Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Parastomal hernia: is prevention better than cure? Use of preperitoneal polypropylene mesh at the time of stoma formation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This is a prospective study of prophylactic mesh placement in the preperitoneal space at the time of stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia.

Methods

Patients undergoing elective permanent stoma formation and resiting of a stoma were included. Patients with peritoneal contamination were excluded. A 6×6-cm polypropylene mesh was placed in the preperitoneal space (no stitches), and a circular hole was made to let the bowel come through with ease and the stoma was constructed. At follow-up, the patients were examined standing and lying down for parastomal hernia. In the event of clinical uncertainty, a CT scan was done.

Results

A total of 42 patients (20 women, 22 men, mean age 61 years) were eligible for the study. The patients were followed up for a mean of 31 months (range 9–68 months). There were 29 end-colostomies and 8 end-ileostomies and 5 stomas resited. Four parastomal hernias were detected during the follow-up period (9.52%). One required repair due to an ill-fitting stoma bag and leakage. The other three were asymptomatic. One patient developed stomal necrosis which required a new segment of bowel to be brought out through the same opening and the underlying mesh was left undisturbed.

Conclusions

The results of the 2-year follow-up in this study (incidence of parastomal herniation 9.5%) along with available evidence in the literature (incidence 0–8.3%), compared to the results of repair make a strong case for the use of a mesh at the time of initial surgery for the formation of any permanent stoma to prevent parastomal herniation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA (2003) Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 90:784–793

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pearl RK (1989) Parastomal hernias. World J Surg 13:569–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tekkis PP, Kocher HM, Payne JG (1999) Parastomal hernia repair: modified thorlakson technique, reinforced by polypropylene mesh. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1505–1508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Israelsson LA (2005) Preventing and treating parastomal hernia. World J Surg 29:1086–1089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bayer I, Kyzer S, Chaimoff C (1986) A new approach to primary strengthening of colostomy with Marlex mesh to prevent paracolostomy hernia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 163:579–580

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2004) Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh. Arch Surg 139:1356–1358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gogenur I, Mortensen J, Harvald T et al (2006) Prevention of parastomal hernia by placement of a polypropylene mesh at the primary operation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1131–1135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marimuthu K, Vijayasekar C, Ghosh D, Mathew G (2006) Prevention of parastomal hernia using preperitoneal mesh: a prospective observational study. Colorectal Dis 8:672–675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin L, Foster G (1996) Parastomal hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78:81–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Morris-Stiff G, Hughes LE (1998) The continuing challenge of parastomal hernia: failure of a novel polypropylene mesh repair. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80:184–187

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aldridge AJ, Simson JN (2001) Erosion and perforation of colon by synthetic mesh in a recurrent paracolostomy hernia. Hernia 5:110–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Steele SR, Lee P, Martin MJ et al (2003) Is parastomal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh safe? Am J Surg 185:436–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanellos I, Vasiliadis K, Angelopoulos S et al (2004) Repair of parastomal hernia with the use of polypropylene mesh extraperitoneally. Tech Coloproctol 8[Suppl 1]:158–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosin JD, Bonardi RA (1977) Paracolostomy hernia repair with Marlex mesh: a new technique. Dis Colon Rectum 20:299–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2004) Randomized clinical trial of the use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 91:280–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Leong AP, Londono-Schimmer EE, Phillips RK (1994) Life-table analysis of stomal complications following ileostomy. Br J Surg 81:727–729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK (1994) Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:916–920

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Devlin HB (1983) Alimentary tract and abdominal wall. In: Dudley H (ed) Operative surgery, vol 1, 4th edn. Butterworth, London, pp 441–443

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hansson BM, van Nieuwenhoven EJ, Bleichrodt RP (2003) Promising new technique in the repair of parastomal hernia. Surg Endosc 17:1789–1791

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Inan I, Gervaz P, Hagen M, Morel P (2007) Multimedia article. Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia using a porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) implant. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Longman RJ, Thomson WH (2005) Mesh repair of parastomal hernias — a safety modification. Colorectal Dis 27:292–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. de Ruiter P, Bijnen AB (1992) Successful local repair of paracolostomy hernia with a newly developed prosthetic device. Int J Colorectal Dis 7:132–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Balique JG, Benchetrit S, Bouillot JL et al (2005) Intraperitoneal treatment of incisional and umbilical hernias using an innovative composite mesh: four-year results of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Hernia 9:68–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Vijayasekar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vijayasekar, C., Marimuthu, K., Jadhav, V. et al. Parastomal hernia: is prevention better than cure? Use of preperitoneal polypropylene mesh at the time of stoma formation. Tech Coloproctol 12, 309–313 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-008-0441-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-008-0441-7

Key words

Navigation