Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 3/2004

01.09.2004 | Original paper

Multichannel Place Pitch Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Recipients

verfasst von: Johan Laneau, Jan Wouters

Erschienen in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Ausgabe 3/2004

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Cochlear implant recipients perceive a rise in pitch when the site of stimulation is moved from the apex toward the base. The place pitch sensitivity is typically measured using the stimulation of single channels. However, all current cochlear implant devices stimulate multiple channels simultaneously or with pulses temporally interleaved. The primary goal of the present study is to test whether the sensitivity of a cochlear implant recipient to changes in perceived pitch associated with changes of place of excitation improves or deteriorates when the number of active channels is increased, compared with stimulation with only one active channel. Place pitch sensitivity was recorded in four Nucleus CI24 subjects as a function of number of active channels (from 1 to 8). Just noticeable differences were estimated from a constant stimuli 2AFC pitch-ranking experiment with roving loudness. Reference and comparison stimuli contained the same number of active channels but were shifted one or two electrodes toward the base or toward the apex. The place pitch sensitivity was measured using monopolar stimulation at two locations along the electrode array. To minimize cues related to loudness, the multichannel stimuli were loudness balanced relative to the single-channel stimuli presented at C-level. The number of active channels did not affect place pitch sensitivity. This is consistent with a model that compares the edges of the excitation pattern irrespective of the overlap between excitation patterns. There was a significant difference in sensitivity to place pitch among subjects. The average just noticeable differences of place pitch, extrapolated from a fitting procedure, for the subjects ranged from 0.25 mm to 0.46 mm.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Black, RC, Clark, GM. 1980Differential electrical excitation of the auditory nerveJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.67868874PubMed Black, RC, Clark, GM. 1980Differential electrical excitation of the auditory nerveJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.67868874PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Busby, PA, Clark, GM. 1996Electrode discrimination by early-deafened cochlear implant patientsAudiology35822PubMed Busby, PA, Clark, GM. 1996Electrode discrimination by early-deafened cochlear implant patientsAudiology35822PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Busby, PA, Whitford, LA, Blamey, PJ, Richardson, LM, Clark, GM. 1994Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesisJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.9526582669PubMed Busby, PA, Whitford, LA, Blamey, PJ, Richardson, LM, Clark, GM. 1994Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesisJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.9526582669PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Carlyon, RP, Deeks, JM. 2002Limitations on rate discriminationJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.11210091025CrossRefPubMed Carlyon, RP, Deeks, JM. 2002Limitations on rate discriminationJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.11210091025CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, LT, Busby, PA, Clark, GM. 1996aCochlear implant place psychophysics2. Comparison of forward masking and pitch estimation data. Audiol. Neurootol.1278292 Cohen, LT, Busby, PA, Clark, GM. 1996aCochlear implant place psychophysics2. Comparison of forward masking and pitch estimation data. Audiol. Neurootol.1278292
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, LT, Busby, PA, Whitford, LA, Clark, GM. 1996bCochlear implant place psychophysics 1Pitch estimation with deeply inserted electrodes. Audiol. Neurootol.1265277 Cohen, LT, Busby, PA, Whitford, LA, Clark, GM. 1996bCochlear implant place psychophysics 1Pitch estimation with deeply inserted electrodes. Audiol. Neurootol.1265277
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, LT, Saunders, E, Clark, GM. 2001Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode arrayHear. Res.1556381CrossRefPubMed Cohen, LT, Saunders, E, Clark, GM. 2001Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode arrayHear. Res.1556381CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Collins, LM, Throckmorton, CS. 2000Investigating perceptual features of electrode stimulation via a multidimensional scaling paradigmJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.10823532365CrossRefPubMed Collins, LM, Throckmorton, CS. 2000Investigating perceptual features of electrode stimulation via a multidimensional scaling paradigmJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.10823532365CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Collins, LM, Zwolan, TA, Wakefield, GH. 1997Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjectsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.101440455CrossRefPubMed Collins, LM, Zwolan, TA, Wakefield, GH. 1997Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjectsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.101440455CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Geurts, L, Wouters, J. 2001Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implantsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.109713726CrossRefPubMed Geurts, L, Wouters, J. 2001Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implantsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.109713726CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Henry, BA, McKay, CM, McDermott, HJ, Clark, GM. 2000The relationship between speech perception and electrode discrimination in cochlear implanteesJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.10812691280CrossRefPubMed Henry, BA, McKay, CM, McDermott, HJ, Clark, GM. 2000The relationship between speech perception and electrode discrimination in cochlear implanteesJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.10812691280CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Levitt, H. 1971Transformed up-down methods in psychoacousticsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.49467477PubMed Levitt, H. 1971Transformed up-down methods in psychoacousticsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.49467477PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lyzenga, J, Horst, JW. 1995Frequency discrimination of band-limited harmonic complexes related to vowel formantsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.9819431955 Lyzenga, J, Horst, JW. 1995Frequency discrimination of band-limited harmonic complexes related to vowel formantsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.9819431955
Zurück zum Zitat Lyzenga, J, Horst, JW. 1997Frequency discrimination of stylized synthetic vowels with a single formantJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.10217551767CrossRefPubMed Lyzenga, J, Horst, JW. 1997Frequency discrimination of stylized synthetic vowels with a single formantJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.10217551767CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Macmillian, NA, Creelman, CD. 1991Detection theory; A user’s guideCambridge University PressCambridge Macmillian, NA, Creelman, CD. 1991Detection theory; A user’s guideCambridge University PressCambridge
Zurück zum Zitat McDermott, HJ, McKay, CM. 1994Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous electrode electrical stimulation of the cochleaJ Acoust. Soc. Am.96155162PubMed McDermott, HJ, McKay, CM. 1994Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous electrode electrical stimulation of the cochleaJ Acoust. Soc. Am.96155162PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat McDermott, HJ, McKay, CM. 1997Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochleaJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.10116221631CrossRefPubMed McDermott, HJ, McKay, CM. 1997Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochleaJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.10116221631CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat McKay, CM, O’Brien, A, James, CJ. 1999Effect of current level on electrode discrimination in electrical stimulationHear. Res.136159164CrossRefPubMed McKay, CM, O’Brien, A, James, CJ. 1999Effect of current level on electrode discrimination in electrical stimulationHear. Res.136159164CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat McKay, CM. 2000Place, temporal cues in pitch perception: are they truly independent?ARLO12530CrossRef McKay, CM. 2000Place, temporal cues in pitch perception: are they truly independent?ARLO12530CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Morris, DJ, Pfingst, BE. 2000Effects of electrode configuration and stimulus level on rate and level discrimination with cochlear implantsJ. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.1211223PubMed Morris, DJ, Pfingst, BE. 2000Effects of electrode configuration and stimulus level on rate and level discrimination with cochlear implantsJ. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.1211223PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson, DA, VanTasell, DJ, Schroder, AC, Soli, S, Levine, S. 1995Electrode ranking of “place pitch” and speech recognition in electrical hearingJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.9819871999PubMed Nelson, DA, VanTasell, DJ, Schroder, AC, Soli, S, Levine, S. 1995Electrode ranking of “place pitch” and speech recognition in electrical hearingJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.9819871999PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson DA, Spatial selectivity, neurotopicity and tonotopicity in cochlear implant listeners. Abstract presented at the 2003 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses, Asilomar, USA Nelson DA, Spatial selectivity, neurotopicity and tonotopicity in cochlear implant listeners. Abstract presented at the 2003 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses, Asilomar, USA
Zurück zum Zitat Pfingst, BE, Holloway, LA, Zwolan, TA, Collins, LM. 1999Effects of stimulus level on electrode-place discrimination in human subjects with cochlear implantsHear. Res.134105115CrossRefPubMed Pfingst, BE, Holloway, LA, Zwolan, TA, Collins, LM. 1999Effects of stimulus level on electrode-place discrimination in human subjects with cochlear implantsHear. Res.134105115CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Pfingst, BE, Franck, KH, Xu, L, Bauer, EM, Zwolan, TA. 2001Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prosthesesJ. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.287103PubMed Pfingst, BE, Franck, KH, Xu, L, Bauer, EM, Zwolan, TA. 2001Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prosthesesJ. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.287103PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Pijl, S. 1997Labeling of musical interval size by cochlear implant patients and normally hearing subjectsEar Hear.18364372CrossRefPubMed Pijl, S. 1997Labeling of musical interval size by cochlear implant patients and normally hearing subjectsEar Hear.18364372CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Piji, S, Schwarz, DW. 1995Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodesJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.98886895PubMed Piji, S, Schwarz, DW. 1995Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodesJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.98886895PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Shannon, RV. 1983Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in manI. Basic psychophysics. Hear. Res.11157189 Shannon, RV. 1983Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in manI. Basic psychophysics. Hear. Res.11157189
Zurück zum Zitat Tong, YC, Clark, GM. 1985Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patientsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.7718811888PubMed Tong, YC, Clark, GM. 1985Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patientsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.7718811888PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Tong, YC, Clark, GM, Blamey, PJ, Busby, PA, Dowell, RC. 1982Psychophysical studies for 2 multiple-channel cochlear implant patientsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.71153160PubMed Tong, YC, Clark, GM, Blamey, PJ, Busby, PA, Dowell, RC. 1982Psychophysical studies for 2 multiple-channel cochlear implant patientsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.71153160PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Tong, YC, Blamey, DJ, Dowell, RC, Clark, GM. 1983Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implantJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.747380PubMed Tong, YC, Blamey, DJ, Dowell, RC, Clark, GM. 1983Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implantJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.747380PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Townshend, B, Cotter, N, VanCompernolle, D, White, RL. 1987Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjectsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.82106115PubMed Townshend, B, Cotter, N, VanCompernolle, D, White, RL. 1987Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjectsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.82106115PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Wouters, J. 1994Vlaamse opname van woordenlijsten voor spraakaudiometrieLogopedie72833 Wouters, J. 1994Vlaamse opname van woordenlijsten voor spraakaudiometrieLogopedie72833
Zurück zum Zitat Zwicker, E. 1970Masking and psychological excitation as consequences of the ear’s frequency analysisPlomp, RSmoorenburg, GF eds. Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in HearingLeidenSijthoff376396 Zwicker, E. 1970Masking and psychological excitation as consequences of the ear’s frequency analysisPlomp, RSmoorenburg, GF eds. Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in HearingLeidenSijthoff376396
Zurück zum Zitat Zwolan, TA, Kileny, PR, Ashbaugh, C, Telian, SA. 1996Patient performance with the Cochlear Corporation “20 + 2” implant: Bipolar versus monopolar activationAm. J. Otol.17717723PubMed Zwolan, TA, Kileny, PR, Ashbaugh, C, Telian, SA. 1996Patient performance with the Cochlear Corporation “20 + 2” implant: Bipolar versus monopolar activationAm. J. Otol.17717723PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Zwolan, TA, Collins, LM, Wakefield, GH. 1997Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjectsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.10236733685CrossRefPubMed Zwolan, TA, Collins, LM, Wakefield, GH. 1997Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjectsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.10236733685CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Multichannel Place Pitch Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Recipients
verfasst von
Johan Laneau
Jan Wouters
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2004
Erschienen in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Ausgabe 3/2004
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Elektronische ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-004-4049-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2004

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 3/2004 Zur Ausgabe

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.