussion 23 CrossRef
15.
Jannetta PJ (1967) Arterial compression of the trigeminal nerve at the pons in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 26(1):Suppl:159–162
16.
Jannetta PJ, Abbasy M, Maroon JC, Ramos FM, Albin MS (1977) Etiology and definitive microsurgical treatment of hemifacial spasm. Operative techniques and results in 47 patients. J Neurosurg 47(3):321–328CrossRefPubMed
17.
Jannetta PJ, Rand RW (1966) Transtentorial retrogasserian rhizotomy in trigeminal neuralgia by microneurosurgical technique. Bull Los Angeles Neurol Soc 31(3):93–99PubMed
18.
Joo W-I, Lee K-J, Park H-K, Chough C-K, Rha H-K (2008) Prognostic value of intra-operative lateral spread response monitoring during microvascular decompression in patients with hemifacial spasm. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas 15(12):1335–1339
19.
Kim C-H, Kong D-S, Lee JA, Kwan-Park (2010) The potential value of the disappearance of the lateral spread response during microvascular decompression for predicting the clinical outcome of hemifacial spasms: a prospective study. Neurosurgery 67(6):1581–1588CrossRefPubMed
20.
Kim HR, Rhee D-J, Kong D-S, Park K (2009) Prognostic factors of hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 45(6):336–340CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Kim Y, Tanaka A, Kimura M, Yoshinaga S, Tomonaga M (1991) Arteriovenous malformation in the cerebellopontine angle presenting as hemifacial spasm—case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 31(2):109–112CrossRef
22.
Kiya N, Bannur U, Yamauchi A, Yoshida K, Kato Y, Kanno T (2001) Monitoring of facial evoked EMG for hemifacial spasm: a critical analysis of its prognostic value. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 143(4):365–368CrossRef
23.
Kobata H, Kondo A, Iwasaki K (2002) Cerebellopontine angle epidermoids presenting with cranial nerve hyperactive dysfunction: pathogenesis and long-term surgical results in 30 patients. Neurosurgery 50(2):276–285, discussion 285–286 PubMed
24.
Kojima A, Ohira T, Takase M, Kawase T (1998) Long-latency response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with hemifacial spasm. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 109(4):285–289CrossRefPubMed
25.
Kong D-S, Park K, Shin B, Lee JA, Eum D-O (2007) Prognostic value of the lateral spread response for intraoperative electromyography monitoring of the facial musculature during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. J Neurosurg 106(3):384–387CrossRefPubMed
26.
Kugelberg E (1946) Injury activity and trigger zones in human nerves. Brain J Neurol 69(4):310–324CrossRef
27.
Marneffe V, Polo G, Fischer C, Sindou M (2003) Microsurgical vascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Follow-up over one year, clinical results and prognostic factors. Study of a series of 100 cases. Neurochirurgie 49(5):527–535PubMed
28.
Møller AR, Jannetta PJ (1984) On the origin of synkinesis in hemifacial spasm: results of intracranial recordings. J Neurosurg 61(3):569–576CrossRefPubMed
29.
Møller AR, Jannetta PJ (1985) Microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm: intraoperative electrophysiological observations. Neurosurgery 16(5):612–618CrossRefPubMed
30.
Møller AR, Jannetta PJ (1986) Physiological abnormalities in hemifacial spasm studied during microvascular decompression operations. Exp Neurol 93(3):584–600CrossRefPubMed
31.
Møller AR, Jannetta PJ (1987) Monitoring facial EMG responses during microvascular decompression operations for hemifacial spasm. J Neurosurg 66(5):681–685CrossRefPubMed
32.
Mooij JJ, Mustafa MK, van Weerden TW (2001) Hemifacial spasm: intraoperative electromyographic monitoring as a guide for microvascular decompression. Neurosurgery 49(6):1365–1370, discussion 1370–1371 CrossRefPubMed
33.
Nagata S, Matsushima T, Fujii K, Fukui M, Kuromatsu C (1992) Hemifacial spasm due to tumor, aneurysm, or arteriovenous malformation. Surg Neurol 38(3):204–209CrossRefPubMed
34.
Nielsen VK (1984) Pathophysiology of hemifacial spasm: II. Lateral spread of the supraorbital nerve reflex. Neurology 34(4):427–431CrossRefPubMed
35.
Nielsen VK (1985) Electrophysiology of the facial nerve in hemifacial spasm: ectopic/ephaptic excitation. Muscle Nerve 8(7):545–555CrossRefPubMed
36.
Nielsen VK, Jannetta PJ (1984) Pathophysiology of hemifacial spasm: III. Effects of facial nerve decompression. Neurology 34(7):891–897CrossRefPubMed
37.
Park JS, Kong D-S, Lee J-A, Park K (2008) Chronologic analysis of symptomatic change following microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: value for predicting midterm outcome. Neurosurg Rev 31(4):413–418, discussion 418–419 CrossRefPubMed
38.
Rahman EA, Trobe JD, Gebarski SS (2002) Hemifacial spasm caused by vertebral artery dolichoectasia. Am J Ophthalmol 133(6):854–856CrossRefPubMed
39.
Rand RW (1981) Gardner neurovascular decompression of the trigeminal and facial nerves for tic douloureux and hemifacial spasm. Surg Neurol 16(5):329–332CrossRefPubMed
40.
Raslan AM, DeJesus R, Berk C, Zacest A, Anderson JC, Burchiel KJ (2009) Sensitivity of high-resolution three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography and three-dimensional spoiled-gradient recalled imaging in the prediction of neurovascular compression in patients with hemifacial spasm: clinical article. J Neurosurg 111(4):733–736CrossRefPubMed
41.
Rosenstengel C, Matthes M, Baldauf J, Fleck S, Schroeder H (2012) Hemifacial spasm: conservative and surgical treatment options. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 109(41):667PubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Sato K, Ezura M, Takahashi A, Yoshimoto T (2001) Fusiform aneurysm of the vertebral artery presenting hemifacial spasm treated by intravascular embolization: case report. Surg Neurol 56(1):52–55CrossRefPubMed
43.
Satoh T, Onoda K, Date I (2007) Fusion imaging of three-dimensional magnetic resonance cisternograms and angiograms for the assessment of microvascular decompression in patients with hemifacial spasms. J Neurosurg 106(1):82–89CrossRefPubMed
44.
Sindou MP (2005) Microvascular decompression for primary hemifacial spasm. Importance of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147(10):1019–1026, discussion 1026 CrossRef
45.
Tan PC, Hsu JC, Chung HS, Chen YC, Chang CN (1991) Abnormal muscle response in microvascular decompression of hemifacial spasm. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi Chin Med J Free China Ed 48(5):333–338
46.
Uchino M, Nomoto J, Ohtsuka T, Kuramitsu T (2005) Fusiform aneurysm of the vertebral artery presenting with hemifacial spasm treated by microvascular decompression. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147(8):901–903CrossRef
47.
Wang X, Thirumala PD, Shah A, Gardner P, Habeych M, Crammond DJ, Balzer J, Horowitz M (2013) Effect of previous botulinum neurotoxin treatment on microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Neurosurg Focus 34(3), E3CrossRefPubMed
48.
Wu Y, Davidson AL, Pan T, Jankovic J (2010) Asian over-representation among patients with hemifacial spasm compared to patients with cranial-cervical dystonia. J Neurol Sci 298(1-2):61–63CrossRefPubMed
49.
Yamashita S, Kawaguchi T, Fukuda M, Suzuki K, Watanabe M, Tanaka R, Kameyama S (2002) Lateral spread response elicited by double stimulation in patients with hemifacial spasm. Muscle Nerve 25(6):845–849CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The value of lateral spread response monitoring in predicting the clinical outcome after microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm: a prospective study on 100 patients
verfasst von
Ahmed El Damaty
Christian Rosenstengel
Marc Matthes
Joerg Baldauf
Henry W. S. Schroeder
Publikationsdatum
06.04.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Neurosurgical Review / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0344-5607
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-2320
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-016-0708-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Neurosurgical Review 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

A new multilayer reconstruction using nasal septal flap combined with fascia graft dural suturing for high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic endonasal surgery

Original Article

Laser biospectroscopy and 5-ALA fluorescence navigation as a helpful tool in the meningioma resection

Review

Remote cerebellar hemorrhage after spinal procedures (part 2): a systematic review

Original Article

Identification of specific age groups with a high risk for developing cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Original Article

The influence of intraoperative resection control modalities on survival following gross total resection of glioblastoma

Review

Computer navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided navigation for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a meta-analysis

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

17.04.2024 | Postoperative nausea and vomiting | Nachrichten

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

16.04.2024 | HNO-Chirurgie | Nachrichten

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.