Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology 8/2016

15.07.2016 | Original Article

30-day mortality after elective colorectal surgery can reasonably be predicted

verfasst von: A. C. Murray, C. Mauro, J. Rein, R. P. Kiran

Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present study was to develop a clinically relevant, accurate and usable risk assessment scoring system solely for colorectal cancer patients undergoing elective resection.

Methods

All colorectal resections for colorectal cancer 2006–2012 were identified from the American College of Surgeons Quality Improvement Program. Independent risk factors for 30-day mortality after elective surgery were identified using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. A points-calculator based on factors most strongly associated with mortality and accurately predicting risk of mortality was developed.

Results

Fifty-nine thousand nine hundred eighty-six patients underwent elective colorectal cancer surgery, and 1096 (1.8 %) died within 30 days. On multivariable analysis, the strongest risk factors for mortality were age ≥65 years [odds ratio (OR) 2.17, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.61–2.92], American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3 (OR 1.77, 95 % CI 1.29–2.42), renal failure (OR 3.15, 95 % CI 1.01–9.77), disseminated cancer (OR 2.56, 95 % CI 1.96–3.35), hypoalbuminemia (OR 2.84, 95 % CI 2.21–3.65), preoperative ascites (OR 3.17, 95 % CI 2.07–4.87), heart failure (OR 2.08, 95 % CI 1.35–3.20) and functional status (OR 2.05, 95 % CI 1.56–2.70). A model that accurately predicted risk of mortality was created using forward stepwise logistic regression and externally validated (area under the curve 0.826). This allowed for development of an eight-factor predictive score; maximum points conferred mortality of 96.1 % (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

A simple preoperative scoring system predicting 30-day mortality with good capability may allow better preoperative risk assessment, optimization and decision-making.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tekkis PP, Poloniecki JD, Thompson MR, Stamatakis JD (2003) Operative mortality in colorectal cancer: prospective national study. BMJ 22:1196–1201CrossRef Tekkis PP, Poloniecki JD, Thompson MR, Stamatakis JD (2003) Operative mortality in colorectal cancer: prospective national study. BMJ 22:1196–1201CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78:355–360CrossRefPubMed Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78:355–360CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tekkis PP, Prytherch DR, Kocher HM et al (2004) Development of a dedicated risk-adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM). Br J Surg 91:1174–1182CrossRefPubMed Tekkis PP, Prytherch DR, Kocher HM et al (2004) Development of a dedicated risk-adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM). Br J Surg 91:1174–1182CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG, Powell SJ (1998) POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity. Br J Surg 85:1217–1220CrossRefPubMed Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG, Powell SJ (1998) POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity. Br J Surg 85:1217–1220CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fazio VW, Tekkis PP, Remzi F, Lavery IC (2004) Assessment of operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: the Cleveland Clinic Foundation colorectal cancer model. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2015–2024CrossRefPubMed Fazio VW, Tekkis PP, Remzi F, Lavery IC (2004) Assessment of operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: the Cleveland Clinic Foundation colorectal cancer model. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2015–2024CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Alves A, Panis Y, Mathieu P, Kwiatkowski F, Slim K, Mantion G, Association Françaisede Chirurgie (AFC) (2005) Mortality and morbidity after surgery of mid and low rectal cancer. Results of a French prospective multicentric study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29:509–514CrossRefPubMed Alves A, Panis Y, Mathieu P, Kwiatkowski F, Slim K, Mantion G, Association Françaisede Chirurgie (AFC) (2005) Mortality and morbidity after surgery of mid and low rectal cancer. Results of a French prospective multicentric study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29:509–514CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferjani AM, Griffin D, Stallard N, Wong LS (2007) A newly devised scoring system for prediction of mortality in patients with colorectal cancer: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol 8:317–322CrossRefPubMed Ferjani AM, Griffin D, Stallard N, Wong LS (2007) A newly devised scoring system for prediction of mortality in patients with colorectal cancer: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol 8:317–322CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Senagore AJ, Warmuth AJ, Delaney CP, Tekkis PP, Fazio VW (2004) POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM: implementation issues in a United States health care system for prediction of outcome for colon cancer resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1435–1441CrossRefPubMed Senagore AJ, Warmuth AJ, Delaney CP, Tekkis PP, Fazio VW (2004) POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM: implementation issues in a United States health care system for prediction of outcome for colon cancer resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1435–1441CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W et al (1998) The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 228:491–507CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W et al (1998) The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 228:491–507CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36CrossRefPubMed Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria KY (2012) Engaging patients and hospitals to expand public reporting in surgery. AHRQ, Rockville Bilimoria KY (2012) Engaging patients and hospitals to expand public reporting in surgery. AHRQ, Rockville
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Daley J, Henderson WG, Khuri SF (2001) Risk-adjusted surgical outcomes. Annu Rev Med 52:275–287CrossRefPubMed Daley J, Henderson WG, Khuri SF (2001) Risk-adjusted surgical outcomes. Annu Rev Med 52:275–287CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE et al (2000) Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 43:83–91CrossRefPubMed Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE et al (2000) Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 43:83–91CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko C, Hall BL (2009) Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 208:1009–1016CrossRefPubMed Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko C, Hall BL (2009) Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 208:1009–1016CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams DJ, Walker JD (2014) A nomogram to calculate the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM). BJS 101:239–245CrossRef Williams DJ, Walker JD (2014) A nomogram to calculate the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM). BJS 101:239–245CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Yan J, Wang YX, Li ZP (2011) Predictive value of the POSSUM, p-POSSUM, cr-POSSUM, APACHE II and ACPGBI scoring systems in colorectal cancer resection. J Int Med Res 39:1464–1473CrossRefPubMed Yan J, Wang YX, Li ZP (2011) Predictive value of the POSSUM, p-POSSUM, cr-POSSUM, APACHE II and ACPGBI scoring systems in colorectal cancer resection. J Int Med Res 39:1464–1473CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Teeuwen PH, Bremers AJ, Groenewoud JM, van Laarhoven CJ, Bleichrodt RP (2011) Predictive value of POSSUM and ACPGBI scoring in mortality and morbidity of colorectal resection: a case–control study. J Gastrointest Surg 15:294–303CrossRefPubMed Teeuwen PH, Bremers AJ, Groenewoud JM, van Laarhoven CJ, Bleichrodt RP (2011) Predictive value of POSSUM and ACPGBI scoring in mortality and morbidity of colorectal resection: a case–control study. J Gastrointest Surg 15:294–303CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Paruch JL, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY (2014) An opportunity to improve informed consent and shared decision making: the role of the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in oncology. Ann Surg Oncol 21:5–7CrossRefPubMed Paruch JL, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY (2014) An opportunity to improve informed consent and shared decision making: the role of the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in oncology. Ann Surg Oncol 21:5–7CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Merkow RP, Hall BL, Cohen ME et al (2012) Relevance of the c-statistic when evaluating risk-adjustment models in surgery. J Am Coll Surg 214:822–830CrossRefPubMed Merkow RP, Hall BL, Cohen ME et al (2012) Relevance of the c-statistic when evaluating risk-adjustment models in surgery. J Am Coll Surg 214:822–830CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Drolet S, MacLean AR, Myers RP, Shaheen AA, Dixon E, Buie WD (2011) Elective resection of colon cancer by high-volume surgeons is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 15:541–550CrossRefPubMed Drolet S, MacLean AR, Myers RP, Shaheen AA, Dixon E, Buie WD (2011) Elective resection of colon cancer by high-volume surgeons is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 15:541–550CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Henneman D, Ten Berge MG, Snijders HS, Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit Group et al (2014) Safety of elective colorectal cancer surgery: non-surgical complications and colectomies are targets for quality improvement. J Surg Oncol 109:567–573CrossRefPubMed Henneman D, Ten Berge MG, Snijders HS, Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit Group et al (2014) Safety of elective colorectal cancer surgery: non-surgical complications and colectomies are targets for quality improvement. J Surg Oncol 109:567–573CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Braga M, Gianotti L, Radaelli G et al (1999) Perioperative immunonutrition in patients undergoing cancer surgery: results of a randomized double-blind phase 3 trial. Arch Surg 134:428–433CrossRefPubMed Braga M, Gianotti L, Radaelli G et al (1999) Perioperative immunonutrition in patients undergoing cancer surgery: results of a randomized double-blind phase 3 trial. Arch Surg 134:428–433CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
30-day mortality after elective colorectal surgery can reasonably be predicted
verfasst von
A. C. Murray
C. Mauro
J. Rein
R. P. Kiran
Publikationsdatum
15.07.2016
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Elektronische ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1503-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

Techniques in Coloproctology 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.