Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology 11/2017

28.10.2017 | Original Article

Validation of an online risk calculator for the prediction of anastomotic leak after colon cancer surgery and preliminary exploration of artificial intelligence-based analytics

verfasst von: T. Sammour, L. Cohen, A. I. Karunatillake, M. Lewis, M. J. Lawrence, A. Hunter, J. W. Moore, M. L. Thomas

Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Ausgabe 11/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Recently published data support the use of a web-based risk calculator (www.​anastomoticleak.​com) for the prediction of anastomotic leak after colectomy. The aim of this study was to externally validate this calculator on a larger dataset.

Methods

Consecutive adult patients undergoing elective or emergency colectomy for colon cancer at a single institution over a 9-year period were identified using the Binational Colorectal Cancer Audit database. Patients with a rectosigmoid cancer, an R2 resection, or a diverting ostomy were excluded. The primary outcome was anastomotic leak within 90 days as defined by previously published criteria. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was derived and compared with that of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program® (ACS NSQIP) calculator and the colon leakage score (CLS) calculator for left colectomy. Commercially available artificial intelligence-based analytics software was used to further interrogate the prediction algorithm.

Results

A total of 626 patients were identified. Four hundred and fifty-six patients met the inclusion criteria, and 402 had complete data available for all the calculator variables (126 had a left colectomy). Laparoscopic surgery was performed in 39.6% and emergency surgery in 14.7%. The anastomotic leak rate was 7.2%, with 31.0% requiring reoperation. The anastomoticleak.com calculator was significantly predictive of leak and performed better than the ACS NSQIP calculator (AUROC 0.73 vs 0.58) and the CLS calculator (AUROC 0.96 vs 0.80) for left colectomy. Artificial intelligence-predictive analysis supported these findings and identified an improved prediction model.

Conclusions

The anastomotic leak risk calculator is significantly predictive of anastomotic leak after colon cancer resection. Wider investigation of artificial intelligence-based analytics for risk prediction is warranted.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sammour T, Hayes IP, Jones IT, Steel MC, Faragher I, Gibbs P (2016) Impact of anastomotic leak on recurrence and survival after colorectal cancer surgery: a BioGrid Australia analysis. ANZ J Surg. doi:10.1111/ans.13648 Sammour T, Hayes IP, Jones IT, Steel MC, Faragher I, Gibbs P (2016) Impact of anastomotic leak on recurrence and survival after colorectal cancer surgery: a BioGrid Australia analysis. ANZ J Surg. doi:10.​1111/​ans.​13648
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinkney T, El-Hussuna A, Zmora O, European Society of Coloproctology Collaborating Group et al (2017) The relationship between method of anastomosis and anastomotic failure after right hemicolectomy and ileo-caecal resection: an international snapshot audit. Colorectal Dis. doi:10.1111/codi.13646 PubMed Pinkney T, El-Hussuna A, Zmora O, European Society of Coloproctology Collaborating Group et al (2017) The relationship between method of anastomosis and anastomotic failure after right hemicolectomy and ileo-caecal resection: an international snapshot audit. Colorectal Dis. doi:10.​1111/​codi.​13646 PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith EB (1978) The anastomotic leak syndrome. J Nat Med Assoc 70(1):49–50 Smith EB (1978) The anastomotic leak syndrome. J Nat Med Assoc 70(1):49–50
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D, Regimbeau JM, Pocard M, Valleur P (2002) Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 26(4):499–502. doi:10.1007/s00268-001-0256-4 CrossRefPubMed Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D, Regimbeau JM, Pocard M, Valleur P (2002) Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 26(4):499–502. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-001-0256-4 CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC (2015) Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg 102(5):462–479. doi:10.1002/bjs.9697 CrossRefPubMed McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC (2015) Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg 102(5):462–479. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​9697 CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Vallance A, Wexner S, Berho M et al (2017) A collaborative review of the current concepts and challenges of anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 19(1):O1–O12. doi:10.1111/codi.13534 CrossRefPubMed Vallance A, Wexner S, Berho M et al (2017) A collaborative review of the current concepts and challenges of anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 19(1):O1–O12. doi:10.​1111/​codi.​13534 CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Daams F, Wu Z, Lahaye MJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2014) Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: a systematic review of literature. World Gastrointest Surg 6(2):14–26. doi:10.4240/wjgs.v6.i2.14 CrossRef Daams F, Wu Z, Lahaye MJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2014) Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: a systematic review of literature. World Gastrointest Surg 6(2):14–26. doi:10.​4240/​wjgs.​v6.​i2.​14 CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rojas-Machado SA, Romero-Simo M, Arroyo A, Rojas-Machado A, Lopez J, Calpena R (2016) Prediction of anastomotic leak in colorectal cancer surgery based on a new prognostic index PROCOLE (prognostic colorectal leakage) developed from the meta-analysis of observational studies of risk factors. Int J Colorectal Dis 31(2):197–210. doi:10.1007/s00384-015-2422-4 CrossRefPubMed Rojas-Machado SA, Romero-Simo M, Arroyo A, Rojas-Machado A, Lopez J, Calpena R (2016) Prediction of anastomotic leak in colorectal cancer surgery based on a new prognostic index PROCOLE (prognostic colorectal leakage) developed from the meta-analysis of observational studies of risk factors. Int J Colorectal Dis 31(2):197–210. doi:10.​1007/​s00384-015-2422-4 CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sammour T, Lewis M, Thomas ML, Lawrence MJ, Hunter A, Moore JW (2017) A simple web-based risk calculator (www.anastomoticleak.com) is superior to the surgeon’s estimate of anastomotic leak after colon cancer resection. Tech Coloproctol 21(1):35–41. doi:10.1007/s10151-016-1567-7 CrossRefPubMed Sammour T, Lewis M, Thomas ML, Lawrence MJ, Hunter A, Moore JW (2017) A simple web-based risk calculator (www.anastomoticleak.com) is superior to the surgeon’s estimate of anastomotic leak after colon cancer resection. Tech Coloproctol 21(1):35–41. doi:10.​1007/​s10151-016-1567-7 CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Rodriguez JL et al (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 262(2):321–330. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000973 CrossRefPubMed Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Rodriguez JL et al (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 262(2):321–330. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000000973​ CrossRefPubMed
20.
23.
24.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Scarborough JE, Mantyh CR, Sun Z, Migaly J (2015) Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation reduces incisional surgical site infection and anastomotic leak rates after elective colorectal resection: an analysis of colectomy-targeted ACS NSQIP. Ann Surg 262(2):331–337. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001041 CrossRefPubMed Scarborough JE, Mantyh CR, Sun Z, Migaly J (2015) Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation reduces incisional surgical site infection and anastomotic leak rates after elective colorectal resection: an analysis of colectomy-targeted ACS NSQIP. Ann Surg 262(2):331–337. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000001041​ CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Domenech PE, Romero-Simo M, Rojas-Machado A, Arroyo A, Calpena R (2016) PROCOLE (prognostic colorectal leakage): a new prognostic index to predict the risk of anastomotic leak in colorectal cancer surgery. J Colitis Diverticulitis 1(2):1–5 Domenech PE, Romero-Simo M, Rojas-Machado A, Arroyo A, Calpena R (2016) PROCOLE (prognostic colorectal leakage): a new prognostic index to predict the risk of anastomotic leak in colorectal cancer surgery. J Colitis Diverticulitis 1(2):1–5
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Srinivas TR, Taber DJ, Su Z et al (2017) Big data, predictive analytics, and quality improvement in kidney transplantation: a proof of concept. Am J Transplant 17(3):671–681. doi:10.1111/ajt.14099 CrossRefPubMed Srinivas TR, Taber DJ, Su Z et al (2017) Big data, predictive analytics, and quality improvement in kidney transplantation: a proof of concept. Am J Transplant 17(3):671–681. doi:10.​1111/​ajt.​14099 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Validation of an online risk calculator for the prediction of anastomotic leak after colon cancer surgery and preliminary exploration of artificial intelligence-based analytics
verfasst von
T. Sammour
L. Cohen
A. I. Karunatillake
M. Lewis
M. J. Lawrence
A. Hunter
J. W. Moore
M. L. Thomas
Publikationsdatum
28.10.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Ausgabe 11/2017
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Elektronische ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1701-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2017

Techniques in Coloproctology 11/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.