Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology 1/2010

01.03.2010 | Original Article

Laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon carcinoma

verfasst von: O. Zmora, A. Bar-Dayan, M. Khaikin, A. Lebeydev, M. Shabtai, A. Ayalon, D. Rosin

Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Ausgabe 1/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic resection of transverse colon carcinoma is technically demanding and was excluded from most of the large trials of laparoscopic colectomy. The aim of this study was to assess the safety, feasibility, and outcome of laparoscopic resection of carcinoma of the transverse colon.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed to identify patients who underwent laparoscopic resection of transverse colon carcinoma. These patients were compared to patients who had laparoscopic resection for right and sigmoid colon carcinoma. In addition, they were compared to a historical series of patients who underwent open resection for transverse colon cancer.

Results

A total of 22 patients underwent laparoscopic resection for transverse colon carcinoma. Sixty-eight patients operated for right colon cancer and 64 operated for sigmoid colon cancer served as comparison groups. Twenty-four patients were identified for the historical open group. Intraoperative complications occurred in 4.5% of patients with transverse colon cancer compared to 5.9% (P = 1.0) and 7.8% (P = 1.0) of patients with right and sigmoid colon cancer, respectively. The early postoperative complication rate was 45, 50 (P = 1.0), and 37.5% (P = 0.22) in the three groups, respectively. Conversion was required in 1 (5%) patient in the laparoscopic transverse colon group. The conversion rate and late complications were not significantly different in the three groups. There was no significant difference in the number of lymph nodes harvested in the laparoscopic and open groups. Operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic transverse colectomy group when compared to all other groups (P = 0.001, 0.008, and <0.001 compared to right, sigmoid, and open transverse colectomy, respectively).

Conclusions

The results of laparoscopic colon resection for transverse colon carcinoma are comparable to the results of laparoscopic resection of right or sigmoid colon cancer and open resection of transverse colon carcinoma. These results suggest that laparoscopic resection of transverse colon carcinoma is safe and feasible.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen HH, Wexner SD, Weiss EG et al (1998) Laparoscopic colectomy for benign colorectal disease is associated with a significant reduction in disability as compared with laparotomy. Surg Endosc 12:1397–1400CrossRefPubMed Chen HH, Wexner SD, Weiss EG et al (1998) Laparoscopic colectomy for benign colorectal disease is associated with a significant reduction in disability as compared with laparotomy. Surg Endosc 12:1397–1400CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2006) Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer. Colorectal Dis 8:375–388CrossRefPubMed Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2006) Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer. Colorectal Dis 8:375–388CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira MR, Adams J, Beart RW Jr (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132:41–44PubMed Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira MR, Adams J, Beart RW Jr (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132:41–44PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hazebroek EJ, Color Study Group (2002) COLOR: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 16:949–953CrossRefPubMed Hazebroek EJ, Color Study Group (2002) COLOR: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 16:949–953CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E et al (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662CrossRefPubMed Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E et al (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, the Transatlantic Laparoscopically Assisted vs Open Colectomy Trials Study Group (2007) Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 142:298–303CrossRefPubMed Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, the Transatlantic Laparoscopically Assisted vs Open Colectomy Trials Study Group (2007) Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 142:298–303CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRefPubMed Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Geis WP, Coletta AV, Verdeja JC, Plasencia G, Ojogho O, Jacobs M (1994) Sequential psychomotor skills development in laparoscopic colon surgery. Arch Surg 129:206–212PubMed Geis WP, Coletta AV, Verdeja JC, Plasencia G, Ojogho O, Jacobs M (1994) Sequential psychomotor skills development in laparoscopic colon surgery. Arch Surg 129:206–212PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Poulin EC (2007) Are transverse colon cancers suitable for laparoscopic resection? Surg Endosc 21:396–399CrossRefPubMed Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Poulin EC (2007) Are transverse colon cancers suitable for laparoscopic resection? Surg Endosc 21:396–399CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Feingold DL, Addona T, Forde KA et al (2004) Safety and reliability of tattooing colorectal neoplasms prior to laparoscopic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 8:543–546CrossRefPubMed Feingold DL, Addona T, Forde KA et al (2004) Safety and reliability of tattooing colorectal neoplasms prior to laparoscopic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 8:543–546CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Zmora O, Dinnewitzer AJ, Pikarsky AJ et al (2002) Intraoperative endoscopy in laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 16:808–811CrossRefPubMed Zmora O, Dinnewitzer AJ, Pikarsky AJ et al (2002) Intraoperative endoscopy in laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 16:808–811CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon carcinoma
verfasst von
O. Zmora
A. Bar-Dayan
M. Khaikin
A. Lebeydev
M. Shabtai
A. Ayalon
D. Rosin
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2010
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Ausgabe 1/2010
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Elektronische ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0551-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2010

Techniques in Coloproctology 1/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.