Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology 3/2015

01.03.2015 | Original Article

Assessment of a novel, full-thickness incisional biopsy model to restage rectal tumours after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: results of an ex vivo pilot study

verfasst von: F. M. Smith, H. Wiland, A. Mace, R. K. Pai, M. F. Kalady

Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

There is currently no reliable means to restage rectal cancers after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Recent histological evidence shows that the epicentre for residual cancer cells is focussed directly underneath any residual mucosal abnormality (RMA). This proof-of-concept study aimed to determine the utility of a novel, minimally invasive method of incisional biopsy as a restaging tool. A secondary aim was to compare its performance to clinical response assessment.

Methods

After surgical resection, 0.5 × 0.5 cm, full-thickness incisional biopsy was performed in 15 rectal cancers. Of these, 13 had RMA and 2 had mucosal cCR but a palpable intramural abnormality. In all patients, a full-thickness incisional biopsy was taken through the centre of these areas. The ypT stage of the incisional biopsy and the final total specimen were compared. Complete mucosal clinical response was deemed to have occurred when either no residual tumour or only a flat mucosal scar remained.

Results

Incisional biopsy correctly identified all patients that had been downstaged to ypT0; however, it also falsely identified 5 of 10 patients (50 %) with yp residual disease as ypT0. Overall performance of incisional biopsy to detect residual cancer was 50 % sensitivity, 100 % specificity, 100 % PPV, and 50 % NPV with an accuracy of 66 %. A complete mucosal clinical response occurred in only one of five patients downstaged to ypT0 (20 % sensitive). It also occurred in one patient, which was ultimately staged as ypT3.

Conclusion

This prospective data demonstrates that incisional biopsy is not suitable as a stand-alone method to restage rectal cancer after CRT. Alternate or complementary means of restaging are needed.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith FM, Waldron D, Winter DC (2010) Rectum-conserving surgery in the era of chemoradiotherapy. Br J Surg 97:1752–1764CrossRefPubMed Smith FM, Waldron D, Winter DC (2010) Rectum-conserving surgery in the era of chemoradiotherapy. Br J Surg 97:1752–1764CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalady MF, de Campos-Lobato LF, Stocchi L et al (2009) Predictive factors of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 250:582–589PubMed Kalady MF, de Campos-Lobato LF, Stocchi L et al (2009) Predictive factors of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 250:582–589PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Wynn G, Marks J, Kessler H, Gama-Rodrigues J (2010) Complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for distal rectal cancer: characterization of clinical and endoscopic findings for standardization. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1692–1698CrossRefPubMed Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Wynn G, Marks J, Kessler H, Gama-Rodrigues J (2010) Complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for distal rectal cancer: characterization of clinical and endoscopic findings for standardization. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1692–1698CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith FM, Chang KH, Sheahan K, Hyland J, O’Connell PR, Winter DC (2012) The surgical significance of residual mucosal abnormalities in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Br J Surg 99:993–1001CrossRefPubMed Smith FM, Chang KH, Sheahan K, Hyland J, O’Connell PR, Winter DC (2012) The surgical significance of residual mucosal abnormalities in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Br J Surg 99:993–1001CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith FM, Wiland H, Mace A, Pai RK, Kalady MF (2014) Clinical criteria underestimate complete pathological response in rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 57:311–315CrossRefPubMed Smith FM, Wiland H, Mace A, Pai RK, Kalady MF (2014) Clinical criteria underestimate complete pathological response in rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 57:311–315CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith FM, Wiland H, Mace A, Pai RK, Kalady MF (2014) Depth and lateral spread of microscopic residual rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: implications for treatment decisions. Colorectal Dis 16:610–615CrossRefPubMed Smith FM, Wiland H, Mace A, Pai RK, Kalady MF (2014) Depth and lateral spread of microscopic residual rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: implications for treatment decisions. Colorectal Dis 16:610–615CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Pereira GV et al (2012) Role of biopsies in patients with residual rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation after downsizing: Can they rule out persisting cancer? Colorectal Dis 14:714–720CrossRefPubMed Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Pereira GV et al (2012) Role of biopsies in patients with residual rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation after downsizing: Can they rule out persisting cancer? Colorectal Dis 14:714–720CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Meterissian S, Skibber J, Rich T et al (1994) Patterns of residual disease after preoperative chemoradiation in ultrasound T3 rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 1:111–116CrossRefPubMed Meterissian S, Skibber J, Rich T et al (1994) Patterns of residual disease after preoperative chemoradiation in ultrasound T3 rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 1:111–116CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Washington MK, Berlin J, Branton PA et al (2008) Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with primary carcinomas of the colon and rectum. Arch Pathol Lab Med 132:1182–1193PubMed Washington MK, Berlin J, Branton PA et al (2008) Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with primary carcinomas of the colon and rectum. Arch Pathol Lab Med 132:1182–1193PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith JD, Ruby JA, Goodman KA et al (2012) Nonoperative management of rectal cancer with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Surg 256:965–972CrossRefPubMed Smith JD, Ruby JA, Goodman KA et al (2012) Nonoperative management of rectal cancer with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Surg 256:965–972CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W et al (2004) Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann Surg 240:711–717PubMedCentralPubMed Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W et al (2004) Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann Surg 240:711–717PubMedCentralPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Maas M, Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM et al (2011) Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:4633–4640CrossRefPubMed Maas M, Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM et al (2011) Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:4633–4640CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Lynn PB et al (2013) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for residual rectal cancer (ypT0-2) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: another word of caution. Dis Colon Rectum 56:6–13CrossRefPubMed Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, Lynn PB et al (2013) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for residual rectal cancer (ypT0-2) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: another word of caution. Dis Colon Rectum 56:6–13CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Maretto I, Pomerri F, Pucciarelli S et al (2007) The potential of restaging in the prediction of pathologic response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:455–461CrossRefPubMed Maretto I, Pomerri F, Pucciarelli S et al (2007) The potential of restaging in the prediction of pathologic response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:455–461CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Habr-Gama A, São Julião GP, Perez RO (2014) Pitfalls of transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 23:63–69CrossRefPubMed Habr-Gama A, São Julião GP, Perez RO (2014) Pitfalls of transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 23:63–69CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayden DM, Jakate S, Pinzon MC et al (2012) Tumor scatter after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: Are we dealing with an invisible margin? Dis Colon Rectum 55:1206–1212CrossRefPubMed Hayden DM, Jakate S, Pinzon MC et al (2012) Tumor scatter after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: Are we dealing with an invisible margin? Dis Colon Rectum 55:1206–1212CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gosens MJ, Klaassen RA, Tan-Go I et al (2007) Circumferential margin involvement is the crucial prognostic factor after multimodality treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 13:6617–6623CrossRefPubMed Gosens MJ, Klaassen RA, Tan-Go I et al (2007) Circumferential margin involvement is the crucial prognostic factor after multimodality treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 13:6617–6623CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Assessment of a novel, full-thickness incisional biopsy model to restage rectal tumours after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: results of an ex vivo pilot study
verfasst von
F. M. Smith
H. Wiland
A. Mace
R. K. Pai
M. F. Kalady
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2015
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Elektronische ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1272-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

Techniques in Coloproctology 3/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.