Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 1/2006

01.03.2006

Effects of Stimulation Mode, Level and Location on Forward-Masked Excitation Patterns in Cochlear Implant Patients

verfasst von: Monita Chatterjee, John J. Galvin III, Qian-Jie Fu, Robert V. Shannon

Erschienen in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Ausgabe 1/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

In multi-channel cochlear implants, electrical current is delivered to appropriate electrodes in the cochlea to approximate the spatial representation of speech. Theoretically, electrode configurations that restrict the current spread within the cochlea (e.g., bi- or tri-polar stimulation) may provide better spatial selectivity, and in turn, better speech recognition than configurations that produce a broader current spread (e.g., monopolar stimulation). However, the effects of electrode configuration on supra-threshold excitation patterns have not been systematically studied in cochlear implant patients. In the present study, forward-masked excitation patterns were measured in cochlear implant patients as functions of stimulation mode, level and location within the cochlea. All stimuli were 500 pulses-per-second biphasic pulse trains (200 μs/phase, 20 μs inter-phase gap). Masker stimuli were 200 ms in duration; the bi-polar configuration was varied from narrow (BP + 1) to wide (BP + 17), depending on the test condition. Probe stimuli were 20 ms in duration and the masker-probe delay was 5 ms; the probe configuration was fixed at BP + 1. The results indicated that as the distance between the active and return electrodes in a bi-polar pair was increased, the excitation pattern broadened within the cochlea. When the distance between active and return electrodes was sufficiently wide, two peaks were often observed in the excitation pattern, comparable to non-overlapping electric fields produced by widely separated dipoles. Analyses of the normalized data showed little effect of stimulation level on the shape of the excitation pattern.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration. J. Neurophysiol. 87:478–492, 2002.PubMed Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration. J. Neurophysiol. 87:478–492, 2002.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC. Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 5:32–48, 2004.PubMedCrossRef Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC. Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 5:32–48, 2004.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boex C, Kos M-I, Pellizone M. Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:2058–2065, 2003.PubMedCrossRef Boex C, Kos M-I, Pellizone M. Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:2058–2065, 2003.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Borland J, Bertschy MR. Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials in Ineraid cochlear implant users: responses to different stimulating electrode configurations and comparison to psychophysical responses. J. Speech Hear. Res. 3:453–467, 1996. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Borland J, Bertschy MR. Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials in Ineraid cochlear implant users: responses to different stimulating electrode configurations and comparison to psychophysical responses. J. Speech Hear. Res. 3:453–467, 1996.
Zurück zum Zitat Chatterjee M. Temporal mechanisms underlying recovery from forward masking in multi-electrode cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105(3):1853–1863, 1999.PubMedCrossRef Chatterjee M. Temporal mechanisms underlying recovery from forward masking in multi-electrode cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105(3):1853–1863, 1999.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chatterjee M, Shannon RV. Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103:2565–2572, 1998.PubMedCrossRef Chatterjee M, Shannon RV. Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103:2565–2572, 1998.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen LT, Saunders E, Clark GM. Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array. Hear. Res. 155:63–81, 2001.PubMedCrossRef Cohen LT, Saunders E, Clark GM. Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array. Hear. Res. 155:63–81, 2001.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Franck KH, Xu L, Pfingst BE. Effects of stimulus level on speech perception with cochlear prostheses. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 4(1):49–59, 2003.PubMedCrossRef Franck KH, Xu L, Pfingst BE. Effects of stimulus level on speech perception with cochlear prostheses. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 4(1):49–59, 2003.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110(2):1150–1163, 2001.PubMedCrossRef Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110(2):1150–1163, 2001.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fu Q-J, Nogaki G. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 6(1):19–27, 2005.PubMedCrossRef Fu Q-J, Nogaki G. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 6(1):19–27, 2005.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fu Q-J, Shannon RV. Effects of electrode configuration and frequency allocation on vowel recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. Ear Hear. 20:332–344, 1999.PubMedCrossRef Fu Q-J, Shannon RV. Effects of electrode configuration and frequency allocation on vowel recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. Ear Hear. 20:332–344, 1999.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kwon BJ, van den Honert C, Parkinson W, Miller D. Comparison of forward masking pattern for different stimulation modes in cochlear implants. Assoc. Res. Otolayngol. Abs: 199, 2003. Kwon BJ, van den Honert C, Parkinson W, Miller D. Comparison of forward masking pattern for different stimulation modes in cochlear implants. Assoc. Res. Otolayngol. Abs: 199, 2003.
Zurück zum Zitat Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1(49):467, 1971.CrossRef Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Suppl. 1(49):467, 1971.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lim HH, Tong YC, Clark GM. Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86:971–980, 1989.PubMedCrossRef Lim HH, Tong YC, Clark GM. Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86:971–980, 1989.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Morris DJ, Pfingst BE. Effects of electrode configuration and stimulus level on rate and level discrimination with cochlear implants. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 1:211–223, 2000.PubMedCrossRef Morris DJ, Pfingst BE. Effects of electrode configuration and stimulus level on rate and level discrimination with cochlear implants. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 1:211–223, 2000.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson DA, Donaldson GS. Psychophysical recovery from pulse-train forward masking in electric hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112:2932–2947, 2002.PubMedCrossRef Nelson DA, Donaldson GS. Psychophysical recovery from pulse-train forward masking in electric hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112:2932–2947, 2002.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pfingst BE, Zwolan TA, Holloway LA. Effects of stimulus configuration on psychophysical operating levels and on speech recognition with cochlear implants. Hear. Res. 112:247–260, 1997.PubMedCrossRef Pfingst BE, Zwolan TA, Holloway LA. Effects of stimulus configuration on psychophysical operating levels and on speech recognition with cochlear implants. Hear. Res. 112:247–260, 1997.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pfingst BE, Franck KF, Xu L, Bauer EM, Zwolan TM. Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prostheses. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2(2):87–103, 2001.PubMed Pfingst BE, Franck KF, Xu L, Bauer EM, Zwolan TM. Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prostheses. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2(2):87–103, 2001.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Shannon RV. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man II. Channel interaction. Hear. Res. 12: 1–16, 1983.PubMedCrossRef Shannon RV. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man II. Channel interaction. Hear. Res. 12: 1–16, 1983.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shannon RV, Adams DD, Ferrel RL, Palumbo RL, Grandgenett M. A computer interface for psychophysical and speech research with the Nucleus cochlear implant. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87:905–907, 1990.PubMedCrossRef Shannon RV, Adams DD, Ferrel RL, Palumbo RL, Grandgenett M. A computer interface for psychophysical and speech research with the Nucleus cochlear implant. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87:905–907, 1990.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Snyder RL, Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC. Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation. J. Assoc. Res.Otolaryngol. 5:305–322, 2004.PubMedCrossRef Snyder RL, Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC. Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation. J. Assoc. Res.Otolaryngol. 5:305–322, 2004.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Snyder RL, Middlebrooks JC, Hetherington A, Rebscher S, Bonham B. The neurophysiological effects of stimulated auditory prosthesis stimulation: summary of electrode configuration effects using the UCSF guinea pig electrode. Eleventh Quarterly Progress Report, NIH contract N01-DC-02-1006, 2005. Snyder RL, Middlebrooks JC, Hetherington A, Rebscher S, Bonham B. The neurophysiological effects of stimulated auditory prosthesis stimulation: summary of electrode configuration effects using the UCSF guinea pig electrode. Eleventh Quarterly Progress Report, NIH contract N01-DC-02-1006, 2005.
Zurück zum Zitat Throckmorton CS, Collins LM. Investigation of the effects of temporal and spatial interactions on speech-recognition skills in cochlear-implant subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:861–873, 1999.PubMedCrossRef Throckmorton CS, Collins LM. Investigation of the effects of temporal and spatial interactions on speech-recognition skills in cochlear-implant subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:861–873, 1999.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tong YC, Clark GM. Loudness summation, masking, and temporal interaction for sensations produced by electric stimulation of two sites in the human cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79:1958–1966, 1986.PubMedCrossRef Tong YC, Clark GM. Loudness summation, masking, and temporal interaction for sensations produced by electric stimulation of two sites in the human cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79:1958–1966, 1986.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Effects of Stimulation Mode, Level and Location on Forward-Masked Excitation Patterns in Cochlear Implant Patients
verfasst von
Monita Chatterjee
John J. Galvin III
Qian-Jie Fu
Robert V. Shannon
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2006
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Ausgabe 1/2006
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Elektronische ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-005-0019-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2006

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 1/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.